Does Chewing Gum Hasten Return of Bowel Function Post-Operatively in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02186717

Last Updated: 2023-06-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

144 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The specific aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of chewing gum on the return of bowel function in a group of patients undergoing spinal surgery with a group of matched controls that do not receive any chewing gum. A 24-hour reduction in time to passage of first flatus will be considered an important clinical difference.

The research questions are:

1. Does providing chewing gum post-operatively hasten the return of bowel function?
2. Does providing chewing gum post-operatively reduced overall length of stay?
3. Does providing chewing gum post-operatively have any associated complications?
4. Does providing chewing gum post-operatively result in higher objective outcomes scores?

The secondary aims are:

1. To compare hospital length of stay between the groups with a mean of ½ day considered clinically important.
2. To compare time until tolerating regular diet as defined as two consecutive meals with no complications with 24 hours considered statistically significant.
3. To compare incidence and nature of complications between the two groups.
4. To compare the time until completion of rehab milestones with 1 day being considered clinically important.
5. To compare the requirement for nutrition evaluations
6. To compare SF-12 scores as a marker of patient satisfaction with a difference of 10 points or more measured between the two groups upon discharge from hospital and at six-weeks after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Return of Bowel Function Following Spinal Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Chewing gum

Chewing gum

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chewing gum

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Patients will be asked to chew gum three times a day for 30 minutes each time

No Chewing Gum

No Chewing Gum

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Chewing gum

Patients will be asked to chew gum three times a day for 30 minutes each time

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18
* Lumbar decompression 2+ levels
* Posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion 1+ levels
* Combined anterior (ALIF/XLIF) and ANY posterior procedure (ie - decompression +/- fusion)

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18
* Trauma
* Tumor
* Infection
* Stand-alone anterior surgery
* Allergy to chewing gum
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Russel C. Huang, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital for Special Surgery

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-065

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Nutrition to Support Postoperative Recovery
NCT07109505 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA