Trial Outcomes & Findings for PROSPECT II & PROSPECT ABSORB - an Integrated Natural History Study and Randomized Trial. (NCT NCT02171065)
NCT ID: NCT02171065
Last Updated: 2021-08-10
Results Overview
Patient-level rate of non-culprit lesion-related MACE (NC-MACE) evaluated at the longest follow-up available, assessed at the time when the last patient enrolled reaches at least 24 months. NC-MACE is defined as an event arising from an originally untreated NC lesion consisting of the composite of 1) cardiac death, 2) myocardial infarction, 3) unstable angina, or 4) progressive angina or anginal equivalent symptoms either 4a) requiring revascularization by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and/or 4b) with angiographic core lab-confirmed rapid lesion progression.(NC-MACE).
COMPLETED
NA
902 participants
Median follow-up of 3.7 (first quartile, third quartile; 3.0, 4.4) years
2021-08-10
Participant Flow
Between June 10, 2014, and December 20, 2017, 902 patients at 16 sites were enrolled in PROSPECT II.
Four patients were disenrolled because non-culprit lesion imaging were not acquired. Among the rest of 898 patients, 182 patients with angiographically nonobstructive lesion but with plaque burden\>=65% were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB, and randomized to Absorb-bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) plus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) (n=93) versus GDMT alone (n=89).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
|
ABSORB BVS + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to ABSORB-BVS + GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
|
PROSPECT II Only
Patients were not enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB. Patients remain in PROSPECT II.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
89
|
93
|
716
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
88
|
93
|
715
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
|
ABSORB BVS + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to ABSORB-BVS + GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
|
PROSPECT II Only
Patients were not enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB. Patients remain in PROSPECT II.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=89 Participants
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
|
ABSORB BVS + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=93 Participants
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to ABSORB-BVS + GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
|
PROSPECT II Only
n=716 Participants
Patients were not enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB. Patients remain in PROSPECT II.
|
Total
n=898 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=89 Participants
|
62.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 • n=93 Participants
|
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=716 Participants
|
62.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=898 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
19 Participants
n=89 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
121 Participants
n=716 Participants
|
153 Participants
n=898 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
70 Participants
n=89 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
595 Participants
n=716 Participants
|
745 Participants
n=898 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
|
16 Participants
n=89 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
226 Participants
n=716 Participants
|
258 Participants
n=898 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
|
65 Participants
n=89 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
396 Participants
n=716 Participants
|
528 Participants
n=898 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Norway
|
8 Participants
n=89 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=716 Participants
|
112 Participants
n=898 Participants
|
|
Body mass index
|
27.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=89 Participants
|
27.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=93 Participants
|
27.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=716 Participants
|
27.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=898 Participants
|
|
Height
|
174.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 • n=89 Participants
|
178.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=93 Participants
|
176.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=716 Participants
|
176.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=898 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
83.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2 • n=89 Participants
|
88.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=93 Participants
|
86.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 • n=716 Participants
|
86.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.0 • n=898 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Median follow-up of 3.7 (first quartile, third quartile; 3.0, 4.4) yearsPatient-level rate of non-culprit lesion-related MACE (NC-MACE) evaluated at the longest follow-up available, assessed at the time when the last patient enrolled reaches at least 24 months. NC-MACE is defined as an event arising from an originally untreated NC lesion consisting of the composite of 1) cardiac death, 2) myocardial infarction, 3) unstable angina, or 4) progressive angina or anginal equivalent symptoms either 4a) requiring revascularization by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and/or 4b) with angiographic core lab-confirmed rapid lesion progression.(NC-MACE).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=89 Participants
Patient were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
|
ABSORB + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=93 Participants
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to ABSORB + BVS + GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
|
PROSPECT II Only
n=716 Participants
Patients were not enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB. Patients remain in PROSPECT II.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Prospect II: Patient Level Non-culprit Lesion Related Non-Culprit Major Adverse Cardiac Event (NC-MACE) Adjudicated to an Originally Untreated Non-culprit Lesion During the Entire Study Duration
|
15 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 25 monthPopulation: Intention to treat population, defined as patients randomized to each arm and completing 25-month imaging follow-up and analyzable intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image available
The MLA at the randomized non-culprit lesion site in patients treated with Absorb BVS + GDMT compared to GDMT only as measured at 25 months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=72 Participants
Patient were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
|
ABSORB + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=84 Participants
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to ABSORB + BVS + GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
|
PROSPECT II Only
Patients were not enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB. Patients remain in PROSPECT II.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Prospect Absorb: The Minimum Luminal Area (MLA) at the Randomized Non-culprit Lesion Site in Patients Treated With the ABSORB BVS + GDMT Compared to GDMT Only Measured at 25 Months
|
3.0 mm^2
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
6.9 mm^2
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
ABSORB BVS + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
PROSPECT II Only
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=89 participants at risk
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
|
ABSORB BVS + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=93 participants at risk
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to ABSORB-BVS + GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
|
PROSPECT II Only
n=716 participants at risk
Patients were not enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB. Patients remain in PROSPECT II.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Intravascular imaging related major complications requiring treatment
|
0.00%
0/89 • The entire study duration, median follow-up 3.7 (first quartile, third quartile; 3.0, 4.4) years
The primary endpoint of PROSPECT II study was measured in the overall PROSPECT II cohort. As a subset of PROSPECT II, 182 patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT vs GDMT-ABSORB. Thus, adverse event has been shown for overall PROSPECT II cohort.
|
0.00%
0/93 • The entire study duration, median follow-up 3.7 (first quartile, third quartile; 3.0, 4.4) years
The primary endpoint of PROSPECT II study was measured in the overall PROSPECT II cohort. As a subset of PROSPECT II, 182 patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT vs GDMT-ABSORB. Thus, adverse event has been shown for overall PROSPECT II cohort.
|
0.28%
2/716 • Number of events 2 • The entire study duration, median follow-up 3.7 (first quartile, third quartile; 3.0, 4.4) years
The primary endpoint of PROSPECT II study was measured in the overall PROSPECT II cohort. As a subset of PROSPECT II, 182 patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT vs GDMT-ABSORB. Thus, adverse event has been shown for overall PROSPECT II cohort.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Principal Investigator: David Erlinge, MD, PhD
Lund University
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place