Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-07-31
2015-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomized Pilot Study of Treatment for BCC Using the Multiplex 595/1064 nm Laser
NCT02270645
Computer-Based Continuing Education for Doctors in Examination and Counseling of Patients on Skin Cancer or Weight Control
NCT00295906
Use of Jet-injection in Photodynamic Therapy for Basal Cell Carcinoma
NCT04552990
One-stop-shop Study for Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma Using Reflectance Confocal Microscopy
NCT02285790
Optimizing Photodynamic Therapy of Cutaneous Neoplastic Diseases Via Structured Illumination and Real-time Dosimetry.
NCT00784108
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Emory Department of Dermatology has created an educational video involving treatment options for patients with newly diagnosed basal cell carcinoma as part of routine clinical care. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the video format in improving efficiency and workflow. Many studies have shown that multimedia tools improve patient education and have been more efficient than in-office verbal discussions alone. In addition, educational videos have been documented to increase patient satisfaction as well as decrease patient stress level and anxiety. Other advantages of educational videos are for the repetition and reinforcement that would benefit the patient.
Moreover, with the utilization of video, patients will receive the same comprehensive information, making the delivery reproducible and controlled. With verbal communication, there is usually no standardized interaction between staff and patients to ensure that the patient is receiving all pertinent information regarding their options. For example, a study designed to examine retention rates for verbal and written instructions, including 10 potential complications, in patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery showed an overall poor retention rate of only 26.5% just 20 minutes after being informed. It is obvious then that educational protocols need additional modalities in order to improve overall retention rates. This then suggests that information presented in video format increases knowledge retention in patients, even weeks after initial delivery of information.
Study participants will be randomly assigned to the control (Group I) - or video- (Group II) group. Participants will be randomized by clinic. Patients randomized to Group II will complete a pre-video knowledge assessment followed by viewing of the BCC educational video. Patients will complete a post-video knowledge assessment following video viewing. Group II patients will then undergo discussion of treatment options with their physician as per standard of care. After the treatment discussion, Group II patients will complete an additional knowledge assessment. After the treatment visit is complete, patients will complete a satisfaction survey. Patients randomized to Group I will not view the educational video. Group I patients will complete a pre-knowledge assessment before their standard of care discussion of treatment options with their physician. Similar to Group II, patients in Group I complete an additional knowledge assessment after the treatment discussion and a satisfaction survey at the conclusion of the treatment visit.
If there is failure of completion of a satisfaction survey in the dermatology clinic, patients (group I and group II) may be contacted via phone to complete the survey.
Physicians will be recruited to complete a satisfaction survey at the end of the day only if they provided treatment to a Group II patient (patients who viewed the video).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Video Group
Patients randomized to Group II will be emailed the educational video, pre- and post- knowledge assessments, and patient satisfaction survey with instructions on what order to fill them out. Group II patients will report to the treatment visit and undergo discussion of options and treatment as per standard of care. An additional knowledge assessment survey will be administered to Group II patients after discussion with treating physician.
Video-Based Informed Consent
Control Group
Patients randomized to Group I will be come to the clinic for the treatment visit and discuss options and treatment as per standard of care. Pre- and post- discussion knowledge assessments and satisfaction surveys will be administered at the time of the treatment visit.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Video-Based Informed Consent
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Emory University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Suephy Chen, MD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Suephy Chen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emory University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Atlanta VA Medical Center
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Armstrong AW, Alikhan A, Cheng LS, Schupp C, Kurlinkus C, Eisen DB. Portable video media for presenting informed consent and wound care instructions for skin biopsies: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2010 Nov;163(5):1014-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10067.x.
Eggers C, Obliers R, Koerfer A, Thomas W, Koehle K, Hoelscher AH, Bollschweiler E. A multimedia tool for the informed consent of patients prior to gastric banding. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Nov;15(11):2866-73. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.340.
Fleischman M, Garcia C. Informed consent in dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Sep;29(9):952-5; discussion 955. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29251.x.
Migden M, Chavez-Frazier A, Nguyen T. The use of high definition video modules for delivery of informed consent and wound care education in the Mohs Surgery Unit. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2008 Mar;27(1):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.sder.2008.02.001.
Schenker Y, Fernandez A, Sudore R, Schillinger D. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):151-73. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10364247. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
Shukla AN, Daly MK, Legutko P. Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;38(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
Weston J, Hannah M, Downes J. Evaluating the benefits of a patient information video during the informed consent process. Patient Educ Couns. 1997 Mar;30(3):239-45. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(96)00968-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DCOR-BCC
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB00074984 (VA IRB number)
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IRB00058881
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.