Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
1312 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-05-12
2035-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial
NCT00530894
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System Pivotal Trial
NCT02163850
PARTNER II Trial: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves II - Nested Registry 3/Valve-in-Valve
NCT03225001
The PARTNER II Trial: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves - PII B
NCT02184442
PIvotal Trial of the KARDION Cory P4 MechANical Circulatory SupporT SystEm
NCT06445608
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Model 400 aortic valve bioprosthesis
Model 400 aortic valve bioprosthesis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Model 400 aortic valve bioprosthesis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
i. Left atrial appendage (LAA) ligation ii. CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) iii. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure iv. Ascending aortic aneurysm or dissection repair not requiring circulatory arrest v. Resection of a sub-aortic membrane not requiring myectomy
2. Patient is geographically stable and willing to return to the implanting site for all follow-up visits
3. Patient is of legal age to provide informed consent in the country where they enroll in the trial
4. Patient has been adequately informed of risks and requirements of the trial and is willing and able to provide informed consent for participation in the clinical trial
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient has had previous implant and then explant of the Model 400 aortic valve bioprosthesis
3. Patient presents with active endocarditis, active myocarditis or other systemic infection
4. Patient has an anatomical abnormality which would increase surgical risk of morbidity or mortality, including:
* Ascending aortic aneurysm or dissection repair requiring circulatory arrest
* Acute Type A aortic dissection
* Ventricular aneurysm
* Porcelain aorta
* Hostile mediastinum
* Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM)
* Documented pulmonary hypertension (systolic \>60mmHg)
5. Patient has a non-cardiac major or progressive disease, with a life expectancy of less than 2 years. These conditions include, but are not limited to:
* Child-Pugh Class C liver disease
* Terminal cancer
* End-stage lung disease
6. Patient has renal failure, defined as dialysis therapy or glomerular filtration rate(GFR)\<30 mL/min/1.73 m2
7. Patient has hyperparathyroidism
8. Patient is participating in another investigational device or drug trial or observational competitive study
9. Patient is pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant during the trial period
10. Patient has a documented history of substance (drug or alcohol) abuse
11. Patient has greater than mild mitral valve regurgitation or greater than mild tricuspid valve regurgitation as assessed by echocardiography
12. Patient has systolic ejection fraction (EF)\<20% as assessed by echocardiography
13. Patient has Grade IV Diastolic Dysfunction
14. Patient has documented bleeding diatheses
15. Patient has had an acute preoperative neurological deficit or myocardial infarction and has not returned to baseline or stabilized ≥30 days prior to enrollment
16. Patient requires emergency surgery
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic
INDUSTRY
Medtronic Cardiac Surgery
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joseph Sabik, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center (Not a recruiting site)
Prof. Dr. Robert Johannes Menno Klautz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Leiden University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Southern California (USC) University Hospital
Los Angeles, California, United States
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
University of Florida Shands
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Piedmont Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan Cardiovascular Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Maimonides Medical Center
Brooklyn, New York, United States
The Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Riverside Methodist Hospital (OhioHealth)
Columbus, Ohio, United States
ProMedica Toledo Hospital
Toledo, Ohio, United States
Oklahoma Heart Hospital
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons (CTVS)
Austin, Texas, United States
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Aurora Saint Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
London Health Sciences Centre - University Campus
London, Ontario, Canada
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ)
Québec, , Canada
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, , Canada
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque
Bordeaux, , France
Hôpital Bichat - Claude Bernard
Paris, , France
Uniklinik Köln
Cologne, Köln, Germany
Deutsches Herzzentrum München
Munich, München, Germany
Universitäts Klinikum Frankfurt - Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt, , Germany
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, , Germany
Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH
Leipzig, , Germany
Ospedale San Raffaele - Milano
Milan, , Italy
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum (LUMC)
Leiden, , Netherlands
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Inselspital - Universitätsspital Bern
Bern, , Switzerland
UniversitätsSpital Zürich
Zurich, , Switzerland
Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust - St Thomas' Hospital
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Velders BJJ, Vriesendorp MD, Weissman NJ, Sabik JF 3rd, Reardon MJ, Dagenais F, Moront MG, Rao V, Fukuhara S, Gunzinger R, van Leeuwen WJ, Brown WM, Groenwold RHH, Klautz RJM, Asch FM. Core Laboratory Versus Center-Reported Echocardiographic Assessment of the Native and Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve. Echocardiography. 2024 Dec;41(12):e70047. doi: 10.1111/echo.70047.
Klautz RJM, Rao V, Reardon MJ, Deeb GM, Dagenais F, Moront MG, Little SH, Labrousse L, Patel HJ, Ito S, Li S, Sabik JF 3rd, Oh JK. Examining the typical hemodynamic performance of nearly 3000 modern surgical aortic bioprostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 May 3;65(5):ezae122. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae122.
Velders BJJ, Vriesendorp MD, De Lind Van Wijngaarden RAF, Rao V, Reardon MJ, Shrestha M, Chu MWA, Sabik JF 3rd, Liu F, Klautz RJM. Perioperative care differences of surgical aortic valve replacement between North America and Europe. Heart. 2023 Jun 26;109(14):1106-1112. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-322350.
Klautz RJM, Kappetein AP, Lange R, Dagenais F, Labrousse L, Bapat V, Moront M, Misfeld M, Zeng C, Sabik Iii JF; PERIGON Investigators. Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep 1;52(3):425-431. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx066.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PERIGON
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.