"Blind" vs. Fluoroscopy-Guided Steroid Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis

NCT ID: NCT02104726

Last Updated: 2017-12-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-07-31

Study Completion Date

2016-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare relative efficacy of intraarticular steroid injection using anatomic landmarks vs. fluoroscopy guided technique in decreasing knee osteoarthritis pain 1 month after the procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Blind Steroid Injection

Blind Steroid Injection for patients with OA deemed qualified for it clinically

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Blind Steroid Injection

Intervention Type OTHER

Want to compare it to fluoroscopy guided, with assumption that it will be less effective in reducing pain

Fluoroscopy guided steroid injection

Fluoroscopy guided Steroid Injection for patients with OA deemed qualified for it clinically. We want to see which one is better.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fluoroscopy guided steroid injection

Intervention Type OTHER

We want to compare if there is a difference between the two arms, with the assumption that with fluoroscopy will deliver the steroid more accurately and see better outcomes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fluoroscopy guided steroid injection

We want to compare if there is a difference between the two arms, with the assumption that with fluoroscopy will deliver the steroid more accurately and see better outcomes.

Intervention Type OTHER

Blind Steroid Injection

Want to compare it to fluoroscopy guided, with assumption that it will be less effective in reducing pain

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Adults with knee OA clinically deemed to qualify for steroid injection

Exclusion Criteria

\- Children Non-English Speakers Pregnant
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00026934

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

pAF for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis
NCT04886960 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2