Optimization of the TB Treatment Regimen Cascade

NCT ID: NCT02153528

Last Updated: 2020-02-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

701 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2017-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

\- Hypothesis: Double dose rifampicin together with earlier monitoring of sputum conversion using vital staining reduces unfavorable outcome of Cat. 1 first-line TB treatment without excess serious toxicity, and allows early switch to specific treatment of MDR-TB without using Cat. 2 retreatment regimen

\- General study design: This open label, randomised clinical trial is intended as a pilot study on the efficacy and safety of high-dose rifampicin and feasibility and added value of auramine and/or FDA vital staining sputum smear after 2 weeks of intensive treatment phase. If this proof-of-concept study provides substantial indication of benefit without indication of excess toxicity, the data from the study will be used to design a larger scale, cluster-randomized study. The aim of this cluster randomised study would be to provide definite proof of the benefit of the intervention on adverse treatment outcomes and lack of excess toxicity associated with high dose rifampicin. In addition, the cluster-randomized study would provide a more precise assessment of the suppression and prevention of (acquired) resistance endpoints.

An interim analysis is thus planned at the time the last recruited patient finishes treatment, i.e. about 9 months after the end of recruitment. It will focus on assessment of drug toxicity versus suggested benefits of the intervention. This analysis will be primarily performed for the go/no-go decision and design considerations for the cluster-randomized trial. The decision on proceeding to the cluster randomized study will be based on the absence of excess toxicity, a trend toward a reduction of unfavourable outcomes (excluding relapse), and possible favourable effects on initially present low-resistance mutations / mutations acquired during treatment. It will also allow to adapt the design of the larger study particularly regarding the algorithm for resistance screening, and whether or not treatment shortening could be justified with rapid initial conversion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard TB treatment

Standard regimen for TB treatment according to guidelines of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard TB treatment

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard regimen for TB treatment according to guidelines of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

double rimfampicin

2HREZ/4HR Cat. 1, modified by using double dose rifampicin throughout

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

double rimfampicin

Intervention Type DRUG

Compared to standard regimen dosing of rifampicin is doubled, while standard dose isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol are maintained

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

double rimfampicin

Compared to standard regimen dosing of rifampicin is doubled, while standard dose isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol are maintained

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard TB treatment

Standard regimen for TB treatment according to guidelines of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Intervention arm Control arm

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed with smear-positive pulmonary TB
* 15 years or older
* Able and willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* contacts of MDR-TB patients and other MDR-TB suspects diagnosed with resistance on rapid DST for rifampicin performed prior to start of treatment according to NTP guidelines
* smear-negative pulmonary and extra-pulmonary TB cases
* patients in need of hospitalization because of very bad general condition or complications
* patients with clinically active liver disease, for the study defined as jaundice confirmed by a local Medical Officer (Government)
* any known HIV-positive patient (although none are expected)
* any patient with known hepatitis B or C infection
* pregnant women; in addition, patients in the intervention arm who become pregnant during treatment will be switched to the control arm
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National TB control Programme Bangladesh

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Damien Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aung Kya Jai Maug, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Damien Foundation Bangladesh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Damien Foundation Bangladesh TB project in Greater Mymensingh district (8 selected clinics)

Dhaka, Greater Mymensingh District, Bangladesh

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Bangladesh

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OneRIF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Expand New Drugs for TB [endTB]
NCT03259269 COMPLETED
Phenotyping of High Dose Rifampicin
NCT04525235 COMPLETED PHASE1
Latency in Pulmonary Tuberculosis
NCT01154959 COMPLETED PHASE3
Tuberculosis Clinical Trials Consortium Study 35
NCT03730181 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Shorter and Safer Treatment Regimens for Latent TB
NCT06498414 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3
Ultra-Short Regimen for Elderly DS-TB
NCT07076225 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3