A Study to Compare Vincristine to Sirolimus for Treatment of High Risk Vascular Tumors
NCT ID: NCT02110069
Last Updated: 2023-09-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
4 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-06-14
2020-10-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this research study, the study doctor will compare two different drugs to see which one will work better to help shrink your vascular tumor. One of the drugs is vincristine. Vincristine is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat people with cancer. Vincristine is used to stop the abnormal cells from growing such as cells that make up blood vessels.
The other drug to be used in this study is sirolimus. Sirolimus is currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to prevent transplanted organ rejection. Sirolimus is not approved by the FDA for treatment of vascular abnormalities and is considered experimental. Sirolimus belongs to a class of drugs call 'mTOR inhibitors'. mTOR (mammilian target of rapamycin) helps cells to grow and may also help blood vessels to grow in a more normal fashion. Sirolimus is currently being tested in patients with vascular tumors and cancer. In vascular tumors, we hope sirolimus will stop the blood vessel growth.
Funding Source: FDA - OOPD (Office of Orphan Products Development)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Crizotinib for Children and Adults With Neurofibromatosis Type 2 and Progressive Vestibular Schwannomas
NCT04283669
Vinblastine and Methotrexate in Treating Children With Desmoid Tumors
NCT00003019
Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Neurofibromatosis and Progressive Plexiform Neurofibromas
NCT00030264
Vinblastine and Methotrexate in Children With Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
NCT00215046
Efficacy and Safety of Rapamycin to Complex Vascular Anomalies in Pediatric Patients
NCT04598204
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis: Sirolimus treatment for children and young adults with Kaposiform hemangioendotheliomas will be more effective than vincristine, assessed by time to response in an induction period and provide equivalent safety parameters.
Study Rationale We propose a multi-center, phase II trial with participation from 8 sites. The study will consist of two phases. The first of these is an initial induction phase in which vincristine and steroids will be compared to sirolimus and steroids. Response in the induction phase will be assessed as time to hematologic response. At the end of induction phase, cross over can occur if there is failure to respond. Part 2 is a maintenance phase which will be 1 year in length. Continued safety and efficacy data will be collected during maintenance and there will be cross over at any time for patients who lose their response following induction. Failure will be defined as worsening of hematological parameters on two separate laboratory evaluations at any time during maintenance or if they meet the definition of progressive disease following response assessments. Formal response in maintenance will be evaluated by imaging studies, functional assessment, and quality of life as per study SIR-DA-0901. Present therapies are very limited and new therapies are desperately needed for this devastating disease. Based on our preliminary data, there is a very good rationale for sirolimus therapy in KHE patients and so a phase II trial is urgently needed to determine if this therapy is to become the new standard of care for KHE patients.
Our secondary aims will be addressing biomarker analysis. There are limited studies describing the biology of these tumors. Per study SIR-DA-0901 there is some preliminary data indicating the importance of VEGF-C and other upregulated markers in the mTor pathway. This needs to be further investigated especially in KHE patients. Furthermore there are no clear objective measurements to determine response data.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vincristine
Induction phase: participants assigned to vincristine will receive vincristine weekly at a dose of 0.05mg/kg/dose IV (for participants less than 10kg) or a dose of 1.5 mg/m2/dose (for participants greater than 10kg) for 2 months.
Maintenance: if participants continue to receive vincristine weekly for 2 months, every 2 weeks for 5 months and every 3 weeks for 5 months.
Vincristine
Vincristine dose dependent upon weight. Weekly for 2 months (Induction); Weekly 2 months; every 2 weeks for next 5 months; every 3 weeks for 5 months (Maintenance)
Sirolimus
Sirolimus will be administered at a dose of 0.8mg/m2/dose twice a day on a continuous dosing schedule throughout the trial for participants randomized to Sirolimus or for participants who fail vincristine may cross-over to the sirolimus arm.
Sirolimus trough levels will be maintained between 10-15 ng/ml.
Sirolimus
Continuous dosing to maintain trough level of 10-15ng/ml.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vincristine
Vincristine dose dependent upon weight. Weekly for 2 months (Induction); Weekly 2 months; every 2 weeks for next 5 months; every 3 weeks for 5 months (Maintenance)
Sirolimus
Continuous dosing to maintain trough level of 10-15ng/ml.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Kaposiform Hemangioendotheliomas
2. Tufted angioma
High Risk Stratification: In addition to the above diagnosis, all of the following criteria need to be met:
a. Kasabach Merritt Syndrome defined at a platelet counts less than 50,000 K/µl and/or fibrinogen level \< 100 mg/dl at the time of diagnosis.
* Age: Patients must be 0 - 31 years of age at the time of study entry. Enrollment includes patients of both genders and all ethnic groups.
* Organ function requirements:
1. Adequate liver function defined as:
1. Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN for age, and
2. SGPT (ALT) ≤ 5 x ULN for age, and
3. Serum albumin \>/= 2 g/dL.
4. Fasting LDL cholesterol of \<160 mg/dL
5. Fasting triglyceride \<400 mg/dl
2. Adequate Bone Marrow Function defined as:
1. Peripheral absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>/= 1000/uL
2. Hemoglobin \>/= 8.0 g/dL (may receive RBC transfusions)
3. No Platelet requirement
3. Adequate Renal Function Defined as:
1. A serum creatinine based on age as follows:
Age (Years) Maximum Serum Creatinine (mg/dL)
* 5 0.8 6 to ≤10 1.0 11 to ≤15 1.2 \>15 1.5
2. Urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPC) \< 0.3 g/l
* Performance Status: Karnofsky \>/= 50 (≥16 years of age) and Lansky \>/= 50 for patients \<16 years of age.
* Prior therapy
2. Surgery: At least 2 weeks since undergoing any major surgery
3. Radiation: \> 6 months from involved field radiation
4. Prior vincristine therapy is permitted. Patients may also have received up to 2 doses of vincristine prior to randomization.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who require medications that are strong inhibitors/inducers CYP3A4 enzyme activity, including anticonvulsants, (Appendix II) to control concurrent medical conditions are not eligible. Patients who discontinue use of prohibited medications with a one week washout prior to start of study treatment are eligible.
* Known history of HIV seropositivity or known immunodeficiency. Testing is not required unless a condition is suspected.
* Impairment of gastrointestinal function or gastrointestinal disease that may significantly alter the absorption of sirolimus (e.g. ulcerative disease, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome or small bowel resection). A gastric tube or nasogastric tube is allowed.
* Females who are pregnant or breast feeding.
* Males or females of reproductive potential may not participate unless they have agreed to use an effective contraceptive method during the period they are receiving the study drug and for 3 months thereafter. Abstinence is an acceptable method of birth control. Females of childbearing potential will be given a pregnancy test within 7 days prior to administration of study treatment and must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test.
* Patients who have received prior treatment with an mTOR inhibitor.
* Patients unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol or who in the opinion of the investigator may not be able to comply with the safety monitoring requirements of the study.
* Patients who currently have an uncontrolled infection, defined as receiving intravenous antibiotics.
31 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pfizer
INDUSTRY
Boston Children's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Denise Martin Adams
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Denise Adams, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston Children's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lucille Packard Children's Hospital Stanford
Palo Alto, California, United States
Emory Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Hemangioma and Vascular Malformation Center
National Organization of Vascular Anomalies
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-2339
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
SIR-DA-1202
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.