Trial Outcomes & Findings for On-Eye Evaluation of Contact Lens Axis Location (NCT NCT02100410)

NCT ID: NCT02100410

Last Updated: 2014-05-16

Results Overview

Axis orientation (the rotational positioning of the lens on the eye) was indicated by an axis mark. The actual location of the axis mark was evaluated during slit lamp review and compared to the ideal location for the axis mark, with the difference measured in degrees (0 to +/- 180). The ideal location for the axis mark was iteration-specific (either 6 o'clock or 3 and 9 o'clock). This outcome measure was pre-specified for the embossed lenses only (TEST1, TEST3, and TEST5).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

50 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Day 1

Results posted on

2014-05-16

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited from 1 study center located in the US.

Of the 50 enrolled, 1 participant was exited as a screen failure prior to randomization and exposure to the study product. This reporting group includes all randomized participants (49).

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Sequence 1
T1 and T2; T3 and T4; T5 and T6
Sequence 2
T1 and T2; T5 and T6; T3 and T4
Sequence 3
T3 and T4; T1 and T2; T5 and T6
Sequence 4
T3 and T4; T5 and T6; T1 and T2
Sequence 5
T5 and T6; T1 and T2; T3 and T4
Sequence 6
T5 and T6; T3 and T4; T1 and T2
Exposure Pair 1, 30 Minutes
STARTED
8
8
8
8
8
9
Exposure Pair 1, 30 Minutes
COMPLETED
8
8
8
8
8
9
Exposure Pair 1, 30 Minutes
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exposure Pair 2, 30 Minutes
STARTED
8
8
8
8
8
9
Exposure Pair 2, 30 Minutes
COMPLETED
8
8
8
8
8
9
Exposure Pair 2, 30 Minutes
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
0
Exposure Pair 3, 30 Minutes
STARTED
8
8
8
8
8
9
Exposure Pair 3, 30 Minutes
COMPLETED
8
8
8
8
8
9
Exposure Pair 3, 30 Minutes
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

On-Eye Evaluation of Contact Lens Axis Location

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Overall
n=49 Participants
All treatment sequences
Age, Customized
18 - 68 Years
45.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Population: This analysis population includes all all randomized participants satisfying all of the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Axis orientation (the rotational positioning of the lens on the eye) was indicated by an axis mark. The actual location of the axis mark was evaluated during slit lamp review and compared to the ideal location for the axis mark, with the difference measured in degrees (0 to +/- 180). The ideal location for the axis mark was iteration-specific (either 6 o'clock or 3 and 9 o'clock). This outcome measure was pre-specified for the embossed lenses only (TEST1, TEST3, and TEST5).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TEST1
n=49 Participants
Iteration 2-87-1 with embossed mark
TEST3
n=49 Participants
Iteration 2-87-2 with embossed mark
TEST5
n=49 Participants
Iteration 2-87-3 with embossed mark
TEST4
Iteration 2-87-2 without embossed mark
TEST5
Iteration 2-87-3 with embossed mark
TEST6
Iteration 2-87-3 without embossed mark
Percentage of Lenses With Axis Orientation ≤ 10 Degrees From Ideal Location After 3 Minutes of Wear
24.5 percentage of lenses
46.9 percentage of lenses
36.7 percentage of lenses

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Population: This analysis population includes all all randomized participants satisfying all of the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Lens awareness was assessed by the participant on a 5-point scale (0=none and 4=severe) within the first 5 minutes of wear for each eye separately.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TEST1
n=49 Participants
Iteration 2-87-1 with embossed mark
TEST3
n=49 Participants
Iteration 2-87-2 with embossed mark
TEST5
n=49 Participants
Iteration 2-87-3 with embossed mark
TEST4
n=49 Participants
Iteration 2-87-2 without embossed mark
TEST5
n=49 Participants
Iteration 2-87-3 with embossed mark
TEST6
n=49 Participants
Iteration 2-87-3 without embossed mark
Lens Awareness
0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4
1.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day 1

Population: This analysis population includes all all randomized participants satisfying all of the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Handling on removal (after 30 minutes of wear) was assessed by the participant on a scale from 1 to 10 (1=poor and 10=excellent). This outcome measure was pre-specified for the embossed lenses only (TEST1, TEST3, and TEST5).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
TEST1
n=49 Participants
Iteration 2-87-1 with embossed mark
TEST3
n=49 Participants
Iteration 2-87-2 with embossed mark
TEST5
n=49 Participants
Iteration 2-87-3 with embossed mark
TEST4
Iteration 2-87-2 without embossed mark
TEST5
Iteration 2-87-3 with embossed mark
TEST6
Iteration 2-87-3 without embossed mark
Handling on Removal
8.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
7.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
8.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8

Adverse Events

TEST (1,3,5)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

TEST (2,4,6)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Joachim Nick, Dipl.-Ing. (FH), Clinical Lead

Alcon Research, Ltd.

Phone: 1-888-451-3937

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place