Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1398 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-30
2017-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pharmacogenomic Decision Support With GeneSight Psychotropic to Guide the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
NCT02466477
Combinatorial Pharmacogenomics Testing in Treatment-Naïve Major Depressive Disorder
NCT03537547
Pharmacogenetic Testing in an Outpatient Population of Patients With Depression
NCT02497027
Pharmacogenomics for Antidepressant Guidance and Education 1 (PAGE-1_AG1)
NCT01426516
Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes With a Pharmacogenomic Algorithm
NCT01632267
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Prospective longitudinal studies of patient samples show that MDD is a chronic illness, characterized by remitting and recurrent depressive episodes (Solomon et al., 1997; Mueller et al., 1999). A major depressive episode is characterized by a low mood or an inability to experience pleasure (anhedonia), or both, for more than 2 weeks, combined with several cognitive and vegetative symptoms and the occurrence of distress or impairment (reviewed in Rot et al., 2009). In the US, nearly 1 in 5 people will experience a major depressive episode at some point in their lives (reviewed in Rot et al., 2009). Drugs currently available to treat depression fall into the categories of those that have their main effect by increasing norepinephrine (NE) (the tricyclic or tetracyclic antidepressants \[TCAs\]), those that increase serotonin (5-HT) (the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors \[SSRIs\]), and those that increase both NE and 5-HT (the monoamine oxidase inhibitors \[MAOIs\] and the serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors \[SNRIs\]). While all antidepressants achieve similar levels of efficacy, treatment failures are relatively high ranging from 30 to 60% (Simpson and DePaulo). Additionally, many of these compounds are associated with significant adverse events (AEs).
The GeneSight Psychotropic product is a pharmacogenomic decision support tool that helps clinicians to make informed, evidence-based decisions about proper drug selection, based on the testing for clinically important genetic variants in multiple pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes that affect a patient's ability to tolerate or respond to medications.
The GeneSight Psychotropic product contains the most commonly prescribed antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, including a full representation of the SSRI and SNRI drug classes.
Tricyclic antidepressants, an MAOI, and typical and atypical antipsychotics are also represented.
The clinical utility of GeneSight Psychotropic has been evaluated in three previous prospective trials. Hall-Flavin et al reported the results of an open-label pilot study (n = 44) comparing GeneSight guided treatment to treatment as usual (TAU) without the benefit of pharmacogenomic testing (2012). The GeneSight guided arm demonstrated a 30.8% improvement in HAM-D17 score by the end of the 8 week treatment period, compared to an 18.2% improvement in the TAU arm (p = 0.04). Results of the larger (n = 165) open-label trial (Hall-Flavin, et al 2013) mirrored these findings, demonstrating a 46.9% improvement in HAMD17 score in the GeneSight arm, compared to a 29.9% improvement in the TAU arm (p \< 0.0001). The third trial used a randomized, double-blind trial design (n = 51). Due to the small sample size, the trial was underpowered to detect a significant difference in improvement between the two arms (TAU and GeneSight). However, effect sizes of improvement reflected those seen in previous trials. The GeneSight group experienced a 30.8% improvement in HAMD17, compared to 20.7% in TAU. Odds ratios for response were calculated, showing that GeneSight-guided subjects had a 2.14 times greater likelihood of response compared to TAU subjects, which was similar to the 4.67 (smaller trial) and 2.06 (larger trial) odds ratios calculated for the other two studies.
Previous studies utilizing an open-label design have shown significant improvement in patient outcomes following use of the GeneSight test. However, although effect sizes were similar to those seen in the open-label studies, a small (n = 51) blinded, randomized controlled trial did not detect a statistically significant outcome. Therefore, the primary rationale for this trial is to replicate previous findings of improvement in clinical outcomes in subjects treated with the benefit of GeneSight testing utilizing a double-blind, randomized control trial (RCT) design.
