Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study To Investigate A Clostridium Difficile Vaccine In Healthy Adults Aged 50 to 85 Years, Who Will Each Receive 3 Doses Of Vaccine. (NCT NCT02117570)
NCT ID: NCT02117570
Last Updated: 2017-01-30
Results Overview
Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
185 participants
From Day of Dose 1 vaccination to within 7 days after Dose 1
2017-01-30
Participant Flow
In Stage 1, 42 participants aged 50 to 64 years were randomized. After at least 14 days of post-Dose 2 blinded safety data for all Stage 1 participants was reviewed and determined safe, the study proceeded to Stage 2, during which 143 participants aged 65 to 85 years were randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
STARTED
|
6
|
18
|
18
|
|
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
Vaccine: Dose 1
|
6
|
18
|
18
|
|
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
Vaccine: Dose 2
|
6
|
18
|
18
|
|
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
Vaccine: Dose 3
|
6
|
17
|
18
|
|
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
COMPLETED
|
5
|
15
|
17
|
|
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
|
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
STARTED
|
21
|
62
|
60
|
|
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Vaccine: Dose 1
|
21
|
61
|
60
|
|
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Vaccine: Dose 2
|
17
|
53
|
50
|
|
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Vaccine: Dose 3
|
4
|
12
|
12
|
|
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
COMPLETED
|
20
|
59
|
54
|
|
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
3
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
|
Stage 1 Participants Aged 50 to 64 Years
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Death
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
|
Stage 2 Participants Aged 65 to 85 Years
Withdrew before vaccination
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study To Investigate A Clostridium Difficile Vaccine In Healthy Adults Aged 50 to 85 Years, Who Will Each Receive 3 Doses Of Vaccine.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=27 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=79 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=78 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Total
n=184 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
Ages 50 to 64 years
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Ages 65 to 85 years
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
142 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Ages 50 to 64 years: Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Ages 50 to 64 years: Male
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Ages 65 to 85 years: Female
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Ages 65 to 85 years: Male
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day of Dose 1 vaccination to within 7 days after Dose 1Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine
Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Any
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 74.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Mild
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 74.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Any
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
55.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.78 to 78.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Mild
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day of Dose 2 vaccination to within 14 days after Dose 2Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received at least 2 doses of study vaccine
Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
61.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.7 to 82.7
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 41.0 to 86.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
|
55.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.8 to 78.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Any
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 74.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Mild
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Any
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
61.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.7 to 82.7
|
83.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 58.6 to 96.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Mild
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
|
55.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.8 to 78.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day of Dose 3 vaccination to within 14 days after Dose 3Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received all 3 doses of study vaccine.
Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=17 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
|
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
|
38.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.3 to 64.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.3 to 59.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
|
55.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.8 to 78.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
|
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Prespecified Local Reactions Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day of Dose 1 vaccination to within 7 days of Dose 1Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine
Fever=temperature ≥38.0°C (100.4°C): Mild=38.0°C to 38.4°C (100.4°F-101.1°F); moderate=38.5°C to 38.9°C (101.2°F-102.0°F); severe=39.0°C to 40.0°C (102.1°F-104.0°F); Grade 4= \>40.0°C (\>104.0°F). Vomiting: Mild=1 to 2 times in 24 hours; moderate= \>2 times in 24 hours; severe=requires intravenous hydration; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization for hypotensive shock. Diarrhea: Mild=2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hours; moderate=4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hours; severe= ≥6 loose stools in 24 hours; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Headache, fatigue, new or worsening joint or muscle pain: Mild=no interference with activity; moderate=some interference with activity; severe=significant interference with activity, prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Any systemic event: Fever ≥38.0°C, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, or new or worsening muscle or joint pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/ worsening muscle pain: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Any
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Mild
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Any
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Mild
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Any
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Mild
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 7 Days After Dose 1 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day of Dose 2 vaccination to within 14 days after Dose 2Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received at least 2 doses of study vaccine
Fever=temperature ≥38.0°C (100.4°C): Mild=38.0°C to 38.4°C (100.4°F-101.1°F); moderate=38.5°C to 38.9°C (101.2°F-102.0°F); severe=39.0°C to 40.0°C (102.1°F-104.0°F); Grade 4= \>40.0°C (\>104.0°F). Vomiting: Mild=1 to 2 times in 24 hours; moderate= \>2 times in 24 hours; severe=requires intravenous hydration; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization for hypotensive shock. Diarrhea: Mild=2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hours; moderate=4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hours; severe= ≥6 loose stools in 24 hours; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Headache, fatigue, new or worsening joint or muscle pain: Mild=no interference with activity; moderate=some interference with activity; severe=significant interference with activity, prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Any systemic event: Fever ≥38.0°C, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, or new or worsening muscle or joint pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Any
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.3 to 59.0
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Mild
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/ worsening joint pain: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Any
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
|
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
|
55.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 30.8 to 78.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Mild
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Moderate
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 49.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.3 to 59.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Any
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
|
38.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.3 to 64.3
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.3 to 59.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Mild
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Moderate
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Any
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Mild
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day of Dose 3 vaccination to within 14 days after Dose 3Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received all 3 doses of study vaccine
Fever=temperature ≥38.0°C (100.4°C): Mild=38.0°C to 38.4°C (100.4°F-101.1°F); moderate=38.5°C to 38.9°C (101.2°F-102.0°F); severe=39.0°C to 40.0°C (102.1°F-104.0°F); Grade 4= \>40.0°C (\>104.0°F). Vomiting: Mild=1 to 2 times in 24 hours; moderate= \>2 times in 24 hours; severe=requires intravenous hydration; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization for hypotensive shock. Diarrhea: Mild=2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hours; moderate=4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hours; severe= ≥6 loose stools in 24 hours; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Headache, fatigue, new or worsening joint or muscle pain: Mild=no interference with activity; moderate=some interference with activity; severe=significant interference with activity, prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Any systemic event: Fever ≥38.0°C, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, or new or worsening muscle or joint pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=17 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
41.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.4 to 67.1
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
29.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.3 to 56.0
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Any
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
29.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.3 to 56.0
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Mild
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Any
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
|
27.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 53.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 41.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Moderate
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
|
17.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 43.4
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Any
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.4 to 47.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
17.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 43.4
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Moderate
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Any
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
|
52.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 27.8 to 77.0
|
61.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 35.7 to 82.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
29.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.3 to 56.0
|
44.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 69.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Moderate
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
5.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 27.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 45.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: AEs: From informed consent to Visit 6 (Month 2). SAEs: From informed consent to Visit 9 (Month 13)Population: All randomized participants aged 50 to 64 years who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or congenital anomaly/birth defect; is life-threatening; or requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=18 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) to Month 2 and Serious AEs (SAEs) to Month 13 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
AEs
|
16.7 Participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
33.3 Participants
Interval 13.3 to 59.0
|
50.0 Participants
Interval 26.0 to 74.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) to Month 2 and Serious AEs (SAEs) to Month 13 (50- to 64-Year Age Cohort)
SAEs
|
16.7 Participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
11.1 Participants
Interval 1.4 to 34.7
|
0 Participants
Interval 0.0 to 18.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day of Dose 1 vaccination to within 7 days of Dose 1Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 years who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine.
Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=61 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=60 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Any
|
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 30.4
|
24.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.5 to 37.3
|
30.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.8 to 43.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Mild
|
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 30.4
|
21.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.9 to 33.7
|
28.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.5 to 41.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.3
|
1.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
6.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.8 to 16.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.3
|
5.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 13.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
1.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.8
|
1.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
1.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.8
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Any
|
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 30.4
|
27.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.1 to 40.8
|
31.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.3 to 45.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Mild
|
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 30.4
|
23.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.2 to 35.5
|
26.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.1 to 39.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
4.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 13.7
|
5.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 13.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day of Dose 2 vaccination to 14 days after Dose 2Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 years who received at least 2 doses of study vaccine
Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=53 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=50 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Any
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
|
66.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 51.7 to 78.5
|
64.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 49.2 to 77.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Mild
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
|
45.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 31.6 to 59.6
|
48.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 33.7 to 62.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
18.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.4 to 32.0
|
14.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.8 to 26.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
1.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
|
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
22.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 12.3 to 36.2
|
30.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.9 to 44.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
9.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
|
8.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.2 to 19.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
5.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 15.7
|
18.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.6 to 31.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
7.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 18.2
|
4.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 13.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
26.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.3 to 40.3
|
26.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.6 to 40.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
11.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 23.0
|
12.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.5 to 24.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
9.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
|
12.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.5 to 24.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
5.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 15.7
|
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Any
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
|
67.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 53.7 to 80.1
|
70.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 55.4 to 82.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Mild
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
|
34.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.5 to 48.3
|
34.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 48.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
24.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.8 to 38.3
|
30.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 17.9 to 44.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
9.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
|
6.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.3 to 16.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day of Dose 3 vaccination to 14 days after Dose 3Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 years who received all 3 doses of study vaccine
Pain at injection site: mild=does not interfere with activity; moderate=interferes with activity; severe=prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Redness/swelling: Mild=2.5 to 5.0 cm; moderate= \>5.0 to 10.0 cm; severe= \>10 cm; Grade 4=necrosis or exfoliative dermatitis for redness category and only necrosis for swelling category. Any local reaction=any pain at the injection site, any swelling, or any redness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=4 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=12 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=12 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 600.2
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Pain at injection site: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Redness: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Swelling: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.9 to 65.1
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Local Reaction Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any local reaction: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day of Dose 1 vaccination to within 7 days of Dose 1Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 years who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine
Fever=temperature ≥38.0°C (100.4°C): Mild=38.0°C to 38.4°C (100.4°F-101.1°F); moderate=38.5°C to 38.9°C (101.2°F-102.0°F); severe=39.0°C to 40.0°C (102.1°F-104.0°F); Grade 4= \>40.0°C (\>104.0°F). Vomiting: Mild=1 to 2 times in 24 hours; moderate= \>2 times in 24 hours; severe=requires intravenous hydration; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization for hypotensive shock. Diarrhea: Mild=2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hours; moderate=4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hours; severe= ≥6 loose stools in 24 hours; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Headache, fatigue, new or worsening joint or muscle pain: Mild=no interference with activity; moderate=some interference with activity; severe=significant interference with activity, prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Any systemic event: Fever ≥38.0°C, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, or new or worsening muscle or joint pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=61 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=60 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
1.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
1.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
1.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.8
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
1.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.8
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Any
|
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
|
11.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.7 to 22.2
|
15.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.1 to 26.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Mild
|
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
|
8.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.7 to 18.1
|
11.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.8 to 22.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.3
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Any
|
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 30.4
|
13.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.8 to 24.2
|
15.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.1 to 26.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
13.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.8 to 24.2
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.8 to 18.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Moderate
|
9.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.2 to 30.4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
6.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.8 to 16.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Any
|
19.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.4 to 41.9
|
26.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.8 to 39.1
|
26.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.1 to 39.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Mild
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 36.3
|
18.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.4 to 30.0
|
13.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.9 to 24.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Moderate
|
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
|
8.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.7 to 18.1
|
13.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.9 to 24.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Any
|
19.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.4 to 41.9
|
4.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 13.7
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.8 to 18.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Mild
|
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.3
|
6.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.8 to 16.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Moderate
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 36.3
|
1.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.8
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
1.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Any
|
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
|
8.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.7 to 18.1
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.8 to 18.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Mild
|
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
|
1.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.8
|
5.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 13.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
6.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.8 to 15.9
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Any
|
23.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.2 to 47.2
|
32.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.3 to 46.0
|
45.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 32.1 to 58.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Mild
|
4.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 23.8
|
21.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 11.9 to 33.7
|
23.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.4 to 36.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Moderate
|
19.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.4 to 41.9
|
11.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.7 to 22.2
|
20.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.8 to 32.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
1.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 8.9
|
|
Percentage of Participants With A Systemic Event Within 7 Days of Dose 1 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.9
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day of Dose 2 vaccination to within 14 days after Dose 2Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 years who received at least 2 doses of study vaccine
Fever=temperature ≥38.0°C (100.4°C): Mild=38.0°C to 38.4°C (100.4°F-101.1°F); moderate=38.5°C to 38.9°C (101.2°F-102.0°F); severe=39.0°C to 40.0°C (102.1°F-104.0°F); Grade 4= \>40.0°C (\>104.0°F). Vomiting: Mild=1 to 2 times in 24 hours; moderate= \>2 times in 24 hours; severe=requires intravenous hydration; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization for hypotensive shock. Diarrhea: Mild=2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hours; moderate=4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hours; severe= ≥6 loose stools in 24 hours; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Headache, fatigue, new or worsening joint or muscle pain: Mild=no interference with activity; moderate=some interference with activity; severe=significant interference with activity, prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Any systemic event: Fever ≥38.0°C, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, or new or worsening muscle or joint pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=17 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=53 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=50 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Mild
|
17.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 43.4
|
17.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.1 to 29.8
|
12.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.5 to 24.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Moderate
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
|
9.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
|
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Any
|
17.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 43.4
|
39.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 26.5 to 54.0
|
32.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.5 to 46.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Mild
|
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
|
20.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.8 to 34.1
|
20.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 33.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Moderate
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
|
18.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.4 to 32.0
|
12.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 4.5 to 24.3
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Any
|
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
|
26.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.3 to 40.3
|
24.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 13.1 to 38.2
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
17.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.1 to 29.8
|
14.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.8 to 26.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Moderate
|
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
|
9.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
|
10.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.3 to 21.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Any
|
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
|
20.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.8 to 34.1
|
14.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.8 to 26.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
13.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 25.3
|
10.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.3 to 21.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Moderate
|
11.8 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 36.4
|
7.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 18.2
|
4.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 13.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Any
|
35.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 14.2 to 61.7
|
50.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 36.8 to 64.9
|
58.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 43.2 to 71.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Mild
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
|
17.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.1 to 29.8
|
34.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 48.8
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Moderate
|
29.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.3 to 56.0
|
32.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.9 to 46.3
|
20.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 33.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
1.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
|
4.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 13.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
1.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
|
4.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 13.7
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
1.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
|
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
1.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
|
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
1.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.1
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Any
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
|
17.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.1 to 29.8
|
18.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 8.6 to 31.4
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Mild
|
5.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 28.7
|
7.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 18.2
|
16.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 7.2 to 29.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Moderate
|
17.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 43.4
|
9.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.1 to 20.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
2.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 10.6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.7
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Systemic Event Within 14 Days of Dose 2 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Any
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 49.9
|
26.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 15.3 to 40.3
|
14.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.8 to 26.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day of Dose 3 vaccination to within 14 days after Dose 3Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 years who received all 3 doses of study vaccine
Fever=temperature ≥38.0°C (100.4°C): Mild=38.0°C to 38.4°C (100.4°F-101.1°F); moderate=38.5°C to 38.9°C (101.2°F-102.0°F); severe=39.0°C to 40.0°C (102.1°F-104.0°F); Grade 4= \>40.0°C (\>104.0°F). Vomiting: Mild=1 to 2 times in 24 hours; moderate= \>2 times in 24 hours; severe=requires intravenous hydration; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization for hypotensive shock. Diarrhea: Mild=2 to 3 loose stools in 24 hours; moderate=4 to 5 loose stools in 24 hours; severe= ≥6 loose stools in 24 hours; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Headache, fatigue, new or worsening joint or muscle pain: Mild=no interference with activity; moderate=some interference with activity; severe=significant interference with activity, prevents daily activity; Grade 4=emergency department visit or hospitalization. Any systemic event: Fever ≥38.0°C, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fatigue, or new or worsening muscle or joint pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=4 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=12 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=12 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fever: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Vomiting: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Any
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Severe
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Diarrhea: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Any
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Mild
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Headache: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 9.9 to 65.1
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Fatigue: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening muscle pain: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Any
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Mild
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 48.4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Severe
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
New/worsening joint pain: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Any
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.8 to 93.2
|
50.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 21.1 to 78.9
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Mild
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
|
8.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.2 to 38.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Moderate
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 5.5 to 57.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Severe
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 80.6
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Systemic Events Within 14 Days After Dose 3 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
Any systemic event: Grade 4
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 60.2
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 26.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: AEs: From informed consent to Visit 6 (Month 2). SAEs: From informed consent to Visit 9 (Month 13)Population: All randomized participants aged 65 to 85 who received at least 1 dose of study vaccine
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or congenital anomaly/birth defect; is life-threatening; or requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=21 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg
n=61 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg
n=60 Participants
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) to Month 2 and Serious AEs (SAEs) to Month 13 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
AEs
|
38.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 18.1 to 61.6
|
36.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 24.2 to 49.4
|
41.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 29.1 to 55.1
|
|
Percentage of Participants Reporting Adverse Events (AEs) to Month 2 and Serious AEs (SAEs) to Month 13 (65- to 85-Year Age Cohort)
SAEs
|
14.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 36.3
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 11.3
|
10.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 20.5
|
Adverse Events
Placebo (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
Placebo (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
n=18 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
n=18 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Placebo (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
n=21 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
n=61 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
n=60 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gangrene
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast Cancer
|
16.7%
1/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus arrest
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pelvic abscess
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device breakage
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device malfunction
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
n=18 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg (50-64 Year Age Cohort)
n=18 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Placebo (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
n=21 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with placebo at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 100 µg (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
n=61 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 100 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
Clostridium Difficile Vaccine, 200 µg (65-85 Year Age Cohort)
n=60 participants at risk
Participants were vaccinated with C difficile vaccine, 200 µg, at each vaccination visit (Days 1, 8, and 30) for a total of 3 vaccinations.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
3/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
8.3%
5/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cervical radiculopathy
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ecchymosis
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus arrest
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site bruising
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site induration
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
2/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site rash
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site swelling
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pelvic abscess
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin candida
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
2/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Excoriation
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
2/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
2/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
2/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal fracture
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Device malfunction
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Sinus operation
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
5.0%
3/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Lymphoedema
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.7%
1/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
1.6%
1/61 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/60 • Adverse events (AEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 6 (Month 2). Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed from informed consent through and including Visit 9.
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Pfizer, Inc
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER