Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
61 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-05-31
2015-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will address these limitations by examining Ryff's (1989) six domains of psychological well-being (PWB), and other aspects of well-being including positive emotions, in CFS. It will also examine the relationship between measures of symptomology, emotional distress and PWB.
Method: This is a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study with a clinical sample of adults with CFS. Participants will complete valid measures of well-being and symptomology.
Results: We expect to find that compared to general population norms, individuals with CFS score lower on measures of PWB. Secondly, we expect PWB dimensions will be related to symptom measures. There are however, no grounds for making strong predictions.
Implications: This study will advance our understanding of quality of life in CFS. Clinically, it has the potential to enrich and inform therapeutic interventions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Longitudinal Study on Longstanding Complicated Fatigue
NCT04955587
ME/CFS: Activity Patterns and Autonomic Dysfunction
NCT02948556
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Chronic Fatigue at the National Institutes of Health
NCT02669212
Patient-Centered Assessment of Symptoms and Outcomes
NCT03952624
Understanding Patterns of Fatigue in Health and Disease
NCT05622669
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single Group Study
Questionnaires
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Aged 18 or over
3. English speaking
Exclusion Criteria
2. Insufficient ability to read and write independently.
3. Incapacity to consent to the study as defined by the Mental Capacity Act (2005).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Royal Holloway University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hannah Jackson
Miss
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hannah Jackson
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal Holloway University London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lincolnshire Hospital Foundation Trust
Lincolnshire, , United Kingdom
Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HJ2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.