Trial Outcomes & Findings for Peace-Building Interventions for Israeli and Palestinian Youth (NCT NCT02122887)
NCT ID: NCT02122887
Last Updated: 2020-04-03
Results Overview
Interactions were coded with the "Coding Interactive Behavior" (CIB) manual (Feldman, 1998), adolescent version. This version of the CIB is composed of 32 codes rated on a scale of 1 to 5, as higher score mean a better outcome. The Two following constructs were used: A personal measure of "Behavioral Empathy" - an average of the following CIB codes: expressing empathy, acknowledging other's communication, elaborating other's topics and ideas, maintaining positive affect, maintaining visual, and give-and-receive reciprocity and Dyadic Tension - averaged codes; displaying a tense, anxious, and uneasy behavior, fear, and constriction of communicative output and social behavior.
COMPLETED
NA
101 participants
trail 1-baseline
2020-04-03
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Control Group
no intervention for 3 months
|
Experimental Group
Peace-Building Intervention Process- The intervention process consists of eight sessions and adheres to a manualized protocol that we developed. Each session lasts 120 minutes.
Peace-Building Intervention Process: The eight sessions include (1) presentation of the self to others members (2) getting familiar with the other culture (3) what is a conflict - how do conflicts come about, what are adaptive and non-adaptive modes of resolving conflict (4) getting to know the "Other" - preconceived notions about the other side (5) on dialogue- what is dialogue, can dialogue offer means for conflict resolution, what are the benefits of dialogue to inter-cultural and inter-racial conflicts, (6) empathy, generosity, and kindness (7) wrapping up - hopes for the future at the personal and community levels, practical suggestions (8) goodbye and summary - what have we learned ,"gift giving", summary of process by group leaders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
60
|
41
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
40
|
39
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
20
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Control Group
no intervention for 3 months
|
Experimental Group
Peace-Building Intervention Process- The intervention process consists of eight sessions and adheres to a manualized protocol that we developed. Each session lasts 120 minutes.
Peace-Building Intervention Process: The eight sessions include (1) presentation of the self to others members (2) getting familiar with the other culture (3) what is a conflict - how do conflicts come about, what are adaptive and non-adaptive modes of resolving conflict (4) getting to know the "Other" - preconceived notions about the other side (5) on dialogue- what is dialogue, can dialogue offer means for conflict resolution, what are the benefits of dialogue to inter-cultural and inter-racial conflicts, (6) empathy, generosity, and kindness (7) wrapping up - hopes for the future at the personal and community levels, practical suggestions (8) goodbye and summary - what have we learned ,"gift giving", summary of process by group leaders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
20
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
1 participant data was lost
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Control Group
n=40 Participants
no intervention for 3 months
|
Experimental Group
n=39 Participants
Peace-Building Intervention Process- The intervention process consists of eight sessions and adheres to a manualized protocol that we developed. Each session lasts 120 minutes.
Peace-Building Intervention Process: The eight sessions include (1) presentation of the self to others members (2) getting familiar with the other culture (3) what is a conflict - how do conflicts come about, what are adaptive and non-adaptive modes of resolving conflict (4) getting to know the "Other" - preconceived notions about the other side (5) on dialogue- what is dialogue, can dialogue offer means for conflict resolution, what are the benefits of dialogue to inter-cultural and inter-racial conflicts, (6) empathy, generosity, and kindness (7) wrapping up - hopes for the future at the personal and community levels, practical suggestions (8) goodbye and summary - what have we learned ,"gift giving", summary of process by group leaders.
|
Total
n=79 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
16.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION .79 • n=40 Participants
|
16.64 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION .74 • n=39 Participants
|
16.54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION .77 • n=79 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
22 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=79 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=79 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
ethnicity · Jewish
|
20 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=79 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
ethnicity · Arab
|
20 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=79 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Israel
|
40 participants
n=40 Participants
|
39 participants
n=39 Participants
|
79 participants
n=79 Participants
|
|
Empathy (IRI-INTERPERSONAL REACTIVITY INDEX )
|
17.71 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.06 • n=40 Participants • 1 participant data was lost
|
18.96 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.83 • n=38 Participants • 1 participant data was lost
|
18.63 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.83 • n=78 Participants • 1 participant data was lost
|
|
Ethnocentrism
|
35.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.83 • n=40 Participants
|
33.89 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.61 • n=39 Participants
|
34.56 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.71 • n=79 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: trail 1-baselinePopulation: All participants
Interactions were coded with the "Coding Interactive Behavior" (CIB) manual (Feldman, 1998), adolescent version. This version of the CIB is composed of 32 codes rated on a scale of 1 to 5, as higher score mean a better outcome. The Two following constructs were used: A personal measure of "Behavioral Empathy" - an average of the following CIB codes: expressing empathy, acknowledging other's communication, elaborating other's topics and ideas, maintaining positive affect, maintaining visual, and give-and-receive reciprocity and Dyadic Tension - averaged codes; displaying a tense, anxious, and uneasy behavior, fear, and constriction of communicative output and social behavior.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=40 Participants
no intervention for 3 months
|
Experimental Group
n=39 Participants
Peace-Building Intervention Process- The intervention process consists of eight sessions and adheres to a manualized protocol that we developed. Each session lasts 120 minutes.
Peace-Building Intervention Process: The eight sessions include (1) presentation of the self to others members (2) getting familiar with the other culture (3) what is a conflict - how do conflicts come about, what are adaptive and non-adaptive modes of resolving conflict (4) getting to know the "Other" - preconceived notions about the other side (5) on dialogue- what is dialogue, can dialogue offer means for conflict resolution, what are the benefits of dialogue to inter-cultural and inter-racial conflicts, (6) empathy, generosity, and kindness (7) wrapping up - hopes for the future at the personal and community levels, practical suggestions (8) goodbye and summary - what have we learned ,"gift giving", summary of process by group leaders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Behavioral Assessment of Dialogue
Behavioral Empathy
|
3.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .81
|
3.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .98
|
|
Behavioral Assessment of Dialogue
Dyadic Tension
|
2.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: trail 1- baselinePopulation: Some participants didn't have a measure due to insufficient saliva
Three saliva samples were collected using Salivettes® at baseline, following interaction, and ten minutes after end and averaged. All samples were then stored at -20°C. Salivette were treated as following: centrifuged twice, at 4°C at 1500 x g for 30 minutes, aliquoted and lyophilized over few days- to concentrate by 4 times. The dry samples were reconstructed in the assay buffer immediately before analysis using an oxytocin enzyme immunoassay commercial kit (ENZO, NY). The assay preformed according the kit's instruction. The concentration of oxytocin was calculated using MatLab-7
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=33 Participants
no intervention for 3 months
|
Experimental Group
n=39 Participants
Peace-Building Intervention Process- The intervention process consists of eight sessions and adheres to a manualized protocol that we developed. Each session lasts 120 minutes.
Peace-Building Intervention Process: The eight sessions include (1) presentation of the self to others members (2) getting familiar with the other culture (3) what is a conflict - how do conflicts come about, what are adaptive and non-adaptive modes of resolving conflict (4) getting to know the "Other" - preconceived notions about the other side (5) on dialogue- what is dialogue, can dialogue offer means for conflict resolution, what are the benefits of dialogue to inter-cultural and inter-racial conflicts, (6) empathy, generosity, and kindness (7) wrapping up - hopes for the future at the personal and community levels, practical suggestions (8) goodbye and summary - what have we learned ,"gift giving", summary of process by group leaders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hormonal Assays- Oxytocin
|
44.08 picogram/ml
Standard Deviation 26.67
|
49.93 picogram/ml
Standard Deviation 34.41
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: trail 1-baselinePopulation: All participants
Participants were interviewed individually on their attitudes towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Perspective-taking (PT), addressed the degree to which adolescents thought justice was solely on their side and the other side is totally wrong, aggressive, and vicious compared to the ability to see some justice on both sides. Participants received binary score for PT, as 1 is some ability to see justice on the other side, and 0 is seeing justice only in own side.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=40 Participants
no intervention for 3 months
|
Experimental Group
n=39 Participants
Peace-Building Intervention Process- The intervention process consists of eight sessions and adheres to a manualized protocol that we developed. Each session lasts 120 minutes.
