Randomized Trial Comparison of Ototoxicity Monitoring Programs

NCT ID: NCT02099786

Last Updated: 2019-10-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

47 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-01

Study Completion Date

2018-05-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study involves research. Some chemotherapeutic drugs that can permanently reduce hearing are termed "ototoxic". One such drug is the chemotherapy called cisplatin. Currently, if a patient is receiving cisplatin, hearing is tested in the Audiology Clinic using lengthy protocols and may be retested only when it is requested by their oncologist and when the Veteran can arrange an appointment. Researchers think that hearing testing prior to every treatment of cisplatin may reduce the number of Veterans who get disabling hearing loss from treatment. The purpose of this study is to compare the current method of monitoring hearing (audiology clinic protocols termed "usual care") with a new portable hearing monitoring program (a comprehensive program of ototoxicity monitoring termed "COMP-VA") that tests hearing using a portable hearing testing audiometer and a variety of efficient tools and techniques so that testing can occur prior to each cisplatin treatment at any quiet location in the hospital.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Research objectives are to compare the effectiveness of ototoxicity monitoring implemented using Comp-VA or usual care with regard to (1) improving Veterans' hearing and quality of life outcomes, (2) assisting oncologists in pre-treatment counseling and therapeutic planning and (3) increasing use of post-treatment rehabilitative services.

The investigators plan to recruit a total of 320 Veterans undergoing cisplatin chemotherapeutic treatment over 4 years and 120 control subjects.

Program Evaluation: Hearing testing prior to treatment will be done in order to establish eligibility, enroll and randomize each subject into one of two study arms. At 5 weeks and at one year post-randomization hearing will be re-tested in order to obtain an estimate of longitudinal trends in hearing and quality of life assessment. Use of audiological services following treatment from the randomized subjects will be tracked. Finally, data will also be collected at each treatment interval to track use of counseling tools and oncology personnel treatment decisions.

Serial measurements from subjects receiving cisplatin prior to treatment who are randomized to:

Comp-VA group will get a screening hearing test prior to treatment, at each treatment interval and at one-month post-treatment. Auditory testing will be done on or near the Chemo Unit and will include otoscopy, immittance testing, and a hearing testing done by the Veteran using a self-testing procedure, and may be tested using distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), if they cannot take a reliable hearing test.

Usual care group will receive a full audiometric evaluation (otoscopy, immittance testing, air conduction and bone conduction hearing testing, speech audiometry, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions, DPOAEs) scheduled in the audiology clinic sound booth according to Audiology Service ototoxicity monitoring protocols. Testing will be arranged according to availability of appointments and patient convenience.

Additionally data will also be collected from control subjects who are similar in age and are tested at intervals similar to the chemotherapy subjects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cisplatin Ototoxicity Hearing Loss

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

COMP-VA

Hearing testing at each treatment and at 1 month following treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

COMP-VA

Intervention Type OTHER

Hearing testing at each treatment interval by the comp-va audiologist

Usual Care

Hearing testing done according to Audiology Clinic protocol

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Standard of care

Intervention Type OTHER

Hearing testing done in the audiology clinic after oncology referral or patient self referral

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

COMP-VA

Hearing testing at each treatment interval by the comp-va audiologist

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard of care

Hearing testing done in the audiology clinic after oncology referral or patient self referral

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All Veterans entering cisplatin chemotherapy will be informed of the project and invited to participate unless the Veteran was excluded by CPRS review or medical advice.

Exclusion Criteria

* Experimental subjects must be prescribed cisplatin for treatment of cancer to be enrolled in the treatment arms of this study.

Criteria for excluding subjects (chemotherapy and controls subjects) from this study will be:

* cognitively or physically unable to participate (patient or nurse report patient is incapable of participating), CPRS indication that subject exhibits aggressive behavior, subject has documented dementia, Alzheimer's disease, or severe psychosocial disorder, CPRS notes indicate individual is not legally capable of providing informed consent (subject has a legal guardian)
* unable to provide reliable behavioral hearing test responses (for either program evaluation hearing test or baseline, pre -treatment hearing test) as indicated by intra-session behavioral threshold reliability criterion of \> +5 dB)
* exhibits Meniere's disease or retrocochlear disorder based on hearing test results, patient report or notes in CPRS
* exhibits active or recent history of middle ear disorder based on otoscopy, tympanometry, patient report, or notes in CPRS
* unwilling to participate
* hearing thresholds \> 70 dB SPL at 4 kHz and below (based on DPOAE 'no response' data from a similar protocol described in Bibliography Reference 32, Table 3). The last exclusion was adopted in an effort to increase the potential that DPOAEs will be measurable in a large number of subjects.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dawn L Konrad-Martin, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Brungart D, Schurman J, Konrad-Martin D, Watts K, Buckey J, Clavier O, Jacobs PG, Gordon S, Dille MF. Using tablet-based technology to deliver time-efficient ototoxicity monitoring. Int J Audiol. 2018 Sep;57(sup4):S25-S33. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1370138. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28893111 (View on PubMed)

Dille MF, McMillan GP, Helt WJ, Konrad-Martin D, Jacobs P. A Store-and-Forward Tele-Audiology Solution to Promote Efficient Screenings for Ototoxicity during Cisplatin Cancer Treatment. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Oct;26(9):750-60. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15028.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26415968 (View on PubMed)

Reavis KM, McMillan GP, Dille MF, Konrad-Martin D. Meta-Analysis of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Retest Variability for Serial Monitoring of Cochlear Function in Adults. Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):e251-60. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000176.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25985018 (View on PubMed)

Konrad-Martin D, Knight K, McMillan GP, Dreisbach LE, Nelson E, Dille M. Long-Term Variability of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants and Children and Its Relation to Pediatric Ototoxicity Monitoring. Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):239-253. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000536.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29280917 (View on PubMed)

Konrad-Martin D, Poling GL, Garinis AC, Ortiz CE, Hopper J, O'Connell Bennett K, Dille MF. Applying U.S. national guidelines for ototoxicity monitoring in adult patients: perspectives on patient populations, service gaps, barriers and solutions. Int J Audiol. 2018 Sep;57(sup4):S3-S18. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1398421. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29157038 (View on PubMed)

Garinis AC, Cornell A, Allada G, Fennelly KP, Maggiore RJ, Konrad-Martin D. Ototoxicity monitoring through the eyes of the treating physician: Perspectives from pulmonology and medical oncology. Int J Audiol. 2018 Sep;57(sup4):S19-S24. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1381769. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28978238 (View on PubMed)

Konrad-Martin D, Poling GL, Dreisbach LE, Reavis KM, McMillan GP, Lapsley Miller JA, Marshall L. Serial Monitoring of Otoacoustic Emissions in Clinical Trials. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Sep;37(8):e286-94. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001134.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27518137 (View on PubMed)

Konrad-Martin D, Reavis KM, McMillan G, Helt WJ, Dille M. Proposed comprehensive ototoxicity monitoring program for VA healthcare (COMP-VA). J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(1):81-100. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.04.0092.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24805896 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3114

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

C0239-R

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effect of Donepezil on Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users
NCT05438264 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1
OTO-313 in Subjects With Subjective Tinnitus
NCT03918109 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Prevention of Noise-induced Hearing Loss
NCT02049073 WITHDRAWN PHASE1/PHASE2