Treatment of Pain Associated With Fibromyalgia

NCT ID: NCT02187471

Last Updated: 2020-11-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1301 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-16

Study Completion Date

2017-01-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of this trial is to compare change in weekly average daily pain score (ADPS) from baseline to Week 13 in participants receiving either dose of DS-5565 versus placebo.

Weekly ADPS is based on daily pain scores reported by the subject that best describes his or her worst pain over the previous 24 hours.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Associated With Fibromyalgia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

pain fibromyalgia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Participants take one each of placebo tablet and capsule, twice daily (BID)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet for oral use, matching DS-5565 tablet

Placebo capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule for oral use, matching pregabalin capsule

Pregabalin

Participants take one pregabalin capsule and one placebo tablet BID

Group Type OTHER

Pregabalin

Intervention Type DRUG

Pregabalin capsule for oral use; 75 mg capsule for one week, then 150 mg capsule

Placebo tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet for oral use, matching DS-5565 tablet

DS-5565 15 mg QD

Participants take one each of placebo tablet and capsule in the morning and one placebo capsule in the evening with one DS-5565 tablet once daily (QD)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DS-5565

Intervention Type DRUG

DS-5565 15 mg QD or BID; tablet for oral use

Placebo tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet for oral use, matching DS-5565 tablet

Placebo capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule for oral use, matching pregabalin capsule

DS-5565 15 mg BID

Participants take one placebo capsule with one DS-5565 tablet BID

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DS-5565

Intervention Type DRUG

DS-5565 15 mg QD or BID; tablet for oral use

Placebo capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule for oral use, matching pregabalin capsule

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DS-5565

DS-5565 15 mg QD or BID; tablet for oral use

Intervention Type DRUG

Pregabalin

Pregabalin capsule for oral use; 75 mg capsule for one week, then 150 mg capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet

Placebo tablet for oral use, matching DS-5565 tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule

Placebo capsule for oral use, matching pregabalin capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Mirogabalin Other treatment - not comparator Tablet Control Capsule Control

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Able to give written informed consent
* Able to complete subject-reported questionnaires per the investigator's judgment
* At screening, subjects must meet the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for FM, i.e. widespread pain present for at least 3 months and pain in at least 11 of 18 specific tender point sites. In addition, the 2010 ACR criteria must be met:
* Widespread pain index (WPI) ≥ 7 and symptom severity (SS) scale score ≥ 5, or WPI 3 to 6 and SS scale score ≥ 9
* Symptoms have been present at a similar level for at least 3 months
* The subject does not have a disorder that would otherwise explain the pain
* ADPS of ≥ 4 on the 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) over the past 7 days prior to randomization (based on completion of at least 4 daily pain diaries during the 7-day baseline period prior to randomization)
* Subject must have documented evidence of a fundoscopic examination (with pupil dilation) within 12 months prior to screening or at screening.
* Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy during the study and for 4 weeks after study completion.

