Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-31
2015-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
\*\*How can clinical decision support tools effectively translate a complex set of evidence-based rules into primary care clinical practice?\*\*
The work is divided into 2 phases.
PHASE 1: Randomized control trial. We will measure change in potentially inappropriate prescribing by primary care prescribers (e.g. family doctors) who are using the Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool in their Electronic Medical Record (EMR), as compared to those who are not. Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing is defined by the STOPP criteria, the same criteria that will be used in the clinical decision support tool in the EMR. We will use the OSCAR EMR for this study. EMR based queries will be developed to assess the number of potentially inappropriate prescriptions are current in each of 12 physician practices at baseline and at 16 weeks.
PHASE 2: We will then complete a qualitative follow up with participants to aid in understanding how primary care prescribers perceived the CDS. This will help explain Phase 1 findings and provide additional information to enhance future decision support tools.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
PHASE 1:
A cluster randomized control trial in private primary care physician offices. The intervention is at the level of the physician and consists of activating the set of STOPP based alerts for the physician so that they see them during their workflow. These alerts will be triggered and displayed to physicians at the point of care. The alerts will suggest the physician consider Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (PIPs), as defined by STOPP. The control group will not have the alerts presented. (STOPP criteria are described in the full proposal, attached).
The primary outcome measure is a composite indicator:
* Δ in Number of PIPs in patients \>64yo with a visit during the intervention
Number of patients \>64yo with a visit during the intervention
Phase 1 Data Analysis: The outcomes will be measured using the University of British Columbia (UBC) Department of Family Practice's research network infrastructure. The network has been designed and successfully tested in a previous study (UBC ETHICS H13-02531). This network connects to OSCAR EMRs and, with permission from the physician, is able to answer practice level questions WITHOUT collecting patient level data. The practice level queries for potentially inappropriate prescriptions will be distributed to the practices through the network and only the aggregate answers (not patient level data) will be returned for analysis. For example, one of the STOPP recommendations is to not use a non-cardioselective beta blocker in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The research network would be able to query the physician practices before and after the intervention and receive counts back on the number of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who are also on a non-cardioselective beta-blocker.
PHASE 2:
Will seek to qualitatively explain the findings from phase 1 with the physician participants.
This will consist of one to two, two-hour, semi-structured discussion group(s) with family physicians from the intervention group. The discussion group will seek to understand specific issues with the Phase 1 tool. The discussion group will move through the following steps: (a) consent; (b) participants provide overall impressions of the tool; (c) review preliminary results from Phase 1; (d) specific feedback on how to improve the tool. The focus group will be audio recorded and qualitatively analyzed through the lens of pragmatic content analysis to better understand perceptions of the Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool and its integration into workflow. There may be 2 discussion groups to allow for broader participation if scheduling is an issue and it may be a remote discussion group, depending on location of physician participants.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
STOPP Criteria Decision Support Content Intervention arm will receive CDS suggestions based on the STOPP criteria.
STOPP Criteria Decision Support Content
55 previously developed clinical decision support suggestions based on the STOPP criteria will be activated in the physician EMR. Each suggestion provides a patient specific rule that, if triggered will display its title in an existing "Clinical Decision Alerts" box on the bottom right hand column in the patient's EMR chart. For example, in a patient with diabetes and on a beta blocker then the suggestion "Consider: avoiding b-blockers in elderly diabetics with \>=1 hypoglycaemic episodes / month" will be presented to the physician in the side bar (not a popup). The physician then can decide to review, consider, or ignore the recommendation.
Control
Control arm will provide care as usual during the intervention period.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
STOPP Criteria Decision Support Content
55 previously developed clinical decision support suggestions based on the STOPP criteria will be activated in the physician EMR. Each suggestion provides a patient specific rule that, if triggered will display its title in an existing "Clinical Decision Alerts" box on the bottom right hand column in the patient's EMR chart. For example, in a patient with diabetes and on a beta blocker then the suggestion "Consider: avoiding b-blockers in elderly diabetics with \>=1 hypoglycaemic episodes / month" will be presented to the physician in the side bar (not a popup). The physician then can decide to review, consider, or ignore the recommendation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have OSCAR EMR installed locally in the practice.
* Agree to be or are already a part of the University of British Columbia's Department of Family Practice's (UBC DFP) research network.
* Ensure their OSCAR Service Provider (OSP) agrees to support the research network hardware/software installation.
* Have not used the STOPP criteria in OSCAR prior to the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Those who do not provide longitudinal care (e.g. walk-in clinics).
* Specialists or midwives.
* Those who do not have regular patients over age 64 (e.g. maternity clinics).
* Those who do not use OSCAR 12.1 or those that do not document prescriptions in their EMR prescription module.
* Those who have ALREADY used the STOPP rules in OSCAR prior to the study.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Morgan Price
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Private Physician Offices
Multiple Expected, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Price M, Davies I, Rusk R, Lesperance M, Weber J. Applying STOPP Guidelines in Primary Care Through Electronic Medical Record Decision Support: Randomized Control Trial Highlighting the Importance of Data Quality. JMIR Med Inform. 2017 Jun 15;5(2):e15. doi: 10.2196/medinform.6226.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H14-00797
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id