Study of Voicing My CHOiCES as a Tool for Advanced Care Planning in Young Adults With Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02108028

Last Updated: 2025-12-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

272 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-03

Study Completion Date

2024-07-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:

\- There are very few documents to help young adults living with advanced cancer discuss their concerns and end-of-life preferences. A new document, Voicing My CHOiCES, allows young adults to explain what kind of care they would want if they became unable to communicate or make medical decisions on their own. Researchers want to study if this document is helpful.

Objective:

\- To study if Voicing My CHOiCES(TM) can reduce anxiety, improve sense of support, and improve communication about advanced care planning.

Eligibility:

\- Adults 18 to 39 years old being treated for cancer.

Design:

* Participants will answer questions about their age, sex, employment, religion, health, and marital status. They will also complete several brief questionnaires:

1. General Anxiety Short Form
2. Peace, Equanimity and Acceptance in the Cancer Experience
3. Functional Assessment of Social Support
4. Quality of Communication
5. Prior Communication about Advanced Care Planning
* Then a health care professional will introduce Voicing My CHOiCES . Participants will review the document and comment on parts they find relevant. They will also say if any important items are missing. Participants will complete 3 pages of the document with the assistance of a health care provider. They will be asked for positive and negative observations.
* The second stage of the study will take place about 1 month later. Participants will repeat the brief questionnaires listed above. They will be asked if they shared any of the preferences they described when completing the 3 pages of Voicing My CHOiCES during visit 1 with a family member, friend, or health care provider. Research staff will ask the participant for permission to contact the people they spoke with in order to learn whether their conversations about the document were helpful. They will ask for feedback on how to make Voicing My CHOiCES more helpful.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background:

Discussing end-of-life (EoL) care is very challenging for young adults (YA) living with a life-threatening disease.

While many helpful documents exist to facilitate EoL conversations with adults, few resources exist to aid YA in understanding and accepting their changing physical, emotional and social needs when treatment is no longer effective.

Between 2007-2011, the Pediatric Oncology Branch (07-C-0085) explored the helpfulness of Five Wishes with adolescents and young adults living with HIV or advanced cancer. This research led to the development of a new advance care planning (ACP) guide, Voicing My CHOiCES (VMC). However, Voicing My CHOiCES has not been empirically examined in its completed form.

Objectives:

To determine the perceived helpfulness of VMC.

To determine whether engaging in advanced care planning using VMC is associated with reduced anxiety, improved social support, increased acceptance of illness, and/or improved communication about ACP with family, friends, and/or health care providers.

To assess the helpfulness of the changes made to the original VMC as compared to the revised VMC document.

Eligibility:

Patient Participants:

Age: 18 through 39 years

Known cancer or other chronic illness and enrolled on an NIH protocol or treated at one of the participating sites.

No prior experience using Voicing My CHOiCES

Participants enrolled to assess the helpfulness of changes made to original VMC must be English speaking.

Patients and family/friend and health care providers must be English or Spanish speaking.

Design:

Each subject will complete a baseline assessment of their anxiety pertaining to advance care planning, quality of social support, acceptance of illness, and quality of communication with family, friends and health care providers. They will be asked to review the advance care planning document, Voicing My CHOiCES , and to comment on each section as to whether it can provide an opportunity to address ACP needs for themselves and for other YA their age living with a serious illness. They will also assess whether revisions are needed to the document.

To obtain the perspectives of different YA, the initial study arm included 200 participants, 27 YA who were living independently, 42 YA who have a child(ren) of their own, and 81 YA who neither lived independently or had child(ren). In addition, up to 50 family/friends and health care providers of the participants participated in the follow up assessment. Arm 2 will include up to 80 participants recruited, at the Clinical Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Rhode Island Hospital (Lifespan) to compare the original Voicing My CHOiCES to the revised document. A total of up to 280 individuals may participate in this study.

A 1-month pre-post design will be used to assess the utility of the document, anxiety, quality of social support, acceptance of illness, communication about EoL planning, and whether the patient participant has shared any of the work completed in the document with a family member, friend, or health care provider.

