Trial Outcomes & Findings for 21 Day Cumulative Skin Irritation of RUT058-60 (NCT NCT02198963)
NCT ID: NCT02198963
Last Updated: 2016-02-04
Results Overview
Primary Analysis After a 23-hour ± 1-hour period of exposure, patches were removed, and the sites evaluated and visually scored for irritancy. The procedures will be repeated on the same test sites an additional twenty times. On each day,mean values, sample sizes, ranges, etc., of the irritation scores, for a total of six configurations, were recorded. Grading Scale for Visual Evaluation of Skin Condition: 0= no evidence of irritation, 1= minimal erythema, barely perceptible, 2= definite erythema, readily visible; minimal edema or minimal papular response, 3= erythema and papules, 4= definite edema, 5= erythema, edema, and papules, 6=' vesicular eruption, 7= strong reaction spreading beyond test site Visual observations of 3, 4, or 5 resulted in discontinuance of product application to that site. Observations of 6 or 7 were considered an adverse event and subject discontinued from the study.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
43 participants
21 days
2016-02-04
Participant Flow
Subjects were recruited and screened at a single US center
Participant milestones
| Measure |
RUT058-60 vs Negative Control vs Positive Control
Each subject was their own control and received occlusive patches containing approximately 200 mg of all three (test article, negative control, and positive control) applied to abraded and non abraded skin sites in the scapular region of each subject's back.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
43
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
36
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
RUT058-60 vs Negative Control vs Positive Control
Each subject was their own control and received occlusive patches containing approximately 200 mg of all three (test article, negative control, and positive control) applied to abraded and non abraded skin sites in the scapular region of each subject's back.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
Baseline Characteristics
21 Day Cumulative Skin Irritation of RUT058-60
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
RUT058-60 vs Negative and Positve Controls
n=43 Participants
All subjects who were enrolled, remained compliant and participated in all scheduled visits and received all study material applications were analyzed.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Latino
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
37 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
43 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 21 daysPopulation: Each subject had each study material (test, positive and negative controls) applied to separate abraded and non-abraded skin sites
Primary Analysis After a 23-hour ± 1-hour period of exposure, patches were removed, and the sites evaluated and visually scored for irritancy. The procedures will be repeated on the same test sites an additional twenty times. On each day,mean values, sample sizes, ranges, etc., of the irritation scores, for a total of six configurations, were recorded. Grading Scale for Visual Evaluation of Skin Condition: 0= no evidence of irritation, 1= minimal erythema, barely perceptible, 2= definite erythema, readily visible; minimal edema or minimal papular response, 3= erythema and papules, 4= definite edema, 5= erythema, edema, and papules, 6=' vesicular eruption, 7= strong reaction spreading beyond test site Visual observations of 3, 4, or 5 resulted in discontinuance of product application to that site. Observations of 6 or 7 were considered an adverse event and subject discontinued from the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Hypochlorous Acid Solution 106 mg/L-Abraded
n=36 Participants
0.02 mL of the Test Product RUT058-60 applied to abraded skin sites.
|
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (0.1%) -Abraded
n=36 Participants
0.02 mL of the Positive Control applied to abraded skin sites.
|
Physiological Saline (0.9%), USP-Abraded
n=36 Participants
0.02 mL of the Negative Control applied to abraded skin sites.
|
Hypochlorous Acid Solution 106 mg/L- Non-Abraded
n=36 Participants
0.02 mL of the Test Product RUT058-60 applied to non-abraded skin sites.
|
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (0.1%)- Non-Abraded
n=36 Participants
0.02 mL of the Positive Control applied to non-abraded skin sites.
|
Physiological Saline (0.9%), USP- Non-Abraded
n=36 Participants
0.02 mL of the Negative Control applied to non-abraded skin sites.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Irritation Score of RUT058-60 Hypochlorous Acid Solution (106 mg/L) on Healthy Human Skin
|
1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
2.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
1.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
1.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
0.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
Adverse Events
RUT058-60 vs Negative and Positve Controls
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
RUT058-60 vs Negative and Positve Controls
n=43 participants at risk
All subjects who were enrolled, remained compliant and participated in all scheduled visits and received all study material applications were analyzed.
|
|---|---|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
|
7.0%
3/43 • Number of events 3
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
4.7%
2/43 • Number of events 2
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Disclosure Agreement
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER