Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Alirocumab in Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia or High Cardiovascular Risk Patients With Hypercholesterolemia on Lipid Modifying Therapy (ODYSSEY JAPAN) (NCT NCT02107898)
NCT ID: NCT02107898
Last Updated: 2016-10-04
Results Overview
Adjusted least-squares (LS) means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from a mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were used in the model (ITT analysis).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
216 participants
From Baseline to Week 24
2016-10-04
Participant Flow
The study was conducted at 31 centers in Japan. A total of 319 participants were screened between March 2014 and July 2014, 103 of whom were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to exclusion criteria met.
Randomization was stratified according to heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH) population. Assignment to treatment arms was done using an Interactive Web Response System in 1:2 (Placebo: Alirocumab) ratio after confirmation of selection criteria. 216 participants were randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
Placebo (for alirocumab) subcutaneous (SC) injection every two weeks (Q2W) added to stable lipid-modifying therapy (LMT) for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
72
|
144
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
72
|
143
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
66
|
132
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
Placebo (for alirocumab) subcutaneous (SC) injection every two weeks (Q2W) added to stable lipid-modifying therapy (LMT) for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Poor compliance to protocol
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Participant moved
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Consent withdrawn by participant
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized but not treated
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Alirocumab in Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia or High Cardiovascular Risk Patients With Hypercholesterolemia on Lipid Modifying Therapy (ODYSSEY JAPAN)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=144 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
Total
n=216 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.0 • n=5 Participants
|
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 • n=7 Participants
|
60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
84 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
131 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Calculated LDL-C in mg/dL
|
141.6 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.7 • n=5 Participants
|
140.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.8 • n=7 Participants
|
141.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Calculated LDL-C in mmol/L
|
3.668 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.691 • n=5 Participants
|
3.650 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.693 • n=7 Participants
|
3.656 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.691 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: ITT population: all randomized participants with one baseline and at least one post-baseline calculated LDL-C value on- or off-treatment.
Adjusted least-squares (LS) means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from a mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were used in the model (ITT analysis).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - Intent-to-Treat (ITT Analysis)
|
1.6 percent change
Standard Error 1.8
|
-62.5 percent change
Standard Error 1.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: Modified ITT (mITT) population: all randomized and treated participants with one baseline and at least one post-baseline calculated LDL-C value on-treatment.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection) (on-treatment analysis).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=71 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis
|
1.7 percent change
Standard Error 1.7
|
-63.7 percent change
Standard Error 1.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: ITT population.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
|
-2.7 percent change
Standard Error 1.6
|
-64.2 percent change
Standard Error 1.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: mITT population.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=71 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-treatment Analysis
|
-2.8 percent change
Standard Error 1.5
|
-64.8 percent change
Standard Error 1.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to Week 24Population: Participants of the ITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline Apo B value on- or off-treatment (Apo B ITT population).
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=71 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=141 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
|
-1.6 percent change
Standard Error 1.7
|
-55.0 percent change
Standard Error 1.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: Participants of the mITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline Apo-B value on-treatment (Apo B mITT population).
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=70 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=140 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis
|
-2.1 percent change
Standard Error 1.7
|
-55.9 percent change
Standard Error 1.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: Participants of the ITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline non-HDL-C value on- or off-treatment (non-HDL-C ITT population).
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
|
2.6 percent change
Standard Error 1.6
|
-54.9 percent change
Standard Error 1.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: Participants of the mITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline non-HDL-C value on-treatment (non-HDL-C mITT population).
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=71 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis
|
2.6 percent change
Standard Error 1.6
|
-56.0 percent change
Standard Error 1.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: Participants of the ITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline Total-C value on- or off-treatment (Total-C ITT population).
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
|
2.0 percent change
Standard Error 1.3
|
-39.5 percent change
Standard Error 0.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: Apo B ITT population.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=71 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=141 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
|
-3.3 percent change
Standard Error 1.5
|
-54.6 percent change
Standard Error 1.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: Non-HDL-C ITT population.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
|
-1.7 percent change
Standard Error 1.4
|
-56.3 percent change
Standard Error 1.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: Total-C ITT population.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
|
-2.1 percent change
Standard Error 1.1
|
-41.1 percent change
Standard Error 0.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 24Population: ITT population.
Calculated LDL-C goal was defined as: * \<100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) for heFH or non-FH participants who had a history of documented congestive heart disease (CHD), or * \<120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) for non-FH participants who had a history of documented diseases (ischemic stroke, peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney disease or diabetes) or other risk factors as defined in JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012. Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach model for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in imputation model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C Goal at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
|
10.2 percentage of participants
|
96.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 24Population: mITT population.
Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were from multiple imputation approach model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=71 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C Goal at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis
|
10.6 percentage of participants
|
97.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: ITT population.
Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from a multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment were included in the imputation model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
|
2.5 percent change
Standard Error 2.5
|
-39.5 percent change
Standard Error 1.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: ITT population.
Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
|
6.7 percent change
Standard Error 3.7
|
-15.3 percent change
Standard Error 2.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: Participants of the ITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline HDL-C value on- or off-treatment (HDL-C ITT population).
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
|
2.1 percent change
Standard Error 1.5
|
7.9 percent change
Standard Error 1.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: Participants of the ITT population with one baseline and at least one post-baseline Apo A1 value on- or off-treatment (Apo A1 ITT population).
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=71 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=141 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A1 at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
|
-2.6 percent change
Standard Error 1.6
|
1.4 percent change
Standard Error 1.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: ITT population.
Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
|
-0.5 percent change
Standard Error 2.4
|
-41.9 percent change
Standard Error 1.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: ITT population.
Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on-or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
|
2.4 percent change
Standard Error 3.7
|
-13.1 percent change
Standard Error 2.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: HDL-C ITT population.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
|
-1.8 percent change
Standard Error 1.2
|
4.7 percent change
Standard Error 0.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 24Population: Apo A1 ITT population.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=71 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=141 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A1 at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
|
-4.8 percent change
Standard Error 1.1
|
1.5 percent change
Standard Error 0.8
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52Population: ITT population.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 52 from MMRM model including available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 52 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 52 - ITT Analysis
|
-3.6 Percent change
Standard Error 1.9
|
-62.5 Percent change
Standard Error 1.4
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 52Population: mITT population.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 52 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 52 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=71 Participants
Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks.
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 Participants
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT for 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥ 120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) at Week 8 according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 52 - On-Treatment Analysis
|
-3.4 Percent change
Standard Error 1.7
|
-64.6 Percent change
Standard Error 1.2
|
Adverse Events
Placebo Q2W
Alirocumab 75 mg/ Up to 150 mg Q2W
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 participants at risk
Participants exposed to placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT (mean exposition of 50 weeks).
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/ Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 participants at risk
Participants exposed to alirocumab 75 mg /up to 150 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT (mean exposition of 50 weeks).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Muscle abscess
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
|
1.4%
1/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Acoustic neuroma
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma
|
1.4%
1/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.00%
0/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Sudden hearing loss
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Congestive cardiomyopathy
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
1.4%
1/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
|
1.4%
1/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.00%
0/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal obstruction
|
1.4%
1/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.00%
0/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spondylolisthesis
|
1.4%
1/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.00%
0/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrotic syndrome
|
1.4%
1/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.00%
0/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
|
1.4%
1/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.00%
0/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
General disorders
Medical device discomfort
|
1.4%
1/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.00%
0/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Traumatic fracture
|
2.8%
2/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Acetabulum fracture
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Clavicle fracture
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Scapula fracture
|
0.00%
0/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo Q2W
n=72 participants at risk
Participants exposed to placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT (mean exposition of 50 weeks).
|
Alirocumab 75 mg/ Up to 150 mg Q2W
n=143 participants at risk
Participants exposed to alirocumab 75 mg /up to 150 mg SC injection Q2W added to stable LMT (mean exposition of 50 weeks).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
36.1%
26/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
45.5%
65/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
5.6%
4/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
6.3%
9/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
8.3%
6/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
6.9%
5/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
|
5.6%
4/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
8.4%
12/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
6.9%
5/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
6.3%
9/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
1.4%
1/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
6.3%
9/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
5.6%
4/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
2.8%
4/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
5.6%
4/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
12.6%
18/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
8.3%
6/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
2.8%
4/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
|
5.6%
4/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
0.70%
1/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
4.2%
3/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
12.6%
18/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
6.9%
5/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
7.7%
11/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
4.2%
3/72 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
5.6%
8/143 • All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (Week 60 post-treatment follow-up visit) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.
Reported adverse events are treatment-emergent adverse events that is AEs that developed/worsened during the 'treatment-emergent period' (the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dose of study drug +70 days). Analysis was done on safety population that included randomized participants who actually received at least 1 dose or part of a dose of double-blind investigational medicinal product (IMP) injection.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If no publication has occurred within 12 months of the completion of the study, the Investigator shall have the right to publish/present independently the results of the study. The Investigator shall provide the sponsor with a copy of any such presentation/publication for comment at least 30 days before any presentation/submission for publication. If requested by the Sponsor, any presentation/submission shall be delayed up to 90 days, to allow the Sponsor to preserve its proprietary rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER