Ultrathin Bronchoscope and Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound (R-EBUS) With Fluoroscopy Versus Standard Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy (FB) (P00029233 )
NCT ID: NCT02146131
Last Updated: 2018-09-25
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
339 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-07-31
2017-07-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This will give the doctor an opportunity to use either of the bronchoscopy methods described above and compare the tests to see if R-EBUS provides better results than standard bronchoscopy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combined Application of EBUS and EUS in Lung Cancer
NCT01385111
Study Comparing EBUS & EUS to Mediastinoscopy in Staging and Detection of Lung Cancer
NCT00970645
Tri-modality Sampling Using Radial Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions
NCT06123312
Thin and Ultrathin Bronchoscopy With Transbronchial Needle Aspiration and Radial Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions
NCT04331587
Endobronchial Ultrasound Needle Aspiration With and Without Suction
NCT05110950
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard FB with fluoroscopy
Administration of moderate or deep sedation, introduction of standard adult bronchoscope into the airway. Following application of topical anesthesia on vocal cord, trachea, bronchoscope is advanced distally under direct visualization. Localization of the lesion using fluoroscopy followed by the acquisition of pathologic and cytologic specimens using standard bronchial brush and standard transbronchial biopsy forceps. Evaluation of acquired samples for pathology. Performance of a portable chest X-ray to look for pneumothorax (PTX).
Standard FB with fluoroscopy
Technique used, to go through the patient's airway, locate and obtain samples from pulmonary lesions
R-EBUS with ultrathin bronchoscope
Administration of moderate or deep sedation, introduction of ultrathin bronchoscope into the airway. Following application of topical anesthesia on vocal cord, trachea, bronchoscope is advanced distally under direct visualization. Attempt to definitively locate the lesion with mechanical R-EBUS probe.
Acquisition of pathologic and cytologic specimens using standard bronchial brush and standard transbronchial biopsy forceps. Performance of a portable chest X-ray to look for PTX.
R-EBUS with ultrathin bronchoscope
Technique used to go through the patient's airway and using radial ultrasound, locate and obtain samples from pulmonary lesions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard FB with fluoroscopy
Technique used, to go through the patient's airway, locate and obtain samples from pulmonary lesions
R-EBUS with ultrathin bronchoscope
Technique used to go through the patient's airway and using radial ultrasound, locate and obtain samples from pulmonary lesions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with a solid lung lesion 2-5cm identified on chest CT that are surgical candidates with a high probability of cancer (\>65%) will be referred for surgical evaluation. If the lesion is partially solid (ie there is a ground glass component) then the solid portion must make up \>75% of the lesion and measure at 2-5cm. If the patient refuses surgery or if the surgeon requests a definitive diagnosis prior to surgery the patient will have the option to be included in this study. All sites will use the same online calculator to document probability of malignancy.
3. Are at least 22 years old,
4. Lack Bleeding disorders, and
5. Are able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with endobronchial involvement seen on chest CT.
3. Patients who refuse to participate,
4. Are less than 22 years of age,
5. Lack fitness to undergo flexible bronchoscopy as determined by the bronchoscopist prior to procedure, and
6. Are unable to provide informed consent
7. Pregnant
22 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Olympus
INDUSTRY
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
Medstar Health Research Institute
OTHER
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Medical University of South Carolina
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nichole T Tanner, MD, M.S.C.R
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of South Carolina
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medstar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Washington University Saint Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
00029233
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.