Trial Outcomes & Findings for Canakinumab for Treatment of Adult-onset Still's Disease (NCT NCT02204293)
NCT ID: NCT02204293
Last Updated: 2020-08-07
Results Overview
Responders included participants with change in disease activity score based on 28 joint counts and ESR (DAS28) score \> 1.2. The DAS28 score index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
36 participants
Week 12
2020-08-07
Participant Flow
Participants with adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) took part in the study from June 21, 2012 to May 5, 2018 at 14 investigative sites located in Germany to participate in two double-blind parts - Part I (Up to Week 12) and Part II (Up to Week 24) and one open-label Long-Term Extension (LTE) phase (Up to Month 27).
A total of 36 participants entered in Part I to receive canakinumab/placebo. Out of 31, 5 participants from canakinumab arm, and 3 from placebo arm did not enter Part II, 23 participants entered Part II and received canakinumab or placebo up to Week 24. 7 participants who achieved clinical remission entered LTE Phase to receive canakinumab.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I
STARTED
|
19
|
17
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Core Study Part I
Intention-to-treat Population
|
18
|
17
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Core Study Part I
Safety Population
|
20
|
15
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Core Study Part I
COMPLETED
|
17
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Core Study Part I
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Core Study Part 2
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
4
|
7
|
0
|
|
Core Study Part 2
Safety Population
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
2
|
7
|
0
|
|
Core Study Part 2
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
4
|
7
|
0
|
|
Core Study Part 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
LTE Phase
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
|
LTE Phase
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
LTE Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I
Met one or more exclusion criteria
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Core Study Part I
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Core Study Part I
Physician Decision
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
LTE Phase
Study Suspended
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Total
n=35 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.06 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 • n=18 Participants
|
40.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 • n=17 Participants
|
40.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
Responders included participants with change in disease activity score based on 28 joint counts and ESR (DAS28) score \> 1.2. The DAS28 score index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders as Assessed by Disease Activity Score 28 Joints (DAS28) Score at Week 12
|
66.7 percentage of participants
Interval 43.1 to 85.2
|
41.2 percentage of participants
Interval 20.1 to 65.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR value.Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission. A positive change in score indicates worsening, and a negative change indicates improvement. Least squares (LS) mean was calculated by mixed linear model for repeated measures (MMRM) analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score
Baseline
|
5.37 score on a scale
Interval 4.7 to 6.0
|
5.3 score on a scale
Interval 4.6 to 6.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score
CFB at Week 4
|
3.56 score on a scale
Interval 2.9 to 4.3
|
4.27 score on a scale
Interval 3.5 to 5.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score
CFB at Week 8
|
2.86 score on a scale
Interval 2.2 to 3.6
|
3.92 score on a scale
Interval 3.1 to 4.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score
CFB at Week 12
|
3.1 score on a scale
Interval 2.4 to 3.8
|
4.0 score on a scale
Interval 3.3 to 4.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and CRP value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-CRP score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission. A positive change in score indicates worsening, and a negative change indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score
Baseline
|
5.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.4 to 5.6
|
5.07 score on a scale
Interval 4.4 to 5.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score
CFB at Week 4
|
3.4 score on a scale
Interval 2.8 to 4.0
|
4.01 score on a scale
Interval 3.3 to 4.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score
CFB at Week 8
|
2.8 score on a scale
Interval 2.2 to 3.4
|
3.81 score on a scale
Interval 3.1 to 4.5
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score
CFB at Week 12
|
3.31 score on a scale
Interval 2.7 to 3.9
|
4.01 score on a scale
Interval 3.3 to 4.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
The 68 TJC included the 8 distal interphalangeal (IP), 10 proximal IP and 10 metacarpophalangeal (MTP) joints of hands, the 10 MTP and 10 proximal IP joints of feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows, 2 shoulders, 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 hip, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Joint tenderness was graded present (1) or absent (0). Total score is calculated by adding the scores, which range from 0 (no tender joint) to 68 (all tender joints). Lower scores indicate no tender joint and higher scores indicate worsening tender joints. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC)
Baseline
|
8.89 tender joints
Interval 4.9 to 12.9
|
11.18 tender joints
Interval 7.1 to 15.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC)
CFB at Week 4
|
5.33 tender joints
Interval 1.3 to 9.3
|
5.85 tender joints
Interval 1.5 to 10.2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC)
CFB at Week 8
|
3.72 tender joints
Interval -0.3 to 7.7
|
5.1 tender joints
Interval 0.6 to 9.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC)
CFB at Week 12
|
4.66 tender joints
Interval 0.6 to 8.7
|
6.9 tender joints
Interval 2.6 to 11.2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
The 66 SJC included the 8 distal interphalangeal (IP), 10 proximal IP and 10 metacarpophalangeal (MTP) joints of hands, the 10 MTP and 10 proximal IP joints of feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows, 2 shoulders, 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Swelling was graded present (1) or absent (0). Total score is calculated by adding the scores, which range from 0 (no swollen joint) to 66 (all swollen joints). Lower scores indicate no swollen joint and higher scores indicate worsening swollen joints. A negative change in Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC)
Baseline
|
5.78 swollen joints
Interval 3.6 to 7.9
|
8.0 swollen joints
Interval 5.8 to 10.2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC)
CFB at Week 4
|
2.5 swollen joints
Interval 0.4 to 4.6
|
2.5 swollen joints
Interval 0.1 to 4.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC)
CFB at Week 8
|
1.33 swollen joints
Interval -0.8 to 3.5
|
2.65 swollen joints
Interval 0.2 to 5.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC)
CFB at Week 12
|
2.89 swollen joints
Interval 0.7 to 5.1
|
4.71 swollen joints
Interval 2.4 to 7.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
A total of 28 joints were assessed for tenderness. The number of tender joints could range from 0 to 28, where higher values represented more tender joints. The change from Baseline to any time points was averaged among all participants, where negative changes indicated an improvement in disease activity. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC
Baseline
|
6.78 tender joints
Interval 4.6 to 9.0
|
7.24 tender joints
Interval 5.0 to 9.5
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC
CFB at Week 4
|
3.67 tender joints
Interval 1.5 to 5.9
|
4.29 tender joints
Interval 1.9 to 6.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC
CFB at Week 8
|
2.39 tender joints
Interval 0.2 to 4.6
|
3.85 tender joints
Interval 1.4 to 6.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC
CFB at Week 12
|
3.47 tender joints
Interval 1.2 to 5.7
|
4.43 tender joints
Interval 2.1 to 6.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
A total of 28 joints were assessed for swelling. The number of swollen joints could range from 0 to 28, where higher values represented more swollen joints. The change from Baseline to any time point was averaged among all participants, where negative changes indicated an improvement in disease activity. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC
Baseline
|
4.97 swollen joints
Interval 3.4 to 6.6
|
6.29 swollen joints
Interval 4.6 to 8.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC
CFB at Week 4
|
2.11 swollen joints
Interval 0.5 to 3.7
|
2.47 swollen joints
Interval 0.7 to 4.2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC
CFB at Week 8
|
0.83 swollen joints
Interval -0.8 to 2.5
|
2.79 swollen joints
Interval 1.0 to 4.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC
CFB at Week 12
|
2.28 swollen joints
Interval 0.6 to 3.9
|
4.51 swollen joints
Interval 2.8 to 6.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
A negative change from Baseline in CRP level indicates an improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP
Baseline
|
45.55 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval 26.1 to 65.0
|
57.26 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval 37.3 to 77.2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP
CFB at Week 4
|
17.53 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval -2.1 to 37.1
|
36.74 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval 15.8 to 57.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP
CFB at Week 8
|
14.61 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval -4.8 to 34.0
|
32.51 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval 11.2 to 53.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP
CFB at Week 12
|
17.05 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval -2.6 to 36.7
|
28.52 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Interval 7.0 to 50.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
A negative change from Baseline in ESR level indicates an improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR
Baseline
|
44.11 millimeter per hour (mm/h)
Interval 33.8 to 54.4
|
38.82 millimeter per hour (mm/h)
Interval 28.3 to 49.4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR
CFB at Week 4
|
24.28 millimeter per hour (mm/h)
Interval 13.8 to 34.7
|
38.6 millimeter per hour (mm/h)
Interval 27.5 to 49.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR
CFB at Week 8
|
25.4 millimeter per hour (mm/h)
Interval 15.0 to 35.8
|
25.25 millimeter per hour (mm/h)
Interval 13.6 to 36.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR
CFB at Week 12
|
15.85 millimeter per hour (mm/h)
Interval 5.3 to 26.4
|
22.41 millimeter per hour (mm/h)
Interval 10.8 to 34.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=17 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=14 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in Serum Ferritin Level at Week 12
|
466.9 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Interval 16.0 to 918.0
|
634.71 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Interval 170.0 to 1099.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
Fever is defined as an oral or rectal body temperature greater than 38 degrees Celsius (°C).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Fever Episodes
|
8.3 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10 where 0= no disease activity and 10= activity to maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score
Baseline
|
5.5 score on a scale
Interval 4.5 to 6.5
|
6.0 score on a scale
Interval 4.9 to 7.1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score
CFB at Week 4
|
3.06 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 4.1
|
3.67 score on a scale
Interval 2.5 to 4.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score
CFB at Week 8
|
2.72 score on a scale
Interval 1.7 to 3.8
|
3.56 score on a scale
Interval 2.4 to 4.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score
CFB at Week 12
|
2.86 score on a scale
Interval 1.8 to 3.9
|
4.26 score on a scale
Interval 3.1 to 5.4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
The participant's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score
Baseline
|
6.08 score on a scale
Interval 4.9 to 7.3
|
5.85 score on a scale
Interval 4.6 to 7.1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score
CFB at Week 4
|
3.78 score on a scale
Interval 2.6 to 5.0
|
4.74 score on a scale
Interval 3.4 to 6.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score
CFB at Week 8
|
2.84 score on a scale
Interval 1.6 to 4.0
|
4.58 score on a scale
Interval 3.2 to 5.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score
CFB at Week 12
|
3.63 score on a scale
Interval 2.4 to 4.8
|
4.32 score on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 5.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
The participant's global assessment of pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score
Baseline
|
6.61 score on a scale
Interval 5.3 to 7.9
|
6.35 score on a scale
Interval 5.0 to 7.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score
CFB at Week 4
|
3.61 score on a scale
Interval 2.3 to 4.9
|
4.85 score on a scale
Interval 3.5 to 6.2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score
CFB at Week 8
|
2.73 score on a scale
Interval 1.4 to 4.0
|
4.18 score on a scale
Interval 2.7 to 5.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score
CFB at Week 12
|
3.71 score on a scale
Interval 2.4 to 5.0
|
4.25 score on a scale
Interval 2.8 to 5.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
The HAQ measures physical disability and functional status. It has 4 dimensions: disability, pain, drug side effects and dollar costs. The HAQ score is calculated by summing the computed scores for each category and dividing by the number of categories answered. It ranges from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Baseline
|
1.31 score on a scale
Interval 0.9 to 1.7
|
1.29 score on a scale
Interval 0.9 to 1.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
CFB at Week 12
|
0.69 score on a scale
Interval 0.3 to 1.1
|
0.98 score on a scale
Interval 0.6 to 1.4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
ACR20 response was defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With American College of Rheumatology Response of 20 (ACR20)
|
61.1 percentage of participants
Interval 37.7 to 81.1
|
41.2 percentage of participants
Interval 20.1 to 65.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
ACR30 response was defined as a ≥ 30% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR30
|
61.1 percentage of participants
Interval 37.7 to 81.1
|
29.4 percentage of participants
Interval 11.7 to 53.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
A participant was considered responder if he/she had achieved the incidence of modified adapted response (ACR30 criteria) of at least a 30% improvement in no intermittent fever and had at least 30% improvement in at least 6 of the following 7 measures: tender and swollen 68-joint counts, participant's assessment of pain, participant's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's functional capacity (HAQ-DI score) and acute phase reactant- ESR. Participant were modified ACR30 responders at a given post-randomization visit if they satisfied the modified ACR30 criteria, respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Modified ACR30
|
55.6 percentage of participants
Interval 32.7 to 76.8
|
23.5 percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 47.5
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
ACR50 response was defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR50
|
50.0 percentage of participants
Interval 27.8 to 72.2
|
17.6 percentage of participants
Interval 4.7 to 40.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
ACR70 response was defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR70
|
27.8 percentage of participants
Interval 11.0 to 51.3
|
11.8 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 33.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
ACR90 response was defined as a ≥ 90% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR90
|
11.1 percentage of participants
Interval 1.9 to 32.1
|
5.9 percentage of participants
Interval 0.3 to 25.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
EULAR response is based on DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP scores. The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, subject global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. A DAS28-CRP or ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value \< 2.6 = disease remission. EULAR response has 3 categories: EULAR Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline \< -1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 \>3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline \< -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 or EULAR No response: DAS28 \>5.1 or a change from Baseline \< -0.6 to ≤ -1.2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response
EULAR DAS28-ESR Response
|
77.8 percentage of participants
Interval 54.7 to 92.5
|
52.9 percentage of participants
Interval 29.7 to 75.2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response
EULAR DAS28-CRP Response
|
72.2 percentage of participants
Interval 48.7 to 89.0
|
47.1 percentage of participants
Interval 24.8 to 70.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
Percentage of responders were defined as the participants who achieved LDA (DAS28 score \< 3.2) at Week 12. The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, participant global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1 implies high disease activity, equal to or less than 3.2 low disease activity, and less than 2.6 remissions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA)
DAS28 (ESR) LDA
|
33.3 percentage of participants
Interval 14.8 to 56.9
|
29.4 percentage of participants
Interval 11.7 to 53.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA)
DAS28 (CRP) LDA
|
50.0 percentage of participants
Interval 27.8 to 72.2
|
23.5 percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 47.5
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
Participants with disease remission: LDA (DAS28 score\< 2.6). The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including both 28 TJC an SJC, participant global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1: high disease activity, ≤ 3.2: low disease activity, and less than 2.6: remission. Extended remission criteria included DAS28 \< 2.6 and no signs of systemic activity for up to two consecutive study visits till Week 12 defined as any of Yamaguchi´s primary classification criteria for AOSD which included fever attacks at 39 °C for more than a week, arthralgia, salmon red, maculate, urticarial or maculo-papular rash and leukocytosis (white blood cells increase) of \> 10000/cubic millimeters (mm\^3) with \> 80% neutrophils.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission
DAS28 (ESR) Remission
|
33.3 percentage of participants
Interval 14.8 to 56.9
|
11.8 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 33.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission
DAS28 (CRP) Remission
|
38.9 percentage of participants
Interval 18.9 to 62.3
|
11.8 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 33.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission
Extended Remission
|
27.8 percentage of participants
Interval 11.0 to 51.3
|
11.8 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 33.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
Number of joints with limitation of motion according to neutral zero method was assessed which included mobility of joints (elbows, wrists, shoulder joints, hip joints, knee joints, and upper ankle joints) within the reference range/degree. Response is defined as an improvement of ≥ 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% from Baseline. A negative change score indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: Change in Joint Mobility (Degrees of Motion) Assessed by Neutral Zero Method
Baseline
|
4.94 degrees
Interval 3.0 to 6.9
|
6.29 degrees
Interval 4.3 to 8.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: Change in Joint Mobility (Degrees of Motion) Assessed by Neutral Zero Method
Week 12
|
5.37 degrees
Interval 3.4 to 7.3
|
6.05 degrees
Interval 4.0 to 8.1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint.
