Investigating a Novel Modifiable Factor Affecting Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy: Cortical Renorrhaphy

NCT ID: NCT02131376

Last Updated: 2020-11-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-09

Study Completion Date

2019-08-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Preserving kidney function during removal of a kidney tumor is becoming increasingly important as rates of chronic kidney disease increase. A novel modifiable factor (suture closure of the defect caused by tumor removal) was discovered on retrospective studies to account for nearly two-thirds of the 15% volume loss commonly seen in operated kidneys. We hypothesize that a randomized controlled surgical trial will show that omitting the suture closure both preserves renal function and will not lead to unreasonable postoperative complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Purpose: To evaluate a never before studied modifiable factor affecting renal function after partial nephrectomy: the suture closure of the renal cortex after tumor removal (renorrhaphy).

Background:

There is increasing interest in preserving renal function when removing renal tumors. This is partly due to studies that link chronic kidney disease with cardiovascular events and overall survival. There is an approximate loss of 10% overall renal function after partial nephrectomy along with a loss of 15% of the volume in the operated kidney. Studies point to 3 factors leading to this loss in renal function after partial nephrectomy: 1) Poor preoperative renal function, 2) Ischemia time (clamping the renal blood vessels to decrease bleeding during surgery, and 3) Loss in renal volume from the surgery.

The only factor that is considered modifiable is ischemia time, especially when over 20-25-minutes in duration. Modern techniques now aid in keeping the ischemia time below the 25-minute cutoff. Leading experts from institutions such as the Cleveland Clinic, The University of Southern California, and The Mayo Clinic have concluded that the most important factor in preserving renal function, renal volume loss, is not modifiable.

Specific Aims: Our question is: if we are removing non-functional tissue (tumor) then why is there a loss in renal volume (15%) and function (10%)? We hypothesize that by omitting one particular step during surgery, sewing closed the defect caused by tumor removal, we will be able to improve renal volume loss and function (RENORRHAPHY CLIP http://youtu.be/NXOtUHdigj4). Indiana University is in a unique position to study this hypothesis as two of our surgeons have routinely omitted closing the defect left after tumor removal (NO RENORRHAPHY CLIP http://youtu.be/ZisMjrm85s8).

In a recently accepted abstract, we discovered that omitting the cortical closure (n=28) resulted in a 0.8% loss in glomerular filtration rate while using the closure resulted in a 7.3% loss (p=0.03). Following this discovery a 3D modeling project was performed to isolate the volume loss in operated kidneys using pre- and postoperative CT scans (not yet published). In this study, we discovered a 15% volume loss with cortical closure (n=38) compared to only a 5% loss without closure (n=20, p \< 0.001).

Bias and confounders cannot completely be removed from our retrospective data making it hard to believe that others will consider our hypothesis without a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We propose a RCT for robotic partial nephrectomy (20 stitch closure vs. 20 no stitch closure) with the primary outcome being volume change in the affected kidney.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

carcinoma, renal cell partial nephrectomy kidney function test robotics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cortical renorrhaphy

Cortical renorrhaphy is performed after partial nephrectomy using a running barbed suture on MH (36mm) needle. Polymer locking clips are used to maintain tension. A base layer running stitch is performed prior to the cortical renorrhaphy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Renorrhaphy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After tumor resection the patient will have both a deep and cortical layer reconstruction

Non-renorrhaphy

The suture closure of the renal cortex after tumor removal is omitted. A base layer running stitch only is performed for hemostasis and urine leak prevention.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Non-renorrhaphy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The suture closure of the renal cortex after tumor removal is omitted. A base layer running stitch only is performed for hemostasis and urine leak prevention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Non-renorrhaphy

The suture closure of the renal cortex after tumor removal is omitted. A base layer running stitch only is performed for hemostasis and urine leak prevention.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Renorrhaphy

After tumor resection the patient will have both a deep and cortical layer reconstruction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

renal reconstruction renal reconstruction

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥ 18 years of age.
* Must provide written informed consent
* Presence of cT1 renal mass by diagnostic CT assessment.
* Scheduled for partial nephrectomy of renal mass.
* Expected survival of at least 3 months.
* ECOG ≤ 1.
* Negative serum/urine pregnancy test within 24 hours for females of child bearing age prior to surgery
* Recovered from toxicity of any prior therapy to grade 1 or better
* If biopsy of mass has been done, pathology must be consistent with RCC.

Exclusion Criteria

* Solitary kidney
* Multiple or bilateral renal masses when more than one mass is operated on at the same time or within 4-months of each other.
* Hepatic or renal toxicity (GFR \<30) greater than or equal to Grade 2 (using CTCAE version 4 standard definitions)
* Bleeding diathesis or inability to hold anticoagulation for surgery
* Participation in another investigational trial concurrently or within 30 days
* Significant acute or chronic medical, neurologic, or psychiatric illness in the subject that, in the judgment of the Principal Investigator, could compromise subject safety, limit the subject's ability to complete the study, and/or compromise the objectives of the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Chandru Sundaram

Professor of Urology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chandru P Sundaram, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University Health

Clinton D Bahler, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IU Health University Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IUCRO-0459

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id