Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-30
2018-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This prospective simple blind multicenter study, will investigate the diagnostic value of the CVC compared to the conventional colonoscopy under general sedation for the detection and the control of colon lesions in children presenting IBD.
If the feasibility and the efficacy of the colon video capsule technique are also proven for use with children, then this new technique might become a very interesting alternative for the endoscopic examination of the colon because of being less expensive and less invasive.
Moreover, this technique would be very useful as a means of lesions detection all along the digestive tract and not limited to the colon only.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the PillCam™ Colon Capsule Endoscopy (PCCE) in Detection & Classification of Ulcerative Colitis
NCT00604422
PillCam™ Colon Capsule Endoscopy (PCCE) in the Visualization of the Colon
NCT00604162
PillCam Colon Capsule and CT-colonography in the Evaluation of Patients With Incomplete Conventional Colonoscopy
NCT01525940
The Utility of Second Generation Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Ulcerative Colitis
NCT02469103
Robot-controlled Magnet-Assisted Capsule Endoscopy
NCT06030518
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
video capsule endoscopy
Colon videocapsule endoscopy (PillCam colon 2)
This is a simple blind (blind for the lecture of the CVC record) study to evaluate the diagnostic value of the colon capsule endoscopy for the detection and the control of colon lesions, the feasibility, tolerance and safety of the CVC compared to the conventional colonoscopy under general sedation in children presented with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Over one week, the patient will undergo two exams (CVC and colonoscopy under general sedation). The exams will be done by two different physicians.
In order to assess the tolerance, after the completion of both exams, the patients will be asked to answer a "comfort score" questionnaire.
In order to assess the safety of the CVC, the patients will have a follow-up for adverse events over a 3 weeks period after completion of the CVC and only if the colon video capsule was not recovered during the conventional colonoscopy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Colon videocapsule endoscopy (PillCam colon 2)
This is a simple blind (blind for the lecture of the CVC record) study to evaluate the diagnostic value of the colon capsule endoscopy for the detection and the control of colon lesions, the feasibility, tolerance and safety of the CVC compared to the conventional colonoscopy under general sedation in children presented with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Over one week, the patient will undergo two exams (CVC and colonoscopy under general sedation). The exams will be done by two different physicians.
In order to assess the tolerance, after the completion of both exams, the patients will be asked to answer a "comfort score" questionnaire.
In order to assess the safety of the CVC, the patients will have a follow-up for adverse events over a 3 weeks period after completion of the CVC and only if the colon video capsule was not recovered during the conventional colonoscopy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presenting a suspected or confirmed Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) such as Crohn Disease, Ulcerative Colitis or undetermined colitis and who are referred for a conventional colonoscopy;
* Between 8 and 18 years old
* Who are not participating in other clinical trials
* For who a written informed consent was obtained
* Having successfully performed a candy test and the bowel permeability test (using the Patency Alagile ® capsule)
Exclusion Criteria
* Presenting a contra indication for colonoscopy under general sedation or for the ingestion of the colon video capsule, especially those for who exist a clinical or radiological suspicion of upper gastrointestinal strictures (esophageal surgery or eosinophil esophagitis) and who presents a dysphagia to solids, swallowing disorders with or without impaired consciousness.
* Who underwent an abdominal surgery during the last 3 months prior to the inclusion visit or who presents signs of bowel stenosis or occlusion
* Who presents a toxic mega colon, radic enteritis, intestinal bowel carcinoma or who receives a chronically non-steroidal anti-inflammatory treatment
* Presenting a contra indication for the bowel preparation agents
* With cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electro medical devices susceptible to interfere with the colon video capsule
* Scheduled for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination within 7 days following the ingestion of the colon video capsule (and until the evacuation of the capsule has been confirmed) or any other life-threatening conditions
8 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ALAIN LACHAUX, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
HOPITAL FEMME MERE ENFANT CHU DE LYON
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Service de Pédiatrie Médicale, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, , France
Service d'Hépatologie, gastroentérologie et nutrition pédiatrique, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon
Bron, , France
Clinique de Pédiatrie, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHU de Lille
Lille, , France
Service de Gastroentérologie, Mucoviscidose et Nutrition, Hôpital Robert Debré, AP-HP
Paris, , France
Service de Hépato Gastroentérologie et Nutrition, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, AP-HP
Paris, , France
Service de Pédiatrie, Hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes
Rennes, , France
Service de Gastroentérologie, Hépatologie, Nutrition et Diabétologie, Hôpital des Enfants, CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-823
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.