Open-Label Extension Study of the Long-Term Effects of Migalastat HCL in Patients With Fabry Disease
NCT ID: NCT02194985
Last Updated: 2020-12-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
84 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-14
2019-10-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Migalastat HCl 150 mg
Migalastat HCl 150 milligram (mg).
migalastat HCl 150 mg
Migalastat HCl 150 mg (equivalent to 123 mg migalastat) was provided as capsules in blister packs. One capsule was taken orally every other day.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
migalastat HCl 150 mg
Migalastat HCl 150 mg (equivalent to 123 mg migalastat) was provided as capsules in blister packs. One capsule was taken orally every other day.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male and female participant agreed to use protocol-identified acceptable contraception
* Participant was willing to provide written informed consent and authorization for use and disclosure of Personal Health Information (PHI)
Exclusion Criteria
* Participant had undergone, or was scheduled to undergo kidney transplantation or was currently on dialysis
* Participant had a documented transient ischemic attack, stroke, unstable angina, or myocardial infarction within the 3 months before Baseline Visit
* Participant had clinically significant unstable cardiac disease in the opinion of the investigator (for example, cardiac disease requiring active management, such as symptomatic arrhythmia, unstable angina, or New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure)
* Participant had a history of allergy or sensitivity to AT1001 (including excipients) or other iminosugars (for example, miglustat, miglitol)
* Participant required treatment with Glyset® (miglitol) or Zavesca® (miglustat)
* Participants with severe or unsuitable concomitant medical condition
* Participants with clinically significant abnormal laboratory value(s) and/or clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) findings
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Amicus Therapeutics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Medical Monitor Clinical Research
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Amicus Therapeutics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinical Study Site
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Clinical Study Site
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Clinical Study Site
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Clinical Study Site
New York, New York, United States
Clinical Study Site
Portland, Oregon, United States
Clinical Study Site
Dallas, Texas, United States
Clinical Study Site
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Clinical Study Site
Pilar, , Argentina
Clinical Study Site
Adelaide, , Australia
Clinical Study Site
Parkville, , Australia
Clinical Study Site
Vienna, , Austria
Clinical Study Site
Edegem, , Belgium
Clinical Study Site
Porto Alegre, , Brazil
Clinical Study Site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Clinical Study Site
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Clinical Study Site
Cairo, , Egypt
Clinical Study Site
Garches, , France
Clinical Study Site
Lille, , France
Clinical Study Site
Florence, , Italy
Clinical Study Site
Roma, , Italy
Clinical Study Site
Suita, Osaka, Japan
Clinical Study Site
Niigata, , Japan
Clinical Study Site
Osaka, , Japan
Clinical Study Site
Tokyo, , Japan
Clinical Study Site
Barcelona, , Spain
Clinical Study Site
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Study Site
London, , United Kingdom
Clinical Study Site
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Narita I, Ohashi T, Sakai N, Hamazaki T, Skuban N, Castelli JP, Lagast H, Barth JA. Efficacy and safety of migalastat in a Japanese population: a subgroup analysis of the ATTRACT study. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2020 Feb;24(2):157-166. doi: 10.1007/s10157-019-01810-w. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-002701-38
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
AT1001-042
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id