Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study Evaluating Trastuzumab Emtansine Plus Pertuzumab Compared With Chemotherapy Plus Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab for Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Breast Cancer (NCT NCT02131064)

NCT ID: NCT02131064

Last Updated: 2019-07-02

Results Overview

tpCR was assessed by local pathology review on samples taken at surgery following completion of neoadjuvant therapy. tpCR was defined as the absence of any residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes ( that is \[i.e.\], ypT0/is, ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer \[AJCC\] staging system, 7th edition). Percentage of participants with tpCR was reported.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

444 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Pre-surgery (within 6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy; up to approximately 6 months)

Results posted on

2019-07-02

Participant Flow

A total of 574 participants were screened at 65 sites in 10 countries, of which 444 participants were randomized in two arms: Trastuzumab (TCH) + Pertuzumab (P) (Arm A) and Trastuzumab Emtansine (TDM1) + P (Arm B)

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
TCH + P
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Overall Study
STARTED
221
223
Overall Study
COMPLETED
196
189
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
25
34

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
TCH + P
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Overall Study
Death
5
6
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
4
8
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
14
18
Overall Study
Other
2
2

Baseline Characteristics

A Study Evaluating Trastuzumab Emtansine Plus Pertuzumab Compared With Chemotherapy Plus Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab for Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Breast Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
TCH + P
n=221 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=223 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Total
n=444 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
49.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=5 Participants
50.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=7 Participants
49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
221 Participants
n=5 Participants
222 Participants
n=7 Participants
443 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-surgery (within 6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy; up to approximately 6 months)

Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population comprised all randomized patients, whether or not they received any study treatment or completed a full course of study treatment. Patients were analyzed according to their randomized treatment.

tpCR was assessed by local pathology review on samples taken at surgery following completion of neoadjuvant therapy. tpCR was defined as the absence of any residual invasive cancer on hematoxylin and eosin evaluation of the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes ( that is \[i.e.\], ypT0/is, ypN0 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer \[AJCC\] staging system, 7th edition). Percentage of participants with tpCR was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=221 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=223 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Percentage of Participants With Total Pathological Complete Response (tpCR) Assessed Based on Tumor Samples
56.1 Percentage of Participants
Interval 49.29 to 62.76
44.4 Percentage of Participants
Interval 37.76 to 51.18

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From randomization until death (up to approximately 47 months)

Population: The ITT Population comprised all randomized patients, whether or not they received any study treatment or completed a full course of study treatment. Patients were analyzed according to their randomized treatment.

Overall survival in the overall study population was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. 3 years OS event-free rate per randomized treatment arms in the ITT population were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and estimated the probability of a patient being event-free after 3 years after treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=221 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=223 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Overall Survival
97.6 Probability
Interval 95.5 to 99.7
97.0 Probability
Interval 94.6 to 99.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Surgery performed after completion of neoadjuvant therapy (approximately 6 months after neoadjuvant period)

BCS rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve BCS out of the ITT population of participants without inflammatory breast cancer.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=213 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=218 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Percentage of Participants Who Received Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS)
52.6 Percentage of Participants
95% Confidence Interval 45.65 • Interval 45.65 to 59.45
41.7 Percentage of Participants
95% Confidence Interval 35.12 • Interval 35.12 to 48.33

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From randomization up to disease progression or recurrence or death (up to approximately 47 months)

Population: The ITT Population comprised all randomized patients, whether or not they received any study treatment or completed a full course of study treatment. Patients were analyzed according to their randomized treatment.

Event-free survival (EFS) is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or disease recurrence (local, regional, distant, or contralateral, invasive or non-invasive), or death from any cause. 3 years EFS rate per randomized treatment arms in the ITT population were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and estimated the probability of a patient being event-free after 3 years after treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=221 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=223 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Event-Free Survival
94.21 Probability
Interval 91.02 to 97.39
85.28 Probability
Interval 80.47 to 90.08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From surgery to the first documented occurrence of IDFC event (up to approximately 47 months)

Population: The ITT Population comprised all randomized patients, whether or not they received any study treatment or completed a full course of study treatment. Patients were analyzed according to their randomized treatment.

IDFS is defined only for participants who undergo surgery. IDFS is defined as the time from surgery to the first documented occurrence of an IDFS event, defined as: Ipsilateral invasive breast tumor recurrence; Ipsilateral local-regional invasive breast cancer recurrence; Distant recurrence; Contralateral invasive breast cancer; and death from any cause. 3 years of IDFS event-free rate per randomized treatment arms in the ITT population were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and estimated the probability of a patient being event-free after 3 years after treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=221 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=223 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Invasive Disease-free Survival (IDFS)
91.99 Probability
Interval 86.73 to 97.26
93.04 Probability
Interval 89.39 to 96.69

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle(C) 3,C5 of neoadjuvant period (each C=21 days); pre-surgery visit (within 6weeks after neoadjuvant therapy; up to approx 6months), C4 & 8 of Adjuvant Period (each C=21 days), End of Treatment, Follow up 2 & 4 (approx 47 months)

Population: ITT population of patients with both a baseline assessment and at least one post-treatment assessment in the respective single question are included in the analysis.

