Comparison of the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT) With the EDTRS- and Landoltring Charts
NCT ID: NCT02198534
Last Updated: 2016-11-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
25 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-06-30
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
B) Background: Landolt Cs and letters are commonly used optotypes. In the explorative study we compare four different ways of applying them: The Freiburg visual acuity test (FrACT) using a keypad and a haptic Landolt device, a Landolt C chart in accordance to ISO 8596 and DIN 58220 with eight-orientated Landolt C and ETDRS charts. The aims of the survey were to determine examinee´s/examiner´s subjective ratings using Visual analogue scales (VAS), the inter-test agreement between the tests and test-retest reliability of the tests, concerning the test duration.
Subjects and Methods: Twenty-four adult examinees with a visual acuity of ≥ 0,2 were included in the explorative study. The visual acuity of one eye was measured monocularly, randomized with regard to the leading/non-leading eye. The subjects passed every visual acuity test twice in a randomized sequence of the visual acuity tests, which is maintained by a pre-specified randomization list, making use of forced choice.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. ETDRS Visual Acuity Tester (Steinbeis Transferzentrum Biomedizinische Optik, Tübingen/Germany)
3. Landoltring chart (Visus GmbH, Stuttgart/Germany)
4. VISUCAT monitor with single optotype display(numbers; Argus Individuell Optic GmbG, Putzbrunn/Germany)
5. Room illuminance level 250 lx, assessed with digital luxmeter (Peak Tech 5025, Peak Tech Prüf - und Messtechnik GmbH, Ahrensburg/Germany)
6. Laptopdisplay (TravelMate, Acer, 8372 Taipeh/China):
luminance level 151 cd/m2 , surround luminance level 75 cd/m2 , assessed with luminance meter (IS-110 Laptop Minolta, Tokyo/Japan)
7. ETDRS Visual Acuity Tester:
luminance level: 237 cd/m², surround luminance level 85 cd/m²
8. Landoltring Chart:
luminance level: 236 cd/m², surround luminance level 84 cd/m²
9. VISUCAT:
luminance level: 380 cd/m², surround luminance level 70 cd/m²
10. Stopwatch (Apple iPhone 4S, Cupertino CA/USA)
11. Laser Rangefinder (GLM 80 Professional, Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart/Germany)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ophthalomogically normal subjects
Methodology of visual acuity assessment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Methodology of visual acuity assessment
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Minimum distant visual acuity (without/with correction) 0.2 (Visucat, single letter optotypes \[numbers\], initial session). As long as minimum distant visual acuity limits are exceeded, test runs without optical corrections are preferred in order to enhance the spectrum/variety of tested visual acuity values
* Ametropia:
maximum myopia sph -2.00 dpt maximum hyperopia sph +5.50 dpt maximum astigmatism cyl 2.5 dpt
* informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Drugs affect the reaction time and / or determining the visual acuity, or the refractive power of the eye
* Ophthalmic Education
* Amblyopia
* strabismus
* Glaucoma IOP\> 22 mmHg
* Nystagmus
* Diabetic retinopathy (blood sugar-related retinal disease)
* Very dry eyes (sicca symptoms)
* eye surgery back are less than 3 months
* Infectious diseases (conjunctivitis, corneal inflammation, choroidal inflammation)
* miosis drugs
* Pronounced eye injuries
* Other eye disorders that affect the image quality
* Macular diseases
* albinism
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Schiefer Ulrich
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Schiefer Ulrich
Prof. Dr. med.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ulrich Schiefer, Prof. Dr. med.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Applied Sciences Aalen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Applied Sciences, Study Course Ophthalmic Optics
Aalen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
F-2014-049
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id