Genomics Used to Improve DEpression Decisions

NCT ID: NCT02109939

Last Updated: 2020-01-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1398 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Evaluate the impact of GeneSight Psychotropic on response to psychotropic treatment as judged by the mean change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression (HAM-D17) score from baseline to end of Week 8 of the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent (Hasin et al., 2005) mental disorder and a leading source of disease burden worldwide (Lopez et al., 2006). Epidemiological studies estimate 12-month and lifetime prevalence for MDD in the United States to be 5.3% and 13.2%, respectively (reviewed in Blanco et al., 2010). MDD is expected to be the second greatest cause of disability by 2020 and has been shown to cause significant morbidity, affecting people's ability to work, function in relationships, and engage in social activities. Moreover, MDD increases the risk of suicidal ideation, attempted suicide, and death by completed suicide.

Prospective longitudinal studies of patient samples show that MDD is a chronic illness, characterized by remitting and recurrent depressive episodes (Solomon et al., 1997; Mueller et al., 1999). A major depressive episode is characterized by a low mood or an inability to experience pleasure (anhedonia), or both, for more than 2 weeks, combined with several cognitive and vegetative symptoms and the occurrence of distress or impairment (reviewed in Rot et al., 2009). In the US, nearly 1 in 5 people will experience a major depressive episode at some point in their lives (reviewed in Rot et al., 2009). Drugs currently available to treat depression fall into the categories of those that have their main effect by increasing norepinephrine (NE) (the tricyclic or tetracyclic antidepressants \[TCAs\]), those that increase serotonin (5-HT) (the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors \[SSRIs\]), and those that increase both NE and 5-HT (the monoamine oxidase inhibitors \[MAOIs\] and the serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors \[SNRIs\]). While all antidepressants achieve similar levels of efficacy, treatment failures are relatively high ranging from 30 to 60% (Simpson and DePaulo). Additionally, many of these compounds are associated with significant adverse events (AEs).

The GeneSight Psychotropic product is a pharmacogenomic decision support tool that helps clinicians to make informed, evidence-based decisions about proper drug selection, based on the testing for clinically important genetic variants in multiple pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes that affect a patient's ability to tolerate or respond to medications.

The GeneSight Psychotropic product contains the most commonly prescribed antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, including a full representation of the SSRI and SNRI drug classes.

Tricyclic antidepressants, an MAOI, and typical and atypical antipsychotics are also represented.

The clinical utility of GeneSight Psychotropic has been evaluated in three previous prospective trials. Hall-Flavin et al reported the results of an open-label pilot study (n = 44) comparing GeneSight guided treatment to treatment as usual (TAU) without the benefit of pharmacogenomic testing (2012). The GeneSight guided arm demonstrated a 30.8% improvement in HAM-D17 score by the end of the 8 week treatment period, compared to an 18.2% improvement in the TAU arm (p = 0.04). Results of the larger (n = 165) open-label trial (Hall-Flavin, et al 2013) mirrored these findings, demonstrating a 46.9% improvement in HAMD17 score in the GeneSight arm, compared to a 29.9% improvement in the TAU arm (p \< 0.0001). The third trial used a randomized, double-blind trial design (n = 51). Due to the small sample size, the trial was underpowered to detect a significant difference in improvement between the two arms (TAU and GeneSight). However, effect sizes of improvement reflected those seen in previous trials. The GeneSight group experienced a 30.8% improvement in HAMD17, compared to 20.7% in TAU. Odds ratios for response were calculated, showing that GeneSight-guided subjects had a 2.14 times greater likelihood of response compared to TAU subjects, which was similar to the 4.67 (smaller trial) and 2.06 (larger trial) odds ratios calculated for the other two studies.

Previous studies utilizing an open-label design have shown significant improvement in patient outcomes following use of the GeneSight test. However, although effect sizes were similar to those seen in the open-label studies, a small (n = 51) blinded, randomized controlled trial did not detect a statistically significant outcome. Therefore, the primary rationale for this trial is to replicate previous findings of improvement in clinical outcomes in subjects treated with the benefit of GeneSight testing utilizing a double-blind, randomized control trial (RCT) design.