Participants answered the question "Did you have tingling hands/feet?", from the Modified Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast Cancer 23 (mQLQ-BR23), on a 5-point scale (1 'Not at all', 2 'A little', 3 'Somewhat', 4 'Quite a bit', 5 'Very much'). Percentage of participants by each response was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=221 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=223 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
A little bit: Pre-Surgery
29.0 Percentage of Participants
17.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Somewhat: Pre-Surgery
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Not at all: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
54.3 Percentage of Participants
59.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
A little bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
20.8 Percentage of Participants
19.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Somewhat: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Quite a bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
3.2 Percentage of Participants
2.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Very much: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
1.8 Percentage of Participants
0.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Not at all: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
37.1 Percentage of Participants
54.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
A little bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
29.9 Percentage of Participants
21.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Somewhat: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Quite a bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
8.6 Percentage of Participants
2.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Very much: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
6.8 Percentage of Participants
1.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Not at all: Pre-Surgery
22.6 Percentage of Participants
52.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Quite a bit: Pre-Surgery
15.4 Percentage of Participants
5.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Very much: Pre-Surgery
10.0 Percentage of Participants
1.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Not at all: Adjuvant Cycle 4
31.2 Percentage of Participants
42.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
A little bit: Adjuvant Cycle 4
31.7 Percentage of Participants
15.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Somewhat: Adjuvant Cycle 4
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Quite a bit: Adjuvant Cycle 4
9.5 Percentage of Participants
9.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Very much: Adjuvant Cycle 4
6.3 Percentage of Participants
2.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Not at all: Adjuvant Cycle 8
33.0 Percentage of Participants
31.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
A little bit: Adjuvant Cycle 8
28.1 Percentage of Participants
19.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Somewhat: Adjuvant Cycle 8
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Quite a bit: Adjuvant Cycle 8
10.9 Percentage of Participants
9.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Very much: Adjuvant Cycle 8
4.1 Percentage of Participants
4.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Not at all: End of Therapy
31.2 Percentage of Participants
31.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
A little bit: End of Therapy
30.8 Percentage of Participants
23.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Somewhat: End of Therapy
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Quite a bit: End of Therapy
10.9 Percentage of Participants
12.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Very much: End of Therapy
5.0 Percentage of Participants
6.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Not at all: Follow-up 2
38.0 Percentage of Participants
32.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
A little bit: Follow-up 2
19.9 Percentage of Participants
19.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Somewhat: Follow-up 2
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Quite a bit: Follow-up 2
5.9 Percentage of Participants
7.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Very much: Follow-up 2
4.1 Percentage of Participants
1.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Not at all: Follow-up 4
39.8 Percentage of Participants
32.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
A little bit: Follow-up 4
15.4 Percentage of Participants
17.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Somewhat: Follow-up 4
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Quite a bit: Follow-up 4
4.1 Percentage of Participants
3.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Very much: Follow-up 4
2.3 Percentage of Participants
1.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Not at all: Baseline
78.7 Percentage of Participants
81.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
A little bit: Baseline
9.5 Percentage of Participants
9.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Somewhat: Baseline
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Quite a bit: Baseline
0.9 Percentage of Participants
0.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Neuropathy Single Item
Very much: Baseline
0.5 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle(C) 3,C5 of neoadjuvant period (each C=21 days); pre-surgery visit (within 6weeks after neoadjuvant therapy; up to approx 6months), C4 & 8 of Adjuvant Period (each C=21 days), End of Treatment, Follow up 2 & 4 (approx 47 months)

Population: ITT population of patients with both a baseline assessment and at least one post-treatment assessment in the respective single question are included in the analysis.

Participants answered the Question 1 "Did itching skin bother you?" and Question 2 "Have you had skin problems?", from the mQLQ-BR23, on a 5-point scale (1 'Not at all', 2 'A little', 3 'Somewhat', 4 'Quite a bit', 5 'Very much'). Percentage of participants by each response was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=221 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=223 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Somewhat: Follow-up 4
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Not at all: Baseline
71.9 Percentage of Participants
72.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: A little bit: Baseline
14.9 Percentage of Participants
16.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Somewhat: Baseline
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Quite a bit: Baseline
2.3 Percentage of Participants
2.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Very much: Baseline
0 Percentage of Participants
0.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Not at all: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
35.3 Percentage of Participants
48.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: A little bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
31.2 Percentage of Participants
27.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Somewhat: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Quite a bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
10.9 Percentage of Participants
4.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Very much: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
2.3 Percentage of Participants
1.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Not at all: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
48.9 Percentage of Participants
46.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: A little bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
23.1 Percentage of Participants
26.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Somewhat: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Quite a bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
7.7 Percentage of Participants
6.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Very much: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
2.3 Percentage of Participants
1.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Not at all: Pre-Surgery
40.3 Percentage of Participants
48.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: A little bit: Pre-Surgery
26.7 Percentage of Participants
21.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Somewhat: Pre-Surgery
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Quite a bit: Pre-Surgery
7.2 Percentage of Participants
5.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Very much: Pre-Surgery
2.7 Percentage of Participants
1.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Not at all: Adjuvant Cycle 4
38.5 Percentage of Participants
39.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: A little bit: Adjuvant Cycle 4
23.5 Percentage of Participants
21.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Somewhat: Adjuvant Cycle 4
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Quite a bit: Adjuvant Cycle 4
9.5 Percentage of Participants
6.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Very much: Adjuvant Cycle 4
6.8 Percentage of Participants
2.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Not at all: Adjuvant Cycle 8
34.8 Percentage of Participants
39.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: A little bit: Adjuvant Cycle 8
27.6 Percentage of Participants
15.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Somewhat: Adjuvant Cycle 8
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Quite a bit: Adjuvant Cycle 8
9.0 Percentage of Participants
6.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Very much: Adjuvant Cycle 8
4.1 Percentage of Participants
3.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Not at all: End of Therapy
39.4 Percentage of Participants
42.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: A little bit: End of Therapy
26.7 Percentage of Participants
22.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Somewhat: End of Therapy
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Quite a bit: End of Therapy
6.8 Percentage of Participants
6.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Very much: End of Therapy
4.5 Percentage of Participants
1.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Not at all: Follow-up 2
43.9 Percentage of Participants
39.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: A little bit: Follow-up 2
19.0 Percentage of Participants
14.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Somewhat: Follow-up 2
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Quite a bit: Follow-up 2
3.6 Percentage of Participants
4.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Very much: Follow-up 2
0.9 Percentage of Participants
2.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Not at all: Follow-up 4
46.2 Percentage of Participants
37.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: A little bit: Follow-up 4
10.4 Percentage of Participants
12.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Somewhat: Follow-up 4
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Quite a bit: Follow-up 4
3.2 Percentage of Participants
4.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q1: Very much: Follow-up 4
1.4 Percentage of Participants
1.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Not at all: Baseline
64.7 Percentage of Participants
67.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: A little bit: Baseline
21.3 Percentage of Participants
17.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Somewhat: Baseline
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Quite a bit: Baseline
3.2 Percentage of Participants
5.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Very much: Baseline
0.5 Percentage of Participants
0.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Not at all: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
14.0 Percentage of Participants
24.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: A little bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
40.7 Percentage of Participants
38.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Somewhat: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Quite a bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
18.6 Percentage of Participants
14.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Very much: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
6.8 Percentage of Participants
4.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Not at all: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
21.3 Percentage of Participants
25.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: A little bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
35.7 Percentage of Participants
37.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Somewhat: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Quite a bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
20.4 Percentage of Participants
12.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Very much: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
5.0 Percentage of Participants
4.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Not at all: Pre-Surgery
21.3 Percentage of Participants
27.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: A little bit: Pre-Surgery
33.9 Percentage of Participants
37.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Somewhat: Pre-Surgery
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Quite a bit: Pre-Surgery
15.4 Percentage of Participants
8.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Very much: Pre-Surgery
6.3 Percentage of Participants
4.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Not at all: Adjuvant Cycle 4
23.5 Percentage of Participants
24.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: A little bit: Adjuvant Cycle 4
33.0 Percentage of Participants
30.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Somewhat: Adjuvant Cycle 4
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Quite a bit: Adjuvant Cycle 4
13.1 Percentage of Participants
9.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Very much: Adjuvant Cycle 4
9.0 Percentage of Participants
4.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Not at all: Adjuvant Cycle 8
23.1 Percentage of Participants
25.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: A little bit: Adjuvant Cycle 8
35.7 Percentage of Participants
24.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Somewhat: Adjuvant Cycle 8
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Quite a bit: Adjuvant Cycle 8
12.2 Percentage of Participants
9.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Very much: Adjuvant Cycle 8
5.0 Percentage of Participants
4.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Not at all: End of Therapy
27.1 Percentage of Participants
27.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: A little bit: End of Therapy
33.9 Percentage of Participants
30.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Somewhat: End of Therapy
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Quite a bit: End of Therapy
10.0 Percentage of Participants
13.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Very much: End of Therapy
6.8 Percentage of Participants
3.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Not at all: Follow-up 2
36.2 Percentage of Participants
27.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: A little bit: Follow-up 2
25.8 Percentage of Participants
25.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Somewhat: Follow-up 2
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Quite a bit: Follow-up 2
4.1 Percentage of Participants
6.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Very much: Follow-up 2
1.8 Percentage of Participants
1.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Not at all: Follow-up 4
39.8 Percentage of Participants
30.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: A little bit: Follow-up 4
14.5 Percentage of Participants
18.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Quite a bit: Follow-up 4
4.5 Percentage of Participants
4.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Skin Problem Single Items
Q2: Very much: Follow-up 4
2.7 Percentage of Participants
2.2 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline (Day 1 Cycle 1) to Cycle 6 (each cycle = 21 days) in neoadjuvant period

Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population comprised all randomized participants, whether or not they received any study treatment or completed a full course of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their randomized treatment. As per protocol, the analysis for this outcome measure was focused on the neoadjuvant period only.

Participants rated their quality of life (global health status) on European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ- C30), with total scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best); where higher score indicates better quality of life. Clinically meaningful deterioration in GHS/QoL was defined as a decrease in score of 10 points in GHS/QoL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=193 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=205 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Deterioration in Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QoL) Score
69.9 Percentage of Participants
45.4 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline (Day 1 Cycle 1) to Cycle 6 (each cycle = 21 days) in neoadjuvant period

Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population comprised all randomized participants, whether or not they received any study treatment or completed a full course of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their randomized treatment. As per protocol, the analysis for this outcome measure was focused on the neoadjuvant period only.

Participants rated their quality of life (global health status) on EORTC QLQ C-30, with total scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best); where higher score indicates better quality of life. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from baseline to first 10-point (or greater) decrease as measured by GHS/QoL. All valid GHS/QoL questionnaires of the neoadjuvant phase including surgery were used. Participants without deterioration were censored at the time of completing the last GHS/QoL plus 1 day. Median time to deterioration was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=191 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=200 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Time to Clinically Meaningful Deterioration in GHS/QoL Score
3.02 months
95% Confidence Interval 2.83 • Interval 2.83 to 3.38
4.63 months
95% Confidence Interval 4.11 • Interval 4.11 to 7.98

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline (Day 1 Cycle 1) to Cycle 6 (each cycle = 21 days) in neoadjuvant period

Population: Patients of the ITT population with a baseline assessment and at least one post-treatment assessment was included in this analysis.

Participants rated their function on EORTC QLQ C-30, with total scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best); where higher score indicates better functioning. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from baseline to first 10-point (or greater) decrease as measured by physical function; to first 14-point (or greater) decrease as measured by role function, to first 7-point (or greater) decrease as measured by cognitive function. Median time to deterioration was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. The 95% CI for the median was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=191 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=200 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Time to Clinically Meaningful Deterioration in Function Subscale
Physical Function
2.79 months
Interval 2.79 to 2.96
4.86 months
Interval 4.4 to 7.98
Time to Clinically Meaningful Deterioration in Function Subscale
Role Function
2.79 months
Interval 2.17 to 2.89
4.44 months
Interval 4.04 to 4.53
Time to Clinically Meaningful Deterioration in Function Subscale
Cognitive Function
3.42 months
Interval 3.02 to 4.24
4.44 months
Interval 4.21 to
Upper limit not reached.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 15-30 minutes (min) post-study treatment infusion (infusion duration = 90 min) on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 6 (each cycle = 21 days) in neoadjuvant and adjuvant period

Population: The pharmacokinetic population comprised all patients who received at least one treatment dose of trastuzumab emtansine (for patients in the T-DM1 + P arm) or trastuzumab (for patients in the TCH + P arm), and had at least one post-treatment serum or plasma sample.

Only participants who received trastuzumab were to be analyzed for this outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=214 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Trastuzumab
Cycle 1 (neoadjuvant period)
167 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 47.1
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Trastuzumab
Cycle 6 (neoadjuvant period)
148 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 44.7
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Trastuzumab
Cycle 1 (adjuvant period)
159 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 36.2
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Trastuzumab
Cycle 6 (adjuvant period)
181 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 30.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 15-30 min post-study treatment infusion (infusion duration = 90 min) on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 6 (each cycle = 21 days) in neoadjuvant and adjuvant period.

Population: The pharmacokinetic population comprised all patients who received at least one treatment dose of trastuzumab emtansine (for patients in the T-DM1 + P arm) or trastuzumab (for patients in the TCH + P arm), and had at least one post-treatment serum or plasma sample.

Only participants who received trastuzumab emtansine were to be analyzed for this outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=222 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Cmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Total Trastuzumab
Trastuzumab emtansine: C1 (neoadjuvant)
80.4 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 26.5
Cmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Total Trastuzumab
Trastuzumab emtansine: C6 (neoadjuvant)
71.7 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 30.2
Cmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Total Trastuzumab
Total Trastuzumab: C1 (neoadjuvant)
79.1 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 25.7
Cmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Total Trastuzumab
Total Trastuzumab: C6 (neoadjuvant)
79.1 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 31.1
Cmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Total Trastuzumab
Trastuzumab emtansine: C1 (adjuvant)
70.4 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 22.7
Cmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Total Trastuzumab
Trastuzumab emtansine: C6 (adjuvant)
73.1 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 21.8
Cmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Total Trastuzumab
Total Trastuzumab: C1 (adjuvant)
73.0 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 23.2
Cmax of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Total Trastuzumab
Total Trastuzumab: C6 (adjuvant)
82.6 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 23.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-study treatment infusion (0 hours [hr]) (infusion duration = 90 min) on Day 1 of Cycle 6 (cycle length = 21 days) in neoadjuvant and adjuvant period

Population: The pharmacokinetic population comprised all patients who received at least one treatment dose of trastuzumab emtansine (for patients in the T-DM1 + P arm) or trastuzumab (for patients in the TCH + P arm), and had at least one post-treatment serum or plasma sample.

Only participants who received trastuzumab were to be analyzed for this outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=214 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Trastuzumab
Trastuzumab (neoadjuvant period)
45.8 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 17.8
Minimum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmin) of Trastuzumab
Trastuzumab (adjuvant period)
21.8 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.153

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-study treatment infusion (0 hr) (infusion duration = 90 min) on Day 1 of Cycle 6 (cycle length = 21 days) in neoadjuvant and adjuvant period

Population: The pharmacokinetic population comprised all patients who received at least one treatment dose of trastuzumab emtansine (for patients in the T-DM1 + P arm) or trastuzumab (for patients in the TCH + P arm), and had at least one post-treatment serum or plasma sample.

Only participants who received trastuzumab emtansine were to be analyzed for this outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=222 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Cmin of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Total Trastuzumab
Trastuzumab emtansine (neoadjuvant)
3.04 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.43
Cmin of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Total Trastuzumab
Total Trastuzumab (neoadjuvant)
12.3 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 8.68
Cmin of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Total Trastuzumab
Trastuzumab emtansine (adjuvant)
4.09 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 11.7
Cmin of Trastuzumab Emtansine and Total Trastuzumab
Total Trastuzumab (adjuvant)
8.70 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.98

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 15-30 min post-study treatment infusion (Cmax) on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 6 in neoadjuvant and adjuvant period

Population: The pharmacokinetic population comprised all patients who received at least one treatment dose of trastuzumab emtansine (for patients in the T-DM1 + P arm) or trastuzumab (for patients in the TCH + P arm), and had at least one post-treatment serum or plasma sample.

DM1 is the metabolite of trastuzumab emtansine. Only participants who received trastuzumab emtansine were to be analyzed for this outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=222 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Plasma N2'-Deacetyl-N2'-(3-mercapto-1-oxopropyl)-Maytansine (DM1) Concentrations
C1: 15-30 min post-dose (neoadjuvant)
4.64 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2.33
Plasma N2'-Deacetyl-N2'-(3-mercapto-1-oxopropyl)-Maytansine (DM1) Concentrations
C6: 15-30 min post-dose (neoadjuvant)
4.73 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2.61
Plasma N2'-Deacetyl-N2'-(3-mercapto-1-oxopropyl)-Maytansine (DM1) Concentrations
C1: 15-30 min post-dose (adjuvant)
4.49 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2.33
Plasma N2'-Deacetyl-N2'-(3-mercapto-1-oxopropyl)-Maytansine (DM1) Concentrations
C6: 15-30 min post-dose (adjuvant)
5.15 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 8.28

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 15-30 min post-study treatment infusion (Cmax) on Day 1 of Cycle 1 and 6 in neoadjuvant and adjuvant period

Population: The pharmacokinetic population comprised all patients who received at least one treatment dose of trastuzumab emtansine (for patients in the T-DM1 + P arm) or trastuzumab (for patients in the TCH + P arm), and had at least one post-treatment serum or plasma sample.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=222 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Serum Levels of Plasma DM1-Containing Catabolites Concentrations (in ng/mL) (Nonreducible Thioether Linker [MCC]-DM1 and Lysine [Lys]-MCC-DM1)
C1: MCC-DM1 (Neoadjuvant Period)
8.18 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 7.23
Serum Levels of Plasma DM1-Containing Catabolites Concentrations (in ng/mL) (Nonreducible Thioether Linker [MCC]-DM1 and Lysine [Lys]-MCC-DM1)
C1: Lys-MCC-DM1 (Neoadjuvant period)
NA ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
not reported since more than 1/3 of the results are LTR (Lower than reportable)
Serum Levels of Plasma DM1-Containing Catabolites Concentrations (in ng/mL) (Nonreducible Thioether Linker [MCC]-DM1 and Lysine [Lys]-MCC-DM1)
C6: MCC-DM1 (Neoadjuvant Period)
8.22 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 8.03
Serum Levels of Plasma DM1-Containing Catabolites Concentrations (in ng/mL) (Nonreducible Thioether Linker [MCC]-DM1 and Lysine [Lys]-MCC-DM1)
C6: Lys-MCC-DM1 (Neoadjuvant period)
NA ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
not reported since more than 1/3 of the results are LTR (Lower than reportable)
Serum Levels of Plasma DM1-Containing Catabolites Concentrations (in ng/mL) (Nonreducible Thioether Linker [MCC]-DM1 and Lysine [Lys]-MCC-DM1)
C1: MCC-DM1 (Adjuvant Period)
7.98 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 6.46
Serum Levels of Plasma DM1-Containing Catabolites Concentrations (in ng/mL) (Nonreducible Thioether Linker [MCC]-DM1 and Lysine [Lys]-MCC-DM1)
C1: Lys-MCC-DM1 (Adjuvant period)
NA ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
not reported since more than 1/3 of the results are LTR (Lower than reportable)
Serum Levels of Plasma DM1-Containing Catabolites Concentrations (in ng/mL) (Nonreducible Thioether Linker [MCC]-DM1 and Lysine [Lys]-MCC-DM1)
C6: MCC-DM1 (Adjuvant Period)
7.90 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5.37
Serum Levels of Plasma DM1-Containing Catabolites Concentrations (in ng/mL) (Nonreducible Thioether Linker [MCC]-DM1 and Lysine [Lys]-MCC-DM1)
C6: Lys-MCC-DM1 (Adjuvant period)
NA ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
not reported since more than 1/3 of the results are LTR (Lower than reportable)

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-trastuzumab [0 hr] infusion [infusion duration = 90 min] on Day 1 of Cycle 1); post-baseline (Pre-trastuzumab infusion [0 hr] on Day 1 of Cycle 6) (each cycle = 21 days) in neoadjuvant and adjuvant period

Population: The participants included in this analysis were the participants who received at least one dose of trastuzumab and had at least one reported serum or plasma results.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=210 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Percentage of Participants With ATA to Trastuzumab
Neoadjuvant Phase (baseline)
11 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ATA to Trastuzumab
Neoadjuvant Phase (post-baseline)
2.6 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ATA to Trastuzumab
Adjuvant Phase (baseline)
5.4 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With ATA to Trastuzumab
Adjuvant Phase (post-baseline)
5.0 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline,Cycle(C) 3, C5 of neoadjuvant period (each C=21 days); pre-surgery visit (within 6weeks after neoadjuvant therapy; up to approx 6months), C4 & 8 of Adjuvant Period (each C=21 days), End of Treatment, Follow up 2 & 4(approx 47 months)

Population: ITT population of patients with both a baseline assessment and at least one post-treatment assessment in the respective single question are included in the analysis.

Participants answered the Question "Have you lost any hair?", from the mQLQ-BR23, on a 5-point scale (1 'Not at all', 2 'A little', 3 'Somewhat', 4 'Quite a bit', 5 'Very much'). Percentage of participants by each response was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=221 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=223 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Not at all: Baseline
81.4 Percentage of Participants
87.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
A little bit: Baseline
7.7 Percentage of Participants
4.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Somewhat: Baseline
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Quite a bit: Baseline
0.5 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Very much: Baseline
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Not at all: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
8.6 Percentage of Participants
65.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
A little bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
11.3 Percentage of Participants
16.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Somewhat: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Quite a bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
20.8 Percentage of Participants
0.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Very much: Neoadjuvant Cycle 3
39.4 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Not at all: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
20.4 Percentage of Participants
58.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
A little bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
19.9 Percentage of Participants
19.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Somewhat: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Quite a bit: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
15.8 Percentage of Participants
1.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Very much: Neoadjuvant Cycle 5
26.2 Percentage of Participants
0.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Not at all: Pre-Surgery
30.8 Percentage of Participants
49.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
A little bit: Pre-Surgery
13.6 Percentage of Participants
24.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Somewhat: Pre-Surgery
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Quite a bit: Pre-Surgery
11.3 Percentage of Participants
2.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Very much: Pre-Surgery
21.3 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Not at all: Adjuvant Cycle 4
67.9 Percentage of Participants
50.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
A little bit: Adjuvant Cycle 4
5.0 Percentage of Participants
15.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Somewhat: Adjuvant Cycle 4
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Quite a bit: Adjuvant Cycle 4
3.2 Percentage of Participants
2.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Very much: Adjuvant Cycle 4
2.7 Percentage of Participants
1.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Not at all: Adjuvant Cycle 8
70.1 Percentage of Participants
48.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
A little bit: Adjuvant Cycle 8
4.1 Percentage of Participants
14.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Somewhat: Adjuvant Cycle 8
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Quite a bit: Adjuvant Cycle 8
0.9 Percentage of Participants
0.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Very much: Adjuvant Cycle 8
0.9 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Not at all: End of Therapy
69.7 Percentage of Participants
57.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
A little bit: End of Therapy
5.4 Percentage of Participants
14.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Somewhat: End of Therapy
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Quite a bit: End of Therapy
0.9 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Very much: End of Therapy
1.8 Percentage of Participants
1.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Not at all: Follow-up 2
55.7 Percentage of Participants
48.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
A little bit: Follow-up 2
9.0 Percentage of Participants
11.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Somewhat: Follow-up 2
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Quite a bit: Follow-up 2
1.4 Percentage of Participants
0.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Very much: Follow-up 2
1.8 Percentage of Participants
0.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Not at all: Follow-up 4
52.9 Percentage of Participants
41.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
A little bit: Follow-up 4
7.2 Percentage of Participants
11.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Somewhat: Follow-up 4
0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Quite a bit: Follow-up 4
0 Percentage of Participants
2.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants by Response for Hair Loss Single Item
Very much: Follow-up 4
1.4 Percentage of Participants
0.4 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to end of study (approximately 47 months)

Population: The Safety Population comprised all patients who received at least one full or partial dose of any study treatment. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

Selected AEs included hepatotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, cardiac dysfunction, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, hemorrhage, infusion related reaction (IRR)/hypersensitivity, IRR/Hypersensitivity symptoms, rash, diarrhea and mucositis. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=219 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=223 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Percentage of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
Hepatotoxicity
14.2 Percentage of Participants
39.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
Pulmonary Toxicity
0.9 Percentage of Participants
4.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
Cardiac Dysfunction
4.6 Percentage of Participants
1.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
Neutropenia
39.7 Percentage of Participants
8.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
Thrombocytopenia
22.8 Percentage of Participants
17.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
Peripheral Neuropathy
47.5 Percentage of Participants
28.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
Hemorrhage
19.2 Percentage of Participants
33.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
IRR/Hypersensitivity
13.7 Percentage of Participants
22.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
IRR/Hypersensitivity symptoms
7.8 Percentage of Participants
19.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
Rash
44.7 Percentage of Participants
36.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
Diarrhea
76.7 Percentage of Participants
38.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Selected Adverse Events (AEs)
Mucositis
43.8 Percentage of Participants
24.7 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline (Day 1 Cycle 1) to Cycle 6 (each cycle = 21 days) in neoadjuvant period

Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population comprised all randomized participants, whether or not they received any study treatment or completed a full course of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their randomized treatment. As per protocol, the analysis for this outcome measure was focused on the neoadjuvant period only.

Participants rated their function on EORTC QLQ C-30, with total score and single-item (physical, cognitive and role functioning) scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best); where higher score indicates better functioning. Clinically meaningful deterioration was defined as a decrease in score of 10 points in physical function; decrease of 7 points in cognitive function and decrease of 14 points in role function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=193 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=205 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Deterioration in Function Subscales
Cognitive Functioning
59.1 Percentage of Participants
42.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Deterioration in Function Subscales
Physical Functioning
72.5 Percentage of Participants
40.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Deterioration in Function Subscales
Role Functioning
76.7 Percentage of Participants
47.8 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (b) (Pre-TDM1 [0 hr] infusion [infusion duration = 90 min] on Day 1 of Cycle 1); post-baseline (pb) (Pre-TDM1 infusion [0 hr] on Day 1 of Cycle 6) (each cycle = 21 days) in neoadjuvant and adjuvant period

Population: The participants included in this analysis were the participants who received at least one dose of trastuzumab emtansine and had at least one reported serum or plasma results.

Participants were considered post-baseline ATA positive if they had ATAs post-baseline that were either treatment-induced or treatment-enhanced. Participants had treatment-induced ATAs if they had a negative or missing ATA result at baseline, and at least one positive ATA result post-baseline. Participants had treatment-enhanced ATAs if they had a positive ATA result at baseline, and at least one positive ATA result post-baseline that was greater than or equal to (\>/=) 0.60 titer units higher than the result at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=219 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to TDM-1
Neoadjuvant Phase (Baseline)
5.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to TDM-1
Neoadjuvant Phase (Post-Baseline)
7.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to TDM-1
Adjuvant Phase (Baseline)
11.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to TDM-1
Adjuvant Phase (Post-baseline)
13.1 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline (Day 1 Cycle 1) to Cycle 6 (each cycle = 21 days) in neoadjuvant period

Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population comprised all randomized participants, whether or not they received any study treatment or completed a full course of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their randomized treatment. As per protocol, the analysis for this outcome measure was focused on the neoadjuvant period only.

Participants rated their symptoms on EORTC QLQ C-30 and mQLQ-BR23, with total scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best); where higher score indicates greater degree of symptoms. Clinically meaningful increase in symptoms was defined as an increase in score (deterioration) of 11 points in nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea; increase of 9 points in insomnia; increase of 14 points in appetite loss; increase of 15 points in diarrhea, constipation; increase of 10 points in fatigue, systemic therapy side effects, hair loss.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TCH + P
n=194 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=205 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Increase in Symptom Subscales
Appetite Loss
61.1 Percentage of Participants
47.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Increase in Symptom Subscales
Any Hair Loss
91.2 Percentage of Participants
40.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Increase in Symptom Subscales
Systemic Therapy Side-Effects
89.7 Percentage of Participants
75.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Increase in Symptom Subscales
Constipation
33.2 Percentage of Participants
32.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Increase in Symptom Subscales
Diarrhea
79.3 Percentage of Participants
50.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Increase in Symptom Subscales
Dyspnea
56.0 Percentage of Participants
31.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Increase in Symptom Subscales
Fatigue
87.6 Percentage of Participants
68.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Increase in Symptom Subscales
Nausea/Vomiting
66.3 Percentage of Participants
43.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Increase in Symptom Subscales
Pain
56.0 Percentage of Participants
36.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Increase in Symptom Subscales
Insomnia
42.5 Percentage of Participants
30.2 Percentage of Participants

Adverse Events

TCH + P

Serious events: 70 serious events
Other events: 217 other events
Deaths: 5 deaths

