Trial Outcomes & Findings for PROSPECT II & PROSPECT ABSORB - an Integrated Natural History Study and Randomized Trial. (NCT NCT02171065)

NCT ID: NCT02171065

Last Updated: 2021-08-10

Results Overview

Patient-level rate of non-culprit lesion-related MACE (NC-MACE) evaluated at the longest follow-up available, assessed at the time when the last patient enrolled reaches at least 24 months. NC-MACE is defined as an event arising from an originally untreated NC lesion consisting of the composite of 1) cardiac death, 2) myocardial infarction, 3) unstable angina, or 4) progressive angina or anginal equivalent symptoms either 4a) requiring revascularization by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and/or 4b) with angiographic core lab-confirmed rapid lesion progression.(NC-MACE).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

902 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Median follow-up of 3.7 (first quartile, third quartile; 3.0, 4.4) years

Results posted on

2021-08-10

Participant Flow

Between June 10, 2014, and December 20, 2017, 902 patients at 16 sites were enrolled in PROSPECT II.

Four patients were disenrolled because non-culprit lesion imaging were not acquired. Among the rest of 898 patients, 182 patients with angiographically nonobstructive lesion but with plaque burden\>=65% were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB, and randomized to Absorb-bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) plus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) (n=93) versus GDMT alone (n=89).

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
ABSORB BVS + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to ABSORB-BVS + GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
PROSPECT II Only
Patients were not enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB. Patients remain in PROSPECT II.
Overall Study
STARTED
89
93
716
Overall Study
COMPLETED
88
93
715
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
0
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
ABSORB BVS + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to ABSORB-BVS + GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
PROSPECT II Only
Patients were not enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB. Patients remain in PROSPECT II.
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
0
0
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
0
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=89 Participants
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
ABSORB BVS + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=93 Participants
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to ABSORB-BVS + GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
PROSPECT II Only
n=716 Participants
Patients were not enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB. Patients remain in PROSPECT II.
Total
n=898 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
64.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=89 Participants
62.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 • n=93 Participants
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=716 Participants
62.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=898 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants
n=89 Participants
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
121 Participants
n=716 Participants
153 Participants
n=898 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
70 Participants
n=89 Participants
80 Participants
n=93 Participants
595 Participants
n=716 Participants
745 Participants
n=898 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
16 Participants
n=89 Participants
16 Participants
n=93 Participants
226 Participants
n=716 Participants
258 Participants
n=898 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
65 Participants
n=89 Participants
67 Participants
n=93 Participants
396 Participants
n=716 Participants
528 Participants
n=898 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Norway
8 Participants
n=89 Participants
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
94 Participants
n=716 Participants
112 Participants
n=898 Participants
Body mass index
27.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=89 Participants
27.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=93 Participants
27.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=716 Participants
27.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=898 Participants
Height
174.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 • n=89 Participants
178.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=93 Participants
176.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=716 Participants
176.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=898 Participants
Weight
83.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2 • n=89 Participants
88.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=93 Participants
86.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 • n=716 Participants
86.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.0 • n=898 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Median follow-up of 3.7 (first quartile, third quartile; 3.0, 4.4) years

Patient-level rate of non-culprit lesion-related MACE (NC-MACE) evaluated at the longest follow-up available, assessed at the time when the last patient enrolled reaches at least 24 months. NC-MACE is defined as an event arising from an originally untreated NC lesion consisting of the composite of 1) cardiac death, 2) myocardial infarction, 3) unstable angina, or 4) progressive angina or anginal equivalent symptoms either 4a) requiring revascularization by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and/or 4b) with angiographic core lab-confirmed rapid lesion progression.(NC-MACE).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=89 Participants
Patient were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
ABSORB + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=93 Participants
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to ABSORB + BVS + GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
PROSPECT II Only
n=716 Participants
Patients were not enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB. Patients remain in PROSPECT II.
Prospect II: Patient Level Non-culprit Lesion Related Non-Culprit Major Adverse Cardiac Event (NC-MACE) Adjudicated to an Originally Untreated Non-culprit Lesion During the Entire Study Duration
15 Participants
10 Participants
41 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 25 month

Population: Intention to treat population, defined as patients randomized to each arm and completing 25-month imaging follow-up and analyzable intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) image available

The MLA at the randomized non-culprit lesion site in patients treated with Absorb BVS + GDMT compared to GDMT only as measured at 25 months.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=72 Participants
Patient were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
ABSORB + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=84 Participants
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to ABSORB + BVS + GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
PROSPECT II Only
Patients were not enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB. Patients remain in PROSPECT II.
Prospect Absorb: The Minimum Luminal Area (MLA) at the Randomized Non-culprit Lesion Site in Patients Treated With the ABSORB BVS + GDMT Compared to GDMT Only Measured at 25 Months
3.0 mm^2
Standard Deviation 1.0
6.9 mm^2
Standard Deviation 2.6

Adverse Events

Guideline Directed Medical Therapy in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

ABSORB BVS + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 2 deaths

PROSPECT II Only

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 16 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Guideline Directed Medical Therapy in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=89 participants at risk
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
ABSORB BVS + GDMT in PROSPECT-ABSORB and PROSPECT II
n=93 participants at risk
Patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to ABSORB-BVS + GDMT group. Patients remain in PROSPECT II cohort.
PROSPECT II Only
n=716 participants at risk
Patients were not enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB. Patients remain in PROSPECT II.
Cardiac disorders
Intravascular imaging related major complications requiring treatment
0.00%
0/89 • The entire study duration, median follow-up 3.7 (first quartile, third quartile; 3.0, 4.4) years
The primary endpoint of PROSPECT II study was measured in the overall PROSPECT II cohort. As a subset of PROSPECT II, 182 patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT vs GDMT-ABSORB. Thus, adverse event has been shown for overall PROSPECT II cohort.
0.00%
0/93 • The entire study duration, median follow-up 3.7 (first quartile, third quartile; 3.0, 4.4) years
The primary endpoint of PROSPECT II study was measured in the overall PROSPECT II cohort. As a subset of PROSPECT II, 182 patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT vs GDMT-ABSORB. Thus, adverse event has been shown for overall PROSPECT II cohort.
0.28%
2/716 • Number of events 2 • The entire study duration, median follow-up 3.7 (first quartile, third quartile; 3.0, 4.4) years
The primary endpoint of PROSPECT II study was measured in the overall PROSPECT II cohort. As a subset of PROSPECT II, 182 patients were enrolled in PROSPECT-ABSORB and randomized to GDMT vs GDMT-ABSORB. Thus, adverse event has been shown for overall PROSPECT II cohort.

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Principal Investigator: David Erlinge, MD, PhD

Lund University

Phone: +46-733746165

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place