A Double-blind Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of E3810 10mg Once and Twice Daily in Maintenance Therapy for PPI Resistant Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients

NCT ID: NCT02135107

Last Updated: 2023-06-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

517 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole 10mg once and twice daily in maintenance therapy for PPI resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind trial that investigates the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole 10mg twice daily over a period of 52 weeks. The 8-week Treatment Period (unblinded) was followed by a 52-week Maintenance Period (blinded). Participants with cure (modified Los Angeles Classification Grade N or Grade M) at the final endoscopy of the Treatment Period were entered into the Maintenance Period. Participants without cure were discontinued from the study. The participants in the Treatment Period were randomized to take Arm C or Arm D at a ratio of 1:1. The non-recurrence rate as endoscopically confirmed at 52 weeks shall be the primary end point, and this shall be examined through a randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind trial that investigates the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole 10mg twice daily over a period of 52 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rabeprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Rabeprazole 10 mg was administered orally twice daily during the treatment period for 8 weeks (unblinded).

Arm B

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rabeprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Rabeprazole 20 mg was administered orally twice daily during the treatment period for 8 weeks (unblinded).

Arm C

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rabeprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Rabeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg were administered orally twice daily during the treatment period (unblinded), and 10 mg was administered once daily during the maintenance period (double-blind).

Arm D

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rabeprazole

Intervention Type DRUG

Rabeprazole 10 or 20 mg were administered orally twice daily during the treatment period (unblinded), and 10 mg was administered twice daily during the maintenance period (double-blind).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rabeprazole

Rabeprazole 10 mg was administered orally twice daily during the treatment period for 8 weeks (unblinded).

Intervention Type DRUG

Rabeprazole

Rabeprazole 20 mg was administered orally twice daily during the treatment period for 8 weeks (unblinded).

Intervention Type DRUG

Rabeprazole

Rabeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg were administered orally twice daily during the treatment period (unblinded), and 10 mg was administered once daily during the maintenance period (double-blind).

Intervention Type DRUG

Rabeprazole

Rabeprazole 10 or 20 mg were administered orally twice daily during the treatment period (unblinded), and 10 mg was administered twice daily during the maintenance period (double-blind).

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

E3810 E3810 E3810 E3810

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects fulfilling all of the below criteria shall be eligible for the study:

1. Patients diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease who are shown through endoscopic examination to have mucosal lesions (erosions, ulcers)
2. Patients shown through endoscopy not to have recovered despite administration of PPI once daily for eight weeks.
3. Patients over 20 years of age who have freely given their informed consent in writing to participation in the study.
4. Patients who, having received a full explanation of the matters that must be adhered to during the study, intend to adhere to their requirements, and are capable of doing so.

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects fulfilling any of the following criteria shall be excluded from the study:

1. Patients considered candidates for surgical treatment of the upper gastrointestinal tract due to perforation, esophageal stricture, pyloric stenosis, esophageal varices, etc.
2. Patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.
3. Patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
4. Patients with serious cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, hematological disorders, renal disease, liver disease, malignant tumors, etc.
5. Patients with long segment Barrett's esophagus.
6. Patients with open gastric or duodenal ulcers.
7. Patients with drug allergies or a past history of drug allergies to PPI.
8. Patients who are taking other drugs under development, or have done so within 12 weeks prior to enrollment.
9. Patients who are, or may be pregnant, patients who wish to become pregnant during the study period, patients who are breastfeeding, and patients or their partners who do not wish to use reliable contraceptive measures.
10. Patients with a history of dependence on or abuse of drugs or alcohol within the past two years.
11. Other patients deemed unsuitable for inclusion in the study by the principal investigator or sub-investigators.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eisai Co., Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Inzai, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Kamagaya, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan

Site Status

Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Koga, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Kōriyama, Fukushima, Japan

Site Status

Annaka, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

Fukuyama, Hiroshima, Japan

Site Status

Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Ishikari, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Amagasaki, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Nishinomiya, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Furukawa, Ibaraki, Japan

Site Status

Tsuchiura, Ibaraki, Japan

Site Status

Takamatsu, Kagawa-ken, Japan

Site Status

Ichikikushikino-shi, Kagoshima-ken, Japan

Site Status

Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Site Status

Suwa, Nagano, Japan

Site Status

Beppu, Oita Prefecture, Japan

Site Status

Fujiidera, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Hirakata, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Kishiwada, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Karatsu, Saga-ken, Japan

Site Status

Ureshino, Saga-ken, Japan

Site Status

Ageo, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Hiki, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Toda, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Wako, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Izumo, Shimane, Japan

Site Status

Fujieda, Shizuoka, Japan

Site Status

Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan

Site Status

Ōtawara, Tochigi, Japan

Site Status

Adachi City, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Chūō, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Koto, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Minato, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Nerima City, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Ōta-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Setagaya City, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Shibuya City, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Toshima City, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Akita, , Japan

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Hiroshima, , Japan

Site Status

Kochi, , Japan

Site Status

Kyoto, , Japan

Site Status

Nagasaki, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Ōita, , Japan

Site Status

Saga, , Japan

Site Status

Saitama, , Japan

Site Status

Yamagata, , Japan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Japan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kinoshita Y, Kato M, Fujishiro M, Masuyama H, Nakata R, Abe H, Kumagai S, Fukushima Y, Okubo Y, Hojo S, Kusano M. Efficacy and safety of twice-daily rabeprazole maintenance therapy for patients with reflux esophagitis refractory to standard once-daily proton pump inhibitor: the Japan-based EXTEND study. J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;53(7):834-844. doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1417-z. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29188387 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

E3810-J081-311

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.