If the participant had shared the ACP preferences that were documented in Voicing My CHOiCES with a family member or friend, and had consented for us to contact that person, we will obtain the family member or friend s consent and complete a brief interview assessing the helpfulness and limitations of Voicing My CHOiCES for ACP. If the participant had shared the ACP preferences that were documented in Voicing My CHOiCES with their health care provider and had consented for us to talk with that health care provider, a brief interview assessing the helpfulness and limitations of Voicing My CHOiCES for end-of-life planning and whether any changes in the participants health care was made in response to Voicing My CHOiCES , will be documented.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV Cancer Chronic Granulomatous Disease Dock 8 Deficiency

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Advance Care Planning Guide End of life Natural History

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort 1A / Initial Young Adults with Children

Young adults who have a child(ren) and are 18-39 years diagnosed with cancer or other chronic illness and enrolled on an NIH protocol or treated at a participating site. COMPLETE

No interventions assigned to this group

Cohort 1B / Comparison Young Adults with Children

Young adults who have children and are 18- 39 years diagnosed with cancer or other chronic illness and enrolled on an NIH protocol or treated at a participating site.

No interventions assigned to this group

Cohort 2A / Initial Independent Young Adults

Young adults who live independently and are 18-39 years diagnosed with cancer or other chronic illness and enrolled on an NIH protocol or treated at a participating site. COMPLETE

No interventions assigned to this group

Cohort 2B / Comparison Independent Young Adults

Young adults who live independently and are 18-39 years diagnosed with cancer or other chronic illness and enrolled on an NIH protocol or treated at a participating site.

No interventions assigned to this group

Cohort 3A / Initial Young Adults No Children, Not Independent

Young adults with no children, not living independently who are 18-39 diagnosed with cancer or other chronic illness and enrolled on an NIH protocol or treated at a participating site. COMPLETE

No interventions assigned to this group

Cohort 3B / Comparison Young Adults No Children, Not Independent

Young adults with no children, not living independently who are 18-39 diagnosed with cancer or other chronic illness and enrolled on an NIH protocol or treated at a participating site.

No interventions assigned to this group

Cohort 4 / Non-patient participants

Family members, friends, or health care providers of patient participant. COMPLETE

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients must be between ages: 18 through 39 years
* Patients must be diagnosed with cancer or other chronic illness.
* Patients must give informed consent.
* Patients must have a score of 3 or less on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale (ECOG PS; Appendix
* Patients must be English or Spanish speaking.

* Cohorts 1B and 2B must be English speaking only.


* Subject must be greater than or equal to 18 years of age
* Family/friend and/or health care providers must be English or Spanish speaking.
* Family/friend and health care providers must provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of psychotic symptoms or severe psychological distress, which in the judgment of the Principal or Associate Investigator or consulting psychiatrist would compromise the patient s ability to engage in the intervention or is likely to interfere with the study procedures or results.
* Cognitive impairment which in the judgment of the Principal or Associate Investigatorwould compromise the patient s ability to understand the VMC material or is likely to interfere with the study procedures or results.
* Clinically significant, systemic illness (serious infections or significant cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic or other organ dysfunction) which in the judgment of the research team would compromise the patient s ability to tolerate or complete this study.
* Participants who have already completed the Voicing My CHOiCES tool.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR NON-PATIENT PARTICPANTS (COHORT 4):
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lori S Wiener, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Hospital of Orange County

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Childrens National Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Moffitt Cancer Center

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

The Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital at Montefiore

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hospital (Lifespan)

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Cook Childrens Hospital

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bleyer A. Older adolescents with cancer in North America deficits in outcome and research. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2002 Oct;49(5):1027-42. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(02)00035-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12430624 (View on PubMed)

Bellizzi KM, Smith A, Schmidt S, Keegan TH, Zebrack B, Lynch CF, Deapen D, Shnorhavorian M, Tompkins BJ, Simon M; Adolescent and Young Adult Health Outcomes and Patient Experience (AYA HOPE) Study Collaborative Group. Positive and negative psychosocial impact of being diagnosed with cancer as an adolescent or young adult. Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;118(20):5155-62. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27512. Epub 2012 Mar 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22415815 (View on PubMed)

Nilsson ME, Maciejewski PK, Zhang B, Wright AA, Trice ED, Muriel AC, Friedlander RJ, Fasciano KM, Block SD, Prigerson HG. Mental health, treatment preferences, advance care planning, location, and quality of death in advanced cancer patients with dependent children. Cancer. 2009 Jan 15;115(2):399-409. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19110677 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14-C-0079

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

140079

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id