Examining the Effectiveness of Self-Acceptance Group Therapy

NCT ID: NCT02121561

Last Updated: 2015-07-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-30

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

When people feel shame, they experience negative thoughts about themselves ("I'm a bad person") and urges to avoid others. Shame is related to many psychological problems, such as depression, social anxiety, and borderline personality disorder (BPD). Because there are currently no well-tested treatments for shame, this study will examine the utility of Self-Acceptance Group Therapy (SAGT). SAGT is short-term group therapy that addresses shame specifically. Changes in shame, mood, and behavior will be examined over the course of treatment and a one-month follow-up.

Based on theory and existing evidence, Hypothesis 1a is that individuals with elevated initial levels of shame will report improvements on all outcome measures (e.g., reductions in trait shame, increases in self-acceptance) from pre-treatment to post-treatment, and Hypothesis 1b is that these gains will be maintained at follow-up one month after treatment completion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Shame is an unpleasant self-conscious emotion that can be experienced following unwanted outcomes and events (Lewis, 1971). Cognitively, shame involves the attribution of negative outcomes to global, stable characterological flaws (e.g., thinking "That happened because I am a bad person;" Tracy \& Robins, 2006). Behaviorally, shame involves urges to avoid or withdraw from other people in order to hide perceived flaws (e.g., Lindsay-Hartz et al., 1995). Shame has been theoretically implicated in the development and maintenance of many forms of psychopathology and problematic behaviors, including depression, social anxiety, and borderline personality pathology (e.g., Beck \& Alford, 2009; Clark \& Wells, 1995; Rizvi et al., 2011; Schoenleber \& Berenbaum, 2012). Indeed, research indicates that shame is ubiquitous in psychopathology (see Tangney \& Dearing, 2002), resulting in increasing recognition that treatments specifically addressing shame are needed (see Dearing \& Tangney, 2011). Although a few promising and potentially shame-relevant treatments have recently been described (Brown et al., 2011; Germer \& Neff, 2013; Gilbert, 2011), no well-validated treatments currently exist and these novel treatments generally do not address both the cognitive and the behavioral components of shame.

Evidence that shame involves both problematic thinking patterns and maladaptive actions suggests that effective interventions for shame need to address each of these components. Indeed, there is some initial evidence that cognitive and behavioral therapy techniques can reduce shame, at least in response to specific triggers. For example, cognitive restructuring in the context of cognitive processing therapy has been found to reduce trauma-related self-blaming thoughts (Resick et al., 2002), and women instructed in how to use the dialectical behavior therapy opposite-action skill to address a specified shame trigger reported reductions in shame about the given trigger (Rizvi \& Linehan, 2005).

Drawing from this literature, a shame-focused intervention, Self-Acceptance Group Therapy (SAGT), was developed to target both the cognitive and behavioral components of shame from a cognitive-behavior therapy framework. SAGT is an 8-week group treatment that involves psychoeducation and training in cognitive and behavioral shame-coping skills in order to promote improvements in self-acceptance, which is the conceptual opposite of shame. For example, group members are taught how to recognize and challenge shame-eliciting thoughts, as well as how to effectively discuss shame-eliciting topics with others in order to alleviate shame, foster adaptive social support, and enhance their ability to demonstrate self-kindness/compassion. As in other cognitive-behavior therapies, group members complete weekly homework assignments that allow them to practice their new skills. In addition, in-session activities are used to promote further skills practice and target the social disconnection created by shame. An initial version of SAGT was provided to 8 women Veterans at the G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center by one of the researchers (Dr. Schoenleber). Preliminary data indicate that group members reported large reductions in trait shame (d = 1.55) and improvements in self-acceptance (d = 2.15). Based on feedback provided by these group members, an updated version of the SAGT protocol has been prepared. The primary aim of the present study is to examine whether the current version of Self-Acceptance Group Therapy is effective in improving shame, as well as emotional and interpersonal functioning among individuals with elevated shame.

Based on theory and existing evidence, Hypothesis 1a is that individuals with elevated initial levels of shame will report improvements on all outcome measures (e.g., trait shame, self-acceptance, psychiatric symptoms) from pre-treatment to post-treatment, and Hypothesis 1b is that these gains will be maintained at follow-up one month after treatment completion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shame

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Self-Acceptance Group Therapy

Participants receive Self-Acceptance Group Therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Self-Acceptance Group Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

SAGT is an 8-week group therapy for persons with high levels of shame focused on providing psychoeducation regarding shame and self-acceptance and teaching skills for effectively responding to shame. SAGT is based on a cognitive-behavioral framework. Group members are taught how to recognize and challenge shame-eliciting thoughts, effectively discuss shame-eliciting topics with others, and build self-acceptance. Group members also complete weekly homework assignments that allow them to practice their new skills. All sessions include a review of homework and previously discussed concepts, introduction of new material, and in-session discussions/activities. The content of SAGT includes: defining self-acceptance and recognizing shame; increasing balanced thinking about oneself; improving social connections; increasing skillful interpersonal disclosure; challenging unhelpful expectations; handling setbacks; review and commitment to future practice.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Self-Acceptance Group Therapy

SAGT is an 8-week group therapy for persons with high levels of shame focused on providing psychoeducation regarding shame and self-acceptance and teaching skills for effectively responding to shame. SAGT is based on a cognitive-behavioral framework. Group members are taught how to recognize and challenge shame-eliciting thoughts, effectively discuss shame-eliciting topics with others, and build self-acceptance. Group members also complete weekly homework assignments that allow them to practice their new skills. All sessions include a review of homework and previously discussed concepts, introduction of new material, and in-session discussions/activities. The content of SAGT includes: defining self-acceptance and recognizing shame; increasing balanced thinking about oneself; improving social connections; increasing skillful interpersonal disclosure; challenging unhelpful expectations; handling setbacks; review and commitment to future practice.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Eligible participants will be adults (age 18 or older) who are fluent in English (as all materials will be presented in English) and report elevated levels of trait shame on the Experience of Shame Scale (ESS) at screening. Specifically, based on past research, individuals must score at least 55 on the ESS screening items, which is consistent with levels of shame often reported by clinical samples. In addition, all interested individuals must have a therapist/case manager/psychiatrist who provides them with individual psychotherapy on a regular basis and for whom the participant is willing to sign an Authorization for Release of Health Information.

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals will be excluded from the present study if they do not report significant difficulties with shame (i.e. ESS screening item scores less than 55), do not have an individual therapist/case manager/psychiatrist who monitors and addresses their broader mental health concerns, are experiencing active psychosis (i.e. delusions and/or hallucinations), or are experiencing an episode of mania.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Mississippi Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kim Gratz

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Mississippi Medical Center

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UMississippi2014-0010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.