Bryophyllum Pinnatum Versus Solifenacin Versus Placebo for Overactive Bladder
NCT ID: NCT02129816
Last Updated: 2017-10-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2/PHASE3
9 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-05-31
2017-07-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Study Design: Multicenter, prospective, double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over study, phase III to test the superiority of Bryophyllum pinnatum (BP) over placebo in the treatment of overactive bladder.
* In this cross-over trial a total of 30 patients is needed to proof the superiority of BP over placebo (5 randomization blocs, each 6 patients). Each patient gets each of the three study drugs (BP, Solifenacin, Placebo) in a double-blind randomization. The number of patients was calculated in a post-hoc analysis based on the primary endpoint of a previous study (reduction of micturition rates/24hours; 9.5 (SD2.2) before and 7.8 (SD1.2) after Bryophyllum versus 9.3 (SD1.8) before and 9.1(SD1.6) after placebo), under the assumption of a normal data distribution and a power of 80% a patient number of 2x20. Plus 10% for non-parametric tests in the case of a non-normal distribution (Wilcoxon) were added, what generated a number of 2x22 patients.
* In order to facilitate an equality in the randomization, the investigator choose a cross-over design. Due to the length of the study time, the drop-out rate was risen from 10 to 20% what yielded under the assumption of a equal block randomization the number of 30 patients. Additionally, an explorative arm containing the standard medication Vesicare was inserted, as this is of great clinical interest. For this explorative comparative arm are no existing data that would allow to do a power calculation.
* This follow-up study will give a compelling answer on the efficacy or non-efficacy of BP as well as the safety of BP in respect to placebo and possible answers of its position regarding the standard medication Vesicare.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bryophyllum
50% in 350mg Lactose, 2-2-2
Bryophyllum
Placebo
Lactose 350mg, 2-2-2
Bryophyllum
Solifenacin
10mg in 350mg Lactose, 2-2-2
Bryophyllum
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bryophyllum
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* postmenopausal women
* cystoscopy to exclude a bladder carcinoma or carcinoma in situ
* written and oral informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* intake of bladder affecting drugs like anticholinergics, diuretics, muscle relaxing medications and phytotherapeutics in the last three months
* neurological conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury or Parkinsons's disease
* postvoid residual volume ≥100 ml
* lactose intolerance
* contraindication for Solifenacin
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
PD Dr. med. Verena Geissbühler
UNKNOWN
Prof. pharm. Ursula von Mandach
UNKNOWN
Dr. med. David Scheiner
UNKNOWN
Dr. med. Matthias Werner
UNKNOWN
University of Zurich
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gynecologic Department, University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, , Switzerland
Gynecology Department, University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Betschart C, von Mandach U, Seifert B, Scheiner D, Perucchini D, Fink D, Geissbuhler V. Randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial with Bryophyllum pinnatum versus placebo for the treatment of overactive bladder in postmenopausal women. Phytomedicine. 2013 Feb 15;20(3-4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KEK 2012-0530 (Zurich)
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
BryoSoliP-2014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id