Treatment of Pain Associated With Fibromyalgia

NCT ID: NCT02187159

Last Updated: 2020-11-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1270 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-07-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of this trial is to compare change in weekly average daily pain score (ADPS) from baseline to Week 13 in participants receiving either dose of DS-5565 versus placebo. Weekly ADPS is based on daily pain scores reported by the participant that best describes his or her worst pain over the previous 24 hours.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Associated With Fibromyalgia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

pain fibromyalgia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DS-5565 QD

Participants take one each of placebo tablet and capsule in the morning, and one DS-5565 tablet once daily (QD) with a placebo capsule in the evening

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DS-5565

Intervention Type DRUG

DS-5565 15 mg tablet for oral administration

Placebo tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet (matching DS5565) for oral administration

Placebo capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule (matching pregabalin) for oral administration

DS-5565 BID

Participants take one DS-5565 tablet and one placebo capsule, twice daily (BID)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DS-5565

Intervention Type DRUG

DS-5565 15 mg tablet for oral administration

Placebo capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule (matching pregabalin) for oral administration

Pregabalin

Participants take one pregabalin capsule and one placebo tablet BID

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pregabalin

Intervention Type DRUG

Pregabalin 150 mg capsule for oral administration

Placebo tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet (matching DS5565) for oral administration

Placebo

Participants take one each of placebo tablet and capsule BID

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet (matching DS5565) for oral administration

Placebo capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule (matching pregabalin) for oral administration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DS-5565

DS-5565 15 mg tablet for oral administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Pregabalin

Pregabalin 150 mg capsule for oral administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet

Placebo tablet (matching DS5565) for oral administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule

Placebo capsule (matching pregabalin) for oral administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

mirogabalin Lyrica Placebo matching DS-5565 Placebo matching pregabalin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Able to give written informed consent
* Able to complete subject-reported questionnaires per the investigator's judgment
* At screening, subjects must meet the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for FM, i.e. widespread pain present for at least 3 months and pain in at least 11 of 18 specific tender point sites. In addition, the 2010 ACR criteria must be met:
* Widespread pain index (WPI) ≥ 7 and symptom severity (SS) scale score ≥ 5, or WPI 3 to 6 and SS scale score ≥ 9
* Symptoms have been present at a similar level for at least 3 months
* The subject does not have a disorder that would otherwise explain the pain
* ADPS of ≥ 4 on the 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) over the past 7 days prior to randomization (based on completion of at least 4 daily pain diaries during the 7-day baseline period prior to randomization)
* Subject must have documented evidence of a fundoscopic examination (with pupil dilation) within 12 months prior to screening or at screening.
* Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy during the study and for 4 weeks after study completion.

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinically significant unstable neurologic, psychiatric, ophthalmologic, hepatobiliary, respiratory, or hematologic illness or unstable cardiovascular disease (e.g. severe hypotension, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, or myocardial infarction) or any other concurrent disease within 12 months prior to screening that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with study participation or assessment of safety and tolerability
* Anticipation of initiation or significant change to normal daily exercise routines or need for ongoing use of concomitant medications or non-pharmacological pain management techniques that may confound assessments of efficacy and/or safety
* Unable to undergo pre-study washout of prohibited concomitant medications
* Subjects who are at risk of suicide as defined by their responses to the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) or in the opinion of the investigator. Note: Patients answering "yes" to any of the questions about active suicidal ideation/intent/behaviors occurring within the past 12 months must be excluded (C-SSRS Suicide Ideation section - Questions 3, 4, or 5; C-SSRS Suicidal Behavior section, any of the suicide behaviors questions). Such patients should be referred immediately to a mental health professional for appropriate evaluation.
* Current severe or uncontrolled major depressive disorder or anxiety disorders as assessed by the Mini-international Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) mild to moderate major depression or anxiety disorders are permitted provided that the investigator assesses the patient as clinically stable and appropriate for entry into the study.
* Any diagnosis of lifetime bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder
* Subjects with pain due to other conditions (e.g. diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain or post-herpetic neuralgia) that in the opinion of the investigator, would confound assessment or self-evaluation of the pain associated with FM.
* Subjects with pain due to any widespread inflammatory musculoskeletal disorder (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, lupus) or widespread rheumatic disease other than FM.
* Abuse or dependence of prescription medications, street drugs, or alcohol within the last 1 year
* Any history of a malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma within the past 5 years
* A diagnosis of untreated sleep apnea or initiation of treatment for sleep apnea within the past 3 months
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding, or intent to become pregnant during the study period
* Subject is currently enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study or is receiving other investigational agents.
* Known hypersensitivity to alpha2-delta (α2δ) ligands or other components of the study medications. Note: Prior exposure to DS-5565 is allowed, as long as hypersensitivity to DS-5565 was not observed.
* Subjects who are unlikely to comply with the protocol (e.g. uncooperative attitude, inability to return for subsequent visits) and/or otherwise considered by the investigator to be unlikely to complete the study.
* Abnormal investigative tests (i.e. electrocardiograms \[ECGs\]) and laboratory values judged by the investigator to be clinically significant at screening, with particular focus on: a. Abnormal renal function defined as calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) \< 60 mL/min determined by the central laboratory using the modified Cockcroft-Gault equation; blood urea nitrogen\> 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN); creatine kinase \> 3.0 × ULN; serum creatinine \> 1.6 mg/dL (\> 141.4 μmol/L); b. Abnormal liver function defined as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 2.0 × ULN, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2.0 × ULN; alkaline phosphatase \> 1.5 × ULN; total bilirubin\> 1.2 × ULN. If a subject has total bilirubin \> 1.2 ULN, unconjugated and conjugated bilirubin fractions should be analyzed and only subjects documented to have Gilbert's syndrome may be enrolled.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Syneos Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Global Clinical Leader

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Daiichi Sankyo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Glendale, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Oxnard, California, United States

Site Status

Richmond, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Simi Valley, California, United States

Site Status

New London, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Brandon, Florida, United States

Site Status

DeBary, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Homestead, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lake Mary, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

North Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plant City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Alpharetta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Gurnee, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Naperville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Shawnee Mission, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Monroe, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Traverse City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Manhasset, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Staten Island, New York, United States

Site Status

Benson, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Garfield Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Tiffin, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Salem, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Rock Hill, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

New Tazewell, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sealy, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Kirkland, Washington, United States

Site Status

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Campsie, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Sherwood, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Southport, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Woodsville, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Site Status

Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Malvern East, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Burgas, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sevlievo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Targovishte, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Tartu, , Estonia

Site Status

Balassagyarmat, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Esztergom, , Hungary

Site Status

Kistarcsa, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Site Status

Surat, Gujarat, India

Site Status

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Hubli, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Pune, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Site Status

Lucknow, VP, India

Site Status

Baldone, , Latvia

Site Status

Balvi, , Latvia

Site Status

Jēkabpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Liepāja, , Latvia

Site Status

Ogre, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Ventspils, , Latvia

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Nelson, , New Zealand

Site Status

Tauranga, , New Zealand

Site Status

Wellington, , New Zealand

Site Status

Bacau, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Târgu Mureş, , Romania

Site Status

Ivanovo, , Russia

Site Status

Krasnoyarsk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Orenburgsky, , Russia

Site Status

Pyatigorski, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Stavropol, , Russia

Site Status

Vladikavkaz, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslav, , Russia

Site Status

Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Dubnica nad Váhom, , Slovakia

Site Status

Galanta, , Slovakia

Site Status

Krompachy, , Slovakia

Site Status

Piešťany, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Penzance, Cornwall, United Kingdom

Site Status

Chesterfield, Derbyshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom

Site Status

Romford, Essex, United Kingdom

Site Status

Blackpool, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Thornton-Cleveleys, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Wigan, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom

Site Status

Southport, Merseyside, United Kingdom

Site Status

Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Barnsley, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Cannock, Staffordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

North Shields, TYNE and WEAR, United Kingdom

Site Status

Atherstone, Warwickshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Dudley, WEST Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Torpoint, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Bulgaria Estonia Hungary India Latvia New Zealand Romania Russia Slovakia United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arnold LM, Whitaker S, Hsu C, Jacobs D, Merante D. Efficacy and safety of mirogabalin for the treatment of fibromyalgia: results from three 13-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group studies and a 52-week open-label extension study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Oct;35(10):1825-1835. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1629757. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31284771 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-005163-10

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DS5565-A-E311

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id