PERIGON Pivotal Trial

NCT ID: NCT02088554

Last Updated: 2025-10-16

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1312 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-12

Study Completion Date

2035-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Model 400 aortic valve bioprosthesis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, interventional, non-randomized, worldwide, multi-center trial. A maximum of 1300 subjects were to be implanted at a maximum of 40 sites in the US, Europe and Canada. The trial includes male and female patients of legal age to provide informed consent in the country where they enrolled in the trial, requiring replacement for a diseased, damaged, or malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic valve. Subjects are followed out to 5 years, and select sites follow subjects out to 12 years. Enrollment closed on 14Jul2017 for all valve sizes. Enrollment was reopened in Apr2019 for the 29mm valve size at a subset of US and Canadian sites to obtain greater patient numbers required by the FDA to support US commercial approval of this valve size. Enrollment for the 29mm valve size closed on 14Feb2023.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Model 400 aortic valve bioprosthesis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Model 400 aortic valve bioprosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Model 400 aortic valve bioprosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient has moderate or greater aortic stenosis or regurgitation, and there is clinical indication for replacement of their native or prosthetic aortic valve with a bioprosthesis, with or without concomitant procedures, which are limited to any of the following:

i. Left atrial appendage (LAA) ligation ii. CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting) iii. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure iv. Ascending aortic aneurysm or dissection repair not requiring circulatory arrest v. Resection of a sub-aortic membrane not requiring myectomy
2. Patient is geographically stable and willing to return to the implanting site for all follow-up visits
3. Patient is of legal age to provide informed consent in the country where they enroll in the trial
4. Patient has been adequately informed of risks and requirements of the trial and is willing and able to provide informed consent for participation in the clinical trial

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient has a pre-existing prosthetic valve or annuloplasty device in another position or requires replacement or repair of the mitral, pulmonary or tricuspid valve
2. Patient has had previous implant and then explant of the Model 400 aortic valve bioprosthesis
3. Patient presents with active endocarditis, active myocarditis or other systemic infection
4. Patient has an anatomical abnormality which would increase surgical risk of morbidity or mortality, including:

* Ascending aortic aneurysm or dissection repair requiring circulatory arrest
* Acute Type A aortic dissection
* Ventricular aneurysm
* Porcelain aorta
* Hostile mediastinum
* Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM)
* Documented pulmonary hypertension (systolic \>60mmHg)
5. Patient has a non-cardiac major or progressive disease, with a life expectancy of less than 2 years. These conditions include, but are not limited to:

* Child-Pugh Class C liver disease
* Terminal cancer
* End-stage lung disease
6. Patient has renal failure, defined as dialysis therapy or glomerular filtration rate(GFR)\<30 mL/min/1.73 m2
7. Patient has hyperparathyroidism
8. Patient is participating in another investigational device or drug trial or observational competitive study
9. Patient is pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant during the trial period
10. Patient has a documented history of substance (drug or alcohol) abuse
11. Patient has greater than mild mitral valve regurgitation or greater than mild tricuspid valve regurgitation as assessed by echocardiography
12. Patient has systolic ejection fraction (EF)\<20% as assessed by echocardiography
13. Patient has Grade IV Diastolic Dysfunction
14. Patient has documented bleeding diatheses
15. Patient has had an acute preoperative neurological deficit or myocardial infarction and has not returned to baseline or stabilized ≥30 days prior to enrollment
16. Patient requires emergency surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medtronic Cardiac Surgery

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joseph Sabik, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center (Not a recruiting site)

Prof. Dr. Robert Johannes Menno Klautz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Leiden University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Southern California (USC) University Hospital

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado Hospital

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Hartford Hospital

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

University of Florida Shands

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Piedmont Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Cardiovascular Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Maimonides Medical Center

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

The Mount Sinai Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Riverside Methodist Hospital (OhioHealth)

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

ProMedica Toledo Hospital

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma Heart Hospital

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgeons (CTVS)

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston Methodist Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Washington Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Aurora Saint Luke's Medical Center

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre - University Campus

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal Heart Institute

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ)

Québec, , Canada

Site Status

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, , Canada

Site Status

Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Bichat - Claude Bernard

Paris, , France

Site Status

Uniklinik Köln

Cologne, Köln, Germany

Site Status

Deutsches Herzzentrum München

Munich, München, Germany

Site Status

Universitäts Klinikum Frankfurt - Goethe-Universität

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Ospedale San Raffaele - Milano

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum (LUMC)

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Erasmus MC

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Inselspital - Universitätsspital Bern

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

UniversitätsSpital Zürich

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust - St Thomas' Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada France Germany Italy Netherlands Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Velders BJJ, Vriesendorp MD, Weissman NJ, Sabik JF 3rd, Reardon MJ, Dagenais F, Moront MG, Rao V, Fukuhara S, Gunzinger R, van Leeuwen WJ, Brown WM, Groenwold RHH, Klautz RJM, Asch FM. Core Laboratory Versus Center-Reported Echocardiographic Assessment of the Native and Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve. Echocardiography. 2024 Dec;41(12):e70047. doi: 10.1111/echo.70047.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39624936 (View on PubMed)

Klautz RJM, Rao V, Reardon MJ, Deeb GM, Dagenais F, Moront MG, Little SH, Labrousse L, Patel HJ, Ito S, Li S, Sabik JF 3rd, Oh JK. Examining the typical hemodynamic performance of nearly 3000 modern surgical aortic bioprostheses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 May 3;65(5):ezae122. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae122.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38710669 (View on PubMed)

Velders BJJ, Vriesendorp MD, De Lind Van Wijngaarden RAF, Rao V, Reardon MJ, Shrestha M, Chu MWA, Sabik JF 3rd, Liu F, Klautz RJM. Perioperative care differences of surgical aortic valve replacement between North America and Europe. Heart. 2023 Jun 26;109(14):1106-1112. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-322350.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36963820 (View on PubMed)

Klautz RJM, Kappetein AP, Lange R, Dagenais F, Labrousse L, Bapat V, Moront M, Misfeld M, Zeng C, Sabik Iii JF; PERIGON Investigators. Safety, effectiveness and haemodynamic performance of a new stented aortic valve bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep 1;52(3):425-431. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx066.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28475690 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PERIGON

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Stent or Surgery (SoS) Trial
NCT00475449 COMPLETED NA
Valiant Evo US Clinical Trial
NCT02652949 COMPLETED NA