The Role of Contingency Management in Waterpipe Smoking Cessation

NCT ID: NCT02159092

Last Updated: 2015-12-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

39 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-07-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Tobacco use kills more than 500,000 people in the United States each year. Although the use of cigarettes has declined, the use of other tobacco products has remained steady. Waterpipe smoking is a common form of tobacco smoking after cigarettes in the U.S. In fact, in 2007 the American Lung Association issued a policy alert to warn consumers about this first new tobacco trend of the 21st century (American Lung Association, 2007). Few studies have been conducted on waterpipe smoking to investigate its harmful effects. Furthermore, no known studies have evaluated treatments for smoking cessation in waterpipe smokers. This study aims to test the role of contingency management (CM) in promoting abstinence from waterpipe smoking for 5 weeks verified by salivary cotinine and to characterize self-reported nicotine withdrawal symptoms. Based on the alarming growth rate over a short period of time in waterpipe tobacco smoking, there is a critical need for clinical research to investigate treatment modalities targeting smoking cessation for waterpipe smokers. Given the evidence for the role of CM in promoting abstinence from many types of drug use, investigation of the utility of CM for waterpipe smoking cessation is important and timely. Although Nicotine Replacement Therapy is the mainstay treatment for treating nicotine dependence delivered through cigarettes, the intermittent use patterns that characterize waterpipe smoking suggest that CM may be more effective in promoting waterpipe smoking cessation. The evidence based knowledge generated in this study may assist in the translation of the treatment program into public health practice.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Contingency Management (CM) has been used successfully to treat tobacco addiction. CM is a powerful drug abuse treatment modality for facilitating change in drug use behaviors. The utility of CM as a treatment for waterpipe smoking is logical, but needs to be evaluated as a tool in the treatment of waterpipe smoking. The primary objective of this research plan is to test the role of CM in promoting abstinence from waterpipe tobacco smoking. The specific aims of the research include: specific aim 1: Conduct a feasibility study to test if CM promotes abstinence from nicotine delivered through waterpipe; specific aim 2: Characterize self-reported nicotine withdrawal symptoms. A randomized clinical trial involving eligible participants who are randomly assigned with equal allocation to either Contingency Management (CM) or Fixed Rate Control (FRC) will be conducted. A 2-group (CM versus FRC) x 10 (repeated measures) mixed-model design will be used. Participants in this study will be followed for 5 weeks during which smoking abstinence will be measured 10 times. Reinforcement in the form of monetary payment delivered contingent on the participant's salivary cotinine will be provided

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Waterpipe Smoking

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Waterpipe Smoking cessation Contingency management Dependence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Contingency Management

Monetary incentives are given for submitting negative saliva cotinine tests.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Contingency Management

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Monetary incentive for the CM groups is contingent on a saliva cotinine reading that indicates smoking abstinence. Participants were assessed 10 times (Mondays/Thursdays) for abstinence from smoking waterpipe verified by saliva cotinine. The maximum monetary incentives this group can receive is $192.50. The CM groups followed an escalating schedule where: 1) the dollar amount of the incentive increases by $.50 as long as the participant is abstinent at each visit;; and 2) resets to the starting incentive ($14) if the participant was non-compliant at the previous visit, but is compliant at the current visit. Also, Participants were given $10 bonus for every three consecutive compliant visits.

Fixed Rate Control

Fixed amounts of payments are provided for submitting saliva samples

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Contingency Management

Monetary incentive for the CM groups is contingent on a saliva cotinine reading that indicates smoking abstinence. Participants were assessed 10 times (Mondays/Thursdays) for abstinence from smoking waterpipe verified by saliva cotinine. The maximum monetary incentives this group can receive is $192.50. The CM groups followed an escalating schedule where: 1) the dollar amount of the incentive increases by $.50 as long as the participant is abstinent at each visit;; and 2) resets to the starting incentive ($14) if the participant was non-compliant at the previous visit, but is compliant at the current visit. Also, Participants were given $10 bonus for every three consecutive compliant visits.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must be18 years and older
* Smoked waterpipe average of \>12 times per month for 2 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Smokes cigarettes (self-report)
* Uses any tobacco product (self-report)
* Uses illicit drugs (urine analysis for toxicology)
* Interested in quitting waterpipe smoking (self-report)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Washington State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

kawkab shishani

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kawkab Shishani, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

South Campus Facility, Washington State University

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5K01DA037661-02

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link