Activating Treatment as Prevention Through Community Mobilization in South Africa

NCT ID: NCT02197793

Last Updated: 2020-09-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2338 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-07-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a community mobilization intervention on the uptake of HIV testing, linkage to and retention in HIV care using a community, cluster randomized trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Eight of 16 intervention naïve communities in the Agincourt HDSS will be randomized to receive the CM intervention to activate TasP based on the investigators CM conceptual framework. The 16 villages will be randomized based on the "restricted randomization" approach, a stratification method to ensure overall balance between intervention and control communities.

Intervention activities will map onto the investigators six mobilization domains identified in the investigators preliminary work as key components for communities to mobilize for change around HIV prevention. These activities will support communities to: 1) identify a shared concern around testing, linkage and retention in care; 2) enable communities to develop critical consciousness around TasP; 3) facilitate identification and development of structures and networks to disseminate information and activities around TasP; 4) identify and engage community leadership around TasP; 5) take collection action to support TasP; and 6) build community cohesion to address the HIV epidemic and support access to care.

The investigators will evaluate the impact of the intervention using a linked data set including electronic clinic records and the HDSS census data, which will allow us to determine whether people in the intervention communities test at higher proportions than those in control communities, whether individuals who test positive in the intervention communities are more likely to receive CD4 testing and initiate treatment within 3 months than the control communities, and whether those who are eligible and not eligible for treatment are retained in care.

The investigators will implement a representative cross-sectional survey in all 16 villages prior to and following the intervention in order to examine changes in CM domains across villages and the mechanisms through which the intervention affects HIV testing, linkage and retention.

In addition, intervention progress and dosage will be carefully monitored through a tracking system to document all workshops and activities that are carried out in each village.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Community Mobilization Program

Intervention activities will map onto six mobilization domains identified as key components for communities to mobilize for change around testing, linkage and retention in care (Treatment as Prevention (TasP)).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Community Mobilization Program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Control Arm

The control arm does not receive the Community Mobilization Intervention.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Community Mobilization Program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* lived in the study area for 12 months
* age 18-49 years
* able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

49 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Witwatersrand, South Africa

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Audrey Pettifor, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Heath Transitions Research Unit

Agincourt, Mpumalanga, South Africa

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Africa

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lippman SA, Pettifor A, Dufour MK, Kabudula CW, Twine R, Peacock D, Mathebula R, Julien A, West R, Neilands TB, Wagner R, Gottert A, Gomez-Olive FX, Rebombo D, Haberland N, Pulerwitz J, Majuba LP, Tollman S, Kahn K. A community mobilisation intervention to improve engagement in HIV testing, linkage to care, and retention in care in South Africa: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2022 Sep;9(9):e617-e626. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00192-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36055294 (View on PubMed)

Lippman SA, Pettifor A, Rebombo D, Julien A, Wagner RG, Kang Dufour MS, Kabudula CW, Neilands TB, Twine R, Gottert A, Gomez-Olive FX, Tollman SM, Sanne I, Peacock D, Kahn K. Evaluation of the Tsima community mobilization intervention to improve engagement in HIV testing and care in South Africa: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0541-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28095904 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14-13575

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Women-Focused HIV Prevention in the Western Cape
NCT00729391 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Reducing HIV in Adolescents
NCT01187979 COMPLETED PHASE2
Couples Health CoOp Plus
NCT05310773 COMPLETED NA