Trial Outcomes & Findings for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) As A Treatment For Cigarette Craving and Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenic (NCT NCT02128919)
NCT ID: NCT02128919
Last Updated: 2017-08-30
Results Overview
The Brief Questionnaire on Smoking Urges (QSU-Brief) was used to measure cigarette cravings. Scores ranged from a minimum of 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to a maximum of 7 ("Strongly Agree") and were determined by self-reported responses to 10 statements about having cravings for smoking. Scores closer to 1 after treatment would indicate a better outcome. Responses to each of the 10 items in the scale were summed for one total score. With 10 items on this scale with a range of scores from 1 to 7, on each occasion of rating the minimum score would be 7 and the maximum score would be 70.
COMPLETED
NA
33 participants
Baseline and after 5 tDCs sessions (mean time 8.7[SD 2.7] days after basleine)
2017-08-30
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Active tDCS
tDCS 2ma for 20 min with anode at DLPFC once a day for 5 days
tDCS: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
|
Sham tDCS
tDCS 2 ma for 40 second s with anode at DLPFC for 5 days
tDCS: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
17
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
14
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) As A Treatment For Cigarette Craving and Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenic
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Active tDCS
n=17 Participants
tDCS 2ma for 20 min with anode at DLPFC once a day for 5 days
tDCS: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
|
Sham tDCS
n=16 Participants
tDCS 2 ma for 40 second s with anode at DLPFC for 5 days
tDCS: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
|
Total
n=33 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
46.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=5 Participants
|
44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=7 Participants
|
45.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
race/ethnicity · white
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
race/ethnicity · black-African american
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
race/ethnicity · hispanic
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
race/ethnicity · other
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and after 5 tDCs sessions (mean time 8.7[SD 2.7] days after basleine)Population: Findings are based on31 subjects (15 active tDCS and 16 sham tDCS) who completed this QSU-Brief questionnaire in at baseline and after 5 tDCS sessions.. Complete sample who entered study and were randomized were 33 subjects 24 male and 9 female, but all subjects did not complete QSU brief rating scale..
The Brief Questionnaire on Smoking Urges (QSU-Brief) was used to measure cigarette cravings. Scores ranged from a minimum of 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to a maximum of 7 ("Strongly Agree") and were determined by self-reported responses to 10 statements about having cravings for smoking. Scores closer to 1 after treatment would indicate a better outcome. Responses to each of the 10 items in the scale were summed for one total score. With 10 items on this scale with a range of scores from 1 to 7, on each occasion of rating the minimum score would be 7 and the maximum score would be 70.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active tDCS
n=15 Participants
tDCS 2ma for 20 min with anode at DLPFC once a day for 5 days
tDCS: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
|
Sham tDCS
n=16 Participants
tDCS 2 ma for 40 second s with anode at DLPFC for 5 days
tDCS: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Cigarette Craving
|
14.40 Units on QSU-Brief Scale
Standard Error 3.57
|
11.00 Units on QSU-Brief Scale
Standard Error 3.45
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 1-3 days (mean 1.8 [SD 1.4] days after 5 tDCS sessions( mean 8.7 days after baseline)The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) was used to measure cognitive performance. Seven Domain scores and a Composite score are calculated by the proprietary MCCB Computer Scoring Program from raw scores on 10 individually administered subtests. We used the revised MCCB program (beta version) which allows for calculation of Domain and Composite scores with missing data. The Domain T-scores are percentile-ranked and range from \<20 (\<0.1 percentile) to \>80 (\>99.9 percentile). The Composite scores are also percentile-ranked and range from \<213 (T\<20, \<0.1 percentile) to \>487 (T\>80, \>99.9 percentile). Higher scores after baseline represent better outcomes. Here we report difference scores from post-treatment and baseline with positive difference scores representing better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active tDCS
n=14 Participants
tDCS 2ma for 20 min with anode at DLPFC once a day for 5 days
tDCS: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
|
Sham tDCS
n=16 Participants
tDCS 2 ma for 40 second s with anode at DLPFC for 5 days
tDCS: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance
MATRICS Composite Diff Score
|
3.47 MATRICS domain difference scores
Standard Deviation 4.09
|
-0.85 MATRICS domain difference scores
Standard Deviation 4.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance
MATRICS Working Memory Diff Score
|
4.04 MATRICS domain difference scores
Standard Deviation 5.70
|
-3.29 MATRICS domain difference scores
Standard Deviation 5.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance
MATRICS Attention/Vigilance Diff Score
|
4.25 MATRICS domain difference scores
Standard Deviation 7.17
|
-1.91 MATRICS domain difference scores
Standard Deviation 7.17
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and after 5 tDCS sessionsThe Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was used to measure psychiatric symptoms. Item scores ranged from 1 (Absent) to 6 (Severe) for symptoms on the Positive Scale (total subscale range: 7-42), the Negative Scale (total subscale range: 7-42), and the General Psychopathology Scale (total subscale range:16-96). All three subscales were summed for the PANSS total score (total scale range: 30-180). Scores closer to 30 after baseline represented better outcomes. Here we report difference scores from post-treatment and baseline with negative difference scores representing better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active tDCS
n=15 Participants
tDCS 2ma for 20 min with anode at DLPFC once a day for 5 days
tDCS: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
|
Sham tDCS
n=15 Participants
tDCS 2 ma for 40 second s with anode at DLPFC for 5 days
tDCS: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Psychiatric Symptoms
PANSS postive diff score
|
-1.70 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.10
|
-1.63 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psychiatric Symptoms
PANSS total diff score
|
-1.51 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.01
|
-2.37 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Psychiatric Symptoms
PANSS Negative diff score
|
1.06 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.38
|
0.68 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.38
|
Adverse Events
Active tDCS
Sham tDCS
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Robert C Smith MD
Nathan Kline institute for Psycghatric Research
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place