It is expected that results from this trial will be used to inform guidelines for the use of pharmacogenomic testing for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Results may also be shared with regulatory bodies in the United States and abroad.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GeneSight Psychotropic Tested
Subjects being tested with GeneSight Psychotropic
GeneSight Psychotropic
The GeneSight Psychotropic product is a pharmacogenomic decision support tool that helps clinicians to make informed, evidence-based decisions about proper drug selection, based on the testing for clinically important genetic variants in multiple pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes that affect a patient's ability to tolerate or respond to medications.
The GeneSight Psychotropic product contains the most commonly prescribed antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, including a full representation of the SSRI and SNRI drug classes.
tricyclic antidepressants, an MAOI, and typical and atypical antipsychotics are also represented.
Treatment As Usual
This group of subjects will not see their GeneSIght results or know whether or not they are in either arm until after week 12.
GeneSight Psychotropic
The GeneSight Psychotropic product is a pharmacogenomic decision support tool that helps clinicians to make informed, evidence-based decisions about proper drug selection, based on the testing for clinically important genetic variants in multiple pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes that affect a patient's ability to tolerate or respond to medications.
The GeneSight Psychotropic product contains the most commonly prescribed antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, including a full representation of the SSRI and SNRI drug classes.
tricyclic antidepressants, an MAOI, and typical and atypical antipsychotics are also represented.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GeneSight Psychotropic
The GeneSight Psychotropic product is a pharmacogenomic decision support tool that helps clinicians to make informed, evidence-based decisions about proper drug selection, based on the testing for clinically important genetic variants in multiple pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes that affect a patient's ability to tolerate or respond to medications.
The GeneSight Psychotropic product contains the most commonly prescribed antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, including a full representation of the SSRI and SNRI drug classes.
tricyclic antidepressants, an MAOI, and typical and atypical antipsychotics are also represented.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have provided written authorization for the use and disclosure of their protected health information;
* Be ≥18 years of age;
* Suffer from a Major Depressive Episode meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria;
* Have had an inadequate response within the current episode to at least 1 psychotropic treatment. Inadequate response is defined as inadequate efficacy after 6 weeks of a psychotropic treatment or discontinuation of a psychotropic treatment due to AEs or intolerability;
* Have a total baseline score on the QIDS-C16 and QIDS-SR16 rating scale ≥11;
* Agree to abide by the study protocol and its restrictions and be able to complete all aspects of the study, including all visits and tests.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with a diagnosis of Bipolar I or II disorder;
* Patients with a current Axis I diagnosis of:
1. Delirium
2. Dementia
3. Amnestic and other cognitive disorder
4. Schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder;
* Patients having experienced hallucinations, delusions, or any psychotic symptomatology within the current depressive episode or during prior depressive episodes;
* Patient is currently in an inpatient facility;
* Patients with a history of hypothyroidism unless taking a stable dose of thyroid medication and asymptomatic or euthyroid for 6 months;
* Patients who meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for any significant current substance use disorder;
* Patients with significant unstable medical condition; life threatening disease; hepatic insufficiency (3X ULN for AST and/or ALT); liver transplant recipient; cirrhosis of the liver; need for therapies that may obscure the results of treatment and/or of the study; malignancy (except basal cell carcinoma) and/or chemotherapy within 1 year prior to screening; malignancy more than 1 year prior to screening must have been local and without metastasis and/or recurrence, and if treated with chemotherapy, without nervous system complications;
* Participation in another clinical trial within 30 days of the screening visit;
* Anticipated inability to attend scheduled study visits;
* Patients who in the judgment of the Investigator may be unreliable or uncooperative with the evaluation procedure outlined in this protocol;
* Patients with a history of prior pharmacogenomic testing;
* Any change in psychotropic medication (including change in dosage) between screening and randomization;
* Patients receiving ECT, DBS or TMS treatment (should a Subject receive any of these treatments they must be discontinued from the study);
* Patients who are known to be pregnant or lactating;