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinically significant unstable neurologic, psychiatric, ophthalmologic, hepatobiliary, respiratory, or hematologic illness or unstable cardiovascular disease (e.g. severe hypotension, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, or myocardial infarction) or any other concurrent disease within 12 months prior to screening that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with study participation or assessment of safety and tolerability
* Anticipation of initiation or significant change to normal daily exercise routines or need for ongoing use of concomitant medications or non-pharmacological pain management techniques that may confound assessments of efficacy and/or safety
* Unable to undergo pre-study washout of prohibited concomitant medications
* Subjects who are at risk of suicide as defined by their responses to the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) or in the opinion of the investigator. Note: Patients answering "yes" to any of the C-SSRS questions at screening must be excluded. Such patients should be referred immediately to a mental health professional for appropriate evaluation.
* Current severe or uncontrolled major depressive disorder or anxiety disorders as assessed by the Mini-international Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) mild to moderate major depression or anxiety disorders are permitted provided that the investigator assesses the patient as clinically stable and appropriate for entry into the study.
* Any diagnosis of lifetime bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder
* Subjects with pain due to other conditions (e.g. diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain or post-herpetic neuralgia) that in the opinion of the investigator, would confound assessment or self-evaluation of the pain associated with FM.
* Subjects with pain due to any widespread inflammatory musculoskeletal disorder (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, lupus) or widespread rheumatic disease other than FM.
* Abuse or dependence of prescription medications, street drugs, or alcohol within the last 1 year
* Any history of a malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma within the past 5 years
* A diagnosis of untreated sleep apnea or initiation of treatment for sleep apnea within the past 3 months
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding, or intent to become pregnant during the study period
* Subject is currently enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study or is receiving other investigational agents.
* Known hypersensitivity to alpha2-delta (α2δ) ligands or other components of the study medications. Note: Prior exposure to DS-5565 is allowed, as long as hypersensitivity to DS-5565 was not observed.
* Subjects who are unlikely to comply with the protocol (e.g. uncooperative attitude, inability to return for subsequent visits) and/or otherwise considered by the investigator to be unlikely to complete the study.
* Abnormal investigative tests (i.e. electrocardiograms \[ECGs\]) and laboratory values judged by the investigator to be clinically significant at screening, with particular focus on: a. Abnormal renal function defined as calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) \< 60 mL/min determined by the central laboratory using the modified Cockcroft-Gault equation; blood urea nitrogen\> 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN); creatine kinase \> 3.0 × ULN; serum creatinine \> 1.6 mg/dL (\> 141.4 μmol/L); b. Abnormal liver function defined as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 2.0 × ULN, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2.0 × ULN; alkaline phosphatase \> 1.5 × ULN; total bilirubin\> 1.2 × ULN. If a subject has total bilirubin \> 1.2 ULN, unconjugated and conjugated bilirubin fractions should be analyzed and only subjects documented to have Gilbert's syndrome may be enrolled.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Syneos Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Global Clinical Leader

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Daiichi Sankyo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Covina, California, United States

Site Status

El Cajon, California, United States

Site Status

Encino, California, United States

Site Status

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Lakewood, California, United States

Site Status

Lomita, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

National City, California, United States

Site Status

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Oceanside, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Upland, California, United States

Site Status

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Edgewater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Largo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Maitland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sunrise, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tamarac, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Vero Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Dawsonville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Smyrna, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Granger, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Owensboro, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brockton, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Rochester Hills, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Florissant, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Hazelwood, Missouri, United States

Site Status

O'Fallon, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Bellevue, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Newington, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Cedarhurst, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Minot, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Media, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Franklin, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lake Jackson, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

Richland, Washington, United States

Site Status

CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Lanús, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

San Fernando, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, , Argentina

Site Status

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Klagenfurt, , Austria

Site Status

Senftenberg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Vitebsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Gozée, , Belgium

Site Status

Oostham, , Belgium

Site Status

Antofagasta, , Chile

Site Status

Providencia, , Chile

Site Status

Puerto Varas, , Chile

Site Status

Viña del Mar, , Chile

Site Status

Barranquilla, , Colombia

Site Status

Bogotá, , Colombia

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Cuautitlán Izcalli, , Mexico

Site Status

Durango, , Mexico

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

León, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Nadarzyn, , Poland

Site Status

Nowa Sól, , Poland

Site Status

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Tychy, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Aveiro, , Portugal

Site Status

Braga, , Portugal

Site Status

Guimarães, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Ponte de Lima, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Vila Nova de Gaia, , Portugal

Site Status

Ljubljana, , Slovenia

Site Status

Slovenj Gradec, , Slovenia

Site Status

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Elche, , Spain

Site Status

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Austria Belarus Belgium Chile Colombia Israel Mexico Poland Portugal Slovenia Spain Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arnold LM, Whitaker S, Hsu C, Jacobs D, Merante D. Efficacy and safety of mirogabalin for the treatment of fibromyalgia: results from three 13-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group studies and a 52-week open-label extension study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Oct;35(10):1825-1835. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1629757. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31284771 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-005162-20

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DS5565-A-E310

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id