Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Trial Comparing Sequential Addition of Insulin Aspart Versus Further Dose Increase With Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Previously Treated With Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide and Metformin and in Need of Further Intensification (NCT NCT02100475)
NCT ID: NCT02100475
Last Updated: 2017-01-20
Results Overview
Change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
31 participants
Week 0, week 26
2017-01-20
Participant Flow
The trial was conducted at 19 sites in 8 countries as follows: Argentina: 2 sites; Greece: 2 sites, Hungary: 1 site; Russian Federation: 5 sites; Slovakia: 4 sites, South Africa: 1 site; Spain: 1 site, United States: 3 sites.
Subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were inadequately controlled (HbA1c level ≥ 7% \[53 mmol/mol\]) on treatment with IDegLira and metformin after 26 weeks of treatment in the NN9068-3952 trial were screened. Eligible subjects were randomised in a 1:1 manner to one of the two parallel treatment groups (IDegLira or IDegLira + IAsp).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
IDegLira
Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. Intensification with IDegLira was performed by dose optimisation up to a maximum of 80 dose steps (80 units IDeg/2.9 mg Lira). All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
IDegLira + IAsp
IDegLira was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. IDegLira was titrated up to a maximum dose of 50 dose steps (50 units IDeg/1.8 mg Lira) with sequential add-on of bolus insulin aspart (IAsp). Dose titration of insulin aspart was based on the respective premeal(s) and bedtime self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) measured daily. All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
16
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
14
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
IDegLira
Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. Intensification with IDegLira was performed by dose optimisation up to a maximum of 80 dose steps (80 units IDeg/2.9 mg Lira). All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
IDegLira + IAsp
IDegLira was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. IDegLira was titrated up to a maximum dose of 50 dose steps (50 units IDeg/1.8 mg Lira) with sequential add-on of bolus insulin aspart (IAsp). Dose titration of insulin aspart was based on the respective premeal(s) and bedtime self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) measured daily. All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Unclassified
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal criteria
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Trial Comparing Sequential Addition of Insulin Aspart Versus Further Dose Increase With Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Previously Treated With Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide and Metformin and in Need of Further Intensification
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
IDegLira
n=16 Participants
Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. Intensification with IDegLira was performed by dose optimisation up to a maximum of 80 dose steps (80 units IDeg/2.9 mg Lira). All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
IDegLira + IAsp
n=15 Participants
IDegLira was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. IDegLira was titrated up to a maximum dose of 50 dose steps (50 units IDeg/1.8 mg Lira) with sequential add-on of bolus insulin aspart (IAsp). Dose titration of insulin aspart was based on the respective premeal(s) and bedtime self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) measured daily. All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
Total
n=31 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=5 Participants
|
57.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=7 Participants
|
57.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Female
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
HbA1c
|
7.6 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9 • n=5 Participants
|
7.7 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=7 Participants
|
7.6 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomised subjects (31 subjects). Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method.
Change from baseline in HbA1c after 26 weeks of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDegLira
n=16 Participants
Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. Intensification with IDegLira was performed by dose optimisation up to a maximum of 80 dose steps (80 units IDeg/2.9 mg Lira). All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
IDegLira + IAsp
n=15 Participants
IDegLira was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. IDegLira was titrated up to a maximum dose of 50 dose steps (50 units IDeg/1.8 mg Lira) with sequential add-on of bolus insulin aspart (IAsp). Dose titration of insulin aspart was based on the respective premeal(s) and bedtime self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) measured daily. All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
|
-0.43 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
-0.14 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0, week 26Population: FAS included all randomised subject (31 subjects). Missing data were imputed using the LOCF method.
Change from baseline in body weight after 26 weeks of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDegLira
n=16 Participants
Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. Intensification with IDegLira was performed by dose optimisation up to a maximum of 80 dose steps (80 units IDeg/2.9 mg Lira). All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
IDegLira + IAsp
n=15 Participants
IDegLira was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. IDegLira was titrated up to a maximum dose of 50 dose steps (50 units IDeg/1.8 mg Lira) with sequential add-on of bolus insulin aspart (IAsp). Dose titration of insulin aspart was based on the respective premeal(s) and bedtime self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) measured daily. All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
|
0.9 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
1.5 Kilograms
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 0 - 26Population: Safety analysis set (SAS) included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator (31 subjects). Confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were reported by 2 subjects in IDegLira arm and 2 subjects in IDegLira + IAsp arm.
Treatment-emergent hypoglycaemic episodes: if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of investigational medicinal product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on investigational medicinal product. Confirmed hypoglycaemia: subject unable to treat himself/herself and/or have a recorded plasma glucose \< 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDegLira
n=16 Participants
Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. Intensification with IDegLira was performed by dose optimisation up to a maximum of 80 dose steps (80 units IDeg/2.9 mg Lira). All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
IDegLira + IAsp
n=15 Participants
IDegLira was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. IDegLira was titrated up to a maximum dose of 50 dose steps (50 units IDeg/1.8 mg Lira) with sequential add-on of bolus insulin aspart (IAsp). Dose titration of insulin aspart was based on the respective premeal(s) and bedtime self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) measured daily. All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Treatment-emergent Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes
|
34 Number of episodes
|
4 Number of episodes
|
Adverse Events
IDegLira
IDegLira + IAsp
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
IDegLira
n=16 participants at risk
Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. Intensification with IDegLira was performed by dose optimisation up to a maximum of 80 dose steps (80 units IDeg/2.9 mg Lira). All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
IDegLira + IAsp
n=15 participants at risk
IDegLira was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. IDegLira was titrated up to a maximum dose of 50 dose steps (50 units IDeg/1.8 mg Lira) with sequential add-on of bolus insulin aspart (IAsp). Dose titration of insulin aspart was based on the respective premeal(s) and bedtime self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) measured daily. All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Chronic myeloid leukaemia
|
0.00%
0/16 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Coronary revascularisation
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/16 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
IDegLira
n=16 participants at risk
Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. Intensification with IDegLira was performed by dose optimisation up to a maximum of 80 dose steps (80 units IDeg/2.9 mg Lira). All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
IDegLira + IAsp
n=15 participants at risk
IDegLira was given subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily in combination with metformin. The starting dose of IDegLira was the dose of IDegLira used at the end of the NN9068-3952 trial. IDegLira was titrated up to a maximum dose of 50 dose steps (50 units IDeg/1.8 mg Lira) with sequential add-on of bolus insulin aspart (IAsp). Dose titration of insulin aspart was based on the respective premeal(s) and bedtime self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) measured daily. All subjects continued with metformin at pre-trial doses (≥ 1500 mg or the maximum tolerated dose).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/16 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Amylase increased
|
0.00%
0/16 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/16 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Blood calcitonin increased
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Cardiac murmur
|
0.00%
0/16 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/16 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dyslipidaemia
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/16 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Lipase increased
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Macular degeneration
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/16 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal cyst
|
0.00%
0/16 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Seborrhoeic dermatitis
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tooth disorder
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 2 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/16 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first trial-related activity (week 0) after the subject had signed the informed consent until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (week 27).
SAS included all subjects receiving at least one dose of the investigational product or comparator, (SAS = 31 subjects). A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that had an onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than seven days after the last day of randomised treatment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee At the end of trial, one or more scientific publications may be prepared collaboratively by the investigators and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER