Comparison Between Two Dose Levels of Daunorubicin and Between One vs. Two Induction Cycles for Adult Patients With AML

NCT ID: NCT02140242

Last Updated: 2023-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

721 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-16

Study Completion Date

2022-04-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The proposed trial will address two clinically important questions for younger patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML): the optimal dose of daunorubicin in induction therapy and the necessity of a second induction cycle in patients with a good response after the first induction. The primary endpoint is the rate of good responders. Secondary outcomes will be relapse-free survival, overall survival and minimal residual disease kinetics. Patients will be recruited in about 40 treatment centers of the Study Alliance Leukemia study group over a period of 40 months. The results will be of great clinical relevance: First, the study could facilitate the establishment or confirmation of the optimal daunorubicin dose.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the first part of the trial, patients will be randomly assigned to receive either 90 mg/m2 or 60 mg/m2 daunorubicin in the first induction cycle in addition to standard dosed cytarabine. Assuming a superiority of 90 mg/m2, 436 patients will be recruited. In the second part of the trial, good responders will be randomized to receive either a second or no further induction cycle. Assuming a non-inferiority of the single induction regarding the rate of complete remissions, a number of 360 patients will be included in the second part. Furthermore, in case of a non-inferiority of single versus double induction in good responders, about half of all younger AML patients could be spared a second induction cycle, leading to a reduction in treatment-related mortality, fewer days spent in hospital and improved quality of life.

As a result of the preplanned interim analysis of part I, the sponsor decided to suspend randomization in trial part I and to offer all patients the standard dose of 60 mg/m2 daunorubicin in both induction cycles (part I and II of the trial). Because of this an Amendment was sent to and approved by regulatories and ethics comitee.

The inclusion age was raised to 65 years based on the current German treatment guidelines in which patients up to the age of 65 are considered eligible for intensive induction chemotherapy with DA60 \[Onkopedia-Leitlinie 2017\].

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Leukemia, Myelocytic, Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

daunorubicin 60 mg/m2

study part 1 - dose daunorubicin standard dose daunorubicin in induction 1 (60 mg/m2) on days 3-5

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

study part 1 - dose daunorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

standard induction dose of daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 on days 3-5

Double induction

study part 2: induction cycles double induction (only patients with good response)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

induction cycles

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

single induction cycle versus double induction cycles (only patients with good response after first induction) Allocation is randomized for cytogenetic risk.

Single induction

study part 2: induction cycles single induction (only patients with good response)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

induction cycles

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

single induction cycle versus double induction cycles (only patients with good response after first induction) Allocation is randomized for cytogenetic risk.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

study part 1 - dose daunorubicin

standard induction dose of daunorubicin 60 mg/m2 on days 3-5

Intervention Type DRUG

induction cycles

single induction cycle versus double induction cycles (only patients with good response after first induction) Allocation is randomized for cytogenetic risk.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Newly diagnosed AML other than acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) according to WHO criteria, i.e. bone marrow aspirate or biopsy must contain ≥20% blasts of all nucleated cells or differential blood count must contain ≥20% blasts. In acute erythroid leukemia, ≥20% blasts in all non-erythroid bone marrow cells. In AML defined by cytogenetic aberrations, the rate of blasts may be \<20%. Secondary AMLs are eligible for inclusion.
* Age 18- inkl.65 years
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
* Adequate liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory requirements to be conducted within 7 days prior to screening:

* Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
* alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) ≤ 2.5 times upper limit of normal

Exclusion Criteria

* Adequate cardiac function, i.e. left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥ 50% as assessed by transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography ("M Mode") or multiple gated acquisition scan (MUGA scan)
* Signed informed consent
* Women must fulfill at least one of the following criteria in order to be eligible for trial inclusion:

* Post-menopausal (12 months of natural amenorrhea or 6 months of amenorrhea with Serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) \> 40 U/ml)
* Postoperative (i.e. 6 weeks) after bilateral ovariectomy with or without hysterectomy
* Continuous and correct application of a contraception method with a Pearl Index of \<1% (e.g. implants, depots, oral contraceptives, intrauterine device - IUD).
* Sexual abstinence
* Vasectomy of the sexual partner


* Patients who are not eligible for standard chemotherapy as assessed by the treating physician
* Central nervous system manifestation of AML
* Cardiac disease: i.e. heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV; unstable coronary artery disease (MI more than 6 months prior to study entry is permitted); serious cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy
* Patients undergoing renal dialysis
* Chronic pulmonary disease with clinical relevant hypoxia
* Known HIV or Hepatitis infection
* Uncontrolled active infection
* Medical conditions other than AML with an estimated life expectancy below 6 months
* Previous treatment of AML except hydroxyurea up to 5 days
* Relapsed or primary refractory AML
* Acute promyelocytic leukemia
* Previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy
* Treatment with any known non-marketed drug substance or experimental therapy within 4 weeks prior to enrollment
* Incapability of understanding purpose and possible consequences of the trial
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
* Evidence suggesting that the patient is not likely to follow the study protocol (e.g. lacking compliance)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Dresden

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Masaryk University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Technische Universität Dresden

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christoph Röllig, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medizinische Fakultät der TU Dresden, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Interní klinika LF Masarykovy univerzity a Fakultní nemocnice Brno

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Faculty Hospital Hradec Králové, II. Clinic of international medicine

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Ústav hematologie a krevní transfuze (ÚHKT)

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Uniklinik RWTH Aachen

Aachen, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Altenburger Land GmbH

Altenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Augsburg

Augsburg, , Germany

Site Status

Sozialstiftung Bamberg Klinikum am Bruderwald

Bamberg, , Germany

Site Status

Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Bielefeld

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Augusta Kliniken Bochum Hattingen

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Ev. Diakonie-Krankenhaus gGmbH Bremen

Bremen, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Chemnitz GmbH

Chemnitz, , Germany

Site Status

Carl.Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus gGmbH

Cottbus, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Krankenhaus Düren gem. GmbH

Düren, , Germany

Site Status

Marienhospital Düsseldorf GmbH

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Essen

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale)

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Asklepios Klinik St. Georg

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

St. Marien-Hospital Hamm

Hamm, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

St. Bernward Krankenhaus Hildesheim

Hildesheim, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Jena

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH

Kaiserslautern, , Germany

Site Status

Städtisches Krankenhaus Kiel

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein GmbH

Koblenz, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Leipzig

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg

Marburg, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Münster

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Nürnberg-Nord

Nuremberg, , Germany

Site Status

Diakonie-Klinikum Schwäbisch Hall gGmbH

Schwäbisch Hall, , Germany

Site Status

Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

Rems-Murr-Klinikum Winnenden

Winnenden, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Czechia Germany

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TUD-2DAUNO-058

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

HDM201 Added to CT in R/R or Newly Diagnosed AML
NCT03760445 WITHDRAWN PHASE1/PHASE2