Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Smartlipo Triplex 1440nm Wavelength Laser and the Sidelaze 800 Hand Piece for the Treatment of Facial Acne Scars (NCT NCT02103816)
NCT ID: NCT02103816
Last Updated: 2020-12-17
Results Overview
This assesses the level of improvement of acne scarring using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. It is done through using photographic evaluation, comparing the baseline photograph to a photograph taken 3 months post the last treatment. The options for the acne scarring improvement are very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, or worse. The photographic evaluator decides this improvement based off of scar appearance differences amongst the photographs.
COMPLETED
NA
21 participants
3 months post treatment
2020-12-17
Participant Flow
One additional patient was enrolled beyond the limitations specified by the original protocol. The protocol was amended (and approved by the IRB) part way through the study to allow for the enrollment of this additional subject.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
SmartLipo Triplex Laser System Along With the SideLaze800 Hand
SmartLipo Triplex laser system along with the SideLaze800 hand piece
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
The Smartlipo Triplex 1440nm Wavelength Laser and the Sidelaze 800 Hand Piece for the Treatment of Facial Acne Scars
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
SmartLipo Triplex Laser System Along With the SideLaze800 Hand
n=21 Participants
SmartLipo Triplex laser system along with the SideLaze800 hand piece
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Caucasian
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Hispanic
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity · Other
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Fitzpatrick Skin Score I
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Fitzpatrick Skin Score II
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Fitzpatrick Skin Score III
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Fitzpatrick Skin Score IV
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Fitzpatrick Skin Score V
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Fitzpatrick Skin Score VI
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months post treatmentPopulation: 1 subject completed the follow up over the phone, so there is no physician score for this subject. 2 subjects were a no-show for their appointment, but attended the other optional follow ups. The other 4 did not return to follow ups and could not be reached after numerous attempts to follow up.
This assesses the level of improvement of acne scarring using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. It is done through using photographic evaluation, comparing the baseline photograph to a photograph taken 3 months post the last treatment. The options for the acne scarring improvement are very much improved, much improved, improved, no change, or worse. The photographic evaluator decides this improvement based off of scar appearance differences amongst the photographs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SmartLipo Triplex Laser System Along With the SideLaze800 Hand
n=14 Participants
SmartLipo Triplex laser system along with the SideLaze800 hand piece
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Facial Acne Improvement Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
Very Much Improved
|
28.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Facial Acne Improvement Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
Much Improved
|
57.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Facial Acne Improvement Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
Improved
|
14.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months post treatmentPopulation: 1 subject completed the follow up over the phone, so there is no physician score for this subject. 2 subjects were a no-show for their appointment, but attended the other optional follow ups. The other 4 did not return to follow ups and could not be reached after numerous attempts to follow up.
The investigator chooses if they are extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied with the results.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SmartLipo Triplex Laser System Along With the SideLaze800 Hand
n=14 Participants
SmartLipo Triplex laser system along with the SideLaze800 hand piece
|
|---|---|
|
Investigator Satisfaction Questionnaire
Extremely Satisfied
|
6 Participants
|
|
Investigator Satisfaction Questionnaire
Satisfied
|
5 Participants
|
|
Investigator Satisfaction Questionnaire
Slightly Satisfied
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 months post treatmentPopulation: 2 subjects were a no-show for their appointment, but attended the other optional follow ups. The other 4 did not return to follow ups and could not be reached after numerous attempts to follow up.
The subject chooses if they are extremely satisfied, satisfied, slightly satisfied, slightly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied with the results.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SmartLipo Triplex Laser System Along With the SideLaze800 Hand
n=15 Participants
SmartLipo Triplex laser system along with the SideLaze800 hand piece
|
|---|---|
|
Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire
Extremely Satisfied
|
6 Participants
|
|
Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire
Satisfied
|
6 Participants
|
|
Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire
Slightly Satisfied
|
2 Participants
|
|
Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire
slightly dissatisfied
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
SmartLipo Triplex Laser System Along With the SideLaze800 Hand
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
SmartLipo Triplex Laser System Along With the SideLaze800 Hand
n=21 participants at risk
SmartLipo Triplex laser system along with the SideLaze800 hand piece
|
|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Pain
|
9.5%
2/21 • Adverse Events occurring were captured and followed for the study duration, about 5 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Swelling
|
71.4%
15/21 • Adverse Events occurring were captured and followed for the study duration, about 5 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Bruising
|
14.3%
3/21 • Adverse Events occurring were captured and followed for the study duration, about 5 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Numbness
|
28.6%
6/21 • Adverse Events occurring were captured and followed for the study duration, about 5 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
4.8%
1/21 • Adverse Events occurring were captured and followed for the study duration, about 5 months.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The PI cannot disclose confidential or proprietary information until after it becomes generally known or available to the public.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER