Trial Outcomes & Findings for Exercise Behavior Among Young Adults Study (NCT NCT02204176)

NCT ID: NCT02204176

Last Updated: 2019-05-03

Results Overview

The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ; Godin \& Shephard, 1985) was used to assess the frequency of typical weekly strenuous, moderate, and mild exercise (open-ended format). Total exercise scores were also computed by multiplying each reported exercise frequency by its metabolic equivalent (MET) and then summing the totals: (strenuous x 9) + (moderate x 5) + (mild x 2) (Godin, Jobin, \& Boullon, 1986). Higher scores on this scale indicates more exercise engagement. Also, participants were loaned a pedometer to obtain objective measures of exercise activity. The pedometers allow participants to enter their weight and height and measure steps taken throughout the day based on this information. The devices automatically reset at midnight and store the information for 30 days.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

221 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

2-3 months after initial intervention session

Results posted on

2019-05-03

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Exercise Information
This group was presented with information that defined and described regular exercise, its benefits, and guidance for using proper form in exercise to minimize the risk of injury. Guidelines for prescribing suggested physical activities were based on recommendations from the USDHHS (2008). These sessions lasted \~90 minutes.
Action Planning
This group discussed all the components from the session for the information-only group with an additional emphasis on how to create action plans. Discussions revolved around possible ways and times of the day to engage in exercise by making specific action plans that designate when, where, and how. Participants were shown how to create an example action plan and guided in writing their own exercise action plans for as many days as they desired in the three-week tracking period in their exercise booklets. Emphasis was placed on the specificity and feasibility of the plans. These sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Realistic Effort Action Planning
This group discussed all components from the action planning condition. Discussion in this group also emphasized the importance of persistence and effortful control in daily life and how these attributes can be transferred to exercise plans. Participants were encouraged to identify their threshold for exerting effort toward exercise based on past experiences and applying that awareness to their planned exercises. They were guided in creating action plans that considered not only past external barriers (e.g., schedule, fitness level, and environment) but also previous internal barriers (i.e., resistance and/or aversiveness to physical exertion) and create plans that would help them avoid repeating the same circumstances. Participants were also asked to realistically consider how much past exercise they have previously engaged in and to refine those estimates to serve as starting points for subsequent small increases in planned exercise. These group sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Overall Study
STARTED
74
73
74
Overall Study
COMPLETED
64
61
58
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
10
12
16

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Exercise Behavior Among Young Adults Study

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Exercise Information
n=74 Participants
This group was presented with information that defined and described regular exercise, its benefits, and guidance for using proper form in exercise to minimize the risk of injury. Guidelines for prescribing suggested physical activities were based on recommendations from the USDHHS (2008). These sessions lasted \~90 minutes.
Action Planning
n=73 Participants
This group discussed all the components from the session for the information-only group with an additional emphasis on how to create action plans. Discussions revolved around possible ways and times of the day to engage in exercise by making specific action plans that designate when, where, and how. Participants were shown how to create an example action plan and guided in writing their own exercise action plans for as many days as they desired in the three-week tracking period in their exercise booklets. Emphasis was placed on the specificity and feasibility of the plans. These sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Realistic Effort Action Planning
n=74 Participants
This group discussed all components from the action planning condition. Discussion in this group also emphasized the importance of persistence and effortful control in daily life and how these attributes can be transferred to exercise plans. Participants were encouraged to identify their threshold for exerting effort toward exercise based on past experiences and applying that awareness to their planned exercises. They were guided in creating action plans that considered not only past external barriers (e.g., schedule, fitness level, and environment) but also previous internal barriers (i.e., resistance and/or aversiveness to physical exertion) and create plans that would help them avoid repeating the same circumstances. Participants were also asked to realistically consider how much past exercise they have previously engaged in and to refine those estimates to serve as starting points for subsequent small increases in planned exercise. These group sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Total
n=221 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
20.39 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.91 • n=5 Participants
20.59 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.05 • n=7 Participants
20.70 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.18 • n=5 Participants
20.56 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.04 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
42 Participants
n=7 Participants
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
132 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
89 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
54 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
29 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
105 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
33 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
73 Participants
n=7 Participants
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
221 Participants
n=4 Participants
Strenuous Exercise
1.36 times per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION .17 • n=5 Participants
1.44 times per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION .18 • n=7 Participants
1.17 times per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION .16 • n=5 Participants
1.32 times per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION .10 • n=4 Participants
Moderate Exercise
1.69 times per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION .17 • n=5 Participants
2.40 times per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION .23 • n=7 Participants
1.93 times per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION .21 • n=5 Participants
2.00 times per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION .12 • n=4 Participants
Mild Exercise
2.54 times per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION .33 • n=5 Participants
2.95 times per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION .34 • n=7 Participants
3.03 times per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION .29 • n=5 Participants
2.84 times per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION .19 • n=4 Participants
Total Exercise
28.29 total metabolic equivalent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.48 • n=5 Participants
33.79 total metabolic equivalent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.87 • n=7 Participants
29.23 total metabolic equivalent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.41 • n=5 Participants
30.42 total metabolic equivalent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.50 • n=4 Participants
Industriousness
4.02 1(disagree strongly)-5(agree strongly)
STANDARD_DEVIATION .07 • n=5 Participants
4.09 1(disagree strongly)-5(agree strongly)
STANDARD_DEVIATION .07 • n=7 Participants
3.89 1(disagree strongly)-5(agree strongly)
STANDARD_DEVIATION .08 • n=5 Participants
4.00 1(disagree strongly)-5(agree strongly)
STANDARD_DEVIATION .04 • n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2-3 months after initial intervention session

The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ; Godin \& Shephard, 1985) was used to assess the frequency of typical weekly strenuous, moderate, and mild exercise (open-ended format). Total exercise scores were also computed by multiplying each reported exercise frequency by its metabolic equivalent (MET) and then summing the totals: (strenuous x 9) + (moderate x 5) + (mild x 2) (Godin, Jobin, \& Boullon, 1986). Higher scores on this scale indicates more exercise engagement. Also, participants were loaned a pedometer to obtain objective measures of exercise activity. The pedometers allow participants to enter their weight and height and measure steps taken throughout the day based on this information. The devices automatically reset at midnight and store the information for 30 days.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exercise Information
n=74 Participants
This group was presented with information that defined and described regular exercise, its benefits, and guidance for using proper form in exercise to minimize the risk of injury. Guidelines for prescribing suggested physical activities were based on recommendations from the USDHHS (2008). These sessions lasted \~90 minutes.
Action Planning
n=73 Participants
This group discussed all the components from the session for the information-only group with an additional emphasis on how to create action plans. Discussions revolved around possible ways and times of the day to engage in exercise by making specific action plans that designate when, where, and how. Participants were shown how to create an example action plan and guided in writing their own exercise action plans for as many days as they desired in the three-week tracking period in their exercise booklets. Emphasis was placed on the specificity and feasibility of the plans. These sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Realistic Effort Action Planning
n=74 Participants
This group discussed all components from the action planning condition. Discussion in this group also emphasized the importance of persistence and effortful control in daily life and how these attributes can be transferred to exercise plans. Participants were encouraged to identify their threshold for exerting effort toward exercise based on past experiences and applying that awareness to their planned exercises. They were guided in creating action plans that considered not only past external barriers (e.g., schedule, fitness level, and environment) but also previous internal barriers (i.e., resistance and/or aversiveness to physical exertion) and create plans that would help them avoid repeating the same circumstances. Participants were also asked to realistically consider how much past exercise they have previously engaged in and to refine those estimates to serve as starting points for subsequent small increases in planned exercise. These group sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Total Physical Activity
34.21 total metabolic equivalent
Standard Error 2.59
37.80 total metabolic equivalent
Standard Error 2.80
39.42 total metabolic equivalent
Standard Error 2.73

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months after initial intervention session

The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ; Godin \& Shephard, 1985) was used to assess the frequency of typical weekly strenuous, moderate, and mild exercise (open-ended format). Total exercise scores were also computed by multiplying each reported exercise frequency by its metabolic equivalent (MET) and then summing the totals: (strenuous x 9) + (moderate x 5) + (mild x 2) (Godin, Jobin, \& Boullon, 1986). Higher scores indicate more exercise engagement. Also, participants were loaned a pedometer to obtain objective measures of exercise activity. The pedometers allow participants to enter their weight and height and measure steps taken throughout the day based on this information. The devices automatically reset at midnight and store the information for 30 days.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exercise Information
n=74 Participants
This group was presented with information that defined and described regular exercise, its benefits, and guidance for using proper form in exercise to minimize the risk of injury. Guidelines for prescribing suggested physical activities were based on recommendations from the USDHHS (2008). These sessions lasted \~90 minutes.
Action Planning
n=73 Participants
This group discussed all the components from the session for the information-only group with an additional emphasis on how to create action plans. Discussions revolved around possible ways and times of the day to engage in exercise by making specific action plans that designate when, where, and how. Participants were shown how to create an example action plan and guided in writing their own exercise action plans for as many days as they desired in the three-week tracking period in their exercise booklets. Emphasis was placed on the specificity and feasibility of the plans. These sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Realistic Effort Action Planning
n=74 Participants
This group discussed all components from the action planning condition. Discussion in this group also emphasized the importance of persistence and effortful control in daily life and how these attributes can be transferred to exercise plans. Participants were encouraged to identify their threshold for exerting effort toward exercise based on past experiences and applying that awareness to their planned exercises. They were guided in creating action plans that considered not only past external barriers (e.g., schedule, fitness level, and environment) but also previous internal barriers (i.e., resistance and/or aversiveness to physical exertion) and create plans that would help them avoid repeating the same circumstances. Participants were also asked to realistically consider how much past exercise they have previously engaged in and to refine those estimates to serve as starting points for subsequent small increases in planned exercise. These group sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Total Physical Activity
38.65 total metabolic equivalent
Standard Error 3.09
40.64 total metabolic equivalent
Standard Error 2.43
42.39 total metabolic equivalent
Standard Error 2.97

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2-3 months after initial intervention session

The 18-item multidimensional exercise self-efficacy scale (Benisovich, Rossi, Norman, \& Nigg, 1998) assessed participants' confidence in being able to exercise despite bad weather, inconvenience, negative affect, exercising alone, excuse making, and resistance from others. Participants were asked to rate "how confident \[they\] are to exercise when other things get in the way" on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all confident, 5 = Extremely confident). Example items include, "I don't have access to exercise equipment," "I don't feel like it," and "I am spending time with friends or family who do not exercise." All items on the scale were averaged for each participant. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy for exercise.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exercise Information
n=74 Participants
This group was presented with information that defined and described regular exercise, its benefits, and guidance for using proper form in exercise to minimize the risk of injury. Guidelines for prescribing suggested physical activities were based on recommendations from the USDHHS (2008). These sessions lasted \~90 minutes.
Action Planning
n=73 Participants
This group discussed all the components from the session for the information-only group with an additional emphasis on how to create action plans. Discussions revolved around possible ways and times of the day to engage in exercise by making specific action plans that designate when, where, and how. Participants were shown how to create an example action plan and guided in writing their own exercise action plans for as many days as they desired in the three-week tracking period in their exercise booklets. Emphasis was placed on the specificity and feasibility of the plans. These sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Realistic Effort Action Planning
n=74 Participants
This group discussed all components from the action planning condition. Discussion in this group also emphasized the importance of persistence and effortful control in daily life and how these attributes can be transferred to exercise plans. Participants were encouraged to identify their threshold for exerting effort toward exercise based on past experiences and applying that awareness to their planned exercises. They were guided in creating action plans that considered not only past external barriers (e.g., schedule, fitness level, and environment) but also previous internal barriers (i.e., resistance and/or aversiveness to physical exertion) and create plans that would help them avoid repeating the same circumstances. Participants were also asked to realistically consider how much past exercise they have previously engaged in and to refine those estimates to serve as starting points for subsequent small increases in planned exercise. These group sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Exercise Self-efficacy
2.92 units on a scale
Standard Error .09
3.05 units on a scale
Standard Error .11
3.09 units on a scale
Standard Error .10

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months after initial intervention session

The 18-item multidimensional exercise self-efficacy scale (Benisovich, Rossi, Norman, \& Nigg, 1998) assessed participants' confidence in being able to exercise despite bad weather, inconvenience, negative affect, exercising alone, excuse making, and resistance from others. Participants were asked to rate "how confident \[they\] are to exercise when other things get in the way" on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all confident, 5 = Extremely confident; αs = .89-.91 across assessments). Example items include, "I don't have access to exercise equipment," "I don't feel like it," and "I am spending time with friends or family who do not exercise." All items on the scale were averaged for each participant. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exercise Information
n=74 Participants
This group was presented with information that defined and described regular exercise, its benefits, and guidance for using proper form in exercise to minimize the risk of injury. Guidelines for prescribing suggested physical activities were based on recommendations from the USDHHS (2008). These sessions lasted \~90 minutes.
Action Planning
n=73 Participants
This group discussed all the components from the session for the information-only group with an additional emphasis on how to create action plans. Discussions revolved around possible ways and times of the day to engage in exercise by making specific action plans that designate when, where, and how. Participants were shown how to create an example action plan and guided in writing their own exercise action plans for as many days as they desired in the three-week tracking period in their exercise booklets. Emphasis was placed on the specificity and feasibility of the plans. These sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Realistic Effort Action Planning
n=74 Participants
This group discussed all components from the action planning condition. Discussion in this group also emphasized the importance of persistence and effortful control in daily life and how these attributes can be transferred to exercise plans. Participants were encouraged to identify their threshold for exerting effort toward exercise based on past experiences and applying that awareness to their planned exercises. They were guided in creating action plans that considered not only past external barriers (e.g., schedule, fitness level, and environment) but also previous internal barriers (i.e., resistance and/or aversiveness to physical exertion) and create plans that would help them avoid repeating the same circumstances. Participants were also asked to realistically consider how much past exercise they have previously engaged in and to refine those estimates to serve as starting points for subsequent small increases in planned exercise. These group sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Exercise Self-efficacy
2.95 units on a scale
Standard Error .12
2.94 units on a scale
Standard Error .09
3.08 units on a scale
Standard Error .11

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 2-3 months after initial intervention session

Industriousness was assessed using a 10-item Industriousness scale (Chernyshenko, 2003). Participants rated themselves on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Disagree strongly, 5 = Agree strongly) indicating the extent to which, for example, they are someone who "has high standards and works toward them; setting goals and achieving them is not very important to me \[reversed\], \[or\] invests little effort into my work \[reversed\] ". Higher scores indicate greater industriousness level.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exercise Information
n=74 Participants
This group was presented with information that defined and described regular exercise, its benefits, and guidance for using proper form in exercise to minimize the risk of injury. Guidelines for prescribing suggested physical activities were based on recommendations from the USDHHS (2008). These sessions lasted \~90 minutes.
Action Planning
n=73 Participants
This group discussed all the components from the session for the information-only group with an additional emphasis on how to create action plans. Discussions revolved around possible ways and times of the day to engage in exercise by making specific action plans that designate when, where, and how. Participants were shown how to create an example action plan and guided in writing their own exercise action plans for as many days as they desired in the three-week tracking period in their exercise booklets. Emphasis was placed on the specificity and feasibility of the plans. These sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Realistic Effort Action Planning
n=74 Participants
This group discussed all components from the action planning condition. Discussion in this group also emphasized the importance of persistence and effortful control in daily life and how these attributes can be transferred to exercise plans. Participants were encouraged to identify their threshold for exerting effort toward exercise based on past experiences and applying that awareness to their planned exercises. They were guided in creating action plans that considered not only past external barriers (e.g., schedule, fitness level, and environment) but also previous internal barriers (i.e., resistance and/or aversiveness to physical exertion) and create plans that would help them avoid repeating the same circumstances. Participants were also asked to realistically consider how much past exercise they have previously engaged in and to refine those estimates to serve as starting points for subsequent small increases in planned exercise. These group sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Industriousness Level
4.01 units on a scale
Standard Error .13
3.96 units on a scale
Standard Error .26
3.98 units on a scale
Standard Error .25

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 6 months after initial intervention session

Industriousness was assessed using a 10-item Industriousness scale (Chernyshenko, 2003). Participants rated themselves on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Disagree strongly, 5 = Agree strongly) indicating the extent to which, for example, they are someone who "has high standards and works toward them; setting goals and achieving them is not very important to me \[reversed\], \[or\] invests little effort into my work \[reversed\] ". Higher scores indicate greater industriousness level.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exercise Information
n=74 Participants
This group was presented with information that defined and described regular exercise, its benefits, and guidance for using proper form in exercise to minimize the risk of injury. Guidelines for prescribing suggested physical activities were based on recommendations from the USDHHS (2008). These sessions lasted \~90 minutes.
Action Planning
n=73 Participants
This group discussed all the components from the session for the information-only group with an additional emphasis on how to create action plans. Discussions revolved around possible ways and times of the day to engage in exercise by making specific action plans that designate when, where, and how. Participants were shown how to create an example action plan and guided in writing their own exercise action plans for as many days as they desired in the three-week tracking period in their exercise booklets. Emphasis was placed on the specificity and feasibility of the plans. These sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Realistic Effort Action Planning
n=74 Participants
This group discussed all components from the action planning condition. Discussion in this group also emphasized the importance of persistence and effortful control in daily life and how these attributes can be transferred to exercise plans. Participants were encouraged to identify their threshold for exerting effort toward exercise based on past experiences and applying that awareness to their planned exercises. They were guided in creating action plans that considered not only past external barriers (e.g., schedule, fitness level, and environment) but also previous internal barriers (i.e., resistance and/or aversiveness to physical exertion) and create plans that would help them avoid repeating the same circumstances. Participants were also asked to realistically consider how much past exercise they have previously engaged in and to refine those estimates to serve as starting points for subsequent small increases in planned exercise. These group sessions lasted \~120 minutes.
Industriousness Level
4.01 units on a scale
Standard Error .09
4.07 units on a scale
Standard Error .08
3.95 units on a scale
Standard Error .10

Adverse Events

Exercise Information

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Action Planning

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Realistic Effort Action Planning

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Phuong Vo

Wayne State University and Michigan State University

Phone: 616-634-0566

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place