Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study To Investigate A Clostridium Difficile Vaccine In Healthy Adults Aged 50 to 85 Years, Who Will Each Receive 3 Doses Of Vaccine. (NCT NCT02117570)

NCT ID: NCT02117570

Last Updated: 2017-01-30

Results Overview

Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

185 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From Day of Dose 1 vaccination to within 7 days after Dose 1

Results posted on

2017-01-30

Participant Flow

In Stage 1, 42 participants aged 50 to 64 years were randomized. After at least 14 days of post-Dose 2 blinded safety data for all Stage 1 participants was reviewed and determined safe, the study proceeded to Stage 2, during which 143 participants aged 65 to 85 years were randomized.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Placebo
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
STARTED
6
18
18
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
Vaccine: Dose 1
6
18
18
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
Vaccine: Dose 2
6
18
18
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
Vaccine: Dose 3
6
17
18
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
COMPLETED
5
15
17
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
NOT COMPLETED
1
3
1
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
STARTED
21
62
60
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Vaccine: Dose 1
21
61
60
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Vaccine: Dose 2
17
53
50
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Vaccine: Dose 3
4
12
12
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
COMPLETED
20
59
54
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
NOT COMPLETED
1
3
6

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Placebo
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
Withdrawal by Subject
0
2
1
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
Lost to Follow-up
1
1
0
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Withdrawal by Subject
0
0
2
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Death
0
0
1
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Protocol Violation
0
0
1
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Lost to Follow-up
1
2
2
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Withdrew before vaccination
0
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

A Study To Investigate A Clostridium Difficile Vaccine In Healthy Adults Aged 50 to 85 Years, Who Will Each Receive 3 Doses Of Vaccine.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Placebo
n=27 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=79 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=78 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Total
n=184 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
Ages 50 to 64 years
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
42 Participants
n=4 Participants
Age, Customized
Ages 65 to 85 years
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
61 Participants
n=7 Participants
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
142 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Ages 50 to 64 years: Female
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Ages 50 to 64 years: Male
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
27 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Ages 65 to 85 years: Female
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
86 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Ages 65 to 85 years: Male
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
56 Participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day of Dose 1 vaccination to within 7 days after Dose 1

Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine

Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Any
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
50.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 74.0
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Mild
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
50.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 74.0
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Any
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
55.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.78 to 78.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Mild
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day of Dose 2 vaccination to within 14 days after Dose 2

Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received at least 2 doses of study vaccine

Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
61.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.7 to 82.7
66.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 41.0 to 86.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
55.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.8 to 78.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Any
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
50.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 74.0
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Mild
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Any
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
61.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.7 to 82.7
83.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 58.6 to 96.4
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Mild
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
55.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.8 to 78.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day of Dose 3 vaccination to within 14 days after Dose 3

Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received all 3 doses of study vaccine.

Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=17 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
38.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.3 to 64.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.3 to 59.0
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
55.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.8 to 78.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day of Dose 1 vaccination to within 7 days of Dose 1

Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine

Fever=temperature ≥38.0°C (100.4°C): Mild=38.0°C to 38.4°C (100.4°F-101.1°F); moderate=38.5°C to 38.9°C (101.2°F-102.0°F); severe=39.0°C to 40.0°C (102.1°F-104.0°F); Grade 4= \>40.0°C (\>104.0°F). Vomiting: Mild=1 to 2 times in 24 hours; moderate= \>2 times in 24 hours; severe=requires intravenous hydration; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization for hypotensive shock. Diarrhea: Mild=2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hours; moderate=4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hours; severe= ≥6 loose stools in 24 hours; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Headache, fatigue, new or worsening joint or muscle pain: Mild=no interference with activity; moderate=some interference with activity; severe=significant interference with activity, prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Any systemic event: Fever ≥38.0°C, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, or new or worsening muscle or joint pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/ worsening muscle pain: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Any
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Mild
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Any
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Mild
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Any
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Mild
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day of Dose 2 vaccination to within 14 days after Dose 2

Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received at least 2 doses of study vaccine

Fever=temperature ≥38.0°C (100.4°C): Mild=38.0°C to 38.4°C (100.4°F-101.1°F); moderate=38.5°C to 38.9°C (101.2°F-102.0°F); severe=39.0°C to 40.0°C (102.1°F-104.0°F); Grade 4= \>40.0°C (\>104.0°F). Vomiting: Mild=1 to 2 times in 24 hours; moderate= \>2 times in 24 hours; severe=requires intravenous hydration; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization for hypotensive shock. Diarrhea: Mild=2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hours; moderate=4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hours; severe= ≥6 loose stools in 24 hours; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Headache, fatigue, new or worsening joint or muscle pain: Mild=no interference with activity; moderate=some interference with activity; severe=significant interference with activity, prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Any systemic event: Fever ≥38.0°C, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, or new or worsening muscle or joint pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Any
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.3 to 59.0
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Mild
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/ worsening joint pain: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Any
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
55.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.8 to 78.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Mild
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Moderate
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 49.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.3 to 59.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Any
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
38.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.3 to 64.3
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.3 to 59.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Mild
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Moderate
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Any
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Mild
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day of Dose 3 vaccination to within 14 days after Dose 3

Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received all 3 doses of study vaccine

Fever=temperature ≥38.0°C (100.4°C): Mild=38.0°C to 38.4°C (100.4°F-101.1°F); moderate=38.5°C to 38.9°C (101.2°F-102.0°F); severe=39.0°C to 40.0°C (102.1°F-104.0°F); Grade 4= \>40.0°C (\>104.0°F). Vomiting: Mild=1 to 2 times in 24 hours; moderate= \>2 times in 24 hours; severe=requires intravenous hydration; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization for hypotensive shock. Diarrhea: Mild=2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hours; moderate=4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hours; severe= ≥6 loose stools in 24 hours; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Headache, fatigue, new or worsening joint or muscle pain: Mild=no interference with activity; moderate=some interference with activity; severe=significant interference with activity, prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Any systemic event: Fever ≥38.0°C, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, or new or worsening muscle or joint pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=17 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
41.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.4 to 67.1
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
29.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.3 to 56.0
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Any
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
29.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.3 to 56.0
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Mild
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Any
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Moderate
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
17.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 43.4
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Any
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
17.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 43.4
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Moderate
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Any
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
52.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.8 to 77.0
61.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.7 to 82.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
29.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.3 to 56.0
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Moderate
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: AEs: From informed consent to Visit 6 (Month 2). SAEs: From informed consent to Visit 9 (Month 13)

Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or congenital anomaly/birth defect; is life-threatening; or requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) to Month 2 and Serious AEs (SAEs) to Month 13 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
AEs
16.7 Participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
33.3 Participants
Interval 13.3 to 59.0
50.0 Participants
Interval 26.0 to 74.0
Percentage of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) to Month 2 and Serious AEs (SAEs) to Month 13 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
SAEs
16.7 Participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
11.1 Participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day of Dose 1 vaccination to within 7 days of Dose 1

Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 years who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine.

Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=61 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=60 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Any
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 30.4
24.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.5 to 37.3
30.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.8 to 43.2
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Mild
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 30.4
21.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.9 to 33.7
28.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.5 to 41.4
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.3
1.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
6.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.8 to 16.2
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.3
5.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 13.9
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
1.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.8
1.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
1.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.8
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Any
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 30.4
27.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.1 to 40.8
31.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.3 to 45.0
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Mild
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 30.4
23.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.2 to 35.5
26.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.1 to 39.7
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
4.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 13.7
5.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 13.9
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day of Dose 2 vaccination to 14 days after Dose 2

Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 years who received at least 2 doses of study vaccine

Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=53 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=50 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Any
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
66.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 51.7 to 78.5
64.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 49.2 to 77.1
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Mild
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
45.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.6 to 59.6
48.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.7 to 62.6
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
18.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.4 to 32.0
14.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.8 to 26.7
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
1.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
22.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.3 to 36.2
30.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.9 to 44.6
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
9.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
8.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.2 to 19.2
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
5.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 15.7
18.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.6 to 31.4
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
7.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 18.2
4.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 13.7
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
26.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.3 to 40.3
26.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.6 to 40.3
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
11.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 23.0
12.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.5 to 24.3
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
9.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
12.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.5 to 24.3
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
5.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 15.7
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Any
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
67.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 53.7 to 80.1
70.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 55.4 to 82.1
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Mild
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
34.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 48.3
34.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 48.8
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
24.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.8 to 38.3
30.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.9 to 44.6
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
9.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
6.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.3 to 16.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day of Dose 3 vaccination to 14 days after Dose 3

Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 years who received all 3 doses of study vaccine

Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=4 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=12 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=12 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 600.2
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.9 to 65.1
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day of Dose 1 vaccination to within 7 days of Dose 1

Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 years who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine

Fever=temperature ≥38.0°C (100.4°C): Mild=38.0°C to 38.4°C (100.4°F-101.1°F); moderate=38.5°C to 38.9°C (101.2°F-102.0°F); severe=39.0°C to 40.0°C (102.1°F-104.0°F); Grade 4= \>40.0°C (\>104.0°F). Vomiting: Mild=1 to 2 times in 24 hours; moderate= \>2 times in 24 hours; severe=requires intravenous hydration; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization for hypotensive shock. Diarrhea: Mild=2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hours; moderate=4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hours; severe= ≥6 loose stools in 24 hours; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Headache, fatigue, new or worsening joint or muscle pain: Mild=no interference with activity; moderate=some interference with activity; severe=significant interference with activity, prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Any systemic event: Fever ≥38.0°C, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, or new or worsening muscle or joint pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=61 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=60 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
1.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
1.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
1.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.8
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
1.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.8
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Any
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
11.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.7 to 22.2
15.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.1 to 26.6
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Mild
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
8.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.7 to 18.1
11.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.8 to 22.6
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.3
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Any
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 30.4
13.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.8 to 24.2
15.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.1 to 26.6
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
13.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.8 to 24.2
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.8 to 18.4
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Moderate
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 30.4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
6.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.8 to 16.2
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Any
19.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.4 to 41.9
26.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.8 to 39.1
26.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.1 to 39.7
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Mild
14.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 36.3
18.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.4 to 30.0
13.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.9 to 24.6
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Moderate
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
8.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.7 to 18.1
13.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.9 to 24.6
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Any
19.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.4 to 41.9
4.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 13.7
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.8 to 18.4
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Mild
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.3
6.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.8 to 16.2
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Moderate
14.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 36.3
1.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.8
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
1.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Any
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
8.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.7 to 18.1
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.8 to 18.4
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Mild
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
1.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.8
5.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 13.9
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
6.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.8 to 15.9
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.5
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Any
23.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.2 to 47.2
32.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.3 to 46.0
45.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 32.1 to 58.4
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Mild
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
21.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.9 to 33.7
23.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.4 to 36.0
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Moderate
19.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.4 to 41.9
11.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.7 to 22.2
20.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.8 to 32.3
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
1.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day of Dose 2 vaccination to within 14 days after Dose 2

Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 years who received at least 2 doses of study vaccine

Fever=temperature ≥38.0°C (100.4°C): Mild=38.0°C to 38.4°C (100.4°F-101.1°F); moderate=38.5°C to 38.9°C (101.2°F-102.0°F); severe=39.0°C to 40.0°C (102.1°F-104.0°F); Grade 4= \>40.0°C (\>104.0°F). Vomiting: Mild=1 to 2 times in 24 hours; moderate= \>2 times in 24 hours; severe=requires intravenous hydration; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization for hypotensive shock. Diarrhea: Mild=2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hours; moderate=4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hours; severe= ≥6 loose stools in 24 hours; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Headache, fatigue, new or worsening joint or muscle pain: Mild=no interference with activity; moderate=some interference with activity; severe=significant interference with activity, prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Any systemic event: Fever ≥38.0°C, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, or new or worsening muscle or joint pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=53 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=50 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Mild
17.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 43.4
17.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.1 to 29.8
12.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.5 to 24.3
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Moderate
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
9.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Any
17.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 43.4
39.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.5 to 54.0
32.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.5 to 46.7
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Mild
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
20.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.8 to 34.1
20.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 33.7
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Moderate
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
18.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.4 to 32.0
12.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.5 to 24.3
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Any
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
26.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.3 to 40.3
24.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.1 to 38.2
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
17.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.1 to 29.8
14.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.8 to 26.7
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Moderate
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
9.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
10.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.3 to 21.8
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Any
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
20.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.8 to 34.1
14.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.8 to 26.7
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
13.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 25.3
10.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.3 to 21.8
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Moderate
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
7.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 18.2
4.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 13.7
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Any
35.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.2 to 61.7
50.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 36.8 to 64.9
58.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 43.2 to 71.8
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Mild
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
17.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.1 to 29.8
34.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 48.8
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Moderate
29.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.3 to 56.0
32.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.9 to 46.3
20.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 33.7
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
1.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
4.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 13.7
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
1.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
4.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 13.7
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
1.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
1.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
1.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Any
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
17.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.1 to 29.8
18.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.6 to 31.4
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Mild
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
7.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 18.2
16.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.2 to 29.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Moderate
17.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 43.4
9.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Any
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
26.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.3 to 40.3
14.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.8 to 26.7

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day of Dose 3 vaccination to within 14 days after Dose 3

Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 years who received all 3 doses of study vaccine

Fever=temperature ≥38.0°C (100.4°C): Mild=38.0°C to 38.4°C (100.4°F-101.1°F); moderate=38.5°C to 38.9°C (101.2°F-102.0°F); severe=39.0°C to 40.0°C (102.1°F-104.0°F); Grade 4= \>40.0°C (\>104.0°F). Vomiting: Mild=1 to 2 times in 24 hours; moderate= \>2 times in 24 hours; severe=requires intravenous hydration; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization for hypotensive shock. Diarrhea: Mild=2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hours; moderate=4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hours; severe= ≥6 loose stools in 24 hours; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Headache, fatigue, new or worsening joint or muscle pain: Mild=no interference with activity; moderate=some interference with activity; severe=significant interference with activity, prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Any systemic event: Fever ≥38.0°C, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, or new or worsening muscle or joint pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=4 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=12 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=12 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Any
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Severe
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Any
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Mild
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.9 to 65.1
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Any
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Mild
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Severe
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Any
50.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 93.2
50.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.1 to 78.9
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Mild
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Moderate
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Severe
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Grade 4
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: AEs: From informed consent to Visit 6 (Month 2). SAEs: From informed consent to Visit 9 (Month 13)

Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or congenital anomaly/birth defect; is life-threatening; or requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=61 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=60 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Percentage of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) to Month 2 and Serious AEs (SAEs) to Month 13 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
AEs
38.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.1 to 61.6
36.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.2 to 49.4
41.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.1 to 55.1
Percentage of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) to Month 2 and Serious AEs (SAEs) to Month 13 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
SAEs
14.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 36.3
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.3
10.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 20.5

Adverse Events

Placebo (50-64 Year Age Cohort)

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg (50-64 Year Age Cohort)

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg (50-64 Year Age Cohort)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 9 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo (65-85 Year Age Cohort)

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg (65-85 Year Age Cohort)

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 22 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg (65-85 Year Age Cohort)

Serious events: 6 serious events
Other events: 22 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Placebo (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
n=18 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
n=18 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Placebo (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
n=21 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
n=61 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
n=60 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Gangrene
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast Cancer
16.7%
1/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Sinus arrest
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Pelvic abscess
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device breakage
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device malfunction
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Placebo (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
n=18 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
n=18 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Placebo (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
n=21 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
n=61 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
n=60 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Fatigue
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Injection site erythema
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
16.7%
3/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.3%
2/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
8.3%
5/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Cervical radiculopathy
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.3%
2/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ecchymosis
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Sinus arrest
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Influenza like illness
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Injection site bruising
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.3%
2/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Injection site induration
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Injection site pain
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.3%
2/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Injection site rash
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Injection site reaction
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Injection site swelling
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
General disorders
Pain
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Pelvic abscess
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Skin candida
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.3%
2/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Excoriation
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.3%
2/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.3%
2/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
3.3%
2/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal fracture
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device malfunction
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Surgical and medical procedures
Sinus operation
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
5.0%
3/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Lymphoedema
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer, Inc

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER