Trial Outcomes & Findings for Gastrointestinal Sensorimotor Dysfunctions in Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT02170870)
NCT ID: NCT02170870
Last Updated: 2019-04-23
Results Overview
Intestinal chemosensitivity was recorded by evaluating symptoms during duodenal lipid infusion (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 mL) and placebo or the glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor antagonist exendin 9-39 over 2 hours. Participants reported the severity of 6 symptoms (nausea, fullness, bloating, abdominal pain, belching, and burning) at 15 minute intervals using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) marked 0 (minimum value) - 4 (maximum value): absent (0), light (1), moderate (2), severe (3) and intolerable(4). The scores recorded for nausea, fullness, bloating, and abdominal pain over the 2 hour infusion were averaged and reported as the mean symptom score. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
104 participants
Day 1, approximately 2 hours after infusion
2019-04-23
Participant Flow
Subjects were recruited from Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Healthy Controls Exendin 9-39
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Healthy Controls Placebo
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml)
|
Diabetics Exendin 9-39
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml)
|
Diabetics Placebo
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Functional Dyspepsia Exendin 9-39
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Functional Dyspepsia Placebo
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
13
|
11
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
13
|
11
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Healthy Controls Exendin 9-39
n=13 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Healthy Controls Placebo
n=11 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Diabetics Exendin 9-39
n=20 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Diabetics Placebo
n=20 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Functional Dyspepsia Exendin 9-39
n=20 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Functional Dyspepsia Placebo
n=20 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Total
n=104 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=13 Participants
|
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=11 Participants
|
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 • n=20 Participants
|
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 • n=20 Participants
|
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 • n=20 Participants
|
39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=20 Participants
|
42.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=104 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=11 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=104 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=11 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=104 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
13 participants
n=13 Participants
|
11 participants
n=11 Participants
|
20 participants
n=20 Participants
|
20 participants
n=20 Participants
|
20 participants
n=20 Participants
|
20 participants
n=20 Participants
|
104 participants
n=104 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
26 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=13 Participants
|
26 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 • n=11 Participants
|
29 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=20 Participants
|
27 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=20 Participants
|
26 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 • n=20 Participants
|
27 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 • n=20 Participants
|
26.8 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=104 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1, approximately 2 hours after infusionPopulation: Functional Dyspepsia arm - enteral lipid infusion was not performed because a nasoduodenal tube could not be placed in 2 functional dyspepsia placebo subjects and 3 functional dyspepsia exendin 9-39 subjects.
Intestinal chemosensitivity was recorded by evaluating symptoms during duodenal lipid infusion (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 mL) and placebo or the glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor antagonist exendin 9-39 over 2 hours. Participants reported the severity of 6 symptoms (nausea, fullness, bloating, abdominal pain, belching, and burning) at 15 minute intervals using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) marked 0 (minimum value) - 4 (maximum value): absent (0), light (1), moderate (2), severe (3) and intolerable(4). The scores recorded for nausea, fullness, bloating, and abdominal pain over the 2 hour infusion were averaged and reported as the mean symptom score. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Controls Exendin 9-39
n=13 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Healthy Controls Placebo
n=11 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Microlipid: Lipid infusion {66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Diabetics Exendin 9-39
n=20 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Diabetics Placebo
n=20 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Microlipid: Lipid infusion {66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Functional Dyspepsia Exendin 9-39
n=17 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Functional Dyspepsia Placebo
n=18 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Intestinal Chemosensitivity to Lipids Perfusion
|
0.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1The time for half of the ingested solids or liquids to leave the stomach. Following a meal consisting of two eggs labeled with technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid (1 mCi) served on one slice of bread with milk labeled with indium In111 diethylenetriaminepentaacetate (0.1 mCi), gastric emptying of solids and liquids was assessed with scintigraphy. Rapid emptying is defined as ≥ 36% emptied at one hour and delayed emptying is defined as \< 76% emptied at four hours. Normal emptying is defined as amount less than rapid emptying definition but greater than delayed emptying definition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Healthy Controls Exendin 9-39
n=13 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Healthy Controls Placebo
n=11 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Microlipid: Lipid infusion {66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Diabetics Exendin 9-39
n=20 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Diabetics Placebo
n=20 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Microlipid: Lipid infusion {66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Functional Dyspepsia Exendin 9-39
n=20 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Functional Dyspepsia Placebo
n=20 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Gastric Emptying (GE t 1/2) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Non-ulcer Dyspepsia (NUD) Compared to Placebo
GE of solids · Rapid emptying
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Rate of Gastric Emptying (GE t 1/2) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Non-ulcer Dyspepsia (NUD) Compared to Placebo
GE of solids · Normal emptying
|
10 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Rate of Gastric Emptying (GE t 1/2) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Non-ulcer Dyspepsia (NUD) Compared to Placebo
GE of solids · Delayed emptying
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Rate of Gastric Emptying (GE t 1/2) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Non-ulcer Dyspepsia (NUD) Compared to Placebo
GE of liquids · Rapid emptying
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Rate of Gastric Emptying (GE t 1/2) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Non-ulcer Dyspepsia (NUD) Compared to Placebo
GE of liquids · Normal emptying
|
11 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Rate of Gastric Emptying (GE t 1/2) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Non-ulcer Dyspepsia (NUD) Compared to Placebo
GE of liquids · Delayed emptying
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Healthy Controls Exendin 9-39
Healthy Controls Placebo
Diabetics Exendin 9-39
Diabetics Placebo
Functional Dyspepsia Exendin 9-39
Functional Dyspepsia Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Healthy Controls Exendin 9-39
n=13 participants at risk
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Healthy Controls Placebo
n=11 participants at risk
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Diabetics Exendin 9-39
n=20 participants at risk
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Diabetics Placebo
n=20 participants at risk
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Functional Dyspepsia Exendin 9-39
n=20 participants at risk
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min).
Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
Functional Dyspepsia Placebo
n=20 participants at risk
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/13 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/11 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Severe fatigue
|
0.00%
0/13 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/11 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/13 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/11 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal cramps
|
0.00%
0/13 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/11 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/13 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/11 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/13 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/11 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Adil E. Bharucha, Principal Investigator
Mayo Clinic
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place