Treatment of Pain Associated With Fibromyalgia

NCT ID: NCT02146430

Last Updated: 2020-11-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1293 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-27

Study Completion Date

2016-07-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of this trial is to compare change in weekly average daily pain score (ADPS) from baseline to Week 13 in subjects receiving either dose of DS-5565 versus placebo. Weekly ADPS is based on daily pain scores reported by the participant that best describes his or her worst pain over the previous 24 hours.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Associated With Fibromyalgia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

pain fibromyalgia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DS-5565 QD

Participants take one each of placebo tablet and capsule in the morning, and one DS-5565 tablet once daily (QD) with a placebo capsule in the evening

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DS-5565

Intervention Type DRUG

DS-5565 15 mg tablet for oral administration

Placebo tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet (matching DS-5565) for oral administration

Placebo capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule (matching pregabalin) for oral administration

DS-5565 BID

Participants take one DS-5565 tablet and one placebo capsule, twice daily (BID)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

DS-5565

Intervention Type DRUG

DS-5565 15 mg tablet for oral administration

Placebo capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule (matching pregabalin) for oral administration

Pregabalin

Participants take one pregabalin capsule and one placebo tablet BID

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pregabalin

Intervention Type DRUG

Pregabalin 150 mg capsule for oral administration

Placebo tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet (matching DS-5565) for oral administration

Placebo

Participants take one each of placebo tablet and capsule BID

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet (matching DS-5565) for oral administration

Placebo capsule

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule (matching pregabalin) for oral administration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DS-5565

DS-5565 15 mg tablet for oral administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Pregabalin

Pregabalin 150 mg capsule for oral administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo tablet

Placebo tablet (matching DS-5565) for oral administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo capsule

Placebo capsule (matching pregabalin) for oral administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

mirogabalin Lyrica Placebo matching DS-5565 Placebo matching pregabalin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Able to give written informed consent
* Able to complete participant-reported questionnaires per the investigator's judgment
* At screening, participants must meet the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for fibromyalgia (FM), i.e. widespread pain present for at least 3 months and pain in at least 11 of 18 specific tender point sites. In addition, the 2010 ACR criteria must be met:
* Widespread pain index (WPI) ≥ 7 and symptom severity (SS) scale score ≥ 5, or WPI 3 to 6 and SS scale score ≥ 9
* Symptoms have been present at a similar level for at least 3 months
* The subject does not have a disorder that would otherwise explain the pain
* ADPS of ≥ 4 on the 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) over the past 7 days prior to randomization (based on completion of at least 4 daily pain diaries during the 7-day baseline period prior to randomization)
* Subject must have documented evidence of a fundoscopic examination (with pupil dilation) within 12 months prior to screening or at screening.
* Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy during the study and for 4 weeks after study completion.

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinically significant unstable neurologic, psychiatric, ophthalmologic, hepatobiliary, respiratory, or hematologic illness or unstable cardiovascular disease (e.g. severe hypotension, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, or myocardial infarction) or any other concurrent disease within 12 months prior to screening that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with study participation or assessment of safety and tolerability
* Anticipation of initiation or significant change to normal daily exercise routines or need for ongoing use of concomitant medications or non-pharmacological pain management techniques that may confound assessments of efficacy and/or safety
* Unable to undergo pre-study washout of prohibited concomitant medications
* Subjects who are at risk of suicide as defined by their responses to the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) or in the opinion of the investigator. Note: Patients answering "yes" to any of the questions about active suicidal ideation/intent/behaviors occurring within the past 12 months must be excluded (C-SSRS Suicide Ideation section - Questions 3, 4, or 5; C-SSRS Suicidal Behavior section, any of the suicide behaviors questions). Such patients should be referred immediately to a mental health professional for appropriate evaluation.
* Current severe or uncontrolled major depressive disorder or anxiety disorders as assessed by the Mini-international Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) mild to moderate major depression or anxiety disorders are permitted provided that the investigator assesses the patient as clinically stable and appropriate for entry into the study.
* Any diagnosis of lifetime bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder
* Participants with pain due to other conditions (e.g. diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain or post-herpetic neuralgia) that in the opinion of the investigator, would confound assessment or self-evaluation of the pain associated with FM.
* Participants with pain due to any widespread inflammatory musculoskeletal disorder (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, lupus) or widespread rheumatic disease other than FM.
* Abuse or dependence of prescription medications, street drugs, or alcohol within the last 1 year
* Any history of a malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma within the past 5 years
* A diagnosis of untreated sleep apnea or initiation of treatment for sleep apnea within the past 3 months
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding, or intent to become pregnant during the study period
* Participant is currently enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 30 days since ending another investigational device or drug study or is receiving other investigational agents.
* Known hypersensitivity to alpha2-delta (α2δ) ligands or other components of the study medications. Note: Prior exposure to DS-5565 is allowed, as long as hypersensitivity to DS-5565 was not observed.
* Participants who are unlikely to comply with the protocol (e.g. uncooperative attitude, inability to return for subsequent visits) and/or otherwise considered by the investigator to be unlikely to complete the study.
* Abnormal investigative tests (i.e. electrocardiograms \[ECGs\]) and laboratory values judged by the investigator to be clinically significant at screening, with particular focus on: a. Abnormal renal function defined as calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) \< 60 mL/min determined by the central laboratory using the modified Cockcroft-Gault equation; blood urea nitrogen\> 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN); creatine kinase \> 3.0 × ULN; serum creatinine \> 1.6 mg/dL (\> 141.4 μmol/L); b. Abnormal liver function defined as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 2.0 × ULN, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \> 2.0 × ULN; alkaline phosphatase \> 1.5 × ULN; total bilirubin\> 1.2 × ULN. If a subject has total bilirubin \> 1.2 ULN, unconjugated and conjugated bilirubin fractions should be analyzed and only participants documented to have Gilbert's syndrome may be enrolled.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Syneos Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Daiichi Sankyo

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Global Clinical Leader

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Daiichi Sankyo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Glendale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Los Alamitos, California, United States

Site Status

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Rancho Mirage, California, United States

Site Status

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Sherman Oaks, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Cromwell, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Danbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Brooksville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Coral Springs, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Port Orange, Florida, United States

Site Status

Royal Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sanford, Florida, United States

Site Status

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Elwood, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Newton, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wheaton, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Fall River, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Methuen, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Southfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Biloxi, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Berlin, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Princeton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Stratford, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

West Long Branch, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Hartsdale, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Valley Stream, New York, United States

Site Status

Williamsville, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fountain Inn, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Summerville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Tullahoma, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Allen, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Carrollton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

DeSoto, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Mesquite, Texas, United States

Site Status

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Richardson, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bountiful, Utah, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Burlington, , Canada

Site Status

Edmonton, , Canada

Site Status

Kentville, , Canada

Site Status

Kitchener, , Canada

Site Status

London, , Canada

Site Status

Markham, , Canada

Site Status

Mississauga, , Canada

Site Status

Newmarket, , Canada

Site Status

Oshawa, , Canada

Site Status

Penticton, , Canada

Site Status

Pointe-Claire, , Canada

Site Status

Sarnia, , Canada

Site Status

Sherbrooke, , Canada

Site Status

Toronto, , Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, , Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, , Canada

Site Status

Choceň, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Rychnov nad Kněžnou, , Czechia

Site Status

Říčany, , Czechia

Site Status

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Hyvinkää, , Finland

Site Status

Kokkola, , Finland

Site Status

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Cubray, , France

Site Status

Élancourt, , France

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Saint-Etienne, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Bad Doberan, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Böhlen, , Germany

Site Status

Chemnitz, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Cottbus, , Germany

Site Status

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Eichstätt, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Fellbach, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Mönchengladbach, , Germany

Site Status

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Rodgau, , Germany

Site Status

Stadtroda, , Germany

Site Status

Wallerfing, , Germany

Site Status

Weinheim, , Germany

Site Status

Westerstede, , Germany

Site Status

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Beek, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Sneek, , Netherlands

Site Status

Ålesund, , Norway

Site Status

Hamar, , Norway

Site Status

Hønefoss, , Norway

Site Status

Kløfta, , Norway

Site Status

Lier, , Norway

Site Status

Lillehammer, , Norway

Site Status

Stavanger, , Norway

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Kragujevac, , Serbia

Site Status

Niš, , Serbia

Site Status

Novi Sad, , Serbia

Site Status

Borås, , Sweden

Site Status

Mölndal, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Czechia Denmark Finland France Germany Netherlands Norway Serbia Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arnold LM, Whitaker S, Hsu C, Jacobs D, Merante D. Efficacy and safety of mirogabalin for the treatment of fibromyalgia: results from three 13-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group studies and a 52-week open-label extension study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Oct;35(10):1825-1835. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1629757. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31284771 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-005161-40

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DS5565-A-E309

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id