The SF-36 determines overall quality of life assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 contribute to physical component summary score (PCS). Items 5-8 contribute to mental component summary score (MCS). Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best"). Positive numbers indicate improvement from Baseline. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=18 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score
SF-36 Physical: Baseline
|
29.39 score on a scale
Interval 24.5 to 34.3
|
28.73 score on a scale
Interval 23.7 to 33.8
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score
SF-36 Physical: CFB at Week 12
|
41.03 score on a scale
Interval 36.0 to 46.1
|
33.45 score on a scale
Interval 27.9 to 39.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score
SF-36 Mental: Baseline
|
37.8 score on a scale
Interval 32.0 to 43.6
|
46.31 score on a scale
Interval 40.4 to 52.2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score
SF-36 Mental: CFB at Week 12
|
43.47 score on a scale
Interval 37.6 to 49.3
|
49.82 score on a scale
Interval 43.6 to 56.1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Month 27Population: Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug.
An AE is an adverse medical event which occurs in a participant of the study and which is not necessarily in a causal relationship with the treatment the participant receives. AEs include symptoms of illnesses, as well as every unfavourable and unintended reaction. SAEs are AEs leading to death, are life-threatening, require hospitalizations or prolongation of hospitalizations, represent an innate malformation or a congenital abnormality.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=20 Participants
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=15 Participants
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
n=14 Participants
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
n=2 Participants
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
n=7 Participants
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
n=7 Participants
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs
|
16 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
Core Study Part I: Placebo
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=20 participants at risk
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=15 participants at risk
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
n=14 participants at risk
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
n=2 participants at risk
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
n=7 participants at risk
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
n=7 participants at risk
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatotoxicity
|
5.0%
1/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fracture
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hand fracture
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Chondromalacia
|
5.0%
1/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Patellofemoral pain syndrome
|
5.0%
1/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypotonia
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Medical device removal
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Core Study Part I: Canakinumab
n=20 participants at risk
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part I: Placebo
n=15 participants at risk
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
|
Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders
n=14 participants at risk
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders
n=2 participants at risk
Participants with response (change in DAS score \> 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders
n=7 participants at risk
Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20.
|
LTE Phase: Canakinumab
n=7 participants at risk
Participants with remission (change in DAS score \> 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Aphthous ulcer
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eyelid oedema
|
10.0%
2/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual impairment
|
5.0%
1/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
5.0%
1/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
10.0%
2/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
10.0%
2/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
5.0%
1/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
42.9%
3/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site rash
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Primary biliary cholangitis
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal infection
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hand-foot-and-mouth disease
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infected bite
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
15.0%
3/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
20.0%
3/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
21.4%
3/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
42.9%
3/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Periodontitis
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pertussis
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth abscess
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus injury
|
5.0%
1/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
10.0%
2/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Appetite disorder
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
10.0%
2/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Groin pain
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoporosis
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pseudarthrosis
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Still's disease
|
25.0%
5/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
2/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tenosynovitis
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Anogenital warts
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carpal tunnel syndrome
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.0%
1/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
20.0%
3/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
28.6%
2/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Intercostal neuralgia
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep disorder
|
5.0%
1/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulva cyst
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
28.6%
2/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleurisy
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
5.0%
1/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nail dystrophy
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
5.0%
1/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
28.6%
2/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
5.0%
1/20 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
7.1%
1/14 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/2 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
|
Additional Information
Prof. Dr Eugen Feist
Helios Fachklinik Vogelsang-Gommern GmbH, Germany
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place