* Patients with a history of gastric bypass surgery.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Michigan
OTHER
Assurex Health Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Greden, Ph.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Michigan
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Birmingham Psychiatry Pharmaceutical Studies
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
CiTrials
Bellflower, California, United States
Catalina Research Institute
Chino, California, United States
CiTrials
Costa Mesa, California, United States
Synergy Research Center
Escondido, California, United States
Pharmacology Research Institute
Los Alamitos, California, United States
North County Research
Oceanside, California, United States
CiTrials
Riverside, California, United States
Stanford School of Medicine
Stanford, California, United States
Viking Clinical Research
Temecula, California, United States
Elite Clinical Trials, Inc
Wildomar, California, United States
MCB Clinical Research Centers, LLC
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Howard University Hospital Mental Health Clinic
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Sarkis Clinical Trials
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions Healthcare
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions
Orlando, Florida, United States
Clinical Research Trials of Florida, Inc
Tampa, Florida, United States
Stedman Clinical Trials
Tampa, Florida, United States
Janus Center For Psychiatric Research
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Atlanta Institute of Medicine and Research
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Mood and Anxiety Program at Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Meridian Clinical Research
Savannah, Georgia, United States
Carman Research
Smyrna, Georgia, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Behavioral Healthcare Associates
Schaumburg, Illinois, United States
The Institute of Psychiatric Research
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Kansas University Medical Center- Clinical Trials Unit
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Pharmasite Research
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Geriatric Outpatient Unit- McLean Hospital
Belmont, Massachusetts, United States
Boston Clinical Trials
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
UMASS Center for Psychopharmacologic Research and Treatment
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
PsychCare Consultants Research
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Meridian Clinical Research
Bellevue, Nebraska, United States
Premier Psychiatric Research Institute, LLC
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
United Medical Research Associates
Binghamton, New York, United States
Integrative Clinical Trials, LLC
Brooklyn, New York, United States
SPRI Clinical Trials
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Eastside Comprehensive Medical Center, LLC
New York, New York, United States
Finger Lakes Clinical Research
Rochester, New York, United States
University of Cincinnati Health
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Ohio State University Department of Psychiatry
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Midwest Clinical Research Center
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Oklahoma Clinical Research Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Summit Research Network
Portland, Oregon, United States
Suburban Research Associates
Media, Pennsylvania, United States
Mood and Anxiety Disorders Treatment and Research
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Lincoln Research
Lincoln, Rhode Island, United States
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, United States
Alliance Research Group
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Northwest Clinical Research Center
Bellevue, Washington, United States
Summit Research Network
Seattle, Washington, United States
Frontier Institute
Spokane, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dunlop BW, Parikh SV, Rothschild AJ, Thase ME, DeBattista C, Conway CR, Forester BP, Mondimore FM, Shelton RC, Macaluso M, Logan J, Traxler P, Li J, Johnson H, Greden JF. Comparing sensitivity to change using the 6-item versus the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale in the GUIDED randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2410-2.
Thase ME, Parikh SV, Rothschild AJ, Dunlop BW, DeBattista C, Conway CR, Forester BP, Mondimore FM, Shelton RC, Macaluso M, Li J, Brown K, Jablonski MR, Greden JF. Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Clinical Outcomes for Patients Taking Medications With Gene-Drug Interactions in a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 31;80(6):19m12910. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19m12910.
Greden JF, Parikh SV, Rothschild AJ, Thase ME, Dunlop BW, DeBattista C, Conway CR, Forester BP, Mondimore FM, Shelton RC, Macaluso M, Li J, Brown K, Gilbert A, Burns L, Jablonski MR, Dechairo B. Impact of pharmacogenomics on clinical outcomes in major depressive disorder in the GUIDED trial: A large, patient- and rater-blinded, randomized, controlled study. J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Apr;111:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ARX1006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.