Trial Outcomes & Findings for Gastrointestinal Sensorimotor Dysfunctions in Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT02170870)

NCT ID: NCT02170870

Last Updated: 2019-04-23

Results Overview

Intestinal chemosensitivity was recorded by evaluating symptoms during duodenal lipid infusion (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 mL) and placebo or the glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor antagonist exendin 9-39 over 2 hours. Participants reported the severity of 6 symptoms (nausea, fullness, bloating, abdominal pain, belching, and burning) at 15 minute intervals using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) marked 0 (minimum value) - 4 (maximum value): absent (0), light (1), moderate (2), severe (3) and intolerable(4). The scores recorded for nausea, fullness, bloating, and abdominal pain over the 2 hour infusion were averaged and reported as the mean symptom score. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

104 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Day 1, approximately 2 hours after infusion

Results posted on

2019-04-23

Participant Flow

Subjects were recruited from Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Healthy Controls Exendin 9-39
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Healthy Controls Placebo
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml)
Diabetics Exendin 9-39
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml)
Diabetics Placebo
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Functional Dyspepsia Exendin 9-39
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Functional Dyspepsia Placebo
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Overall Study
STARTED
13
11
20
20
20
20
Overall Study
COMPLETED
13
11
20
20
20
20
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Healthy Controls Exendin 9-39
n=13 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Healthy Controls Placebo
n=11 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Diabetics Exendin 9-39
n=20 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Diabetics Placebo
n=20 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Functional Dyspepsia Exendin 9-39
n=20 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Functional Dyspepsia Placebo
n=20 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Total
n=104 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=13 Participants
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=11 Participants
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 • n=20 Participants
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 • n=20 Participants
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 • n=20 Participants
39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=20 Participants
42.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=104 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
n=13 Participants
6 Participants
n=11 Participants
16 Participants
n=20 Participants
15 Participants
n=20 Participants
15 Participants
n=20 Participants
16 Participants
n=20 Participants
76 Participants
n=104 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants
n=13 Participants
5 Participants
n=11 Participants
4 Participants
n=20 Participants
5 Participants
n=20 Participants
5 Participants
n=20 Participants
4 Participants
n=20 Participants
28 Participants
n=104 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants
n=13 Participants
11 participants
n=11 Participants
20 participants
n=20 Participants
20 participants
n=20 Participants
20 participants
n=20 Participants
20 participants
n=20 Participants
104 participants
n=104 Participants
BMI
26 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=13 Participants
26 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 • n=11 Participants
29 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=20 Participants
27 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=20 Participants
26 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 • n=20 Participants
27 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 • n=20 Participants
26.8 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=104 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1, approximately 2 hours after infusion

Population: Functional Dyspepsia arm - enteral lipid infusion was not performed because a nasoduodenal tube could not be placed in 2 functional dyspepsia placebo subjects and 3 functional dyspepsia exendin 9-39 subjects.

Intestinal chemosensitivity was recorded by evaluating symptoms during duodenal lipid infusion (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 mL) and placebo or the glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor antagonist exendin 9-39 over 2 hours. Participants reported the severity of 6 symptoms (nausea, fullness, bloating, abdominal pain, belching, and burning) at 15 minute intervals using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) marked 0 (minimum value) - 4 (maximum value): absent (0), light (1), moderate (2), severe (3) and intolerable(4). The scores recorded for nausea, fullness, bloating, and abdominal pain over the 2 hour infusion were averaged and reported as the mean symptom score. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Controls Exendin 9-39
n=13 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Healthy Controls Placebo
n=11 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml). Microlipid: Lipid infusion {66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Diabetics Exendin 9-39
n=20 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Diabetics Placebo
n=20 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml). Microlipid: Lipid infusion {66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Functional Dyspepsia Exendin 9-39
n=17 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Functional Dyspepsia Placebo
n=18 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Mean Intestinal Chemosensitivity to Lipids Perfusion
0.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
0.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
0.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

The time for half of the ingested solids or liquids to leave the stomach. Following a meal consisting of two eggs labeled with technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid (1 mCi) served on one slice of bread with milk labeled with indium In111 diethylenetriaminepentaacetate (0.1 mCi), gastric emptying of solids and liquids was assessed with scintigraphy. Rapid emptying is defined as ≥ 36% emptied at one hour and delayed emptying is defined as \< 76% emptied at four hours. Normal emptying is defined as amount less than rapid emptying definition but greater than delayed emptying definition.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Controls Exendin 9-39
n=13 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Healthy Controls Placebo
n=11 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml). Microlipid: Lipid infusion {66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Diabetics Exendin 9-39
n=20 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Diabetics Placebo
n=20 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml). Microlipid: Lipid infusion {66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Functional Dyspepsia Exendin 9-39
n=20 Participants
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Functional Dyspepsia Placebo
n=20 Participants
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Rate of Gastric Emptying (GE t 1/2) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Non-ulcer Dyspepsia (NUD) Compared to Placebo
GE of solids · Rapid emptying
1 Participants
3 Participants
0 Participants
5 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
Rate of Gastric Emptying (GE t 1/2) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Non-ulcer Dyspepsia (NUD) Compared to Placebo
GE of solids · Normal emptying
10 Participants
8 Participants
12 Participants
10 Participants
16 Participants
14 Participants
Rate of Gastric Emptying (GE t 1/2) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Non-ulcer Dyspepsia (NUD) Compared to Placebo
GE of solids · Delayed emptying
2 Participants
0 Participants
8 Participants
5 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
Rate of Gastric Emptying (GE t 1/2) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Non-ulcer Dyspepsia (NUD) Compared to Placebo
GE of liquids · Rapid emptying
2 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Rate of Gastric Emptying (GE t 1/2) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Non-ulcer Dyspepsia (NUD) Compared to Placebo
GE of liquids · Normal emptying
11 Participants
9 Participants
19 Participants
18 Participants
19 Participants
19 Participants
Rate of Gastric Emptying (GE t 1/2) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Non-ulcer Dyspepsia (NUD) Compared to Placebo
GE of liquids · Delayed emptying
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

Adverse Events

Healthy Controls Exendin 9-39

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Healthy Controls Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Diabetics Exendin 9-39

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Diabetics Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Functional Dyspepsia Exendin 9-39

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Functional Dyspepsia Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Healthy Controls Exendin 9-39
n=13 participants at risk
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Healthy Controls Placebo
n=11 participants at risk
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Diabetics Exendin 9-39
n=20 participants at risk
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Diabetics Placebo
n=20 participants at risk
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Functional Dyspepsia Exendin 9-39
n=20 participants at risk
Exendin 9-39 was administered intravenously (1,200 pmol/kg bolus followed by infusion at 300 pmol/kg/min). Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Functional Dyspepsia Placebo
n=20 participants at risk
Normal saline infusion was prepared to match the appearance of Exendin 9-39. Lipid infusion 66.7 mL Microlipid (0.5 gm/mL diluted in water to 222 ml).
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
0.00%
0/13 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/11 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
General disorders
Severe fatigue
0.00%
0/13 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/11 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Presyncope
0.00%
0/13 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/11 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal cramps
0.00%
0/13 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/11 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Syncope
0.00%
0/13 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/11 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
General disorders
Nausea
0.00%
0/13 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/11 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.
0.00%
0/20 • For this study, the study treatment follow-up period was defined as one day following the last administration of study treatment.

Additional Information

Dr. Adil E. Bharucha, Principal Investigator

Mayo Clinic

Phone: 507-284-2687

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place