T-DM1 + P

Serious events: 30 serious events
Other events: 212 other events
Deaths: 6 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
TCH + P
n=219 participants at risk
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=223 participants at risk
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
1.3%
3/223 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
11.9%
26/219 • Number of events 33 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
1.3%
3/223 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
3.2%
7/219 • Number of events 7 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
0.91%
2/219 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
1.4%
3/219 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
4.1%
9/219 • Number of events 9 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
1.8%
4/219 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
General disorders
Asthenia
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.91%
2/219 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Breast cellulitis
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.91%
2/219 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile colitis
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile infection
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Diarrhoea infectious
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Enterocolitis infectious
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis norovirus
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Kidney infection
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.91%
2/219 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.90%
2/223 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Postoperative wound infection
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.91%
2/219 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Skin infection
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
1.3%
3/223 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subcutaneous haematoma
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Investigations
Lipase increased
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
1.4%
3/219 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypermagnesaemia
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
0.91%
2/219 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Intraductal proliferative breast lesion
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Adenomyosis
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast haematoma
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.90%
2/223 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Vascular disorders
Shock haemorrhagic
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural intestinal perforation
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
0.91%
2/219 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
General disorders
Device related thrombosis
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Nodular regenerative hyperplasia
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Breast abscess
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Seroma
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cervix carinoma
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neuroendocrine tumour
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0/0 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchiectasis
0.00%
0/219 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.45%
1/223 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
TCH + P
n=219 participants at risk
Participants received pertuzumab 840 milligrams (mg) (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) intravenous (IV) infusion, trastuzumab 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion, docetaxel 75 milligrams per square meter (mg/m\^2) IV infusion and carboplatin at a dose to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 6 milligrams per milliliter\* minute (mg/mL\*min) IV infusion every 3 weeks (q3w) for 6 cycles in neoadjuvant period. Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) and 6 mg/kg (maintenance dose) IV infusion q3w for rest of the cycles (12 cycles) in adjuvant period (up to a total of 18 cycles).
T-DM1 + P
n=223 participants at risk
Participants received pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) and 420 mg (maintenance dose) IV infusion followed by trastuzumab emtansine 3.6 mg/kg IV infusion q3w for a total of 18 cycles (6 cycles of neoadjuvant period and 12 cycles of adjuvant period).
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
37.0%
81/219 • Number of events 103 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
19.3%
43/223 • Number of events 47 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
26.9%
59/219 • Number of events 92 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
5.8%
13/223 • Number of events 20 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
11.0%
24/219 • Number of events 36 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
8.1%
18/223 • Number of events 23 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Eye disorders
Dry eye
6.4%
14/219 • Number of events 16 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
7.2%
16/223 • Number of events 16 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
8.2%
18/219 • Number of events 21 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
2.7%
6/223 • Number of events 9 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
13.7%
30/219 • Number of events 45 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
9.4%
21/223 • Number of events 29 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
10.0%
22/219 • Number of events 29 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
3.1%
7/223 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
19.6%
43/219 • Number of events 48 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
15.2%
34/223 • Number of events 52 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
74.4%
163/219 • Number of events 372 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
38.6%
86/223 • Number of events 179 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
1.8%
4/219 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
12.1%
27/223 • Number of events 33 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
6.8%
15/219 • Number of events 18 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
11.2%
25/223 • Number of events 30 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
7.3%
16/219 • Number of events 18 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
3.1%
7/223 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
6.4%
14/219 • Number of events 19 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
2.2%
5/223 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
63.5%
139/219 • Number of events 249 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
46.2%
103/223 • Number of events 248 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
22.4%
49/219 • Number of events 70 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
10.3%
23/223 • Number of events 30 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
31.1%
68/219 • Number of events 83 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
15.7%
35/223 • Number of events 47 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
General disorders
Asthenia
27.9%
61/219 • Number of events 115 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
18.8%
42/223 • Number of events 73 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
General disorders
Chills
4.1%
9/219 • Number of events 9 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
12.1%
27/223 • Number of events 32 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
General disorders
Fatigue
43.4%
95/219 • Number of events 143 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
37.2%
83/223 • Number of events 116 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
General disorders
Influenza like illness
4.6%
10/219 • Number of events 12 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
7.2%
16/223 • Number of events 21 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
13.7%
30/219 • Number of events 37 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
9.9%
22/223 • Number of events 29 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
14.2%
31/219 • Number of events 38 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
4.5%
10/223 • Number of events 11 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
General disorders
Pyrexia
15.5%
34/219 • Number of events 43 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
17.0%
38/223 • Number of events 53 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
10.5%
23/219 • Number of events 29 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
13.0%
29/223 • Number of events 34 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
6.8%
15/219 • Number of events 18 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
9.4%
21/223 • Number of events 24 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
7.8%
17/219 • Number of events 20 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
5.4%
12/223 • Number of events 16 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radiation skin injury
21.0%
46/219 • Number of events 48 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
9.4%
21/223 • Number of events 22 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
11.0%
24/219 • Number of events 37 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
28.7%
64/223 • Number of events 83 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
9.6%
21/219 • Number of events 37 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
24.7%
55/223 • Number of events 74 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
10.0%
22/219 • Number of events 44 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
2.2%
5/223 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
11.9%
26/219 • Number of events 37 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
10.3%
23/223 • Number of events 38 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Investigations
Weight decreased
11.0%
24/219 • Number of events 24 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
8.1%
18/223 • Number of events 19 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
7.8%
17/219 • Number of events 22 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
3.6%
8/223 • Number of events 11 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
18.3%
40/219 • Number of events 46 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
14.8%
33/223 • Number of events 41 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
9.1%
20/219 • Number of events 23 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
5.8%
13/223 • Number of events 17 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
5.9%
13/219 • Number of events 13 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
18.7%
41/219 • Number of events 55 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
13.9%
31/223 • Number of events 37 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
9.1%
20/219 • Number of events 22 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
6.3%
14/223 • Number of events 20 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
7.8%
17/219 • Number of events 25 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
3.6%
8/223 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
6.4%
14/219 • Number of events 16 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
9.0%
20/223 • Number of events 21 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
9.1%
20/219 • Number of events 22 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
4.5%
10/223 • Number of events 10 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
16.9%
37/219 • Number of events 41 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
12.6%
28/223 • Number of events 42 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
12.3%
27/219 • Number of events 30 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
9.9%
22/223 • Number of events 28 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
20.1%
44/219 • Number of events 58 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
13.9%
31/223 • Number of events 39 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
16.9%
37/219 • Number of events 53 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
30.5%
68/223 • Number of events 95 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
8.7%
19/219 • Number of events 21 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
3.1%
7/223 • Number of events 9 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
13.2%
29/219 • Number of events 36 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
9.4%
21/223 • Number of events 37 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
10.5%
23/219 • Number of events 28 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
4.9%
11/223 • Number of events 14 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
11.9%
26/219 • Number of events 26 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
11.7%
26/223 • Number of events 27 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
7.3%
16/219 • Number of events 17 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
4.5%
10/223 • Number of events 10 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
14.2%
31/219 • Number of events 37 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
16.1%
36/223 • Number of events 40 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast pain
5.5%
12/219 • Number of events 13 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
7.6%
17/223 • Number of events 18 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
9.6%
21/219 • Number of events 26 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
13.5%
30/223 • Number of events 38 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
8.2%
18/219 • Number of events 21 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
8.1%
18/223 • Number of events 22 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
11.0%
24/219 • Number of events 31 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
22.0%
49/223 • Number of events 82 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
5.0%
11/219 • Number of events 17 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
4.5%
10/223 • Number of events 11 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
66.7%
146/219 • Number of events 149 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
16.6%
37/223 • Number of events 38 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis acneiform
7.3%
16/219 • Number of events 16 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
5.4%
12/223 • Number of events 14 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
12.3%
27/219 • Number of events 32 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
13.5%
30/223 • Number of events 32 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nail discolouration
9.1%
20/219 • Number of events 21 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.00%
0/223 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nail disorder
5.0%
11/219 • Number of events 13 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
0.90%
2/223 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
11.9%
26/219 • Number of events 34 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
9.0%
20/223 • Number of events 22 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
26.0%
57/219 • Number of events 77 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
19.3%
43/223 • Number of events 60 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
20.5%
45/219 • Number of events 47 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
9.9%
22/223 • Number of events 25 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
6.8%
15/219 • Number of events 18 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
6.3%
14/223 • Number of events 14 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival bleeding
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
6.7%
15/223 • Number of events 17 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
5.0%
11/219 • Number of events 17 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
2.7%
6/223 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
0.46%
1/219 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
9.0%
20/223 • Number of events 28 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
5.9%
13/219 • Number of events 16 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
6.7%
15/223 • Number of events 15 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
6.4%
14/219 • Number of events 15 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
5.8%
13/223 • Number of events 15 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
5.5%
12/219 • Number of events 16 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
4.9%
11/223 • Number of events 14 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
3.7%
8/219 • Number of events 10 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.
7.2%
16/223 • Number of events 18 • From Baseline up to approximately 47 months
Safety population was analyzed.

Additional Information

Medical Communications

Hoffmann-La Roche

Phone: 800 821-8590

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER