Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety Study of Simeprevir in Combination With Sofosbuvir in Participants With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Cirrhosis (NCT NCT02114151)

NCT ID: NCT02114151

Last Updated: 2016-04-04

Results Overview

Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (\<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 12 weeks after the actual end of treatment.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

103 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Week 24

Results posted on

2016-04-04

Participant Flow

A total of 147 participants from the United States and Canada were Screened and 103 were enrolled into the study. All 103 participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and so were included in intent to treat (ITT) population.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Overall Study
STARTED
103
Overall Study
COMPLETED
96
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
7

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Overall Study
Death
1
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
5

Baseline Characteristics

Efficacy and Safety Study of Simeprevir in Combination With Sofosbuvir in Participants With Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Cirrhosis

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=103 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Age, Continuous
58 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
83 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication.

Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (\<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 12 weeks after the actual end of treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=103 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 12 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (EOT)
83.5 Percentage of Participants
Interval 75.8 to 91.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 16

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication.

Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (\<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 4 weeks after the actual end of treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=103 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 4 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (EOT)
86.4 Percentage of Participants
Interval 79.3 to 93.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 36

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication.

Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (\<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 24 weeks after the actual end of treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=103 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With a Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 24 Weeks After the Actual End of Treatment (EOT)
82.5 Percentage of Participants
Interval 74.7 to 90.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 2, 4 and End of Treatment (Week 12)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.

On-treatment virologic response was determined by HCV RNA results satisfying a specified threshold. \<LLOQ undetectable was considered as threshold at any time point. The LLOQ value is 25 IU/mL. EOT=End of Treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=103 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
Week 2: < 100 IU/mL (n=102)
90.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
Week 2: < 25 IU/mL (n=102)
68.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
Week 2: < 25 IU/mL Detectable (n=102)
44.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
Week 2: < 25 IU/mL Undetectable (n=102)
24.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
Week 4: < 100 IU/mL (n=102)
99.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
Week 4: < 25 IU/mL (n=102)
99.0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
Week 4: < 25 IU/mL Detectable (n=102)
15.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
Week 4: < 25 IU/mL Undetectable (n=102)
83.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
EOT (Week 12): < 100 IU/mL (n=103)
97.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
EOT (Week 12): < 25 IU/mL (n=103)
97.1 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
EOT (Week 12): < 25 IU/mL Detectable (n=103)
0 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Response
EOT (Week 12): < 25 IU/mL Undetectable (n=103)
97.1 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who took at least one dose of investigational drug.

On-treatment failure is defined as participants who do not achieve SVR12 and with confirmed detectable HCV RNA at the actual end of study drug treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=103 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Failure
2.9 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to End of Treatment (Week 12)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication.

Viral breakthrough was defined as confirmed greater than (\>) 1 log10 increase in HCV RNA from nadir or confirmed HCV RNA \>100 IU/mL in participants who had previously achieved HCV RNA \< LLOQ (25 IU/mL).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=103 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With Viral Breakthrough
1.9 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the Follow-up (Week 24)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Viral relapse was defined as participants who did not achieve SVR12 and had HCV RNA \< LLOQ (25 IU/mL) undetectable at EOT and had HCV RNA \>= LLOQ (25 IU/mL) during the follow-up period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=99 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With Viral Relapse
13.1 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Follow-Up Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here, "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.

The HCV-SIQv4 OBSS was a self-administered questionnaire that contained 33 items: 29 questions developed to assess severity or frequency of symptoms associated with HCV or its treatment, 3 questions regarding the impact of symptoms on work/school attendance, and 1 question regarding the impact of symptoms on daily activities. A symptom severity score (the mean of responses to the 29 symptom items); each symptom score was transformed to have a range from 0 to 100 (most severe). Higher HCV SIQv4 scores indicates worse symptom severity, more time missed from work/school, and more impairment in daily activities, respectively.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=98 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Symptom and Impact Questionnaire Version 4 (HCV-SIQv4) Overall Body System Score (OBSS) up to Follow-up Week 12
Baseline (n=98)
17.4 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 1.47
Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Symptom and Impact Questionnaire Version 4 (HCV-SIQv4) Overall Body System Score (OBSS) up to Follow-up Week 12
Change at Week 4 (n=96)
-4.9 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 1.23
Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Symptom and Impact Questionnaire Version 4 (HCV-SIQv4) Overall Body System Score (OBSS) up to Follow-up Week 12
Change at Week 12 (n=89)
-4.7 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 1.39
Change From Baseline in Hepatitis C Symptom and Impact Questionnaire Version 4 (HCV-SIQv4) Overall Body System Score (OBSS) up to Follow-up Week 12
Change at Follow-up Week 12 (n=94)
-5.8 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 1.36

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, Follow-up Week 12 and 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here, "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.

The FSS was a self-administered questionnaire with 9 items developed to assess disabling fatigue that has been used extensively in studies of chronic HCV infection. Item responses were measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1 point) to strongly agree (7 points). The 9 items were averaged to produce a total score; a lower total score indicates less severe fatigue. FSS scores have a range from 1 to 7 where higher scores indicate more severe fatigue.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=96 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) up to Follow-up Week 24
Baseline (n=96)
3.4 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 0.18
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) up to Follow-up Week 24
Change at Week 12 (n=86)
-0.4 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 0.18
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) up to Follow-up Week 24
Change at Follow-up Week 12 (n=92)
-0.6 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 0.16
Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) up to Follow-up Week 24
Change at Follow-up Week 24 (n=86)
-0.8 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 0.18

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12, Follow-up Week 12 and 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here, "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.

The CES-D Scale assessed how often during the past week participants experienced 20 symptoms commonly associated with major depression. The CES-D scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (all 20 symptoms most or all of the time during the past 5 to 7 days). The CES-D scores between 16 and 23 points indicate mild to moderate depressive illness while CES-D scores \>=23 indicate probable major depressive illness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=96 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Follow-up Week 12: No Depression (n=94)
79.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Baseline: No Depression (n=96)
67.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Baseline: Mild to Moderate Depression (n=96)
16.7 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Baseline: Severe Depression (n=96)
15.6 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Week 12: No Depression (n=88)
77.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Week 12: Mild to Moderate Depression (n=88)
15.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Week 12: Severe Depression (n=88)
6.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Follow-up Week12:Mild to Moderate Depression(n=94)
6.4 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Follow-up Week 12: Severe Depression (n=94)
13.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Follow-up Week 24: No Depression (n=88)
79.5 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Follow-up Week24:Mild to Moderate Depression(n=88)
10.2 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Depression by Using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Follow-up Week 24: Severe Depression (n=88)
10.2 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Follow-up Week 12 and 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here, "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies those participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure at given time point.

The EQ-5D questionnaire was a brief, generic health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment that could also be used to incorporate participant preferences into health economic evaluations. The EQ-5D questionnaire assessed HRQOL in terms of degree of limitation on 5 health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and as overall health using a "thermometer" visual analog scale with response options ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=96 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) up to Follow-up Week 24
Baseline (n=96)
70.1 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 2.17
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) up to Follow-up Week 24
Change at Follow-up Week 12 (n=92)
9.8 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 1.90
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) up to Follow-up Week 24
Change at Follow-up Week 24 (n=86)
9.5 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 1.75

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Day 3, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, Follow-up Week 4, 12 and 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all enrolled participants who took at least 1 dose of investigational medication. Here, "N" (Number of Participants Analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Sequencing of the HCV nonstructural protein 3/4A (NS3/4A) and nonstructural protein 5B (NS5B) genes was done to identify pre-existing sequence polymorphisms and characterize emerging HCV viral variants in participants not achieving SVR. Sequencing data is available for 16 participants.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=16 Participants
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Number of Participants Not Achieving SVR Showing Emerging Mutation at Time of Failure in HCV NS3/4A Sequence and NS5B up to Follow-up Week 24
HCV NS3
13 Participants
Number of Participants Not Achieving SVR Showing Emerging Mutation at Time of Failure in HCV NS3/4A Sequence and NS5B up to Follow-up Week 24
NS5B
0 Participants

Adverse Events

Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 47 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=103 participants at risk
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.97%
1/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.97%
1/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
0.97%
1/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
0.97%
1/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.97%
1/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
0.97%
1/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Simeprevir Plus Sofosbuvir
n=103 participants at risk
Participants received simeprevir 150 milligram (mg) in combination with sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for 12 weeks.
General disorders
Fatigue
20.4%
21/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)
Nervous system disorders
Headache
20.4%
21/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
10.7%
11/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
7.8%
8/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
6.8%
7/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
5.8%
6/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
9.7%
10/103 • Baseline up to End of Treatment (Week 36)

Additional Information

Associate Director

Janssen Infectious Diseases - Diagnostics BVBA

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested in writing, such publication will be withheld for up to an additional 60 days.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER