Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus the Combination of Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel in Patients With HER2-positive Breast Cancer (NCT NCT02144012)
NCT ID: NCT02144012
Last Updated: 2017-03-07
Results Overview
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, on the basis of investigator assessments. Progression was defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm) or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
49 participants
At time of clinical data cut-off (up to 20 months)
2017-03-07
Participant Flow
Only 49 participants of the originally planned 561 participants were enrolled in the study at the time of study termination.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
34
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
34
|
15
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
11
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Study Terminated by Sponsor
|
18
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
3
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus the Combination of Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel in Patients With HER2-positive Breast Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
Total
n=49 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
51.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=7 Participants
|
53.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of clinical data cut-off (up to 20 months)Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, on the basis of investigator assessments. Progression was defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm) or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
|
10.3 months
Interval 4.2 to
Not Available (NA) = parameter not estimable due to small number of participants included in analysis
|
8.2 months
Interval 6.0 to 13.8
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of clinical data cut-off (up to 20 months)Population: The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
|
94.1 percentage of participants
|
100 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of clinical data cut-off (up to 20 months)Population: The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
Grade 3 and 4 AEs were evaluated according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.0. Grade 3 was defined as severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care activities of daily living, including bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding self, using the toilet, taking medications, and not bedridden. Grade 4 was defined as life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 AEs
|
20.6 percentage of participants
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of clinical data cut-off (up to 20 months)Population: The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
|
14.7 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of clinical data cut-off (up to 20 months)Population: The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Treatment Interruption
|
11.8 percentage of participants
|
33.3 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of clinical data cut-off (up to 20 months)Population: The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Dose Reduction
|
2.9 percentage of participants
|
26.7 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of clinical data cut-off (up to 20 months)Population: The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
Significant decline in LVEF was defined as LVEF below 50% and decrease from baseline of 15% points or more. Echocardiogram or multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan was used to assess LVEF.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Significant Decline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of clinical data cut-off (up to 20 months)Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
|
NA months
NA = parameter not estimable due to small number of participants included in analysis
|
NA months
NA = parameter not estimable due to small number of participants included in analysis
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 12 monthsPopulation: The ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Participants, for whom data were collected, are included in the analysis for this outcome measure.
One-year survival rate as determined by Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=8 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=8 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
One-Year Survival Rate
|
92.31 percentage of participants
Interval 56.64 to 98.88
|
100.00 percentage of participants
NA = parameter not estimable due to small number of participants included in analysis
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 24 monthsPopulation: Data for this outcome measure were not collected and are therefore not reported. The study was terminated before the time point for data collection of this outcome measure.
OS truncated at 2 years was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause, with deaths occurring beyond 2 years after the participant's randomization date censored at 2 years.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of clinical data cut-off (up to 20 months)Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Participants, for whom data were collected, are included in the analysis for this outcome measure.
ORR was defined as percentage of participants with partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) determined on the basis of investigator assessments with the use of RECIST v1.1. Tumor assessments were performed with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. CR: disappearance of all target lesions; PR: \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Objective Response Rate (OR) = CR + PR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=27 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=14 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
|
48.1 percentage of participants
Interval 28.67 to 68.05
|
71.4 percentage of participants
Interval 41.9 to 89.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of clinical data cut-off (up to 20 months)Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Participants, for whom data were collected, are included in the analysis for this outcome measure.
DOR was defined as the time from the date of initial confirmed PR or CR to the date of disease progression or death within the study. CR: disappearance of all target lesions; PR: \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. Disease progression was defined according to RECIST, v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=13 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=10 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response (DOR)
|
NA months
Interval 3.5 to
NA = parameter not estimable due to small number of participants included in analysis
|
6.2 months
Interval 4.1 to 11.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 (Day 1), Day 1, Cycle 2 (Day 22), Day 1, Cycle 4 (Day 64) and at study drug completion or discontinuation visit (up to 20 months)Population: No PK analyses were performed as no participants were enrolled from China and no samples were collected.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were to be determined in a subset of participants. PK samples from the first 100 Chinese participants were planned to be collected.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1, Cycle 1 (Day 1), Day 1, Cycle 4 (Day 64) and at study drug completion or discontinuation visit (up to 20 months)Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with at least one post-dose sample available for ATA analysis were analyzed for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=33 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Immunogenicity: Percentage of Positive Anti-Therapeutic Antibody (ATA) Response to Trastuzumab Emtansine
|
3.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: On the first Day of each 21-day Cycle (Day 1, 22, 43, etc.) and at study drug completion or discontinuation visit (up to 20 months)Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
The FACT-B (version 4) is a self-reported instrument which measures health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of participants with breast cancer.The FACT-B includes the breast cancer sub-scale (BCS) and is comprised of nine items specific to assessing patients' HRQOL in breast cancer.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 8 Day 1
|
16 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 9 Day 1
|
15 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 1 Day 1
|
34 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 2 Day 1
|
34 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 3 Day 1
|
33 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 4 Day 1
|
30 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 5 Day 1
|
27 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 6 Day 1
|
23 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 7 Day 1
|
18 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 10 Day 1
|
12 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 11 Day 1
|
11 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 12 Day 1
|
9 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 13 Day 1
|
8 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 14 Day 1
|
7 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 15 Day 1
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 16 Day 1
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 17 Day 1
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 18 Day 1
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 19 Day 1
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Cycle 20 Day 1
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire
Study Drug Completion/Discontinuation Visit
|
33 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1 and 8 of Cycles 1 and 2 and on the first day of each subsequent 21-day cycle thereafter as well as at study drug completion or discontinuation visit (up to 20 months)Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
The FACT - Taxane is a self-reported instrument which measures the HRQOL of participants receiving taxane containing chemotherapy. The FACT-Taxane consists of 16 items and was designed to assess the impact of taxane treatment-related symptoms from the participant's perspective.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 Participants
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 1 Day 1
|
27 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 1 Day 8
|
27 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 2 Day 1
|
29 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 2 Day 8
|
29 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 3 Day 1
|
33 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 4 Day 1
|
30 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 5 Day 1
|
27 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 6 Day 1
|
23 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 7 Day 1
|
18 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 8 Day 1
|
16 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 9 Day 1
|
15 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 10 Day 1
|
12 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 11 Day 1
|
11 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 12 Day 1
|
9 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 13 Day 1
|
8 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 14 Day 1
|
7 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 15 Day 1
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 16 Day 1
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 17 Day 1
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 18 Day 1
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 19 Day 1
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Cycle 20 Day 1
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes: Number of Participants Who Completed the FACT-Taxane Questionnaire
Study Drug Completion/Discontinuation Visit
|
33 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 participants at risk
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 participants at risk
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
20.0%
3/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Post procedural cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperammonaemia
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Normal pressure hydrocephalus
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Arm A: Trastuzumab Emtansine
n=34 participants at risk
Participants were administered trastuzumab emtansine once every three weeks (Q3W). Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab Emtansine: Trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV) over 30-90 minutes Q3W.
|
Arm B: Trastuzumab + Docetaxel
n=15 participants at risk
Participants were administered trastuzumab plus docetaxel Q3W. Participants could remain on study treatment until investigator assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Sponsor study termination occurs, whichever occurs first.
Trastuzumab: For the first three-week cycle, trastuzumab was administered IV at 8 mg/kg. For subsequent cycles, trastuzumab was administered IV at 6 mg/kg Q3W.
Docetaxel: Docetaxel was administered IV at either 75 milligrams/square meter (mg/m\^2) or 100 mg/m\^2 Q3W.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
26.7%
4/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
40.0%
6/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
20.6%
7/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation decreased
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
14.7%
5/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
26.7%
4/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
20.6%
7/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
73.3%
11/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
32.4%
11/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
20.0%
3/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
33.3%
5/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
11.8%
4/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Chest discomfort
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Device occlusion
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Extravasation
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Face oedema
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
26.5%
9/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Feeling cold
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Generalised oedema
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
26.7%
4/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
33.3%
5/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
20.0%
3/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Central nervous system infection
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Groin infection
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Laryngitis
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
38.2%
13/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
26.7%
4/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Seroma
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
17.6%
6/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
23.5%
8/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
26.7%
4/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
17.6%
6/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Limb discomfort
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
32.4%
11/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
53.3%
8/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
26.7%
4/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
32.4%
11/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
33.3%
5/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
23.5%
8/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
53.3%
8/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination, auditory
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
20.0%
3/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary incontinence
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast discharge
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast pain
|
14.7%
5/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
29.4%
10/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
20.0%
3/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
11.8%
4/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
66.7%
10/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperkeratosis
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nail discolouration
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
13.3%
2/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nail disorder
|
2.9%
1/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
20.0%
3/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nail ridging
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
20.0%
3/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
5.9%
2/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
0.00%
0/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
8.8%
3/34 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Up to 19 months
The safety analysis population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety analyses were based on the treatment that participants actually received.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER