Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy of AGN-199201 and AGN-190584 in Patients With Presbyopia (NCT NCT02197806)
NCT ID: NCT02197806
Last Updated: 2015-12-03
Results Overview
UNVA is assessed without corrective lenses in the non-dominant eye. UNVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of lines read correctly. The lower the number of lines read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of lines read correctly means that vision has improved. The percentages of patients with at least a 2 or more line improvement in UNVA in the non-dominant eye are presented.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
65 participants
Baseline, Day 3
2015-12-03
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
AGN-199201
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-199201 vehicle in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-190584
1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-199201 vehicle in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-199201 + AGN-190584 in One Eye
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-199201 + AGN-190584 in Both Eyes
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution in both eyes, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
15
|
17
|
16
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
16
|
16
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
AGN-199201
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-199201 vehicle in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-190584
1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-199201 vehicle in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-199201 + AGN-190584 in One Eye
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-199201 + AGN-190584 in Both Eyes
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution in both eyes, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy of AGN-199201 and AGN-190584 in Patients With Presbyopia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
AGN-199201
n=15 Participants
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-199201 vehicle in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-190584
n=17 Participants
1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-199201 vehicle in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-199201 + AGN-190584 in One Eye
n=16 Participants
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-199201 + AGN-190584 in Both Eyes
n=17 Participants
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution in both eyes, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
Total
n=65 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
49.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.88 • n=5 Participants
|
49.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.47 • n=7 Participants
|
48.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.16 • n=5 Participants
|
49.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.97 • n=4 Participants
|
49.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.81 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 3Population: Modified Intent to Treat: all randomized patients with a baseline assessment and at least 1 postbaseline assessment of UNVA
UNVA is assessed without corrective lenses in the non-dominant eye. UNVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of lines read correctly. The lower the number of lines read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of lines read correctly means that vision has improved. The percentages of patients with at least a 2 or more line improvement in UNVA in the non-dominant eye are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
AGN-199201
n=15 Participants
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-199201 vehicle in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-190584
n=17 Participants
1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-199201 vehicle in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-199201 + AGN-190584 in One Eye
n=16 Participants
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-199201 + AGN-190584 in Both Eyes
n=16 Participants
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution in both eyes, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2 Line Improvement From Baseline in Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity (UNVA) in the Non-Dominant Eye
|
46.7 Percentage of Patients
|
70.6 Percentage of Patients
|
56.3 Percentage of Patients
|
68.8 Percentage of Patients
|
Adverse Events
AGN-199201
AGN-190584
AGN-199201 + AGN-190584 in One Eye
AGN-199201 + AGN-190584 in Both Eyes
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
AGN-199201
n=15 participants at risk
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-199201 vehicle in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-190584
n=17 participants at risk
1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-199201 vehicle in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-199201 + AGN-190584 in One Eye
n=16 participants at risk
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution in the non-dominant eye and 2 drops of AGN-199201 vehicle in the dominant eye, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
AGN-199201 + AGN-190584 in Both Eyes
n=17 participants at risk
1 drop of AGN-199201 ophthalmic solution followed by 1 drop of AGN-190584 ophthalmic solution in both eyes, once and twice daily for 3 days each.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Vision Blurred
|
0.00%
0/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
5.9%
1/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
12.5%
2/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
5.9%
1/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival Hyperaemia
|
0.00%
0/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
5.9%
1/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
6.2%
1/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
5.9%
1/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation Increased
|
0.00%
0/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
5.9%
1/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
6.2%
1/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
5.9%
1/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
Eye disorders
Metamorphopsia
|
0.00%
0/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
5.9%
1/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular Discomfort
|
0.00%
0/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
12.5%
2/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eyelid Retraction
|
26.7%
4/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
6.2%
1/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
Eye disorders
Photophobia
|
0.00%
0/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
6.2%
1/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Irritation
|
0.00%
0/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
5.9%
1/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
Eye disorders
Punctate Keratitis
|
6.7%
1/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
5.9%
1/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
General disorders
Product Taste Abnormal
|
0.00%
0/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
5.9%
1/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
General disorders
Discomfort
|
0.00%
0/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
6.2%
1/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
6.7%
1/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
Investigations
Blood Pressure Increased
|
0.00%
0/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
5.9%
1/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/15
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
0.00%
0/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
12.5%
2/16
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
17.6%
3/17
The Safety Population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and was used to assess adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER