The Healthy Heart Study

NCT ID: NCT02105246

Last Updated: 2019-04-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1154 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-15

Study Completion Date

2018-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The long-term goal of this research is to improve patient-centered outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), the leading cause of death in the world. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs decrease mortality and improve quality of life in patients with CHD. Published guidelines recommend exercise-based CR following hospitalization for myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, or percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Despite these compelling benefits, CR programs are vastly underutilized, with less than a third of eligible patients participating. One promising solution is greater implementation of home-based CR. Both home and center-based CR programs have equal benefits on cardiovascular risk factors and quality of life. However, similar efficacy does not necessarily translate into similar effectiveness. If patients are more likely to participate in home- vs. center-based therapy, then greater participation could lead to greater clinical effectiveness. We are therefore conducting a quasi-experimental, controlled trial at two VA medical centers to determine the comparative effectiveness of referral to home- vs. center-based CR in patients with CHD.

Aim 1: Determine whether automatic referral to home- vs. center-based CR increases patient participation in CR after hospitalization for myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization.

Aim 2: Among patients who choose to participate in CR, compare the effectiveness of home- vs. center-based CR on six-minute walk distance, quality of life, and healthcare expenditures.

Aim 3: Determine whether the effects of home vs. center-based CR differ by age, gender, race, ethnicity, employment, socioeconomic status, social support, comorbid conditions, or patient preference.

Results from this study will (a) help policy makers determine the effect of covering home CR on healthcare expenditures in patients with CHD; (b) help providers understand the potential benefits and harms of home- vs. center-based CR; and (c) help patients answer questions like, "Given my personal circumstances and preferences, which of these options will improve the outcomes most important to me".

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The long-term goal of this research is to improve patient-centered outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). CHD is the leading cause of death in the world. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs decrease mortality and improve quality of life in patients with CHD. Published guidelines recommend exercise-based CR following hospitalization for myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, or percutaneous coronary revascularization, and referral to CR is one of nine performance measures established by the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology for patients with CHD.

Despite these compelling benefits, CR programs are vastly underutilized, with less than a third of eligible patients participating. The largest barrier to patient participation is that CR must be provided in a physician's office or hospital setting to qualify for reimbursement. For this reason, virtually all existing CR programs require that the patient travel to a CR center 3 times per week for 12 to 36 weeks. Unfortunately, many Americans live too far from a CR center to enroll, and even when nearby programs are available, many patients do not have the time, flexibility, transportation, social support, and/or financial resources to attend.

One promising solution to the problem of CR under-utilization is greater implementation of home-based CR. Both home and center-based CR programs have equal benefits on cardiovascular risk factors and quality of life. However, similar efficacy does not necessarily translate into similar effectiveness. If patients are more likely to participate in home- vs. center-based therapy, then greater participation could lead to greater clinical effectiveness. We are therefore conducting a quasi-experimental, controlled trial at two VA medical centers to determine the comparative effectiveness of referral to home- vs. center-based CR in patients with CHD.

Aim 1: Determine whether automatic referral to home- vs. center-based CR increases patient participation in CR after hospitalization for myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization.

Aim 2: Among patients who choose to participate in CR, compare the effectiveness of home- vs. centerbased CR on six-minute walk distance, quality of life, and healthcare expenditures.

Aim 3: Determine whether the effects of home vs. center-based CR differ by age, gender, race, ethnicity, employment, socioeconomic status, social support, comorbid conditions, or patient preference.

Results from this study will (a) help policy makers determine the effect of covering home CR on healthcare expenditures in patients with CHD; (b) help providers understand the potential benefits and harms of home- vs. center-based CR; and (c) help patients answer questions like, "Given my personal circumstances and preferences, which of these options will improve the outcomes most important to me.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Rehabilitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Home-based

Referral to a home-based cardiac rehabilitation program (intervention).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Referral to center-based cardiac rehab

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Center-based cardiac rehab is a health center-based cardiac rehabilitation program that involves counseling in healthy heart behaviors and exercise delivered in a clinical setting.

Center-based

Referral to a center-based cardiac rehabilitation program (standard of care).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Referral to home-based cardiac rehab

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Home-based cardiac rehab is a 12 week, home-based lifestyle intervention that includes counseling regarding heart healthy lifestyle changes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Referral to home-based cardiac rehab

Home-based cardiac rehab is a 12 week, home-based lifestyle intervention that includes counseling regarding heart healthy lifestyle changes.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Referral to center-based cardiac rehab

Center-based cardiac rehab is a health center-based cardiac rehabilitation program that involves counseling in healthy heart behaviors and exercise delivered in a clinical setting.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Post MI, CABG, or PCI Able to speak, read and write in english

Exclusion Criteria

Class IV CHF Unstable Angina Complex Ventricular Arrythmias EF \<35% without AICD AICD candidate Resting SBP \>200mmHG Resting DBP\>110mmHG Cognitive Impairment by MoCA Score \<26 Life expectancy \<1 year
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mary Whooley, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schopfer DW, Whooley MA, Allsup K, Pabst M, Shen H, Tarasovsky G, Duvernoy CS, Forman DE. Effects of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation on Time to Enrollment and Functional Status in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(19):e016456. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016456. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32954885 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CHR13-10887

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.