Primary Care eHealth Intervention for Improved Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT ID: NCT02097550
Last Updated: 2022-03-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
102 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-05-31
2018-12-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of an Electronic CKD Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) in Clinical Care
NCT02925962
Improving Evidence-Based Primary Care for Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT01767883
Primary Care CKD Registry
NCT03473509
Kidney Awareness Registry and Education
NCT01530958
Electronic Tools to Increase Recognition and Improve Primary Care Management for Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT03679247
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) affects over 20 million American adults. Effective medications for reducing progression remain vastly under-utilized due to well-known behavioral barriers for patients and clinicians, including the affective barriers of denial, inertia, and uncertainty. The health consequences of this poor level of medication adoption warrant development of new strategies to facilitate their use.
Moderate CKD as a Critical Juncture for Intervention: Rates of CKD are likely only to escalate as contributing conditions (e.g., type 2 diabetes, obesity) increase. With progression, patients experience costly but preventable renal and cardiovascular disease adverse outcomes (e.g., dialysis, myocardial infarction). CKD also imposes a disproportionately heavy burden on racial/ethnic minorities and those of lower socioeconomic status. There are an estimated 8 million U.S. adults with stage 3 or "moderate" CKD (defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 30-59 mL/min/1.73m2) offering a sizeable target population for intervention. Patients with stage 3 CKD are often diagnosed at this stage of disease through routine laboratory tests performed by their primary care providers and at a time when disease progression can still be minimized. Evidence shows that use of four categories of medications (for renal protection, hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia) can slow or even halt CKD disease progression.
Underutilization of Effective Medications for CKD Exposes a Quality Gap: These effective drugs remain vastly under-utilized despite their promotion through drug formularies, practice guidelines, and clinician and patient educational campaigns, including the landmark 2002 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative and related undertakings. National ambulatory data indicate that even among patients with CKD who are diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD), only 57% are on an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), only 35% have achieved the target blood pressure control, and only 52% are taking a lipid-lowering agent, despite their clear benefits in high-risk populations. Those without a CVD diagnosis have comparable or even worse rates for these target measures. After a system-wide quality improvement initiative, Southern California Kaiser patients identified as having CKD still had notable quality gaps in care: though improved, 16% were missing an ACE-I/ARB, 56% had poorly controlled blood pressure, 40% had LDL over the target, and 50% of those with comorbid type 2 diabetes (diabetes) had hemoglobin A1c levels of 7% or greater.
Aim 1: Formative research-Develop the eHealth intervention Challenge: There is good evidence on how to target conscious processing for health behavior change but less on affective processing. Approach: Using a theory-based approach, we will identify the promising content, minimum dose, and delivery for an eHealth intervention to promote appropriate medication adoption. We will use observational, systematic review, and qualitative methodologies for this formative research with a special emphasis on targeting affective processing (in addition to conscious processing). Impact: We will develop an e-Health intervention that is anticipated to have an effective content, dose, and delivery.
Aim 2: Evaluative research-Pilot test the eHealth intervention in a small RCT Challenge: The eHealth intervention must be piloted and refined prior to a definitive investigation of its efficacy. Approach: We will test the eHealth intervention for feasibility in a 2-arm pilot RCT (intervention vs. usual care controls) among patients with stage 3b CKD managed in primary care and their clinicians, while also collecting data critical to designing a future efficacy trial. Randomization: patients (50/arm) will be clustered by clinician (20/arm) with targeted inclusion of 1-3/clinician. Primary outcome: 4-point "CKD score" assessing control of risk factors for CKD progression (proteinuria, blood pressure, plasma glucose, cholesterol level/calculated CVD risk). H1: the intervention group will achieve a better mean CKD score than the usual care group. Secondary outcomes: new prescriptions for the promoted medications, CKD progression, and feasibility and process data. Impact: A new intervention specifically targeted at medication adoption that is ready for evaluation in a larger efficacy RCT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
eHealth Intervention
Patients randomized to this arm will receive eHealth materials every 2-4 weeks over the 12-month intervention. However, the exact nature of timing, dose, and delivery channel will be informed by the formative research.
eHealth Intervention
Patients randomized to this arm will receive eHealth materials every 2-4 weeks over the 12-month intervention. However, the exact nature of timing, dose, and delivery channel will be informed by the formative research.
Standard of care
These patients will receive the standard of care from their physician.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
eHealth Intervention
Patients randomized to this arm will receive eHealth materials every 2-4 weeks over the 12-month intervention. However, the exact nature of timing, dose, and delivery channel will be informed by the formative research.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having a primary care provider (PCP) at UCSF, defined as an identified individual provider or provider group from whom the participant receives ongoing medical care, if needed;
* Not pregnant at study assessment.
* The ability to use a computer or smartphone
* The ability to understand English
Exclusion Criteria
* Hyperkalemia (K\>5.0 mEq/L)
* Serious illness likely to preclude study completion
* Pregnancy
* Intolerance/allergy to all indicated CKD medications
* Medication management for CKD (i.e., with all of the medications/medication classes targeted for promotion by the eHealth intervention) has already been optimized
* Has never used MyChart: because MyChart use indicates a minimum level of existing familiarity with and use of eHealth materials
* Having no access to a computer or smartphone
* Plans to change primary care site.
* Family/household member of another study participant or of a study staff member;
* Already enrolled or planning to enroll in a research study that would limit full participation in this trial or confound interpretation of its results;
* Investigator discretion for clinical safety or protocol adherence reasons.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Veronica Yank, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB-28341
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.