Trial Outcomes & Findings for Sugar Champ: Pilot Social Network Intervention to Reduce Intake of Sugary Drinks (NCT NCT02138240)
NCT ID: NCT02138240
Last Updated: 2019-07-09
Results Overview
Number of sessions attended calculated from attendance sign-in sheets. This is used for the assessment of program feasibility.
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
3 months
2019-07-09
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Social Network Intervention
Individuals will be recruited and trained to be "Peer Educators" who will participate in group sessions and then communicate this information with members of their social network ("Sidekick") and work to make changes to reduce intake of sugar-sweetened beverages. Peer Educators will participate in 6 core group sessions over a 6-week period as well as 3 additional booster sessions over the subsequent 3 months after completing the core curriculum. All sessions will be delivered by a facilitator and assistant facilitator using a guide.
Social network intervention: The intervention combined a social network approach with strategies that address public housing residents' challenges related to the built environment to improve dietary habits. Given the frequent intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) in this population, the intervention focused on reducing added sugar intake through the reduced consumption of SSB.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Limited to only Sidekicks
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Social Network Intervention
n=34 Participants
Individuals will be recruited and trained to be "Peer Educators" who will participate in group sessions and then communicate this information with members of their social network ("Sidekick") and work to make changes to reduce intake of sugar-sweetened beverages. Peer Educators will participate in 6 core group sessions over a 6-week period as well as 3 additional booster sessions over the subsequent 3 months after completing the core curriculum. All sessions will be delivered by a facilitator and assistant facilitator using a guide.
Social network intervention: The intervention combined a social network approach with strategies that address public housing residents' challenges related to the built environment to improve dietary habits. Given the frequent intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) in this population, the intervention focused on reducing added sugar intake through the reduced consumption of SSB.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=34 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
27 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African-American
|
33 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
1 Participants
n=34 Participants
|
|
Added sugar intake total sample
|
38.0 teaspoons/day
n=34 Participants
|
|
Added Sugar Intake among Sidekicks
|
37.0 teaspoons/day
n=17 Participants • Limited to only Sidekicks
|
|
Added Sugar Intake among Peer Educators
|
42.4 teaspoons/day
n=17 Participants • Limited to only Peer Educators
|
|
Weight, continuous
|
85.9 kg
n=34 Participants
|
|
Body mass index, continuous
|
32.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 • n=34 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: Limited to Peer Educators who had the opportunity to attend the sessions.
Number of sessions attended calculated from attendance sign-in sheets. This is used for the assessment of program feasibility.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Social Network Intervention
n=17 Participants
Individuals will be recruited and trained to be "Peer Educators" who will participate in group sessions and then communicate this information with members of their social network ("Sidekick") and work to make changes to reduce intake of sugar-sweetened beverages. Peer Educators will participate in 6 core group sessions over a 6-week period as well as 3 additional booster sessions over the subsequent 3 months after completing the core curriculum. All sessions will be delivered by a facilitator and assistant facilitator using a guide.
Social network intervention: The intervention combined a social network approach with strategies that address public housing residents' challenges related to the built environment to improve dietary habits. Given the frequent intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) in this population, the intervention focused on reducing added sugar intake through the reduced consumption of SSB.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Sessions Attended
|
9 Number of sessions
Interval 4.0 to 9.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsSurvey question assesses participant satisfaction with the intervention using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = Very satisfied; 2= Somewhat satisfied; 3 = Somewhat dissatisfied; 4 = Very dissatisfied). This is used for the assessment of program acceptability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Social Network Intervention
n=34 Participants
Individuals will be recruited and trained to be "Peer Educators" who will participate in group sessions and then communicate this information with members of their social network ("Sidekick") and work to make changes to reduce intake of sugar-sweetened beverages. Peer Educators will participate in 6 core group sessions over a 6-week period as well as 3 additional booster sessions over the subsequent 3 months after completing the core curriculum. All sessions will be delivered by a facilitator and assistant facilitator using a guide.
Social network intervention: The intervention combined a social network approach with strategies that address public housing residents' challenges related to the built environment to improve dietary habits. Given the frequent intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) in this population, the intervention focused on reducing added sugar intake through the reduced consumption of SSB.
|
|---|---|
|
Participant Satisfaction as Assessed by 4-point Likert Scale
Very satisfied
|
30 Participants
|
|
Participant Satisfaction as Assessed by 4-point Likert Scale
Somewhat satisfied
|
4 Participants
|
|
Participant Satisfaction as Assessed by 4-point Likert Scale
Somewhat dissatisfied
|
0 Participants
|
|
Participant Satisfaction as Assessed by 4-point Likert Scale
Very dissatisfied
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsSurvey question assesses willingness to recommend that a friend participate using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = Very likely; 2= Somewhat likely; 3 = Somewhat unlikely; 4 = Very unlikely). This is used to assess the program acceptability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Social Network Intervention
n=34 Participants
Individuals will be recruited and trained to be "Peer Educators" who will participate in group sessions and then communicate this information with members of their social network ("Sidekick") and work to make changes to reduce intake of sugar-sweetened beverages. Peer Educators will participate in 6 core group sessions over a 6-week period as well as 3 additional booster sessions over the subsequent 3 months after completing the core curriculum. All sessions will be delivered by a facilitator and assistant facilitator using a guide.
Social network intervention: The intervention combined a social network approach with strategies that address public housing residents' challenges related to the built environment to improve dietary habits. Given the frequent intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) in this population, the intervention focused on reducing added sugar intake through the reduced consumption of SSB.
|
|---|---|
|
Participant's Likelihood to Recommend Program Assessed by 4-point Likert Scale
Very likely
|
31 Participants
|
|
Participant's Likelihood to Recommend Program Assessed by 4-point Likert Scale
Somewhat likely
|
3 Participants
|
|
Participant's Likelihood to Recommend Program Assessed by 4-point Likert Scale
Somewhat unlikely
|
0 Participants
|
|
Participant's Likelihood to Recommend Program Assessed by 4-point Likert Scale
Very unlikely
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsParticipants answered questions from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 5-factor dietary screener, and relevant elements as recommended by NHIS were combined to estimate the daily added sugar intake (i.e.,soda, sugar-sweetened beverages, sweets and doughnuts). At 6 months, this measure ranged (min-max) from 9.1 to 56.0 teaspoons/day in this sample. The American Heart Association recommends that all adults limit their added sugar intake to no more than 9 teaspoons per day.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Social Network Intervention
n=34 Participants
Individuals will be recruited and trained to be "Peer Educators" who will participate in group sessions and then communicate this information with members of their social network ("Sidekick") and work to make changes to reduce intake of sugar-sweetened beverages. Peer Educators will participate in 6 core group sessions over a 6-week period as well as 3 additional booster sessions over the subsequent 3 months after completing the core curriculum. All sessions will be delivered by a facilitator and assistant facilitator using a guide.
Social network intervention: The intervention combined a social network approach with strategies that address public housing residents' challenges related to the built environment to improve dietary habits. Given the frequent intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) in this population, the intervention focused on reducing added sugar intake through the reduced consumption of SSB.
|
|---|---|
|
Added Sugar Intake (Teaspoons/Day) Among Total Sample at Follow up
|
17.2 teaspoons/day
Interval 11.2 to 27.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Limited to Sidekicks only
Participants answered questions from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 5-factor dietary screener, and relevant elements as recommended by NHIS were combined to estimate the daily added sugar intake (i.e.,soda, sugar-sweetened beverages, sweets and doughnuts). The American Heart Association recommends that all adults limit their added sugar intake to no more than 9 teaspoons per day.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Social Network Intervention
n=17 Participants
Individuals will be recruited and trained to be "Peer Educators" who will participate in group sessions and then communicate this information with members of their social network ("Sidekick") and work to make changes to reduce intake of sugar-sweetened beverages. Peer Educators will participate in 6 core group sessions over a 6-week period as well as 3 additional booster sessions over the subsequent 3 months after completing the core curriculum. All sessions will be delivered by a facilitator and assistant facilitator using a guide.
Social network intervention: The intervention combined a social network approach with strategies that address public housing residents' challenges related to the built environment to improve dietary habits. Given the frequent intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) in this population, the intervention focused on reducing added sugar intake through the reduced consumption of SSB.
|
|---|---|
|
Added Sugar Intake (Teaspoons/Day) Among Alters ("Sidekicks") at Follow up
|
16.9 teaspoons/day
Interval 12.7 to 27.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Limited to Peer Educators
Participants answered questions from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 5-factor dietary screener, and relevant elements as recommended by NHIS were combined to estimate the daily added sugar intake (i.e.,soda, sugar-sweetened beverages, sweets and doughnuts). The American Heart Association recommends that all adults limit their added sugar intake to no more than 9 teaspoons per day.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Social Network Intervention
n=17 Participants
Individuals will be recruited and trained to be "Peer Educators" who will participate in group sessions and then communicate this information with members of their social network ("Sidekick") and work to make changes to reduce intake of sugar-sweetened beverages. Peer Educators will participate in 6 core group sessions over a 6-week period as well as 3 additional booster sessions over the subsequent 3 months after completing the core curriculum. All sessions will be delivered by a facilitator and assistant facilitator using a guide.
Social network intervention: The intervention combined a social network approach with strategies that address public housing residents' challenges related to the built environment to improve dietary habits. Given the frequent intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) in this population, the intervention focused on reducing added sugar intake through the reduced consumption of SSB.
|
|---|---|
|
Added Sugar Intake (Teaspoons/Day) Among Egos ("Peer Educators") at Follow up
|
17.4 teaspoons/day
Interval 11.2 to 24.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsWeight (kg) measured using standard methods
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Social Network Intervention
n=34 Participants
Individuals will be recruited and trained to be "Peer Educators" who will participate in group sessions and then communicate this information with members of their social network ("Sidekick") and work to make changes to reduce intake of sugar-sweetened beverages. Peer Educators will participate in 6 core group sessions over a 6-week period as well as 3 additional booster sessions over the subsequent 3 months after completing the core curriculum. All sessions will be delivered by a facilitator and assistant facilitator using a guide.
Social network intervention: The intervention combined a social network approach with strategies that address public housing residents' challenges related to the built environment to improve dietary habits. Given the frequent intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) in this population, the intervention focused on reducing added sugar intake through the reduced consumption of SSB.
|
|---|---|
|
Median Weight at Follow up
|
84.3 kg
Interval 74.7 to 100.4
|
Adverse Events
Social Network Intervention
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Kimberly Gudzune
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place