Peace-Building Intervention Process: The eight sessions include (1) presentation of the self to others members (2) getting familiar with the other culture (3) what is a conflict - how do conflicts come about, what are adaptive and non-adaptive modes of resolving conflict (4) getting to know the "Other" - preconceived notions about the other side (5) on dialogue- what is dialogue, can dialogue offer means for conflict resolution, what are the benefits of dialogue to inter-cultural and inter-racial conflicts, (6) empathy, generosity, and kindness (7) wrapping up - hopes for the future at the personal and community levels, practical suggestions (8) goodbye and summary - what have we learned ,"gift giving", summary of process by group leaders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
PT (Perspective-taking)
justice is solely on our side
|
21 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
PT (Perspective-taking)
There is some justice in the other side
|
19 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: trail 2- 3 months after trail 1Population: Control group had few missing values due to problems in the interaction videos that didn't allow data analysis
interactions were coded with the "Coding Interactive Behavior" (CIB) manual (Feldman, 1998), adolescent version. This version of the CIB is composed of 32 codes rated on a scale of 1 to 5, as higher score mean a better outcome. The Two following constructs were used: A personal measure of "Behavioral Empathy" - an average of the following CIB codes: expressing empathy, acknowledging other's communication, elaborating other's topics and ideas, maintaining positive affect, maintaining visual, and give-and-receive reciprocity and Dyadic Tension - averaged codes; displaying a tense, anxious, and uneasy behavior, fear, and constriction of communicative output and social behavior.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=36 Participants
no intervention for 3 months
|
Experimental Group
n=39 Participants
Peace-Building Intervention Process- The intervention process consists of eight sessions and adheres to a manualized protocol that we developed. Each session lasts 120 minutes.
Peace-Building Intervention Process: The eight sessions include (1) presentation of the self to others members (2) getting familiar with the other culture (3) what is a conflict - how do conflicts come about, what are adaptive and non-adaptive modes of resolving conflict (4) getting to know the "Other" - preconceived notions about the other side (5) on dialogue- what is dialogue, can dialogue offer means for conflict resolution, what are the benefits of dialogue to inter-cultural and inter-racial conflicts, (6) empathy, generosity, and kindness (7) wrapping up - hopes for the future at the personal and community levels, practical suggestions (8) goodbye and summary - what have we learned ,"gift giving", summary of process by group leaders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Behavioral Assessment of Dialogue
Dyadic Tension
|
1.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .90
|
1.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .89
|
|
Behavioral Assessment of Dialogue
Behavioral Empathy
|
3.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .81
|
3.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .79
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: trail 2- 3 months after trail1Population: Some participants didn't have a measure due to insufficient saliva
Three saliva samples were collected using Salivettes® at baseline, following interaction, and ten minutes after end and averaged. All samples were then stored at -20°C. Salivette were treated as following: centrifuged twice, at 4°C at 1500 x g for 30 minutes, aliquoted and lyophilized over few days- to concentrate by 4 times. The dry samples were reconstructed in the assay buffer immediately before analysis using an oxytocin enzyme immunoassay commercial kit (ENZO, NY). The assay preformed according the kit's instruction. The concentration of oxytocin was calculated using MatLab-7
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=38 Participants
no intervention for 3 months
|
Experimental Group
n=38 Participants
Peace-Building Intervention Process- The intervention process consists of eight sessions and adheres to a manualized protocol that we developed. Each session lasts 120 minutes.
Peace-Building Intervention Process: The eight sessions include (1) presentation of the self to others members (2) getting familiar with the other culture (3) what is a conflict - how do conflicts come about, what are adaptive and non-adaptive modes of resolving conflict (4) getting to know the "Other" - preconceived notions about the other side (5) on dialogue- what is dialogue, can dialogue offer means for conflict resolution, what are the benefits of dialogue to inter-cultural and inter-racial conflicts, (6) empathy, generosity, and kindness (7) wrapping up - hopes for the future at the personal and community levels, practical suggestions (8) goodbye and summary - what have we learned ,"gift giving", summary of process by group leaders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hormonal Assays-Oxytocin
|
40.03 picogram/ml
Standard Deviation 57.43
|
43.42 picogram/ml
Standard Deviation 35.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: trail 2- 3 months after trail 1Population: All participants
Participants were interviewed individually on their attitudes towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Perspective-taking (PT), addressed the degree to which adolescents thought justice was solely on their side and the other side is totally wrong, aggressive, and vicious compared to the ability to see some justice on both sides. Participants received binary score for PT.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=40 Participants
no intervention for 3 months
|
Experimental Group
n=39 Participants
Peace-Building Intervention Process- The intervention process consists of eight sessions and adheres to a manualized protocol that we developed. Each session lasts 120 minutes.
Peace-Building Intervention Process: The eight sessions include (1) presentation of the self to others members (2) getting familiar with the other culture (3) what is a conflict - how do conflicts come about, what are adaptive and non-adaptive modes of resolving conflict (4) getting to know the "Other" - preconceived notions about the other side (5) on dialogue- what is dialogue, can dialogue offer means for conflict resolution, what are the benefits of dialogue to inter-cultural and inter-racial conflicts, (6) empathy, generosity, and kindness (7) wrapping up - hopes for the future at the personal and community levels, practical suggestions (8) goodbye and summary - what have we learned ,"gift giving", summary of process by group leaders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in PT (Perspective-taking) After Intervention
justice is solely on our side
|
16 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Changes in PT (Perspective-taking) After Intervention
There is some justice in the other side
|
24 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: trail 2- 3 months after trail1Population: All participants
Perspective-taking (PT), addressed the degree to which adolescents thought justice was solely on their side compared to the ability to see some justice on both sides. Participants received binary score for PT and were divided to high vs low PT groups accordingly. We compared participants' tension levels, according to level of PT and group (intervention or control). Interactions were coded with the "Coding Interactive Behavior" (CIB) manual (Feldman, 1998), adolescent version. This version of the CIB is composed of 32 codes rated on a scale of 1 to 5, as higher score means a better outcome. Dyadic Tension is the averaged codes; displaying a tense, anxious, and uneasy behavior, fear, and constriction of communicative output and social behavior.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=40 Participants
no intervention for 3 months
|
Experimental Group
n=39 Participants
Peace-Building Intervention Process- The intervention process consists of eight sessions and adheres to a manualized protocol that we developed. Each session lasts 120 minutes.
Peace-Building Intervention Process: The eight sessions include (1) presentation of the self to others members (2) getting familiar with the other culture (3) what is a conflict - how do conflicts come about, what are adaptive and non-adaptive modes of resolving conflict (4) getting to know the "Other" - preconceived notions about the other side (5) on dialogue- what is dialogue, can dialogue offer means for conflict resolution, what are the benefits of dialogue to inter-cultural and inter-racial conflicts, (6) empathy, generosity, and kindness (7) wrapping up - hopes for the future at the personal and community levels, practical suggestions (8) goodbye and summary - what have we learned ,"gift giving", summary of process by group leaders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Tension as a Function of Perspective-taking and Group
High Perspective-taking
|
2.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
|
Changes in Tension as a Function of Perspective-taking and Group
Low Perspective-taking
|
2.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
2.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: trail 2- 3 months after trail 1Population: All participants
Perspective-taking (PT), addressed the degree to which adolescents thought justice was solely on their side compared to the ability to see some justice on both sides. Participants received binary score for PT and were divided to high vs low PT groups accordingly. We compared participants' behavioral empathy levels. Interactions were coded with the "Coding Interactive Behavior" (CIB) manual (Feldman, 1998), adolescent version. This version of the CIB is composed of 32 codes rated on a scale of 1 to 5, as higher score means a better outcome. "Behavioral Empathy" is the average of the following CIB codes: expressing empathy, acknowledging other's communication, elaborating other's topics and ideas, maintaining positive affect, maintaining visual, and give-and-receive reciprocity
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=40 Participants
no intervention for 3 months
|
Experimental Group
n=39 Participants
Peace-Building Intervention Process- The intervention process consists of eight sessions and adheres to a manualized protocol that we developed. Each session lasts 120 minutes.
Peace-Building Intervention Process: The eight sessions include (1) presentation of the self to others members (2) getting familiar with the other culture (3) what is a conflict - how do conflicts come about, what are adaptive and non-adaptive modes of resolving conflict (4) getting to know the "Other" - preconceived notions about the other side (5) on dialogue- what is dialogue, can dialogue offer means for conflict resolution, what are the benefits of dialogue to inter-cultural and inter-racial conflicts, (6) empathy, generosity, and kindness (7) wrapping up - hopes for the future at the personal and community levels, practical suggestions (8) goodbye and summary - what have we learned ,"gift giving", summary of process by group leaders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Empathy as a Function of Perspective Taking
High Perspective-taking
|
1.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
1.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
|
Changes in Empathy as a Function of Perspective Taking
Low Perspective-taking
|
1.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
1.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
Adverse Events
no Intervention for 3 Months
Experimental Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place