Intervention Study on Break Activities and Workers´ Psychological and Physiological Health & Performance
NCT ID: NCT02124837
Last Updated: 2014-12-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-30
2014-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
By combining the knowledge of work and environmental psychology about recovery and restorative experiences, by merging three recovery perspectives (settings, processes, and outcomes) and by using data triangulation, we produce valid results that broaden our view on mechanisms underlying recovery and enhance our understanding about their links to psychological, behavioural and physiological outcomes, resulting in a more comprehensive picture of work stress recovery in general.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
Participants continue their normal lunch routine.
No interventions assigned to this group
Relaxation exercise during lunch break
Participants perform relaxation exercises during each lunch break during work for a period of 2 working weeks.
Relaxation during lunch break
Park walk during lunch break
Participants go for a walk in the closest park nearby each lunch break during work for a period of 2 working weeks.
Park walk during lunch break
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Park walk during lunch break
Relaxation during lunch break
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Paid work for at least 24 hours per week
Exclusion Criteria
* Serious illness or allergies that prevent participants from walking in nature
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tampere University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jessica de Bloom
Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ulla Kinnunen, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tampere University
Kalevi Korpela, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tampere University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Tampere
Tampere, Pirkanmaa, Finland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
de Bloom J, Kinnunen U, Korpela K. Exposure to nature versus relaxation during lunch breaks and recovery from work: development and design of an intervention study to improve workers' health, well-being, work performance and creativity. BMC Public Health. 2014 May 22;14:488. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-488.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
257682SA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id