The Effects of Single-dose Rectal Midazolam Application on Post-operative Recovery
NCT ID: NCT02127489
Last Updated: 2014-04-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-06-30
2006-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: 40 children between 2 and 10 years of American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) I-II stages were randomized and applied caudal anesthesia under general anesthesia. Patients were applied caudal block in addition with saline and 1milliliter/kilograms (mL/kg) bupivacaine 0.25%. In the postoperative period, Group C (n=20) was given 5 milliliter (mL) saline and Group M (n=20) was given 0.30 mg/kg rectal midazolam diluted with 5mL saline. Sedation scale and postoperative pain scale (CHIPPS) of the patients were evaluated. The patients were observed for their analgesic need, first analgesic time, and adverse effects for 24 hours.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Midazolam
1 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25%.
1 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25%.
40 children between 2 and 10 years of ASA I-II were randomized and they received caudal anesthesia under general anesthesia. Patients underwent the application of caudal block in addition with saline and 1 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25%. In the postoperative period, Group C (n=20) was given 5mL saline and Group M (n=20) was given 0.30 mg/kg rectal midazolam diluted with 5mL saline. Sedation scale and postoperative pain scale (CHIPPS) of the patients were evaluated. The patients were observed for their analgesic need, first analgesic time, and adverse effects for 24 hours.
saline
5mL rectal saline
1 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25%.
40 children between 2 and 10 years of ASA I-II were randomized and they received caudal anesthesia under general anesthesia. Patients underwent the application of caudal block in addition with saline and 1 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25%. In the postoperative period, Group C (n=20) was given 5mL saline and Group M (n=20) was given 0.30 mg/kg rectal midazolam diluted with 5mL saline. Sedation scale and postoperative pain scale (CHIPPS) of the patients were evaluated. The patients were observed for their analgesic need, first analgesic time, and adverse effects for 24 hours.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
1 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25%.
40 children between 2 and 10 years of ASA I-II were randomized and they received caudal anesthesia under general anesthesia. Patients underwent the application of caudal block in addition with saline and 1 mL/kg bupivacaine 0.25%. In the postoperative period, Group C (n=20) was given 5mL saline and Group M (n=20) was given 0.30 mg/kg rectal midazolam diluted with 5mL saline. Sedation scale and postoperative pain scale (CHIPPS) of the patients were evaluated. The patients were observed for their analgesic need, first analgesic time, and adverse effects for 24 hours.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2 Years
10 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karadeniz Technical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
SEDAT SAYLAN
Medical Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
SEDAT SAYLAN, Med. doctor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
KANUNI EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL, TRABZON ,TURKEY
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine
Trabzon, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mahajan R, Batra YK, Grover VK, Kajal J. A comparative study of caudal bupivacaine and midazolam-bupivacaine mixture for post-operative analgesia in children undergoing genitourinary surgery. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Mar;39(3):116-20. doi: 10.5414/cpp39116.
Breschan C, Schalk HV, Schaumberger F, Likar R. Experience with caudal blocks in children over a period of 3.5 years. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1996;109:174-6. No abstract available.
Sumpelmann R, Munte S. Postoperative analgesia in infants and children. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2003 Jun;16(3):309-13. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200306000-00011.
Lee HM, Sanders GM. Caudal ropivacaine and ketamine for postoperative analgesia in children. Anaesthesia. 2000 Aug;55(8):806-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01330-2.x.
Silvani P, Camporesi A, Agostino MR, Salvo I. Caudal anesthesia in pediatrics: an update. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006 Jun;72(6):453-9.
Clausen TG, Wolff J, Hansen PB, Larsen F, Rasmussen SN, Dixon JS, Crevoisier C. Pharmacokinetics of midazolam and alpha-hydroxy-midazolam following rectal and intravenous administration. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988 Apr;25(4):457-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb03330.x.
Kanegaye JT, Favela JL, Acosta M, Bank DE. High-dose rectal midazolam for pediatric procedures: a randomized trial of sedative efficacy and agitation. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003 Oct;19(5):329-36. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000092578.40174.85.
McGrath PJ, McAlpine L. Psychologic perspectives on pediatric pain. J Pediatr. 1993 May;122(5 Pt 2):S2-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(11)80002-8.
Tyler DC, Tu A, Douthit J, Chapman RC. Toward validation of pain measurement tools for children: a pilot study. Pain. 1993 Mar;52(3):301-309. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90163-J.
Shavit I, Keidan I, Augarten A. The practice of pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;13(5):270-5. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200610000-00005.
Roy RC. Choosing general versus regional anesthesia for the elderly. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2000 Mar;18(1):91-104, vii. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8537(05)70151-6.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
Somri M, Gaitini LA, Vaida SJ, Yanovski B, Sabo E, Levy N, Greenberg A, Liscinsky S, Zinder O. Effect of ilioinguinal nerve block on the catecholamine plasma levels in orchidopexy: comparison with caudal epidural block. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Nov;12(9):791-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00916.x.
Solak M, Ulusoy H, Sarihan H. Effects of caudal block on cortisol and prolactin responses to postoperative pain in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Aug;10(4):219-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1072362.
Golianu B, Krane EJ, Galloway KS, Yaster M. Pediatric acute pain management. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2000 Jun;47(3):559-87. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70226-1.
Martinez-Telleria A, Cano Serrano ME, Martinez-Telleria MJ, Castejon Casado J. [Analysis of regional anesthetic efficacy in pediatric postop pain]. Cir Pediatr. 1997 Jan;10(1):18-20. Spanish.
Da Conceicao MJ, Coelho L. Caudal anaesthesia with 0.375% ropivacaine or 0.375% bupivacaine in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 1998 Apr;80(4):507-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/80.4.507.
Gann DS, Lilly MP. The neuroendocrine response to multiple trauma. World J Surg. 1983 Jan;7(1):101-18. doi: 10.1007/BF01655918. No abstract available.
Kehlet H. The stress response to surgery: release mechanisms and the modifying effect of pain relief. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1989;550:22-8.
Reier CE, George JM, Kilman JW. Cortisol and growth hormone response to surgical stress during morphine anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1973 Nov-Dec;52(6):1003-10. No abstract available.
Saylan S, Eroglu A, Dohman D. The effects of single-dose rectal midazolam application on postoperative recovery, sedation, and analgesia in children given caudal anesthesia plus bupivacaine. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:127548. doi: 10.1155/2014/127548. Epub 2014 May 5.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
U.S. National Library of Medicine
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B.30.2.KTU.0.01.00.01/372
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id