It is expected that results from this trial will be used to inform guidelines for the use of pharmacogenomic testing for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Results may also be shared with regulatory bodies in the United States and abroad.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GeneSight Psychotropic Tested

Subjects being tested with GeneSight Psychotropic

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

GeneSight Psychotropic

Intervention Type GENETIC

The GeneSight Psychotropic product is a pharmacogenomic decision support tool that helps clinicians to make informed, evidence-based decisions about proper drug selection, based on the testing for clinically important genetic variants in multiple pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes that affect a patient's ability to tolerate or respond to medications.

The GeneSight Psychotropic product contains the most commonly prescribed antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, including a full representation of the SSRI and SNRI drug classes.

tricyclic antidepressants, an MAOI, and typical and atypical antipsychotics are also represented.

Treatment As Usual

This group of subjects will not see their GeneSIght results or know whether or not they are in either arm until after week 12.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

GeneSight Psychotropic

Intervention Type GENETIC

The GeneSight Psychotropic product is a pharmacogenomic decision support tool that helps clinicians to make informed, evidence-based decisions about proper drug selection, based on the testing for clinically important genetic variants in multiple pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes that affect a patient's ability to tolerate or respond to medications.

The GeneSight Psychotropic product contains the most commonly prescribed antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, including a full representation of the SSRI and SNRI drug classes.

tricyclic antidepressants, an MAOI, and typical and atypical antipsychotics are also represented.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GeneSight Psychotropic

The GeneSight Psychotropic product is a pharmacogenomic decision support tool that helps clinicians to make informed, evidence-based decisions about proper drug selection, based on the testing for clinically important genetic variants in multiple pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic genes that affect a patient's ability to tolerate or respond to medications.

The GeneSight Psychotropic product contains the most commonly prescribed antidepressant and antipsychotic medications, including a full representation of the SSRI and SNRI drug classes.

tricyclic antidepressants, an MAOI, and typical and atypical antipsychotics are also represented.

Intervention Type GENETIC

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Assurex Health GeneSight

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Be able to understand the requirements of the study and provide written informed consent to participate in this study; a signed and dated ICF will be obtained from each patient before participation in the study;
* Have provided written authorization for the use and disclosure of their protected health information;
* Be ≥18 years of age;
* Suffer from a Major Depressive Episode meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria;
* Have had an inadequate response within the current episode to at least 1 psychotropic treatment. Inadequate response is defined as inadequate efficacy after 6 weeks of a psychotropic treatment or discontinuation of a psychotropic treatment due to AEs or intolerability;
* Have a total baseline score on the QIDS-C16 and QIDS-SR16 rating scale ≥11;
* Agree to abide by the study protocol and its restrictions and be able to complete all aspects of the study, including all visits and tests.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients posing a serious suicidal risk and/or in need of immediate hospitalization as judged by the investigator;
* Patients with a diagnosis of Bipolar I or II disorder;
* Patients with a current Axis I diagnosis of:

1. Delirium
2. Dementia
3. Amnestic and other cognitive disorder
4. Schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder;
* Patients having experienced hallucinations, delusions, or any psychotic symptomatology within the current depressive episode or during prior depressive episodes;
* Patient is currently in an inpatient facility;
* Patients with a history of hypothyroidism unless taking a stable dose of thyroid medication and asymptomatic or euthyroid for 6 months;
* Patients who meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for any significant current substance use disorder;
* Patients with significant unstable medical condition; life threatening disease; hepatic insufficiency (3X ULN for AST and/or ALT); liver transplant recipient; cirrhosis of the liver; need for therapies that may obscure the results of treatment and/or of the study; malignancy (except basal cell carcinoma) and/or chemotherapy within 1 year prior to screening; malignancy more than 1 year prior to screening must have been local and without metastasis and/or recurrence, and if treated with chemotherapy, without nervous system complications;
* Participation in another clinical trial within 30 days of the screening visit;
* Anticipated inability to attend scheduled study visits;
* Patients who in the judgment of the Investigator may be unreliable or uncooperative with the evaluation procedure outlined in this protocol;
* Patients with a history of prior pharmacogenomic testing;
* Any change in psychotropic medication (including change in dosage) between screening and randomization;
* Patients receiving ECT, DBS or TMS treatment (should a Subject receive any of these treatments they must be discontinued from the study);
* Patients who are known to be pregnant or lactating;
* Patients with a history of gastric bypass surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Assurex Health Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Greden, Ph.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Michigan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham Psychiatry Pharmaceutical Studies

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

CiTrials

Bellflower, California, United States

Site Status

Catalina Research Institute

Chino, California, United States

Site Status

CiTrials

Costa Mesa, California, United States

Site Status

Synergy Research Center

Escondido, California, United States

Site Status

Pharmacology Research Institute

Los Alamitos, California, United States

Site Status

North County Research

Oceanside, California, United States

Site Status

CiTrials

Riverside, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford School of Medicine

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Viking Clinical Research

Temecula, California, United States

Site Status

Elite Clinical Trials, Inc

Wildomar, California, United States

Site Status

MCB Clinical Research Centers, LLC

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Howard University Hospital Mental Health Clinic

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Sarkis Clinical Trials

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Neuroscience Solutions Healthcare

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Neuroscience Solutions

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clinical Research Trials of Florida, Inc

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Stedman Clinical Trials

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Janus Center For Psychiatric Research

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta Institute of Medicine and Research

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Mood and Anxiety Program at Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Meridian Clinical Research

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Carman Research

Smyrna, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Behavioral Healthcare Associates

Schaumburg, Illinois, United States

Site Status

The Institute of Psychiatric Research

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Kansas University Medical Center- Clinical Trials Unit

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Pharmasite Research

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Geriatric Outpatient Unit- McLean Hospital

Belmont, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Boston Clinical Trials

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

UMASS Center for Psychopharmacologic Research and Treatment

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

PsychCare Consultants Research

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Meridian Clinical Research

Bellevue, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Premier Psychiatric Research Institute, LLC

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

United Medical Research Associates

Binghamton, New York, United States

Site Status

Integrative Clinical Trials, LLC

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

SPRI Clinical Trials

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Eastside Comprehensive Medical Center, LLC

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Finger Lakes Clinical Research

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati Health

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University Department of Psychiatry

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Midwest Clinical Research Center

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma Clinical Research Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Summit Research Network

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Suburban Research Associates

Media, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Mood and Anxiety Disorders Treatment and Research

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lincoln Research

Lincoln, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Clinical Neuroscience Solutions

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Alliance Research Group

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Northwest Clinical Research Center

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

Summit Research Network

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Frontier Institute

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dunlop BW, Parikh SV, Rothschild AJ, Thase ME, DeBattista C, Conway CR, Forester BP, Mondimore FM, Shelton RC, Macaluso M, Logan J, Traxler P, Li J, Johnson H, Greden JF. Comparing sensitivity to change using the 6-item versus the 17-item Hamilton depression rating scale in the GUIDED randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 27;19(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2410-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31881956 (View on PubMed)

Thase ME, Parikh SV, Rothschild AJ, Dunlop BW, DeBattista C, Conway CR, Forester BP, Mondimore FM, Shelton RC, Macaluso M, Li J, Brown K, Jablonski MR, Greden JF. Impact of Pharmacogenomics on Clinical Outcomes for Patients Taking Medications With Gene-Drug Interactions in a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 31;80(6):19m12910. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19m12910.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31721487 (View on PubMed)

Greden JF, Parikh SV, Rothschild AJ, Thase ME, Dunlop BW, DeBattista C, Conway CR, Forester BP, Mondimore FM, Shelton RC, Macaluso M, Li J, Brown K, Gilbert A, Burns L, Jablonski MR, Dechairo B. Impact of pharmacogenomics on clinical outcomes in major depressive disorder in the GUIDED trial: A large, patient- and rater-blinded, randomized, controlled study. J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Apr;111:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30677646 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ARX1006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.