Improving the Concentration of MR Contrast in the Arteries
NCT ID: NCT02155218
Last Updated: 2017-10-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
26 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-06-30
2015-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This project is designed to find the best way to administer the contrast agent during CE-MRA to produce the best images. The clinical availability of programmable power injectors facilitates the use of variable contrast rate and volume injection protocols that are based on patient specific parameters.
CE-MRA is a valuable imaging tool for diagnosing abnormalities of the major blood vessels in the chest and abdomen. It is often used in conjunction with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations to evaluate the blood vessels of the heart and lung. CE-MRA is attractive because 1) it does not involve radiation, and 2) the contrast agents used are not toxic to the kidneys and can be used in patients who are at greater risk for kidney dysfunction following iodinated contrast agents.
We plan to administer a small (1cc) test amount of contrast, taking pictures as the contrast passes through the blood vessels, and analyze the results. Using this information, we will administer an individually patient-tailored injection given in multiple phases (i.e., a "multi-phasic" injection) to maintain constant contrast concentration (and therefore constant signal intensity) throughout the scan. We believe this will reduce image blurring, and improve the sharpness and likely the diagnostic quality of CE-MRA.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At present, the clinically accepted method of injecting the contrast agent is essentially the same for every patient, and has not been systematically evaluated or optimized. For most chest and abdominal CE-MRA studies contrast is injected over 5-15 seconds, and the resultant concentration of contrast agent in the arteries over the duration of the MR acquisition is not well known. What this concentration is and how it varies over time, however, has a large impact on the quality and clarity of the resulting images. This project is designed to optimize the concentration of contrast agent in the arteries during the MR scan by using the predictive results of a small "test bolus" injection to tailor the actual contrast injection for each individual patient such that concentration remains as high and as constant as possible during the time of MR acquisition. This will be accomplished by developing algorithms and software tools to tailor the optimal, patient-specific injection parameters. The method will be validated in a preliminary clinical study.
We propose that we can predict what the contrast bolus will look like (i.e., its "concentration vs. time") by first administering a small (1cc) test bolus, taking pictures as the contrast passes through the blood vessels, and analyzing the results. Using this information, we believe that an individually patient-tailored injection given in multiple phases (i.e., a "multi-phasic" injection) can create constant contrast concentration (and therefore constant signal intensity) throughout the scan, eliminating this source of image blurring, and improving the sharpness and likely the diagnostic quality of first-pass CE-MRA. Moreover, by tailoring the contrast to the duration of the scan, the contrast agent is used most efficiently and not wasted outside the acquisition duration, potentially recouping any contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) loss. It is important to note the results of this study are generalizable to CT Angiography (CTA) as well, where similar efficient use of the contrast will reduce cost and excessive patient exposure to iodinated contrast. We plan to compare an "optimized" multiphasic contrast administration to a standard single phase contrast administration.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Injection Rate
Subjects will be given a small amount of contrast (approximately 1 cc test bolus) followed by administration of the remainder of the volume of contrast they are getting for their clinical study. This will be approximately 30-40 cc, depending on patient size, given at an injection rate of 2 - 2.5 cc/second.
Standard Injection Rate
Normally an IV is placed in an arm and the gadolinium contrast (30-40 cc, depending on patient size) is administered through the IV with a power injector as a single bolus. Subjects will have a test bolus and main bolus.
gadolinium contrast
Patient Tailored Injection Rate
Subjects will be given a small amount of contrast (approximately 1 cc test bolus) followed by administration of the remainder of the volume of contrast they are getting for their clinical study. This will be approximately 30-40 cc, depending on patient size. We will use a mathematical algorithm to rapidly analyze the test bolus and calculate a predicted "best" way to inject the contrast - likely slower and "multi-phasic", meaning different flow rates as the bolus injection evolves. The injection rate will vary from 1 to 3 cc/second.
Patient Tailored Injection Rate
Normally an IV is placed in an arm and the gadolinium contrast (30-40 cc, depending on patient size) is administered through the IV with a power injector as a single bolus. Subjects will have a test bolus and main bolus. We will use a mathematical algorithm to rapidly analyze the test bolus and calculate a predicted "best" way to inject the main bolus - likely slower and "multi-phasic", meaning different flow rates as the bolus injection evolves.
gadolinium contrast
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard Injection Rate
Normally an IV is placed in an arm and the gadolinium contrast (30-40 cc, depending on patient size) is administered through the IV with a power injector as a single bolus. Subjects will have a test bolus and main bolus.
Patient Tailored Injection Rate
Normally an IV is placed in an arm and the gadolinium contrast (30-40 cc, depending on patient size) is administered through the IV with a power injector as a single bolus. Subjects will have a test bolus and main bolus. We will use a mathematical algorithm to rapidly analyze the test bolus and calculate a predicted "best" way to inject the main bolus - likely slower and "multi-phasic", meaning different flow rates as the bolus injection evolves.
gadolinium contrast
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled at University of Washington Radiology to undergo contrast-enhanced cardiac MR.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unwilling to participate;
* Prisoner;
* Pregnant;
* Contraindications for MRI:
* Metallic or other surgical implants
* History of metal work; metal pieces in your eyes or other body parts
* pacemaker
* defibrillator
* some aneurysm clips
* some artificial heart valves
* some implanted venous access device
* some cochlear/inner ear implants
* spinal stimulator
* some intrauterine devices (IUD)
* some tattoos or permanent make-up
* transdermal patch
* severe anxiety in confined spaces (claustrophobia)
* Contraindications for contrast:
* an allergic reaction to gadolinium contrast in the past that required treatment
* severe kidney or liver disease
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Washington
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeffrey Maki
Professor of Radiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeffrey H. Maki, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Washington
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wilson GJ, Maki JH. Evaluation of a tailored injection profile (TIP) algorithm for uniform contrast-enhanced signal intensity profiles in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Dec;44(6):1664-1672. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25298. Epub 2016 May 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00001892
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id