OPTIMA: Efficacy of Optimized Re-treatment and Step-up Therapy With Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) Patients
NCT ID: NCT02161562
Last Updated: 2018-09-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
314 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-08-01
2016-11-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy and Safety of Omalizumab in Patients With Severe Acute Urticaria
NCT02191072
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Omalizumab in Refractory Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Patients
NCT02329223
A Phase III Study of and Efficacy of Ligelizumab in the Treatment of CSU in Adolescents and Adults Inadequately Controlled With H1-antihistamines.
NCT03580356
A Phase III Study of Safety and Efficacy of Ligelizumab in the Treatment of CSU in Adolescents and Adults Inadequately Controlled With H1-antihistamines
NCT03580369
Mode of Action Study of Omalizumab in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria (CIU) Who Fail to Respond to Antihistamine Treatment
NCT01599637
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Phase 1 (Screening): At the first visit (Screening Visit), the participant was provided informed consent and then completed all screening visit assessments. During this visit, all CIU/CSU treatments taken by the participant were documented. Any protocol-defined prohibited CIU/CSU treatments were stopped at this visit, and the participant underwent a wash-out period of 1-5weeks (refer to study protocol for medication wash-out times) prior to Phase 2 Visit1. Only non-sedating H1- antihistamines, at locally-approved dosages, were allowed to be continued during the Screening Period and throughout the rest of the study. All participants also needed to complete daily diary during the entire screening period.
Phase 2 (Initial Dosing Period): Following completion of Phase 1, eligible participants were randomly assigned (in a 4:3 ratio) to either Group A or Group B. Participants in Group A were treated with omalizumab 150mg by subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks during the 24-week Phase 2 (Initial Dosing Period), while participants in Group B were treated with omalizumab 300mg every 4 weeks during this period. Randomization to treatment groups was stratified at Phase 2 Visit 1 by geographic location of the study site (i.e. Canada or Latin America), baseline presence/absence of angioedema and baseline UAS7 score (collected at Phase 2 Visit 1). At the end of Phase 2, all participants with a UAS7 score ≤ 6 entered Phase 3 (Study Treatment Withdrawal Period). Group A participants who had a UAS7 \> 6 at any visit of Phase 2 starting at Week 8 (Phase2-Visit3) skipped Phase 3 and moved directly to Phase 4 (Second Dosing Period) and received 300 mg Omalizumab (step-up). Group B participants who had a UAS7 \>6 at the end of Phase 2 skipped Phase 3 and moved directly to Phase 4.
Phase 3 (Study Treatment Withdrawal Period): During Phase 3 (Study Treatment Withdrawal Period), no study treatment (omalizumab) was given and participants continued to visit the study center at 4-week intervals (to a maximum of 8 weeks). If a UAS7 score ≥16 was observed during Phase 3 (Study Treatment Withdrawal Period), the participant moved directly to Phase 4 (Second Dosing Period). If a participant completed the full 8 weeks of Phase 3 (Study Treatment Withdrawal Period) with a UAS7 score \<16, the participant was moved directly to Phase 5 (Follow-up Period).
Phase 4 (Second Dosing Period)
* Group A participants who relapsed (UAS7 ≥16) during Phase 3 (Study Treatment Withdrawal Period) were retreated with omalizumab 150mg by SC injection every 4 weeks during the 12-week Phase 4 (Second Dosing Period)
* Group A participants who were not clinically well-controlled at week 8 of Phase 2 (Initial Treatment Period) or any subsequent visit in Phase 2 moved to Phase 4 (Second Dosing Period) immediately during which their study treatment was up-titrated to 300mg by SC injection every 4 weeks for 12 weeks.
* Group A participants who had their symptoms well controlled at week 24 (UAS7≤6) but did not relapse during the 8 weeks Study Treatment withdrawal period (UAS7\<16) moved directly to Phase 5, Follow up period.
* Group B participants who relapsed during Phase 3 (Study Treatment Withdrawal Period) were retreated with omalizumab 300mg by SC injection every 4 weeks during the 12- week Phase 4 (Second Dosing Period)
* Group B participants who were not clinically well-controlled at week 24 of Phase 2 (Initial Treatment Period) moved to Phase 4 (Second Dosing Period) immediately during which their study treatment remained 300mg by SC injection every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. In case the treating physician and the participant decided not to extend treatment, they could move directly from Phase 2 (Initial Treatment Period) to Phase 5 (Follow- up Period).
* Group B participants who had their symptoms well controlled at week 24 (UAS7≤6) but did not relapse during the 8 weeks Study Treatment withdrawal period (UAS7\<16) moved directly to Phase 5, Follow up period.
Phase 5 (Follow-up Period)
* Participants who did not relapse (UAS7 \<16) following completion of Phase 3 (Study Treatment Withdrawal Period) entered the 4-week Phase 5 (Follow-up Period).
* Group B participants who did not respond during their initial 24-week treatment period (Phase 2), and who did not wish to extend their treatment into Phase 4 (Second Dosing Phase) were allowed to move directly into the 4-week Phase 5 (Follow-up Period).
* All participants who completed Phase 4 (Second Dosing Period) entered the 4-week Phase 5 (Follow-up Period).
During Phase 5 (Follow-up Period), participants continued to only receive non-sedating H1- antihistamines at approved dosages. Omalizumab was not allowed to be administered during this period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
omalizumab 150mg
Participants received 150mg omalizumab every 4 weeks during the initial dosing phase (24 weeks). A second dosing period (at 150mg or 300mg) may have been implemented based on protocol-defined assessment criteria.
omalizumab
150mg omalizumab via sub-cutaneous injection once every 4 weeks
omalizumab 300mg
Participants received 300mg omalizumab every 4 weeks during the initial dosing phase (24 weeks). A second dosing period may have been implemented based on protocol-defined assessment criteria.
omalizumab
300mg omalizumab via sub-cutaneous injection once every 4 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
omalizumab
150mg omalizumab via sub-cutaneous injection once every 4 weeks
omalizumab
300mg omalizumab via sub-cutaneous injection once every 4 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having a diagnosis of CSU and the presence of symptoms for ≥6 months prior to the screening visit.
* Presence of itch and hives for ≥6 consecutive weeks at any time prior to the screening visit despite concurrent use of non-sedating H1-antihistamine treatment
* Patient must have been on an approved dose of non-sedating H1-antihistamine for CSU, and no other concomitant CSU treatment, for at least the 7 consecutive days immediately prior to the randomization visit and must document current use on the day of the randomization visit.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with other skin disease associated with itch that could interfere with study outcomes and/or compromise the safety of the patient
* Patients with evidence of parasitic infection
* Patients with a history of malignancy of any organ system (other than localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases.
* Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women,
* Women of child-bearing potential, unless they are using effective methods of contraception during dosing of study treatment.
* Patients who are unable or unwilling to comply with study procedures, attend scheduled study visits, complete questionnaires and daily diaries, or who may otherwise be unable to comply with the study requirements.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Santa Fe, Rosario, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Salta, , Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil
Novartis Investigative Site
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Novartis Investigative Site
Alphaville / Barueri, São Paulo, Brazil
Novartis Investigative Site
Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil
Novartis Investigative Site
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Markham, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, , Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago, , Chile
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago, , Chile
Novartis Investigative Site
Santo Domingo, Republica Dominicana, Dominican Republic
Novartis Investigative Site
Guatemala City, , Guatemala
Novartis Investigative Site
Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico
Novartis Investigative Site
Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico
Novartis Investigative Site
Panama City, , Panama
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sussman G, Hebert J, Gulliver W, Lynde C, Yang WH, Papp K, Gooderham M, Chambenoit O, Khalil S, DeTakacsy F, Vieira A, Rihakova L. Omalizumab Re-Treatment and Step-Up in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: OPTIMA Trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jul-Aug;8(7):2372-2378.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.03.022. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIGE025ECA01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.