Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Guselkumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis and an Inadequate Response to Ustekinumab (NCT NCT02203032)
NCT ID: NCT02203032
Last Updated: 2017-09-12
Results Overview
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
872 participants
Week 28 through Week 40
2017-09-12
Participant Flow
Study consists of 2 periods: Open label run-in (Period 1) and blinded phase (Period 2). Participants were enrolled in open label run-in period only. Participants completed the open label run-in period entered into blinded phase period.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ustekinumab (Open Label Run-in)
All participants received ustekinumab 45 milligram (mg) (participants weighing less than or equal to \[\<=\]100 kilogram \[kg\]) or 90 mg (participants weighing \>100 kg) at Weeks 0 and 4. At Week 16, participants with IGA \>=2 were randomized to either switch to guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16 and 20 and then every 8 weeks thereafter or continue on ustekinumab every 12 weeks (q12w); participants with an IGA=0 or 1 were to continue to receive open-label ustekinumab q12w.
|
100 mg Guselkumab (Randomized)
Participants from open label run-in phase with an investigator global assessment (IGA) greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 at Week 16 who were randomized to guselkumab, received guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and placebo for ustekinumab at Weeks 16, 28, and 40.
|
Ustekinumab (Randomized)
Participants from open label run-in phase with an IGA \>=2 at Week 16 who were randomized to ustekinumab, continued to receive ustekinumab, according to their baseline (Week 0) weight, at Weeks 16, 28, and 40, and placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44.
|
Ustekinumab (Nonrandomized Open Label Continuation)
Participants from open label run-in phase with an IGA=0 or 1 at Week 16 received ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg (according to their baseline weight \[Week 0\]) at Weeks 16, 28, and 40.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Open Label Run-in (Week 0 to Week 16)
STARTED
|
872
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open Label Run-in (Week 0 to Week 16)
Treated
|
871
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open Label Run-in (Week 0 to Week 16)
COMPLETED
|
853
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open Label Run-in (Week 0 to Week 16)
NOT COMPLETED
|
19
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Blinded Phase (Week 16 to Week 44)
STARTED
|
0
|
135
|
133
|
585
|
|
Blinded Phase (Week 16 to Week 44)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
120
|
107
|
539
|
|
Blinded Phase (Week 16 to Week 44)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
15
|
26
|
46
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ustekinumab (Open Label Run-in)
All participants received ustekinumab 45 milligram (mg) (participants weighing less than or equal to \[\<=\]100 kilogram \[kg\]) or 90 mg (participants weighing \>100 kg) at Weeks 0 and 4. At Week 16, participants with IGA \>=2 were randomized to either switch to guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16 and 20 and then every 8 weeks thereafter or continue on ustekinumab every 12 weeks (q12w); participants with an IGA=0 or 1 were to continue to receive open-label ustekinumab q12w.
|
100 mg Guselkumab (Randomized)
Participants from open label run-in phase with an investigator global assessment (IGA) greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 at Week 16 who were randomized to guselkumab, received guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and placebo for ustekinumab at Weeks 16, 28, and 40.
|
Ustekinumab (Randomized)
Participants from open label run-in phase with an IGA \>=2 at Week 16 who were randomized to ustekinumab, continued to receive ustekinumab, according to their baseline (Week 0) weight, at Weeks 16, 28, and 40, and placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44.
|
Ustekinumab (Nonrandomized Open Label Continuation)
Participants from open label run-in phase with an IGA=0 or 1 at Week 16 received ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg (according to their baseline weight \[Week 0\]) at Weeks 16, 28, and 40.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Open Label Run-in (Week 0 to Week 16)
Adverse Event
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open Label Run-in (Week 0 to Week 16)
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open Label Run-in (Week 0 to Week 16)
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open Label Run-in (Week 0 to Week 16)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open Label Run-in (Week 0 to Week 16)
Protocol Violation
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open Label Run-in (Week 0 to Week 16)
Other
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open Label Run-in (Week 0 to Week 16)
Enrolled but not treated
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Blinded Phase (Week 16 to Week 44)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
8
|
|
Blinded Phase (Week 16 to Week 44)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
8
|
19
|
20
|
|
Blinded Phase (Week 16 to Week 44)
Other
|
0
|
4
|
1
|
15
|
|
Blinded Phase (Week 16 to Week 44)
Death
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Blinded Phase (Week 16 to Week 44)
Completed Safety follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Guselkumab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis and an Inadequate Response to Ustekinumab
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ustekinumab (Open Label Run-in)
n=871 Participants
All participants received ustekinumab 45 milligram (mg) (participants weighing less than or equal to \[\<=\]100 kilogram \[kg\]) or 90 mg (participants weighing \>100 kg) at Weeks 0 and 4. At Week 16, participants with IGA \>=2 were randomized to either switch to guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16 and 20 and then every 8 weeks thereafter or continue on ustekinumab every 12 weeks (q12w); participants with an IGA=0 or 1 were to continue to receive open-label ustekinumab q12w.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
814 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
43.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.21 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
305 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
566 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
96 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
294 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Russia
|
88 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
11 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
61 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
194 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic Of
|
29 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan, Province Of China
|
55 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 28 through Week 40Population: Randomized population included all enrolled participants with IGA \>=2 at Week 16 randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 treatment regimens (guselkumab or ustekinumab) at Week 16.
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab (Randomized)
n=135 Participants
Participants from open label Run-in phase with an investigator global assessment (IGA) greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 at Week 16 who were randomized to guselkumab, received guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and placebo for ustekinumab at Weeks 16, 28, and 40.
|
Ustekinumab (Randomized)
n=133 Participants
Participants from open label run-in phase with an IGA \>=2 at Week 16 who were randomized to ustekinumab, continued to receive ustekinumab, according to their baseline (Week 0) weight, at Weeks 16, 28, and 40, and placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) and at Least a 2 Grade Improvement (From Week 16) From Week 28 Through Week 40
|
1.5 visits
Standard Deviation 1.57
|
0.7 visits
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 28 through Week 40Population: Randomized population included all enrolled participants with IGA \>=2 at Week 16 randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 treatment regimens (guselkumab or ustekinumab) at Week 16.
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas were assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 to 6, and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab (Randomized)
n=135 Participants
Participants from open label Run-in phase with an investigator global assessment (IGA) greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 at Week 16 who were randomized to guselkumab, received guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and placebo for ustekinumab at Weeks 16, 28, and 40.
|
Ustekinumab (Randomized)
n=133 Participants
Participants from open label run-in phase with an IGA \>=2 at Week 16 who were randomized to ustekinumab, continued to receive ustekinumab, according to their baseline (Week 0) weight, at Weeks 16, 28, and 40, and placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response From Week 28 Through Week 40
|
2.2 visits
Standard Deviation 1.69
|
1.1 visits
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 28 through Week 40Population: Randomized population included all enrolled participants with IGA \>=2 at Week 16 randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 treatment regimens (guselkumab or ustekinumab) at Week 16.
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab (Randomized)
n=135 Participants
Participants from open label Run-in phase with an investigator global assessment (IGA) greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 at Week 16 who were randomized to guselkumab, received guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and placebo for ustekinumab at Weeks 16, 28, and 40.
|
Ustekinumab (Randomized)
n=133 Participants
Participants from open label run-in phase with an IGA \>=2 at Week 16 who were randomized to ustekinumab, continued to receive ustekinumab, according to their baseline (Week 0) weight, at Weeks 16, 28, and 40, and placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0) From Week 28 Through Week 40
|
0.9 visits
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
0.4 visits
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 28Population: Randomized population included all enrolled participants with IGA \>=2 at Week 16 randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 treatment regimens (guselkumab or ustekinumab) at Week 16.
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participants' psoriasis was assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab (Randomized)
n=135 Participants
Participants from open label Run-in phase with an investigator global assessment (IGA) greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 at Week 16 who were randomized to guselkumab, received guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and placebo for ustekinumab at Weeks 16, 28, and 40.
|
Ustekinumab (Randomized)
n=133 Participants
Participants from open label run-in phase with an IGA \>=2 at Week 16 who were randomized to ustekinumab, continued to receive ustekinumab, according to their baseline (Week 0) weight, at Weeks 16, 28, and 40, and placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) and at Least a 2 Grade Improvement (From Week 16) at Week 28
|
31.1 percentage of participants
|
14.3 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Ustekinumab (Open Label Run-in)
100 mg Guselkumab (Randomized)
Ustekinumab (Randomized)
Ustekinumab (Nonrandomized Open Label Continuation)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ustekinumab (Open Label Run-in)
n=871 participants at risk
All participants received ustekinumab 45 milligram (mg) (participants weighing less than or equal to \[\<=\]100 kilogram \[kg\]) or 90 mg (participants weighing \>100 kg) at Weeks 0 and 4. At Week 16, participants with IGA \>=2 were randomized to either switch to guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16 and 20 and then every 8 weeks thereafter or continue on ustekinumab every 12 weeks (q12w); participants with an IGA=0 or 1 were to continue to receive open-label ustekinumab q12w.
|
100 mg Guselkumab (Randomized)
n=135 participants at risk
Participants from open label run-in phase with an investigator global assessment (IGA) greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 at Week 16 who were randomized to guselkumab, received guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and placebo for ustekinumab at Weeks 16, 28, and 40.
|
Ustekinumab (Randomized)
n=133 participants at risk
Participants from open label run-in phase with an IGA \>=2 at Week 16 who were randomized to ustekinumab, continued to receive ustekinumab, according to their baseline (Week 0) weight, at Weeks 16, 28, and 40, and placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44.
|
Ustekinumab (Nonrandomized Open Label Continuation)
n=585 participants at risk
Participants from open label run-in phase with an IGA=0 or 1 at Week 16 received ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg (according to their baseline weight \[Week 0\]) at Weeks 16, 28, and 40.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute Myocardial Infarction
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.75%
1/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina Unstable
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Fibrillation
|
0.11%
1/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
1.5%
2/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus Node Dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Eye disorders
Blindness
|
0.11%
1/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.34%
2/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal Artery Embolism
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
General disorders
Chest Pain
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile Duct Stenosis
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.11%
1/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Anal Abscess
|
0.11%
1/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.11%
1/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paraspinal Abscess
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Periodontitis
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia Bacterial
|
0.11%
1/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Alcohol Poisoning
|
0.11%
1/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Scapula Fracture
|
0.11%
1/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tibia Fracture
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Toxicity to Various Agents
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.75%
1/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Foot Deformity
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bile Duct Cancer
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic Carcinoma Metastatic
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Transitional Cell Carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.11%
1/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Ectopic Pregnancy
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
|
0.23%
2/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large Intestinal Stenosis
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
General disorders
Chest Discomfort
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Arthritis Bacterial
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Epididymitis
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Salpingitis
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion Spontaneous
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.74%
1/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.75%
1/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.17%
1/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes Mellitus
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.75%
1/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.75%
1/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal Detachment
|
0.00%
0/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.75%
1/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
0.00%
0/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ustekinumab (Open Label Run-in)
n=871 participants at risk
All participants received ustekinumab 45 milligram (mg) (participants weighing less than or equal to \[\<=\]100 kilogram \[kg\]) or 90 mg (participants weighing \>100 kg) at Weeks 0 and 4. At Week 16, participants with IGA \>=2 were randomized to either switch to guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16 and 20 and then every 8 weeks thereafter or continue on ustekinumab every 12 weeks (q12w); participants with an IGA=0 or 1 were to continue to receive open-label ustekinumab q12w.
|
100 mg Guselkumab (Randomized)
n=135 participants at risk
Participants from open label run-in phase with an investigator global assessment (IGA) greater than or equal to (\>=) 2 at Week 16 who were randomized to guselkumab, received guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and placebo for ustekinumab at Weeks 16, 28, and 40.
|
Ustekinumab (Randomized)
n=133 participants at risk
Participants from open label run-in phase with an IGA \>=2 at Week 16 who were randomized to ustekinumab, continued to receive ustekinumab, according to their baseline (Week 0) weight, at Weeks 16, 28, and 40, and placebo for guselkumab at Weeks 16, 20, 28, 36, and 44.
|
Ustekinumab (Nonrandomized Open Label Continuation)
n=585 participants at risk
Participants from open label run-in phase with an IGA=0 or 1 at Week 16 received ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg (according to their baseline weight \[Week 0\]) at Weeks 16, 28, and 40.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.4%
47/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
17.0%
23/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
17.3%
23/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
5.6%
33/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
3.8%
33/871 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
11.1%
15/135 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
8.3%
11/133 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
4.6%
27/585 • Up to Week 60
Safety analysis included all participants who were enrolled at Week 0 and received at least 1 dose of study agent administration.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested in writing, such publication will be withheld for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER