POC - Transfusion Algorithm Cardiac Study

NCT ID: NCT02200419

Last Updated: 2016-12-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

7402 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This multi-centre study will provide sound, generalizable data on the effectiveness of a POC-based algorithm to determine to what extent this guideline can reduce blood product transfusions. Investigators will study outcomes in 7000 patients undergoing heart surgery at 10 participating hospitals. The proposed trial addresses several important research and clinical issues and has the potential to markedly improve the transfusion management and surgical care in general of cardiac surgery patients.

The intervention will be a novel POC-based algorithm that has been shown in a pilot study by us to be associated with a substantial reduction in blood product transfusions. The algorithm will employ viscoelastic and aggregometric POC-tests and an objective measure of blood loss. The primary outcome will be avoidance of red blood cell transfusion during hospitalization. The study has a 90% power to detect a 12% increase in avoidance rate. Secondary outcomes will include avoidance of red blood cell use and other blood products (plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate), units of blood products transfused, and adverse clinical outcomes related to transfusion (acute kidney injury, infections, and death). Data will also be collected for future health-economics analyses.

Largely due to the limitations of existing evidence, however, such algorithms are rarely used in clinical practice. The proposed trial will provide sound, generalizable data on the effectiveness of a POC-based algorithm to guide their future use. An integrated blood management algorithm that employs POC coagulation tests will reduce blood product transfusions in cardiac surgery, thereby improving clinical outcomes.

Does an integrated blood transfusion algorithm that employs POC coagulation tests applied across a network of hospitals reduce blood transfusions and associated adverse outcomes in cardiac surgery?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite major advances in cardiac surgery, coagulopathy continues to carry a heavy burden in cases that require the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), occurring frequently and resulting in excessive blood loss, blood product transfusions, and adverse clinical outcomes. Current management of coagulopathy is hampered by the inability of conventional laboratory tests to delineate its etiology in a timely manner, thereby precluding timely and targeted transfusion therapy. With the advent of point-of-care (POC) coagulation tests that can rapidly identify the etiology of coagulopathy, it may now be possible to reduce the burden of coagulopathy and thereby reduce transfusions and adverse outcomes. Several single-centre studies (including one by the investigator group) have found that the use of POC-based algorithms in cardiac surgery can markedly reduce blood product transfusions and by that means reduce morbidities and mortality.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Diseases

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Rotem Point of care coagulation tests Cardiac surgery Vascular surgery Cardiopulmonary bypass Blood products Transfusion Viscoelastic coagulation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transfusion Algorithm

Hospitals will be randomized to the intervention arm of the study in a stratified manner.

Group Type OTHER

POC-based transfusion algorithm

Intervention Type OTHER

A transfusion algorithm based on point-of-care coagulation testing.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

POC-based transfusion algorithm

A transfusion algorithm based on point-of-care coagulation testing.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participating hospitals must not currently be using a POC-based blood conservation algorithm; must have an in-hospital RBC transfusion rate of \> 35% and platelet or plasma transfusion rates of \> 20%; must conduct \> 600 cardiac surgeries employing CPB per year; and must have commitments from departments of Anesthesia, Cardiac Surgery, and Laboratory Medicine to support the study and to abide by the algorithm
* Blood transfusion algorithm instituted as standard-of-care at participating hospitals
* All adult (≥ 18 years) patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) will be included in the analysis.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jo Carroll

Research Manager

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Keyvan Karkouti, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Health Network, Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr. Charles McAdams

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Blaine Achen

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Dr. Terry Waters

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Dr. Sukhpal Brar

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Dr. H. Grocott

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Dr. Summer Syed

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dr. Christopher Harle

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dr. Daniel Kim

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dr. D. Tran

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dr. F. Moussa

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Dr. E. Medicis

Fleurimont, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Dr. J. Bussieres

Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Karkouti K, Callum J, Wijeysundera DN, Rao V, Crowther M, Grocott HP, Pinto R, Scales DC; TACS Investigators. Point-of-Care Hemostatic Testing in Cardiac Surgery: A Stepped-Wedge Clustered Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2016 Oct 18;134(16):1152-1162. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023956. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27654344 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14-7495-A

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id